Sorgun Hoşumlu Göleti Su Kalitesinin İyonik ve Ağır Metal İçeriği Açısından Analizi

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 3, 407 - 415, 30.09.2025

Elif Seda Özbek , Ekrem Mutlu

Öz

Bu çalışmada gölet suyunun kalitesi 10 fizikokimyasal parametre ve 7 ağır metal üzerinden değerlendirilmiş, sonuçlar SWQR (2016) ve WHO (2021) standartları doğrultusunda tartışılmıştır. Ölçülen parametreler genel olarak ulusal ve uluslararası standartlarla uyumlu bulunmuş, ağır metaller arasında yalnızca bakır (Cu) ortalama 7,64 µg/L değeri ile SWQR (2016) sınırını aşmasına karşın WHO (2021) kriterleriyle uyumlu bulunmuştur. Sulama suyu indeksleri SAR (1,80) ve %Na (31,19) değerleri bakımından suyun kullanılabilir olduğunu göstermiş, PI (51,43) orta kaliteyi işaret etmiş, MH (62,33) ise sulama açısından yüksek magnezyum tehlikesi ortaya koymuştur. Ağır metal kirliliği indeksleri HPI (10,70) ve HEI (0,39) gölet suyunun ağır metal kirliliği bakımından düşük risk taşıdığını ortaya koymuştur. Piper diyagramı sonuçlarına göre suyun Ca⁺²–Mg⁺²–HCO₃⁻ fasiyesinde yer aldığı belirlenmiştir. Bu durum gölet suyunun karbonatlı kayaçlarla ilişkili doğal jeokimyasal özelliklere sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. Genel olarak elde edilen bulgular, gölet suyunun sulama amaçlı kullanıma uygun nitelikte olduğunu, ancak magnezyum birikimi ile bakır konsantrasyonunun düzenli olarak izlenmesinin, suyun uzun vadeli ve sürdürülebilir kullanımı açısından kritik önem taşıdığını göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Hoşumlu Göleti , İyonik ve Ağır Metal İçeriği , Piper Diyagramı.

Analysis of Water Quality in Sorgun Hoşumlu Pond in Terms of Ionic and Heavy Metal Content

Öz

In this study, the water quality of the pond was evaluated based on 10 physicochemical parameters and 7 heavy metals, and the results were discussed in accordance with SWQR (2016) and WHO (2021) standards. The measured parameters were generally found to be in compliance with both national and international guidelines. Among the heavy metals, only copper (Cu), with an average concentration of 7.64 µg/L, exceeded the SWQR (2016) threshold, while still remaining within the permissible limits of WHO (2021). Irrigation water indices indicated that the water is suitable for use in terms of SAR (1.80) and Na% (31.19), whereas PI (51.43) reflected medium quality, and MH (62.33) revealed a high magnesium hazard for irrigation purposes. Heavy metal pollution indices, HPI (10.70) and HEI (0.39), demonstrated that the pond water poses a low risk in terms of heavy metal contamination. According to the Piper diagram, the water was classified within the Ca²⁺–Mg²⁺–HCO₃⁻ facies, indicating that the hydrochemical characteristics of the pond are associated with carbonate-rich lithological formations. Overall, the findings suggest that while the pond water is suitable for irrigation, regular monitoring of magnesium accumulation and copper concentrations is essential to ensure its long-term and sustainable use.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Hoşumlu Pond , Ionic and Heavy Metal Content , Piper Diagram

Etik Beyan

Compliance with Ethical Standard a) Author Contributions The published version of the manuscript has been read and approved by both authors. 1. E.M.: Study design, data collection, analysis and review, preparation of the original draft, and manuscript submission. 2. E.S.Ö.: Statistical analyses, data interpretation, preparation of the original draft, and manuscript submission. b) Conflict of Interests There is no conflict of interest, according to the authors. c) Statement on the Welfare of Animals Not relevant, d) Statement of Human Rights There are no human subjects in this study. e) Declaration of Not Using AI During the preparation of this manuscript, the authors used AI-based tools for grammar correction and to improve the fluency of the text. The study design, data interpretation, and critical analyses were developed and finalized solely by the authors, without the use of AI tools at this stage.

Destekleyen Kurum

This study did not receive any funding from any institution or organization.

Teşekkür

We would like to express our gratitude to the General Directorate of Nature Conservation and National Parks for their valuable contributions to this study.

