Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

AB-Türkiye ilişkilerinde zamansallık ve etkileşim

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 51 Sayı: 2, 145 - 158, 27.12.2024

Öz

Bu çalışma, AB-Türkiye ilişkilerinin tarihsel gelişimini Atila Eralp’ın Türkiye-AB ilişkileri literatüne yaptığı katkılarda öne sürmüş olduğu zamansallık ve etkileşim çerçevesi kapsamında ele almaktadır. Makale, Eralp’ın zamansallık, etkileşim ve Avrupalılaşma eksenli analitik perspektifinin AB-Türkiye ilişkilerinin 2005 yılı öncesindeki gelişimini açıkladığı gibi, 2005 sonrasında ilişkilerde yaşanan olumsuz seyri de anlamdırmakta önemli bir yer tuttuğunu iddia etmektedir.

Kaynakça

  • ARISAN ERALP, N., S. AYDIN DÜZGİT, A. ERALP, F. KEYMAN, and Ç. NAS (2020), EU-Turkey Relations after the Council Summit: A Chance for Reengagement or Facing a Complete Breakdown? Istanbul: Istanbul Policy Center.
  • AYDIN DÜZGİT, S., and N. TOCCI (2015), Turkey and the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • AYDIN DÜZGİT, S. and A. KALİBER (2016), “Encounters with Europe in an Era of Domestic and International Turmoil: Is Turkey a De-Europeanising Country?”, South European Society and Politics 21 (1): 1-14.
  • AYDIN DÜZGİT, S., KEYMAN, F. and K. BIEHL (2019), Changing Patterns of Migration Cooperation: Beyond the EU-Turkey Deal? Istanbul: Istanbul Policy Center.
  • ERALP, A. (1992), “Turkey and the European Community: Forging Old Identities along Old Lines”, New Perspectives on Turkey, 8 (1992): 1-14.
  • ERALP, A. (2009), “The Role of Temporality and Interaction in the Turkey-EU Relationship”, New Perspectives on Turkey, 40 (2009): 149-170.
  • ERALP, A. (2018), Revitalizing Turkey-EU Relations? IPC-Mercator Policy Brief. Istanbul: Istanbul Policy Center.
  • ERALP, A. (2019), Multilateralism Matters: Toward a Rules-Based Turkey-EU Relationship. Istanbul: Istanbul Policy Center.
  • ERDEMLİ, Ö. (2003), “Chronology: Turkey’s Relations with the EU.” Turkish Studies 4 (1): 4-8.
  • EUROPEAN COUNCIL (2005), Negotiating Framework (Turkey). 3 October 2005. Accessed July 26, 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/pdf/turkey/ st20002_05_tr_framedoc_en.pdf
  • KFIR, I. (2018), “A Faustian Pact: Has the EU-Turkey Deal Undermined the EU’s Own Security?” Comparative Strategy 37 (3): 207-219.
  • MÜFTÜLER BAÇ, M. (2005), “Turkey’s Political Reforms and the Impact of the European Union.” South European Society and Politics 10 (1): 17-31.
  • NOUTCHEVA, G., and S. AYDIN DÜZGİT (2012), “Lost in Europeanization?: The Western Balkans and Turkey.” West European Politics 35 (1): 59-78.
  • OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (1977), Agreement establishing an Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey, No L 361/1, 31 December.
  • OKYAY, A., and J. ZARAGOZA CRISTIANI (2016), “The Leverage of the Gatekeeper: Power and Interdependence in the Migration Nexus between the EU and Turkey.” The International Spectator 51 (4): 51–66.
  • ÖZBEY, E., H. HAGUE, and A. ERALP (2022), “Identity Representations in Narratives on EU-Turkey Relations” in F. Tekin and A. Schönlau (eds) The EU-German-Turkish Triangle: Narratives, Perceptions and Discourse of a Unique Relationship. Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 31-57.
  • SAATÇİOĞLU, B., F. TEKİN, S. EKİM, and N. TOCCI (2019), “The Future of EU-Turkey Relations: A Dynamic Association Framework amidst Conflictual Cooperation”. FEUTURE Synthesis Paper. Accessed July 26, 2021. https://feuture.uni-koeln.de/sites/monteus/user_upload/FEUTURE_Synthesis_Paper.pdf
  • TOCCI, N. (2004), EU Accession Dynamics and Conflict Resolution: Catalyzing Peace or Consolidating Partition in Cyprus? Aldershot: Ashgate.
  • VERNEY, S. and K. IFANTIS, eds. (2009), Turkey’s Road to European Union Membership: National Identity and Political Change. London: Routledge.

