Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Examining the Relationship between the Gender Perception and Psychosocial Health Status of Pregnant Women

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 3, 410 - 417, 22.09.2022
https://doi.org/10.37990/medr.1112018

Öz

Aim: This descriptive study was conducted to determine the effect of the gender perceptions of pregnant women on their psychosocial health status.
Material and Methods: The study was conducted in the obstetrics service and outpatient clinic of Yozgat Bozok University Hospital between November 2020 and June 2021, and 121 pregnant women were included in the sample. In the study, in which the Individual Identification Form, Pregnancy Psychosocial Health Assessment Scale (PPHA) and the Gender Perceptions Scale (GPS) were used, the data were collected through face-to-face interviews.
Results: The mean age of the pregnant women included in the study was found to be 29.46±6.16. A significant relationship was found between the total mean GPS score of pregnant women and the total mean score of PPHAS. In addition, it was concluded that there was a statistically significant relationship between the mean score of GPS and the subscales of PPHAS, characteristics of spousal relationship, characteristics of anxiety and stress, characteristics of domestic violence, familial characteristics and physical-psychosocial changes related to pregnancy. (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Pregnancy is critical period that can negatively affect the woman biopsychosocially. Therefore, in all health screenings, monitoring and evaluations for psychosocial health should be done with a holistic approach.

