Araştırma Makalesi

Optimal design of Turkey’s emission trading system: Lessons from the EU and global best practices

Cilt: 52 Sayı: 1 30 Haziran 2025
PDF İndir
EN TR

Optimal design of Turkey’s emission trading system: Lessons from the EU and global best practices

Öz

The paper aims to analyze the challenges and opportunities of establishing a Turkish Emissions Trading System (ETS) in light of the European Green Deal (EGD) and its Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) by reviewing global ETS practices, particularly the EU ETS, to highlight potential shortcomings in the Turkish system. Türkiye’s Emissions Trading System (ETS) development, initiated in 2015 with its Monitoring, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) framework, faces critical design challenges that may undermine its effectiveness. The current inclusion threshold of 500 kt CO₂/year for Category C installations risks excluding significant emitters in key sectors—a limitation that could be addressed by adopting the EU ETS’s activity-specific criteria. Furthermore, while Türkiye’s proposed cap aligns with its 2023 Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC), independent analyses highlight its inadequacy for Paris Agreement compliance, projecting a 2030 emissions level (695 MtCO₂e) vastly exceeding a 1.5°C-compatible "fair share" (433.9 MtCO₂e). Without stringent adjustments, the TR ETS may generate a 17-million-unit allowance surplus by 2027, collapsing carbon prices and granting windfall profits to high emitters. However, strategically allocated ETS revenues (€2.1–2.5 billion annually at €10/allowance) could accelerate decarbonization through renewable energy investments, industrial efficiency programs, and just transition mechanisms—provided complementary policies address existing fossil fuel subsidies and ensure policy coherence. The analysis revealed the importance of a stringent, declining cap aligned with climate targets, contrasting Türkiye's current NDC projections with historical emission trends and 1.5-degree compatibility scenarios. Finally, we discuss the potential revenues from a Turkish ETS and suggest their strategic reinvestment for a sustainable economic transition.

Anahtar Kelimeler

European Green Deal, Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, Turkish emission trading system

Destekleyen Kurum

TÜBİTAK 1001 Proje No: 124K846

Proje Numarası

124K846

Kaynakça

  1. References BAI, J., & Ru, H. (2022). Carbon Emissions Trading and Environmental Protection: International Evidence. Manag. Sci., 70, 4593-4603. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4241378.
  2. BALABAN, O. (2019). Challenges to Türkiye’s Transition to a Low-Carbon Urban Development: A Roadmap for an Effective Climate Change Policy. The Urban Book Series. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05773-2_13.
  3. BETZ, R., MICHAELOWA, A., CASTRO, P., KOTSCH, R., MEHLING, M.A., MICHAELOWA, K., & BARANZINI, A. (2022). The Carbon Market Challenge. Cambridge University Pres. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009216500.
  4. BRANGER, F., LECUYER, O., & QUIRION, P. (2015). The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme: should we throw the flagship out with the bathwater?. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 6. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.326.
  5. Climate Action Tracker (2023) “Türkiye”, retrieved in February 2025. https://climateactiontracker.org/countries/Türkiye/.
  6. Delft, C. E. (2021). Additional profits of sectors and firms from the EU ETS. Delft. Récupéré le, 20.
  7. DIRIX, J., PEETERS, W., & STERCKX, S. (2015). Is the EU ETS a Just Climate Policy?. New Political Economy, 20, 702 - 724. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2014.999758.
  8. DU, Z., XU, C., & LIN, B. (2022). Does the Emission Trading Scheme achieve the dual dividend of reducing pollution and improving energy efficiency? Micro evidence from China.. Journal of environmental management, 323, 116202 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116202.
  9. EBRD (2023) “Potential Impact of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism on the Turkish Economy”, available at https://iklim.gov.tr/db/turkce/haberler/files/20230523%20Impacts%20of%20CBAM%20on%20Turkiye%20phase%202%20report%20FV3%20(2)-sayfalar-1,3,5-16%20(1)%20(1).pdf
  10. ELLERMAN, A. D., CONVERY, F. J., & DE PERTHUIS, C. (2010). Pricing carbon: the European Union emissions trading scheme. Cambridge University Press.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Aşıcı, A. A. (2025). Optimal design of Turkey’s emission trading system: Lessons from the EU and global best practices. ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi, 52(1), 69-90. https://izlik.org/JA77PF47GF
AMA
1.Aşıcı AA. Optimal design of Turkey’s emission trading system: Lessons from the EU and global best practices. ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi. 2025;52(1):69-90. https://izlik.org/JA77PF47GF
Chicago
Aşıcı, Ahmet Atıl. 2025. “Optimal design of Turkey’s emission trading system: Lessons from the EU and global best practices”. ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi 52 (1): 69-90. https://izlik.org/JA77PF47GF.
EndNote
Aşıcı AA (01 Haziran 2025) Optimal design of Turkey’s emission trading system: Lessons from the EU and global best practices. ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi 52 1 69–90.
IEEE
[1]A. A. Aşıcı, “Optimal design of Turkey’s emission trading system: Lessons from the EU and global best practices”, ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi, c. 52, sy 1, ss. 69–90, Haz. 2025, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA77PF47GF
ISNAD
Aşıcı, Ahmet Atıl. “Optimal design of Turkey’s emission trading system: Lessons from the EU and global best practices”. ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi 52/1 (01 Haziran 2025): 69-90. https://izlik.org/JA77PF47GF.
JAMA
1.Aşıcı AA. Optimal design of Turkey’s emission trading system: Lessons from the EU and global best practices. ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi. 2025;52:69–90.
MLA
Aşıcı, Ahmet Atıl. “Optimal design of Turkey’s emission trading system: Lessons from the EU and global best practices”. ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi, c. 52, sy 1, Haziran 2025, ss. 69-90, https://izlik.org/JA77PF47GF.
Vancouver
1.Ahmet Atıl Aşıcı. Optimal design of Turkey’s emission trading system: Lessons from the EU and global best practices. ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi [Internet]. 01 Haziran 2025;52(1):69-90. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA77PF47GF