Araştırma Makalesi

Predictive Power of Mathematics Teacher Candidates’ Learning Styles to Their Teaching Style Preferences

Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2 31 Aralık 2019
PDF İndir
TR EN

Predictive Power of Mathematics Teacher Candidates’ Learning Styles to Their Teaching Style Preferences

Öz

In this research, it was aimed to examine predictive power of pre-service mathematics teacher’s learning syle on teaching style preferences. This research was carried out by using  survey method. The research was carried out by a total of 374 II, III and IV grades pre-service mathematics teachers at the Department of Primary Mathematics Education in Necmettin Erbakan University  Ahmet Keleşoğlu  Faculty of Education. In this research, “Grasha-Reichmann Learning Style Inventory”, prepared by Grasha-Reichmann (1974) and adapted to Turkish by Sarıtaş and Süral (2010), was used in order to determine learning styles, and “Grasha Teaching Style Inventory”, prepared by Grasha (1994) and adapted to Turkish by Sarıtaş and Güral (2010), was used in order to determine teaching styles. The collected data analysed by descriptive and inferential statistical techniques, as t-test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), correlation and regression. The following results were obtained by the study; The most preferred learning style is the “independent" style, while  the least preferred learning style is the "avoidant" learning style. The most preferred teaching style is “Group 3 (Facilitator/ Personal Model/Expert)”, while the  least  preferred teaching style group is “Group 2 (Personal Model/Expert/Formal Authority)”. A relation has been determined between the learning and the teaching style preferences.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Learning Style,Teaching Style,Mathematics Education,Pre-Service Teacher

Kaynakça

  1. [1] Akbaba-Altun, S. Information Technology Classrooms and Elementary School Principals' Roles: Turkish Experience, Education and Information Technologies (2004) 9: 255.[2] OECD, Are Students Ready for a Technology-Rich World?: What PISA Studies Tell Us. Paris, OECD, 2006.[3] OECD, The OECD Handbook for Innovative Learning Environments, OECD, Publishing, Paris, OECD, 2017.[4] Singapore Ministry of Education. (1997). Speech by Radm Teo Chee Hearty Minister for Education and 2nd Minister for Defence at the launch of the masterplan for it in education on mon- day 28 april 97 at Suntec City at 10 am opening new frontiers in education with information technology. [5] Singapore Ministry of Education. (2002). Speech by Mr Thar- man Shanmugaratnam, Senior Minister of Statefor Trade and Industry & Education at Itopia 2002.[6] Singapore Ministry of Education. (2008). Opening address by Dr Ng Eng Hetty Minister for Education and Second Minister for D fence, at the International Conference on Teaching and Learning with Technology (iCTLT) at the Suntec Convention Hall, on Tuesday, 5 August 2008 [7] Singapore Ministry of Education (2010). Building a national education system for the 21st century: The Singapore experience. Presented at the Building Blocks for Education: Whole System Reform Toronto, September 2010. [8] Singapore Ministry of Education. (2010b). MOE, IDA and Microsoft launch cyber wellness student ambassador programme.[9] Singapore Ministry of Education. (2013a). Cyber wellness portal. [10] Singapore Ministry of Education (2013b). Primary school curriculum. [11] Singapore Ministry of Education (2013c). Normal course curriculum.[12] Singapore National Institute of Education-NIE. (2011). Bachelor of Arts and science education.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Kaleci, F. (2019). Predictive Power of Mathematics Teacher Candidates’ Learning Styles to Their Teaching Style Preferences. Medeniyet ve Toplum Dergisi, 3(2), 180-192. https://izlik.org/JA94XN69LZ
AMA
1.Kaleci F. Predictive Power of Mathematics Teacher Candidates’ Learning Styles to Their Teaching Style Preferences. Medeniyet ve Toplum Dergisi. 2019;3(2):180-192. https://izlik.org/JA94XN69LZ
Chicago
Kaleci, Fatih. 2019. “Predictive Power of Mathematics Teacher Candidates’ Learning Styles to Their Teaching Style Preferences”. Medeniyet ve Toplum Dergisi 3 (2): 180-92. https://izlik.org/JA94XN69LZ.
EndNote
Kaleci F (01 Aralık 2019) Predictive Power of Mathematics Teacher Candidates’ Learning Styles to Their Teaching Style Preferences. Medeniyet ve Toplum Dergisi 3 2 180–192.
IEEE
[1]F. Kaleci, “Predictive Power of Mathematics Teacher Candidates’ Learning Styles to Their Teaching Style Preferences”, Medeniyet ve Toplum Dergisi, c. 3, sy 2, ss. 180–192, Ara. 2019, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA94XN69LZ
ISNAD
Kaleci, Fatih. “Predictive Power of Mathematics Teacher Candidates’ Learning Styles to Their Teaching Style Preferences”. Medeniyet ve Toplum Dergisi 3/2 (01 Aralık 2019): 180-192. https://izlik.org/JA94XN69LZ.
JAMA
1.Kaleci F. Predictive Power of Mathematics Teacher Candidates’ Learning Styles to Their Teaching Style Preferences. Medeniyet ve Toplum Dergisi. 2019;3:180–192.
MLA
Kaleci, Fatih. “Predictive Power of Mathematics Teacher Candidates’ Learning Styles to Their Teaching Style Preferences”. Medeniyet ve Toplum Dergisi, c. 3, sy 2, Aralık 2019, ss. 180-92, https://izlik.org/JA94XN69LZ.
Vancouver
1.Fatih Kaleci. Predictive Power of Mathematics Teacher Candidates’ Learning Styles to Their Teaching Style Preferences. Medeniyet ve Toplum Dergisi [Internet]. 01 Aralık 2019;3(2):180-92. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA94XN69LZ