Kaynakça

• AquaStat. (2025). FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture. Retrieved on July 28, 2025 from https://www.fao.org/aquastat/en/databases/dams.
• APHA (2012). Standard Methods for examination of water and wastewater. 22nd ed. Washington: American Public Health Association, pp. 1360.
• Arshad, M., & Shakoor, A. (2017). Irrigation water quality. Water Int, 12(1-2), 145-160.
• Ayers, R. S., & Westcot, D. W. (1985). Water quality for agriculture (Vol. 29, p. 174). Rome: Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations.
• Azhari, H.E.; Cherif, E.K.; Sarti, O.; Azzirgue, E.M.; Dakak, H.; Yachou, H.; Esteves da Silva, J.C.G.; Salmoun, F. (2023). Assessment of Surface Water Quality Using the Water Quality Index (IWQ), Multivariate Statistical Analysis (MSA) and Geographic Information System (GIS) in Oued Laou Mediterranean Watershed, Morocco. Water, 15, 130. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15010130.
• Bauder, T. A., Waskom, R. M., Davis, J. G., & Sutherland, P. L. (2011). Irrigation water quality criteria (pp. 10-13). Fort Collins: Colorado State University Extension.
• Bhateria, R., & Jain, D. (2016). Water quality assessment of lake water: a review. Sustainable water resources management, 2(2), 161-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-015-0014-7.
• ÇŞİDM. (2022). Yozgat İli 2022 Yılı Çevre Durum Raporu. Çevre Denetim ve Yönetim Şube Müdürlüğü. Yozgat, Türkiye.
• Doneen, L.D. (1975). Water Quality for Irrigated Agriculture. In: Poljakoff-Mayber, A., Gale, J. (eds) Plants in Saline Environments. Ecological Studies, vol 15. (pp. 56-76). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-80929-3_5.
• FAO. (2017). A report produced for the G20 Presidency of Germany: Water for Sustainable Food and Agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, Italy.
• Follett, R. H., & Soltanpour, P. N. (1992). Fact sheet. 506, Irrigation water quality criteria. Colorado State University Extension.
• George, D., & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, 17.0 update (10a ed.). Boston: Pearson
• Güzel, A.E. & Mutlu, E. (2023). Su Kalitesi ve Kirliliğinin İyonik Bileşen İçeriği Tespiti İle Değerlendirilmesi. J. Anatolian Env. and Anim. Sciences, 8(4), 707-713. https://doi.org/10.35229/jaes.1391913.
• Haghnazar, H., Sabbagh, K., Johannesson, K. H., Pourakbar, M., & Aghayani, E. (2023). Phytoremediation capability of Typha latifolia L. to uptake sediment toxic elements in the largest coastal wetland of the Persian Gulf. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 188, 114699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.114699.
• Isaac, R. K., Khura, T. K., & Wurmbrand, J. R. (2009). Surface and subsurface water quality appraisal for irrigation. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 159, 465-473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0643-5.
• Jahin, H. S., Abuzaid, A. S., & Abdellatif, A. D. (2020). Using multivariate analysis to develop irrigation water quality index for surface water in Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypt. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 17, 100532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2019.100532.
• Jiang, J., Huo, Z., Feng, S., & Zhang, C. (2012). Effect of irrigation amount and water salinity on water consumption and water productivity of spring wheat in Northwest China. Field Crops Research, 137, 78-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.08.019.
• Kangabam, R. D., Bhoominathan, S. D., Kanagaraj, S., & Govindaraju, M. (2017). Development of a water quality index (WQI) for the Loktak Lake in India. Applied Water Science, 7(6), 2907–2918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-017-0579-4.
• Khalid, S. (2019). An assessment of groundwater quality for irrigation and drinking purposes around brick kilns in three districts of Balochistan province, Pakistan, through water quality index and multivariate statistical approaches. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 197, 14-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2018.11.007.
• Kurnaz, A., Mutlu, E., & Uncumusaoğlu, A. A. (2016). Determination of water quality parameters and heavy metal content in surface water of Çiğdem Pond (Kastamonu/Turkey). Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 4(10), 907-913. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v4i10.907-913.942.
• Kutlu, B., & Mutlu, E. (2024). Evaluation of the Şerefiye (Zara-Sivas) Dam According to Water Quality Indexes. Menba Kastamonu Üniversitesi Su Ürünleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.58626/menba.1479473.
• Kutlu, B., & Sarıgül, A. (2023). The assessment of health risk from heavy metals with water indices for irrigation and the portability of Munzur Stream: A case study of the Ovacık area (Ramsar site), Türkiye. Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies, 52(1), 111-123. https://doi.org/10.26881/oahs-2023.1.09.
• López-Felices, B., Aznar-Sánchez, J. A., Velasco-Muñoz, J. F., & Piquer-Rodríguez, M. (2020). Contribution of irrigation ponds to the sustainability of agriculture. A review of worldwide research. Sustainability, 12(13), 5425. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135425.
• Mohan, S. V., Nithila, P., & Reddy, S. J. (1996). Estimation of heavy metals in drinking water and development of heavy metal pollution index. Journal of Environmental Science & Health Part A, 31(2), 283-289. https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529609376357.