Destekleyen Kurum

-

Proje Numarası

-

Teşekkür

We would like to thank all the women who participated in the research.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Aksay, Y., Gülhan, Y. B., Saygın, N., Körükcü, Ö. Is there any effect of psychosocial health of pregnant women on birth preference?. GUJHS 2017, 6(4):138-145.
  • 2. Can, R., Dereli Yılmaz, S., Çankaya, S., Kodaz, N. Problems experienced during pregnancy and their associations with quality of life. Health and Society 2019, 29(2):59-64.
  • 3. Taşkın L. Doğum ve kadın sağlığı hemşireliği. 13nd ed. Ankara: Akademisyen Publications, 2016.
  • 4. Körükçü, Ö., Deliktaş, A., Aydın, R., Kabukcuoğlu, K. Investigation of the relationship between the psychosocial health status and fear of childbirth in healthy pregnancies. Clin Exp Health Sci 2017, 7:152-158.
  • 5. Bekmezci, H., Özkan, H. Psychosocial health care in pregnancy, prenatal attachment and responsibilities of midwife-nurse. International Refereed Journal of Gynaecology and Maternal Child Health 2016, 8:50-62
  • 6. Sezgin, D. Health and medicalization ın gender perspective. Journal of Sociological Research 2015, 18(1):153-186.
  • 7. İlçioğlu, K., Keser, N., Çınar, N. Women's health and affecting factors in Turkey. Journal of Human Rhythm 2017, 3(3):112-119.
  • 8. Adler, A. Social Roles and Personality. Turhan Yörükhan (Ed.). 4nd ed. İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Publication, 2015.
  • 9. Başar, F. Social gender inequality: Its effect on women’s health, ACU Health Sciences Journal 2017, (3):131-137
  • 10. Eryılmaz, S. The gender roles and women's health, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University Health Sciences Institue Journal 2020, 1(1):5-13.
  • 11. Kaplan, V. (2021). Gender Sensitive Psychiatry and Feminist Therapy. Cyprus Turkish Journal of Psychiatry and Psychology, 3(3):211-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.35365/ctjpp.21.3.22
  • 12. Boz, İ., Özçetin, E., Teskereci, G. Becoming a mother after infertility: A theoretical analysis. Current Approaches in Psychiatry 2018, 10(4):496-511. http://dx.doi.org/10.18863/pgy.382342
  • 13. Koç, M., Avcı, Ö. H., Bayar, Ö. Development of the feminine gender role stress scale (fgrss): validity and reliability study. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty 2017, 41:284-297.
  • 14. Tire, O. Women’s powerty in Turkey in terms of gender rolles. Mavi Atlas 2017, 5(1):97-112. https://doi.org/10.18795/gumusmaviatlas.306047
  • 15. Arslan, S., Okcu, G., Coşkun A., Temiz, F. Women’s perception of pregnancy and the affecting factors. Journal of Health Science and Profession 2019, 6(1):179-192
  • 16. Yıldız, H. Development study of the pregnancy psychosocial health assessment scale. Maltepe University Nursing Sciences and Art Journal 2011, 4(1):63-74.
  • 17. Altınova, H. H., Duyan, V. The validity and reliability of perception of gender scale. Journal of Society & Social Work 2013, 24(2):9-22.
  • 18. Erdemoğlu, Ç., Karakayalı, Ç., Özşahin, Z. Psychosocial health level and related factors in pregnancy. The Journal of Turkish Family Physician 2018, 9(2):34-46. http://doi: 10.15511/tjtfp.18.00234
  • 19. Öztürk, N., Aydın, N. The importance of maternal mental health. Marmara University Journal of Women and Gender Studies 2017, 1(2):29-36.
  • 20. Boybay Koyuncu, S., Dereli Yılmaz, S. The effect of some socio-demographic and obstetric traits on psychosocial health status of nullipara pregnants at the last trimester. Journal of Ege University Nursing Faculty 2015, 31(2):53-66.
  • 21. Gümüşdaş M, Apay S, Özorhan E. Comparison of psycho-social health in pregnant women with and without risk. HSP 2014, 1(2):32-42.
  • 22. Maaref, M., Khalili, S., Hejazi, E., Lavasani, M. G. The relationship between identity style, gender role and marital satisfaction in married couples. Journal of Psychology 2015. 18(4):365–380.
  • 23. Arghavanian, F.E., Roudsari, R.L., Heydari, A., Bahmani, M.N.D. Pregnant women's experiences of social roles: An ethnophenomenological study. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res 2019, 25(1):31-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_54_19
  • 24. Belali, S., Mohammadi, B., Mohagheghi, A. Factors affecting the contradiction of women's roles and its relationship with family conflict in the city of Hamedan. Appl Sociol 2017, 27:117-132.
  • 25. Rezvani, M., Zanjanizadeh, H. A study on factors affecting division of labor in family (Case study of married female working for ministry of education in Mashhad). Women Stud Sociol Psychol 2015, 13: 29–60
  • 26. Maharlouei, N. The Importance of Social Support During Pregnancy. Women’s Health Bull 2016, 3(1):1.
  • 27. Sönmez, T., Ejder Apay, S., & Gür, E. Y. Assessment of the marital satisfaction of pregnant women. Journal of Hacettepe University Faculty of Nursing 2018, 5(3):209-219.
  • 28. Başar, F., Demirci, N. Gender inequality and violence. Journal of Women’s Health Nursing 2015, 2(1):41-52.
  • 29. Altuntaş, O., Altınova, H. H. Determining the relationship between gender perception and socioeconomic variables. Turkish Studies 2015, 10(6):83-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.7674
  • 30. Özden, S., Gölbaşı, Z. Determination of health workers' attitudes towards gender roles. Journal of Health Sciences of Kocaeli University2018, 4(3):95-100. https://doi.org/10.30934/kusbed.420223
  • 31. Yüksel, Ö., Dağ, İ. The relationship between marital adjustment and psychological symptoms in women: The mediator roles of coping strategies and gender role attitudes. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry 2015, 26(3):181-8.
  • 32. Durualp, E., Kaytez, N., Girgin, B.A. An analysis of the relation between marital satisfaction and maternal bonding. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry 2017, 18(2):129-138.

Gebe Kadınların Toplumsal Cinsiyet Algıları ve Psikososyal Sağlık Durumları Arasındaki İlişkinin Belirlenmesi

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 3, 410 - 417, 22.09.2022
https://doi.org/10.37990/medr.1112018

