Araştırma Makalesi
PDF Zotero Mendeley EndNote BibTex Kaynak Göster

Hemşirelik Birinci Sınıf Öğrencilerinde Kol Maketi Üzerinde Anlatımın Antekübital Bölge Venlerinin Yerlerini Doğru Bulma Başarısı Üzerine Etkisi

Yıl 2021, Cilt 3, Sayı 2, 125 - 129, 06.05.2021
https://doi.org/10.37990/medr.857173

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışma; öğrencilerin kol maketi üzerinde uygulanan eğitimin antekübital bölge venlerinin yerlerini doğru bulma başarısı üzerine etkisini değerlendirmek amacıyla yapılmıştır.
Materyal ve Metot: Yarı-deneysel nitelikte yapılan bu araştırma, 19 Mart-30 Mart 2018 tarihleri arasında hemşirelik birinci sınıfta okuyan ilk defa Hemşirelik Esasları derini alan 60 öğrenci ile yürütülmüştür. Veriler, literatür doğrultusunda oluşturulan veri toplama formu ile toplanmıştır. Formda yer alan bilgi ve becerilerini değerlendirmeye yönelik sorular ön test ve son test şeklinde uygulanmıştır. Öğrencilerin bilgi ve becerilerini değerlendirme soruları 40 puan, antekübital bölge venlerinin yerlerini doğru tespit etme ise 3 puan üzerinden hesaplanmıştır.
Bulgular: Öğrencilerin kol maketi üzerinde uygulamalı eğitim öncesi ön test puan ortalamaları ile uygulamalı eğitim sonrası son test puan ortalamaları arasındaki fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmuştur (p<0.05). Benzer şekilde antekübital bölge venlerinin yerlerini doğru tespit etme puanları arasındaki fark da istatistiksel olarak anlamlı değerlendirilmiştir (p<0.05).
Sonuç: Öğrencilerin intravenöz kateter uygulamaları hakkındaki bilgi düzeylerini artırmada maket üzerindeki uygulamalı eğitimin etkili olduğu bulunmuştur. 

