Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Hizmeti Alan Serebral Palsi’li Çocukların Fonksiyonel Düzeylerinin, Ailelerinin Etkilenimi ve Merhamet Düzeylerinin İncelenmesi

Öz

Amaç: Serebral palsi tanısı konmuş çocukların aileleri, özel gereksinimli bir çocuğun bakımını üstlenmeleri sonucu yoğun bakım yükü, stres, depresyon ve fiziksel sağlık sorunlarıyla karşı karşıya kalabilmektedir. Bu çalışma, fizyoterapi ve rehabilitasyon hizmeti alan serebral palsili çocukların motor ve el becerileri ile ailelerinin etkilenim ve merhamet düzeylerini incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Yöntem: Araştırmaya 4 ila 12 yaşları arasında değişen 36 serebral palsili çocuk ve ebeveynleri dahil edilmiştir. Çocukların kaba motor fonksiyonları Kaba Motor Fonksiyon Sınıflama Sistemi ile değerlendirilmiş, el becerileri ise El Becerileri Sınıflandırma Sistemi ile ölçülmüştür. Ailelerin etkilenim düzeyleri Aile Etki Ölçeği ile, merhamet düzeyleri ise Merhamet Ölçeği ile belirlenmiştir. Bulgular: Katılımcı çocukların yaş ortalaması 8,33 yıl olup 10’u kız, 26’sı erkektir. Kaba motor fonksiyon ile el becerileri arasında güçlü ve anlamlı pozitif ilişki saptanmıştır (p<0,05). Aile etkilenim puanları ile kaba motor fonksiyon ve el becerileri arasında zayıf fakat anlamlı pozitif ilişkiler bulunmuştur (p<0,05). Ayrıca el becerileri ile merhamet arasında orta düzeyde ve anlamlı negatif ilişki gözlenmiştir (p<0,05). Tartışma: Bulgular, serebral palsili çocukların fonksiyonel düzeyleri ile ailelerin etkilenim ve merhamet düzeyleri arasında ilişkiler olduğunu göstermektedir. Özellikle yüksek bakım gereksinimi olan çocukların ailelerinde etkilenim ve merhamet düzeylerinin daha ayrıntılı incelenebilmesi için daha geniş örneklemli araştırmalara ihtiyaç vardır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Günlük yaşam aktiviteleri
• Merhamet düzeyi
• Rehabilitasyon
• Serebral palsi.

Investigation of Functional Levels of Child with Cerebral Palsy Who Take Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Services and Their Family Impact and Compassion Levels

Öz

Aim: Caring for a child with cerebral palsy (CP) can place considerable physical and emotional strain on families. Such demands often lead to heightened stress, depressive symptoms, and secondary health issues. This study aimed to explore the motor and hand functions of children receiving physiotherapy and rehabilitation and to examine how these functional outcomes relate to parental involvement and emotional closeness. Material and Methods: Thirty-six children with CP, aged 4–12 years, and their parents participated. Gross motor function was classified according to the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), while hand use was rated using the Manual Ability Classification System (MACS). Parental involvement and affection were measured with the Family Impact Scale (FIS) and the Affection Scale (CS). Results: The mean age of the children was 8.3 years; 10 were girls and 26 boys. Analyses revealed a strong positive correlation between gross motor function and hand use (p <0.05). Family effect scores showed a weak but statistically significant positive correlation with motor and hand functions (p <0.05). In addition, a moderate negative correlation was found between hand function and affection levels (p <0.05). Conclusion: The results show that the functional abilities of children with CP are closely linked to their families' psychosocial experiences. In particular, when children's functional limitations are more severe, increased caregiving responsibilities appear to increase the family burden while decreasing perceived affection. Future studies with larger and more heterogeneous samples are needed to clarify these relationships and provide information about interventions that support both children and their families.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Activities of daily living
• Cerebral palsy
• Compassion level
• Rehabilitation

Kaynakça

1. Aisen ML, Kerkovich D, Mast J, Mulroy S, Wren TAL, Kay RM, Rethlefsen SA. Cerebral palsy: Clinical care and neurological rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10(9):844-52.
2. Richards CL, Malouin F. Cerebral palsy: Definition, assessment and rehabilitation. In: Dulac O, Lassonde M, Sarnat HB, editors. Pediatric neurology part I. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2013. p. 183-95.
3. Cans C. Surveillance of cerebral palsy in Europe: a collaboration of cerebral palsy surveys and registers. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2000;42(12):816-24.
4. Christine C, Dolk H, Platt MJ, Colver A, Prasauskienė A, Krägeloh-Mann I, SCPE Collaborative Group. Recommendations from the SCPE collaborative group for defining and classifying cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol Suppl. 2007;109:35-8.
5. Palisano RJ, Cameron D, Rosenbaum PL, Walter SD, Russell D. Stability of the gross motor function classification system. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006;48(6):424-8.
6. Palisano RJ, Rosenbaum P, Bartlett D, Livingston MH. Content validity of the expanded and revised Gross Motor Function Classification System. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50(10):744-50.
7. Eliasson AC, Krumlinde-Sundholm L, Rösblad B, Beckung E, Arner M, Ohrvall AM, Rosenbaum P. The Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) for children with cerebral palsy: Scale development and evidence of validity and reliability. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006;48(7):549-54.
8. Ribeiro MF, Vandenberghe L, Prudente CO, Vila VD, Porto CC. Cerebral palsy: How the child's age and severity of impairment affect the mother's stress and coping strategies. Cien Saude Colet. 2016;21(10):3203-12.