Öz

Amaç: Bu tanımlayıcı araştırma, gebelerin cinsiyet algılarının psikososyal sağlık durumlarına etkisini belirlemek amacıyla yapılmıştır.
Materyal ve Metot: Çalışma Kasım 2020–Haziran 2021 tarihleri arasında, Yozgat Bozok Üniversitesi Hastanesininin kadın doğum servis ve polikliniğinde yapılmış olup örnekleme 121 gebe dahil edilmiştir. Birey Tanıtım Formu, Gebelikte Psikososyal Sağlık Değerlendirme Ölçeği ve Toplumsal Cinsiyet Algıları Ölçeğinin kullanıldığı çalışmada veriler, yüz yüze görüşmeler ile yapılarak toplanmıştır.
Bulgular: Çalışmaya dahil edilen gebelerin yaş ortalaması 29,46±6,16 olarak tespit edilmiştir. Gebelerin TCAÖ puan ortalaması ile GPSDÖ toplam puan ortalaması arasında anlamlı ilişki tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca TCAÖ puan ortalaması ile GPSDÖ’nun alt ölçekleri olan eş ilişkisine ait özellikler, kaygı ve strese ait özellikler, aile içi şiddete ait özellikler, ailesel özellikler ve gebeliğe ilişkin fiziksel-psikososyal değişikliklere ait özellikler puan ortalamaları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır (p<0,05).
Sonuç: Gebelik, kadın biyopsikososyalini olumsuz etkileyebilecek kritik bir dönemdir. Bu nedenle tüm sağlık taramalarında psikososyal sağlığa yönelik izleme ve değerlendirmeler bütüncül bir yaklaşımla yapılmalıdır.

Proje Numarası

-

Kaynakça

  • 1. Aksay, Y., Gülhan, Y. B., Saygın, N., Körükcü, Ö. Is there any effect of psychosocial health of pregnant women on birth preference?. GUJHS 2017, 6(4):138-145.
  • 2. Can, R., Dereli Yılmaz, S., Çankaya, S., Kodaz, N. Problems experienced during pregnancy and their associations with quality of life. Health and Society 2019, 29(2):59-64.
  • 3. Taşkın L. Doğum ve kadın sağlığı hemşireliği. 13nd ed. Ankara: Akademisyen Publications, 2016.
  • 4. Körükçü, Ö., Deliktaş, A., Aydın, R., Kabukcuoğlu, K. Investigation of the relationship between the psychosocial health status and fear of childbirth in healthy pregnancies. Clin Exp Health Sci 2017, 7:152-158.
  • 5. Bekmezci, H., Özkan, H. Psychosocial health care in pregnancy, prenatal attachment and responsibilities of midwife-nurse. International Refereed Journal of Gynaecology and Maternal Child Health 2016, 8:50-62
  • 6. Sezgin, D. Health and medicalization ın gender perspective. Journal of Sociological Research 2015, 18(1):153-186.
  • 7. İlçioğlu, K., Keser, N., Çınar, N. Women's health and affecting factors in Turkey. Journal of Human Rhythm 2017, 3(3):112-119.
  • 8. Adler, A. Social Roles and Personality. Turhan Yörükhan (Ed.). 4nd ed. İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Publication, 2015.
  • 9. Başar, F. Social gender inequality: Its effect on women’s health, ACU Health Sciences Journal 2017, (3):131-137
  • 10. Eryılmaz, S. The gender roles and women's health, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University Health Sciences Institue Journal 2020, 1(1):5-13.
  • 11. Kaplan, V. (2021). Gender Sensitive Psychiatry and Feminist Therapy. Cyprus Turkish Journal of Psychiatry and Psychology, 3(3):211-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.35365/ctjpp.21.3.22
  • 12. Boz, İ., Özçetin, E., Teskereci, G. Becoming a mother after infertility: A theoretical analysis. Current Approaches in Psychiatry 2018, 10(4):496-511. http://dx.doi.org/10.18863/pgy.382342
  • 13. Koç, M., Avcı, Ö. H., Bayar, Ö. Development of the feminine gender role stress scale (fgrss): validity and reliability study. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty 2017, 41:284-297.
  • 14. Tire, O. Women’s powerty in Turkey in terms of gender rolles. Mavi Atlas 2017, 5(1):97-112. https://doi.org/10.18795/gumusmaviatlas.306047
  • 15. Arslan, S., Okcu, G., Coşkun A., Temiz, F. Women’s perception of pregnancy and the affecting factors. Journal of Health Science and Profession 2019, 6(1):179-192
  • 16. Yıldız, H. Development study of the pregnancy psychosocial health assessment scale. Maltepe University Nursing Sciences and Art Journal 2011, 4(1):63-74.
  • 17. Altınova, H. H., Duyan, V. The validity and reliability of perception of gender scale. Journal of Society & Social Work 2013, 24(2):9-22.
  • 18. Erdemoğlu, Ç., Karakayalı, Ç., Özşahin, Z. Psychosocial health level and related factors in pregnancy. The Journal of Turkish Family Physician 2018, 9(2):34-46. http://doi: 10.15511/tjtfp.18.00234
  • 19. Öztürk, N., Aydın, N. The importance of maternal mental health. Marmara University Journal of Women and Gender Studies 2017, 1(2):29-36.
  • 20. Boybay Koyuncu, S., Dereli Yılmaz, S. The effect of some socio-demographic and obstetric traits on psychosocial health status of nullipara pregnants at the last trimester. Journal of Ege University Nursing Faculty 2015, 31(2):53-66.
  • 21. Gümüşdaş M, Apay S, Özorhan E. Comparison of psycho-social health in pregnant women with and without risk. HSP 2014, 1(2):32-42.
  • 22. Maaref, M., Khalili, S., Hejazi, E., Lavasani, M. G. The relationship between identity style, gender role and marital satisfaction in married couples. Journal of Psychology 2015. 18(4):365–380.
  • 23. Arghavanian, F.E., Roudsari, R.L., Heydari, A., Bahmani, M.N.D. Pregnant women's experiences of social roles: An ethnophenomenological study. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res 2019, 25(1):31-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_54_19
  • 24. Belali, S., Mohammadi, B., Mohagheghi, A. Factors affecting the contradiction of women's roles and its relationship with family conflict in the city of Hamedan. Appl Sociol 2017, 27:117-132.
  • 25. Rezvani, M., Zanjanizadeh, H. A study on factors affecting division of labor in family (Case study of married female working for ministry of education in Mashhad). Women Stud Sociol Psychol 2015, 13: 29–60
  • 26. Maharlouei, N. The Importance of Social Support During Pregnancy. Women’s Health Bull 2016, 3(1):1.
  • 27. Sönmez, T., Ejder Apay, S., & Gür, E. Y. Assessment of the marital satisfaction of pregnant women. Journal of Hacettepe University Faculty of Nursing 2018, 5(3):209-219.
  • 28. Başar, F., Demirci, N. Gender inequality and violence. Journal of Women’s Health Nursing 2015, 2(1):41-52.
  • 29. Altuntaş, O., Altınova, H. H. Determining the relationship between gender perception and socioeconomic variables. Turkish Studies 2015, 10(6):83-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.7674
  • 30. Özden, S., Gölbaşı, Z. Determination of health workers' attitudes towards gender roles. Journal of Health Sciences of Kocaeli University2018, 4(3):95-100. https://doi.org/10.30934/kusbed.420223
  • 31. Yüksel, Ö., Dağ, İ. The relationship between marital adjustment and psychological symptoms in women: The mediator roles of coping strategies and gender role attitudes. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry 2015, 26(3):181-8.
  • 32. Durualp, E., Kaytez, N., Girgin, B.A. An analysis of the relation between marital satisfaction and maternal bonding. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry 2017, 18(2):129-138.
Toplam 32 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Hemşirelik
Bölüm Özgün Makaleler
Yazarlar