Kaynakça

  • 1. Gökdoğan F, Yorgun S. Sağlık hizmetlerinde hasta güvenliği ve hemşireler. Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 2010; 13(2):53-59.
  • 2. Sur H, Özsarı H, Say B. Hasta Güvenlği. Sur H, Palteki, T (Editörler). Hastane Yönetimi, Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri: İstanbul; 2013. p. 509-519.
  • 3. Çetinkaya Uslusoy E, Duran ET, Korkmaz M. Güvenli Enjeksiyon Uygulamaları, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi. 2016; 3(2): 50-57.
  • 4. Karabacak BG. Parenteral ilaç uygulamaları. In: Sabuncu N, Ay FA (Editörler), Klinik beceriler Sağlığın değerlendirilmesi ve hasta bakımı. Nobel Tıp Kitapevleri: 2010. p. 251-255.
  • 5. Akça Ay F. Sağlık Uygulamalarında Temel Kavramlar ve Beceri Kitabı, Sağlık Uygulamalarında Temel Kavramlar ve Beceriler Kitabı, Nobel Tıp Kitabevi: 2015. p. 473-559.
  • 6. Phillips DL, Gorski L. Manual of I.V. Therapeutics, evidence-based practice for ınfusion therapy. 6th ed. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company: 2014. p. 545-61.
  • 7. Saini R, Agnihotri M, Gupta A, Walia I. Epidemiology of infiltration and phlebitis, Nursing and Midwifery Research Journal. 2011; 7(1): 22-33.
  • 8. Jacinto L, Karina A, Machado AH, Mavilde P. Predisposing factors for infiltration in children submitted to peripheral venous catheterization, Journal of Infusion Nursing. 2011; 34(6): 391-398.
  • 9. Lazarus HM, Trehan S, Miller R, Fox RM, Creger RJ, Raaf JH. Multipurpose silastic dual-lumen central venous catheters for both collection and transplantation of hematopoietic progenitor cells, Bone Marrow Transplant. 2000; 25(7): 779-85.
  • 10. Woody G, Davis BA. Increasing nurse competence in peripheral intravenous therapy, Journal of Infusion Nursing, 2013; 36(6): 413–9.
  • 11. Akyüz A. Hemşirelik Beceri Eğitiminde Yenilikçi Uygulamalar. Bilimlerinde Klinik ve İletişim Beceri Eğitimleri Kongresi. Kongre Özet Kitabı: Ankara, 2011. p. 30-73.
  • 12. Oktay BH. Hemşirelik Becerileri Eğitiminin Değerlendirilmesi, Sağlık Bilimlerinde Klinik ve İletişim Beceri Eğitimleri Kongresi, Ankara, Kongre Özet Kitabı: 2011. p. 20-56.
  • 13. Medley C, Horne C. Using Simulation Technology for Undergraduate Nursing Education, Journal of Nursing Education. 2005; 44(5): 31–34.
  • 14. Anderson C, Powell D. Faculty shortages in baccalaureate and graduate nursing programs: Scope of the problems and strategies for expanding the supply (issue bulletin), Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges of Nursing 2005, pp 19-42. https://www.aacnnursing.org/Portals/42/News/White-Papers/facultyshortage-2005.pdf. Erişim Tarihi: 01.03.2019.
  • 15. Jones RS, Simmons A, Boykin Sr GL, Stamper D, Thompson JC. Measuring ıntravenous cannulation skills of practical nursing students using rubber mannequin ıntravenous training arms, Military Med. 2014; 179(11): 1361-1367.
  • 16. Ricketts B. The role of simulation for learning within pre-registration nursing education a literature review, Nurse Education Today. 2011; 31(7): 650-54.
  • 17. Gürol A, Akpınar R, Apay S. Effect of simulation applications on students' skill levels, Kocatepe Medical Journal. 2016; 17(3): 99-104.
  • 18. Liaw SY, Scherphier A, Rethans JJ, Klainin- Yobas P. Assessment for simulation learning outcomes: a comparison of knowledge and self-reported confidence with observed clinical performance, Nurse Education Today. 2012; 32(6): 35-39.
  • 19. Warren JN, Luctkar Flude M, Godfrey C, Lukewich J. Asystematic review of the effectiveness of simulation-based education on satisfaction and learning outcomes in Nurse Practitioner Programs, Nurse Education Today. 2016; 46(99): 99-108.
  • 20. Liaw SY, Chen FG, Klainin P, Brammer J, O’Brien A, Samarasekera DD. Developing clinical competency in crisis event management: An integrated simulation problem-based learning activity, Adv Health Sci Education. 2010; 15(3): 403–13.
  • 21. Çayır A, Özkal F. The Use of Simulation in Nursing Education: The Example of Myocardial Infarction, Research on Education and Psyshology. 2017;1(1): 38-46. 22. Chang KK, Chung JW, Wong TK. Learning intravenous cannulation: A comparison of the conventional method and the CathSim Intravenous Training System, Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2002; 11: 73-78.
  • 23. Shepherd CK, McCunnis M, Brown L, Hair M. Investigating the use of simula-tion as a teaching strategy, Nurs. Stand. 2010; 24(35): 42–48.
  • 24. Zarifsanaiey N, Amini M, Saadat FA. Comparison of educational strategies for the acquisition of nursing student’s performance and critical thinking: simulation-based training vs. integrated training (simulation and critical thinking strategies), BMC Medical Education. 2016; 16: 294-1-7.
  • 25. Arslan Taş F, Türkmen Sonay A, Çelen R, Özkan S, Altıparmak D, Şahin A. Comparing Traditional nad Simulation-Based Experiences in Pediatrics wwith Undergraduate Nursing Students in Turkey, Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2018; 16: 62-9.