Temporality and interaction in the EU-Turkey relationship

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 51 Sayı: 2, 145 - 158, 27.12.2024

Öz

This article provides an assessment of the history of the EU-Turkey relationship in the context of temporality and interaction put forward by Eralp (2009). Eralp has argued that there is a close relationship between temporality, interaction and Europeanization in the EU-Turkey relationship. The article argues and demonstrates that this conceptual framework does not only explain the tumultous nature of the relationship until the end of the 1990s, but also furthers our understanding of the souring of the EU-Turkey relationship and the ensuing de-Europeanisation of Turkey in the second decade of the 2000nds.

Kaynakça

  • ARISAN ERALP, N., S. AYDIN DÜZGİT, A. ERALP, F. KEYMAN, and Ç. NAS (2020), EU-Turkey Relations after the Council Summit: A Chance for Reengagement or Facing a Complete Breakdown? Istanbul: Istanbul Policy Center.
  • AYDIN DÜZGİT, S., and N. TOCCI (2015), Turkey and the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • AYDIN DÜZGİT, S. and A. KALİBER (2016), “Encounters with Europe in an Era of Domestic and International Turmoil: Is Turkey a De-Europeanising Country?”, South European Society and Politics 21 (1): 1-14.
  • AYDIN DÜZGİT, S., KEYMAN, F. and K. BIEHL (2019), Changing Patterns of Migration Cooperation: Beyond the EU-Turkey Deal? Istanbul: Istanbul Policy Center.
  • ERALP, A. (1992), “Turkey and the European Community: Forging Old Identities along Old Lines”, New Perspectives on Turkey, 8 (1992): 1-14.
  • ERALP, A. (2009), “The Role of Temporality and Interaction in the Turkey-EU Relationship”, New Perspectives on Turkey, 40 (2009): 149-170.
  • ERALP, A. (2018), Revitalizing Turkey-EU Relations? IPC-Mercator Policy Brief. Istanbul: Istanbul Policy Center.
  • ERALP, A. (2019), Multilateralism Matters: Toward a Rules-Based Turkey-EU Relationship. Istanbul: Istanbul Policy Center.
  • ERDEMLİ, Ö. (2003), “Chronology: Turkey’s Relations with the EU.” Turkish Studies 4 (1): 4-8.
  • EUROPEAN COUNCIL (2005), Negotiating Framework (Turkey). 3 October 2005. Accessed July 26, 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/pdf/turkey/ st20002_05_tr_framedoc_en.pdf
  • KFIR, I. (2018), “A Faustian Pact: Has the EU-Turkey Deal Undermined the EU’s Own Security?” Comparative Strategy 37 (3): 207-219.
  • MÜFTÜLER BAÇ, M. (2005), “Turkey’s Political Reforms and the Impact of the European Union.” South European Society and Politics 10 (1): 17-31.
  • NOUTCHEVA, G., and S. AYDIN DÜZGİT (2012), “Lost in Europeanization?: The Western Balkans and Turkey.” West European Politics 35 (1): 59-78.
  • OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (1977), Agreement establishing an Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey, No L 361/1, 31 December.
  • OKYAY, A., and J. ZARAGOZA CRISTIANI (2016), “The Leverage of the Gatekeeper: Power and Interdependence in the Migration Nexus between the EU and Turkey.” The International Spectator 51 (4): 51–66.
  • ÖZBEY, E., H. HAGUE, and A. ERALP (2022), “Identity Representations in Narratives on EU-Turkey Relations” in F. Tekin and A. Schönlau (eds) The EU-German-Turkish Triangle: Narratives, Perceptions and Discourse of a Unique Relationship. Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 31-57.
  • SAATÇİOĞLU, B., F. TEKİN, S. EKİM, and N. TOCCI (2019), “The Future of EU-Turkey Relations: A Dynamic Association Framework amidst Conflictual Cooperation”. FEUTURE Synthesis Paper. Accessed July 26, 2021. https://feuture.uni-koeln.de/sites/monteus/user_upload/FEUTURE_Synthesis_Paper.pdf
  • TOCCI, N. (2004), EU Accession Dynamics and Conflict Resolution: Catalyzing Peace or Consolidating Partition in Cyprus? Aldershot: Ashgate.
  • VERNEY, S. and K. IFANTIS, eds. (2009), Turkey’s Road to European Union Membership: National Identity and Political Change. London: Routledge.
Toplam 19 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Avrupa Birliği-Türkiye İlişkileri
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Senem Aydın-düzgit 0000-0001-8177-9957

Yayımlanma Tarihi 27 Aralık 2024
Gönderilme Tarihi 9 Kasım 2024
Kabul Tarihi 10 Aralık 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2024 Cilt: 51 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Aydın-düzgit, S. (2024). Temporality and interaction in the EU-Turkey relationship. Middle East Technical University Studies in Development, 51(2), 145-158.