9. Sawyer MG, Bittman M, La Greca AM, Crettenden AD, Borojevic N, Raghavendra P, Russo R. Time demands of caring for children with cerebral palsy: What are the implications for maternal mental health? Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53(4):338-43.
10. Whittingham K, Sanders M, McKinlay L, Boyd RN. Stepping stones triple p and acceptance and commitment therapy for parents of children with cerebral palsy: Trial protocol. Brain Impairment. 2013;14(2):270-80.
11. Parkes J, Caravale B, Marcelli M, Franco F, Colver A. Parenting stress and children with cerebral palsy: A European cross-sectional survey. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53(9):815-21.
12. Barreto TM, Bento MN, Barreto TM, Jagersbacher JG, Jones NS, Lucena R, Bandeira ID. Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and substance-related disorders in parents of children with cerebral palsy: A systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2020;62(2):163-8.
13. Asan G, Akay BN, Kılınç H, Gökşen F. Determining the levels of family burden and psychological symptoms in mothers with children with cerebral palsy. Kontakt. 2024;26(1):17-23.
14. Gilbert P. Compassion: From its evolution to a psychotherapy. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020;11:586161.
15. Sinnathamby A, Ibrahim H, Ong YT, Ravindran N, Wan DWJ, Tan JH, et al. Towards a theory of compassion fatigue in palliative care and oncology: A systematic scoping review. Am J Hosp Palliat Med. 2025.
16. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175-91.
17. Palisano, R., Rosenbaum, P., Walter, S., Russell, D., Wood, E., & Galuppi, B. (1997). Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 39, 214–223.
18. El Ö, Baydar M, Berk H, Peker O, Koşay C, Demital Y. Interobserver reliability of the Turkish version of the expanded and revised Gross Motor Function Classification System. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(12):1030-3
19. Akpınar P, Tezel CG, Eliasson AC, İçağasıoğlu A. Reliability and cross-cultural validation of the Turkish version of Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) for children with cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(23):1910-6.
20. Beydemir F. The Impact on Family Scale’ın (Aile Etki Ölçeği) Türkçeye uyarlanması, geçerlilik ve güvenilirliği [Yüksek lisans tezi]. Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü; 2008.
21. Akdeniz S, Deniz ME. Merhamet Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. J Happiness Well Being. 2016;4(1):50-61.
22. Önes K, Yılmaz E, Çetinkaya B, Çağlar N. Assessment of the quality of life of mothers of children with cerebral palsy (primary caregivers). Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2005;19(3):232-7.
23. Akçay E, Tanır Y, Tıraş Teber S, Günay Kılıç B. Motor functions, quality of life and maternal anxiety and depression in children with cerebral palsy of different intelligence levels. Turk J Pediatr. 2021;63(5):846–54.
24. Yığman F, Yığman ZA, Akyüz EÜ. Investigation of the relationship between disease severity, caregiver burden and emotional expression in caregivers of children with cerebral palsy. Ir J Med Sci. 2020;1-7.
25. Emir A, Tarakcı D, Doğan S. Investigation of caregiver burden and compassion fatigue in mothers of children with special needs. Halic Univ J Health Sci. 2020;3(3):153-60.
26. Tarakcı D, Hüsrevoğlu S, Özdemir Görgü S. Serebral palsili çocukların aile etkilenimi ve ailedeki bakım verenin yaşam kalitesi, uyku kalitesi ve bireysel beden eğitim memnuniyetinin değerlendirilmesi: Karma çalışma. Turk J Physiother Rehabil. 2024;35(3):342-51.
27. Khanna AK, Prabhakaran A, Patel P, Ganjiwale JD, Nimbalkar SM. Social, psychological and financial burden on caregivers of children with chronic illness: A cross-sectional study. Indian J Pediatr. 2015;82(11):1006-11.
28. Sarman A, Tuncay S, Budak Y, Demirpolat E, Bulut İ. Anxiety, depression, and support needs of the mothers of children with cerebral palsy and determining their opinions: Mixed methods study. J Pediatr Nurs. 2024 Sep-Oct;78:e133–e140.