The Effect of Representation Using an Arm Model on the Finding the Location of Antecubital Area Veins Success of First Year Nursing Students

Yıl 2021, Cilt 3, Sayı 2, 125 - 129, 06.05.2021
https://doi.org/10.37990/medr.857173

Öz

Aim: This study; It was conducted to evaluate the effect of education on the the success of the antecubital region veins on the arm model of the students.
Material and Method: This quasi-experimental study was conducted with 60 students studying in the 1st year of nursing for the first time, taking the fundamentals of Nursing between 19 March-30 March 2018. The data were collected with a data collection form created in line with the literature. The questions to evaluate the knowledge and skills in the form were applied as pre-test and post-test. The questions to evaluate the students’ knowledge and skills were calculated over 40 points, and correctly determining the locations of the antecubital region veins was calculated over 3 points.
Results: The difference between the pre-test mean scores of the students before the applied training on the arm model and the post-test mean scores after the applied training was found to be statistically significant (p <0.05). Similarly, the difference between the scores of correctly locating the antecubital region veins was evaluated statistically significant (p <0.05).
Conclusion: It has been found that practical training on models is effective in increasing students’ knowledge about intravenous catheter applications.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Gökdoğan F, Yorgun S. Sağlık hizmetlerinde hasta güvenliği ve hemşireler. Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 2010; 13(2):53-59.
  • 2. Sur H, Özsarı H, Say B. Hasta Güvenlği. Sur H, Palteki, T (Editörler). Hastane Yönetimi, Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri: İstanbul; 2013. p. 509-519.
  • 3. Çetinkaya Uslusoy E, Duran ET, Korkmaz M. Güvenli Enjeksiyon Uygulamaları, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi. 2016; 3(2): 50-57.
  • 4. Karabacak BG. Parenteral ilaç uygulamaları. In: Sabuncu N, Ay FA (Editörler), Klinik beceriler Sağlığın değerlendirilmesi ve hasta bakımı. Nobel Tıp Kitapevleri: 2010. p. 251-255.
  • 5. Akça Ay F. Sağlık Uygulamalarında Temel Kavramlar ve Beceri Kitabı, Sağlık Uygulamalarında Temel Kavramlar ve Beceriler Kitabı, Nobel Tıp Kitabevi: 2015. p. 473-559.
  • 6. Phillips DL, Gorski L. Manual of I.V. Therapeutics, evidence-based practice for ınfusion therapy. 6th ed. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company: 2014. p. 545-61.
  • 7. Saini R, Agnihotri M, Gupta A, Walia I. Epidemiology of infiltration and phlebitis, Nursing and Midwifery Research Journal. 2011; 7(1): 22-33.
  • 8. Jacinto L, Karina A, Machado AH, Mavilde P. Predisposing factors for infiltration in children submitted to peripheral venous catheterization, Journal of Infusion Nursing. 2011; 34(6): 391-398.
  • 9. Lazarus HM, Trehan S, Miller R, Fox RM, Creger RJ, Raaf JH. Multipurpose silastic dual-lumen central venous catheters for both collection and transplantation of hematopoietic progenitor cells, Bone Marrow Transplant. 2000; 25(7): 779-85.
  • 10. Woody G, Davis BA. Increasing nurse competence in peripheral intravenous therapy, Journal of Infusion Nursing, 2013; 36(6): 413–9.
  • 11. Akyüz A. Hemşirelik Beceri Eğitiminde Yenilikçi Uygulamalar. Bilimlerinde Klinik ve İletişim Beceri Eğitimleri Kongresi. Kongre Özet Kitabı: Ankara, 2011. p. 30-73.
  • 12. Oktay BH. Hemşirelik Becerileri Eğitiminin Değerlendirilmesi, Sağlık Bilimlerinde Klinik ve İletişim Beceri Eğitimleri Kongresi, Ankara, Kongre Özet Kitabı: 2011. p. 20-56.
  • 13. Medley C, Horne C. Using Simulation Technology for Undergraduate Nursing Education, Journal of Nursing Education. 2005; 44(5): 31–34.
  • 14. Anderson C, Powell D. Faculty shortages in baccalaureate and graduate nursing programs: Scope of the problems and strategies for expanding the supply (issue bulletin), Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges of Nursing 2005, pp 19-42. https://www.aacnnursing.org/Portals/42/News/White-Papers/facultyshortage-2005.pdf. Erişim Tarihi: 01.03.2019.
  • 15. Jones RS, Simmons A, Boykin Sr GL, Stamper D, Thompson JC. Measuring ıntravenous cannulation skills of practical nursing students using rubber mannequin ıntravenous training arms, Military Med. 2014; 179(11): 1361-1367.
  • 16. Ricketts B. The role of simulation for learning within pre-registration nursing education a literature review, Nurse Education Today. 2011; 31(7): 650-54.
  • 17. Gürol A, Akpınar R, Apay S. Effect of simulation applications on students' skill levels, Kocatepe Medical Journal. 2016; 17(3): 99-104.
  • 18. Liaw SY, Scherphier A, Rethans JJ, Klainin- Yobas P. Assessment for simulation learning outcomes: a comparison of knowledge and self-reported confidence with observed clinical performance, Nurse Education Today. 2012; 32(6): 35-39.
  • 19. Warren JN, Luctkar Flude M, Godfrey C, Lukewich J. Asystematic review of the effectiveness of simulation-based education on satisfaction and learning outcomes in Nurse Practitioner Programs, Nurse Education Today. 2016; 46(99): 99-108.
  • 20. Liaw SY, Chen FG, Klainin P, Brammer J, O’Brien A, Samarasekera DD. Developing clinical competency in crisis event management: An integrated simulation problem-based learning activity, Adv Health Sci Education. 2010; 15(3): 403–13.
  • 21. Çayır A, Özkal F. The Use of Simulation in Nursing Education: The Example of Myocardial Infarction, Research on Education and Psyshology. 2017;1(1): 38-46. 22. Chang KK, Chung JW, Wong TK. Learning intravenous cannulation: A comparison of the conventional method and the CathSim Intravenous Training System, Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2002; 11: 73-78.
  • 23. Shepherd CK, McCunnis M, Brown L, Hair M. Investigating the use of simula-tion as a teaching strategy, Nurs. Stand. 2010; 24(35): 42–48.
  • 24. Zarifsanaiey N, Amini M, Saadat FA. Comparison of educational strategies for the acquisition of nursing student’s performance and critical thinking: simulation-based training vs. integrated training (simulation and critical thinking strategies), BMC Medical Education. 2016; 16: 294-1-7.
  • 25. Arslan Taş F, Türkmen Sonay A, Çelen R, Özkan S, Altıparmak D, Şahin A. Comparing Traditional nad Simulation-Based Experiences in Pediatrics wwith Undergraduate Nursing Students in Turkey, Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2018; 16: 62-9.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Sağlık Bilimleri ve Hizmetleri
Bölüm Özgün Makaleler
Yazarlar