• Mutlu, E., & Uncumusaoğlu, A. A. (2022). Assessment of spatial and temporal water pollution patterns in Aydos River (Turkey) by using water quality index and multivariate statistical methods. Desalination and Water Treatment, 246, 196-211. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2022.28030.
• Nayak, A., Matta, G., & Uniyal, D. P. (2023). Hydrochemical characterization of groundwater quality using chemometric analysis and water quality indices in the foothills of Himalayas. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25(12), 14229-14260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02661-4.
• Oketola, A. A., Adekolurejo, S. M., & Osibanjo, O. (2013). Water quality assessment of River Ogun using multivariate statistical techniques. Journal of Environmental Protection, 4, 466-479. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jep.2013.45055.
• Özkay, F., Taş, İ. & Çelik, A. (2008). Sulama Projelerinin Çevresel Etkileri, TMMOB 2. Su Politikaları Kongresi, Türkiye, pp. 501-508.
• Paliwal, K. V. (1972). Irrigation with saline water. IARI, Monograph no. 2. New Science, New Delhi, 198.
• Piper, A. M. (1944). A graphic procedure in the geochemical interpretation of water‐analyses. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 25(6), 914-928. https://doi.org/10.1029/TR025i006p00914.
• Rafique, T., Naseem, S., Bhanger, M.I., Usmani, T.H. (2008). Fluoride ion contamination in the groundwater of Mithi sub-district, the Thar Desert, Pakistan. Environ Geol 56, 317–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-007-1167-y.
• Ravikumar, P., Aneesul Mehmood, M., & Somashekar, R. K. (2013). Water quality index to determine the surface water quality of Sankey tank and Mallathahalli lake, Bangalore urban district, Karnataka, India. Applied water science, 3, 247-261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-013-0077-2.
• Rice, E. W., Baird, R. B., Eaton, A. D., & Clesceri, L. S. (2012). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater.
• Richards, L. A. (Ed.). (1954). Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils (No. 60). US Government Printing Office.
• Saleh HN, Panahande M, Yousefi M, Asghari FB, Oliveri Conti G, Talaee E, & Mohammadi AA. (2019). Carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risk assessment of heavy metals in groundwater wells in Neyshabur Plain, Iran. Biol Trace Elem Res, 190(1):251–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-018-1516-6.
• SWQR. (2016). Türkiye Yerüstü Su Kalitesi Yönetmeliği. Retrieved on July 30, 2025 from https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2016/08/20160810-9.html.
• Şener, Ş., Şener, E., & Davraz, A. (2017). Evaluation of water quality using water quality index (WQI) method and GIS in Aksu River (SW-Turkey). The Science of the Total Environment, 584-585, 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.102.
• Şimşek, A., & Mutlu, E. (2023). Assessment of the water quality of Bartın Kışla (Kozcağız) Dam by using geographical information system (GIS) and water quality indices (WQI). Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(20), 58796-58812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26568-3.
• TOB. (2019). Ekosistem Esaslı Su Kalitesi Yönetimi. T.C. Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı. Ankara, Türkiye.
• TOB. (2023). Yeşilırmak Havzası Kuraklık Yönetim Planı. T.C. Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı Su Yönetimi Genel Müdürlüğü Taşkın ve Kuraklık Yönetimi Daire Başkanlığı. Ankara, Türkiye.
• Ustaoğlu, F. (2020). Evaluation of the Effect of Dissolved Metals Detected in Değirmendere Dam (Amasya, Turkey) on Drinking and Irrigation Water Quality. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 8(12): 2729-2737. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v8i12.2729-2737.4019.
• Wang, J., Liu, G., Liu, H., & Lam, P. K. (2017). Multivariate statistical evaluation of dissolved trace elements and a water quality assessment in the middle reaches of Huaihe River, Anhui, China. Science of the Total Environment. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.088.
• WHO. (2011). Guideline for drinking water quality, 4th edn. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. WHO. (2021). A global overview of national regulations and standarts for drinking-water quality, second edition. World Health Organization. Geneva, Switzerland.
• Wilcox, L. (1955). Classification and use of irrigation waters (No. 969). US Department of Agriculture.
• Yuan, G., Cao, Y., Schulz, H. M., Hao, F., Gluyas, J., Liu, K., ... & Li, F. (2019). A review of feldspar alteration and its geological significance in sedimentary basins: From shallow aquifers to deep hydrocarbon reservoirs. Earth-science reviews, 191, 114-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.02.004.
• Zaman, M., Shahid, S. A., & Heng, L. (2018). Guideline for salinity assessment, mitigation and adaptation using nuclear and related techniques (p. 164). Springer Nature.
• Zhang, H., Huang, Q., Zhao, G., Guo, Z., & Chen, Y. J. (2016). Three-dimensional conductivity model of crust and uppermost mantle at the northern Trans North China Orogen: Evidence for a mantle source of Datong volcanoes. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 453, 182-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2016.08.025.