Evaluation of Common Diagnostic Errors in Panoramic Radiographs and Interobserver Agreement in Error Identification

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 114 - 119, 15.01.2025

Yasin Yasa , Dilek Çoban , Furkan Özbey , Tunahan Tuna , Büşra Nur Gökkurt Yılmaz , Zerrin Ünal Erzurumlu , Elif Sadık

https://doi.org/10.37990/medr.1562670

Öz

Aim: Panoramic radiography is frequently used in dental practice as an imaging technique that provides an extensive view of facial anatomical structures. Achieving high-quality radiographic images requires precise positioning and technique. This study aims to evaluate the quality of panoramic radiographs, to identify common errors that compromise diagnostic adequacy, and to analyze interobserver agreement levels concerning these errors.
Material and Method: A study analyzed 947 panoramic radiographs from the archive of Ordu University based on nine specific error criteria. Four research assistants evaluated the diagnostic quality of each image, classifying them as “excellent,” “diagnostically acceptable,” or “unacceptable.” Inter-observer agreement was measured with kappa statistics, and overall agreement was evaluated using the Fleiss κ test.
Results: The rate of incorrect radiographs was 66.1% to 78.8%, with the most common error criterion differing for each observer. The least common error was the chin tipped too low for observers 1 and 2, and the patient positioned forward for observers 3 and 4. The highest inter-observer agreement was observed regarding the presence of foreign objects on the radiographs, while the lowest agreement occurred in cases where the patient was positioned too far back. Overall, the diagnostic quality of the panoramic radiographs was rated as “acceptable,” with scores ranging from 60.5% to 69.5%. The Fleiss Kappa analysis indicated fair agreement among the four observers in assessing radiographic quality (k=0.252).
Conclusion: This study demonstrates that errors in panoramic radiography significantly impact image quality and diagnostic accuracy, highlighting the need for standardization, the use of various imaging models, and enhanced training in radiographic education.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Panoramic radiography, quality control, oral radiology, radiographic errors

Kaynakça

• Flint DJ, Paunovich E, Moore WS, et al. A diagnostic comparison of panoramic and intraoral radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998;85:731-5.
• Peretz B, Gotler M, Kaffe I. Common errors in digital panoramic radiographs of patients with mixed dentition and patients with permanent dentition. Int J Dent. 2012;2012:584138.
• Mayil M, Keser G, Pekiner F. Clinical Image Quality Assessment in Panoramic Radiography. MÜSBED. 2014;4:126-32.
• Brezden NA, Brooks SL, Arbor A. Evaluation of panoramic dental radiographs taken in private practice. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1987;63:617-21.
• Rondon RHN, Pereira YCL, do Nascimento GC. Common positioning errors in panoramic radiography: a review. Imaging Sci Dent. 2014;44:1-6.
• Schiff T, D’Ambrosio J, Glass BJ, et al. Common positioning and technical errors in panoramic radiography. J Am Dent Assoc. 1986;113:422-6.
• Aydın Ü, Aybar Y. The types and frequency of errors in panoramic radiographs. SDÜ Tıp Fak Derg. 2004;11:1-5.
• Horner K. Review article: radiation protection in dental radiology. Br J Radiol. 1994;67:1041-9.
• Dhillon M, Raju SM, Verma S, et al. Positioning errors and quality assessment in panoramic radiography. Imaging Sci Dent. 2012;42:207-12.
• Rumberg H, Hollender L, Oda D. Assessing the quality of radiographs accompanying biopsy specimens. J Am Dent Assoc. 1996;127:363-8.
• Matzen LH, Schropp L, Spin-Neto R, Wenzel A. Radiographic signs of pathology determining removal of an impacted mandibular third molar assessed in a panoramic image or CBCT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2016;46:20160330.
• Landis JR, Koch GG. An application of Hierarchical Kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics. 1977;33:363-74.
• Akarslan ZZ, Erten H, Güngör K, Celik I. Common errors on panoramic radiographs taken in a dental school. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2003;4:24-34.
• Public Health England (PHE) and Faculty of General Dental Practice (UK) (FGDP[UK]). Guidance Notes for Dental Practitioners on the Safe Use of X-ray Equipment. 2nd edition. London, UK: PHE and FGDP (UK); 2020.
• Aktuna Belgin C, Serindere G. Evaluation of error types and quality on panoramic radiography. International Dental Research. 2019;9:99-104.
• Subbulakshmi AC, Mohan N, Thiruneervannan R, et al. Positioning errors in digital panoramic radiographs: a study. J Orofac Sci. 2016;8:22-6.
• Hacıosmanoğlu N, Eren H, Küçükkalem MF, Görgün S. Errors during shooting in digital panoramic radiographs. Selcuk Dent J. 2019;6:209-15.
• Kumar N. Assessment of common errors and subjective quality of digital panoramic radiographs in a dental institution. Dentistry and Medical Research. 2020;8:23.
• Khator AM, Motwani MB, Choudhary AB. A study for determination of various positioning errors in digital panoramic radiography for evaluation of diagnostic image quality. Indian J Dent Res. 2017;28:666-70.
• Bissoon A, Whaites E, Moze K, et al. Evaluation of common operator errors in panoramic radiography in Trinidad and Tobago: a comparison of formally vs informally trained operators. West Indian Med J. 2012;61:733-8.
• Kaviani F, Johari M, Esmaeili F. Evaluation of common errors of panoramic radiographs in Tabriz faculty of dentistry. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2008;2:99-101.
• Glass BJ, Seals RR Jr, Williams EO. Common errors in panoramic radiography of edentulous patients. J Prosthodont. 1994;3:68-73.
• Granlund CM, Lith A, Molander B, Gröndahl K, Hansen K, Ekestubbe A. Frequency of errors and pathology in panoramic images of young orthodontic patients. Eur J Orthod. 2012;34:452-7.
• Rushton VE, Horner K, Worthington HV. The quality of panoramic radiographs in a sample of general dental practices. Br Dent J. 1999;186:630-3.
• Thapasum Fairozekhan A, Mohammed F, Veerankutty Jameela R, et al. Positional errors in orthopantomograph-a comparative systematic review with analysis of 1014 additional cases. 2020;7:1711-23.
• Singh S, Singh I, Ahmed F, Baba A. Retrospective study: evaluating the positioning errors in digital panoramic radiographs. 2022;10:5-8.
• Wenzel A, Matzen LH, Spin-Neto R, Schropp L. Effect of computer-assisted-learning and simulation clinics on dental students’ cognitive and performance skills: panoramic image errors related to patient’s head position. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2020;49:20200154.
• Du X, Chen Y, Zhao J, Xi Y. A Convolutional Neural Network Based Auto-Positioning Method For Dental Arch In Rotational Panoramic Radiography. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2018;2018:2615-8.