Veysel Kaplan 0000-0001-9082-1379

Arzu Kul Uçtu 0000-0002-5736-8186

Proje Numarası -
Yayımlanma Tarihi 22 Eylül 2022
Kabul Tarihi 24 Mayıs 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

AMA Kaplan V, Kul Uçtu A. Examining the Relationship between the Gender Perception and Psychosocial Health Status of Pregnant Women. Med Records. Eylül 2022;4(3):410-417. doi:10.37990/medr.1112018

 Chief Editors

Assoc. Prof. Zülal Öner
Address: İzmir Bakırçay University, Department of Anatomy, İzmir, Turkey

Assoc. Prof. Deniz Şenol
Address: Düzce University, Department of Anatomy, Düzce, Turkey

E-mail: medrecsjournal@gmail.com

Publisher:
Medical Records Association (Tıbbi Kayıtlar Derneği)
Address: Orhangazi Neighborhood, 440th Street,
Green Life Complex, Block B, Floor 3, No. 69
Düzce, Türkiye
Web: www.tibbikayitlar.org.tr

Publication Support: 

Effect Publishing & Agency
Phone: + 90 (540) 035 44 35
E-mail: info@effectpublishing.com
Address: Akdeniz Neighborhood, Şehit Fethi Bey Street,
No: 66/B, Ground floor, 35210 Konak/İzmir, Türkiye
web: www.effectpublishing.com