Alev YILDIRIM KESKİN (Sorumlu Yazar)
SELCUK UNIVERSITY
0000-0003-0981-5364
Türkiye


Pınar TUNÇ TUNA
SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ
0000-0002-6566-0937
Türkiye


Birsel MOLU
SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ
0000-0001-5144-286X
Türkiye


Halil İbrahim TUNA
SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ
0000-0003-2119-5874
Türkiye

Destekleyen Kurum Yok
Proje Numarası Yok
Teşekkür Yok
Yayımlanma Tarihi 6 Mayıs 2021
Yayınlandığı Sayı Yıl 2021, Cilt 3, Sayı 2

Kaynak Göster

Vancouver Yıldırım Keskin A. , Tunç Tuna P. , Molu B. , Tuna H. İ. Hemşirelik Birinci Sınıf Öğrencilerinde Kol Maketi Üzerinde Anlatımın Antekübital Bölge Venlerinin Yerlerini Doğru Bulma Başarısı Üzerine Etkisi. Medical Records. 2021; 3(2): 125-129.


Editor in Chief

Assoc. Prof. Zülal Öner

Address: İzmir Bakırçay University, Department of Anatomy, İzmir, Turkey
E-mail: medrecsjournal@gmail.com

Contact

Publisher: Effect Publishing & Agency
Phone: + 90 (553) 610 67 80
E-mail: info@effectpublishing.com