Belirli Meslek Grupları Arasında Mobbinge Maruz Kalmanın İncelenmesi: Psikologlar, Öğretmenler ve Diğer Meslek Grupları

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 26 - 51, 12.07.2025

Yunus Emre Öksüz , Gözde Masatcıoğlu , Atakan Gürhan , Gözde Kevser Genç

https://doi.org/10.59007/meyadakademi.1664558

Öz

Mobbing, iş yerinde sistematik olarak uygulanan psikolojik şiddet ve taciz davranışlarını ifade eden bir kavram olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Bu çalışma, toplumun eğitiminde ön sırayı alan öğretmenlerin ve mobbing mağdurlarının tedavisi ve rehabilitasyonunda ön sırada yer alan psikologların maruz kaldıkları mobbing deneyimlerini araştırmak ve farklı meslek gruplarıyla karşılaştırmak amacıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırma nicel araştırma olup araştırma deseni olarak ilişkisel tarama modeli benimsenmiştir. Çalışmada 5 boyut altında toplam 23 maddeden oluşan Akademisyenlere Yönelik Mobbing Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Araştırmaya 53 öğretmen 38 psikolog 51 diğer meslek grubu mensubu olmak üzere 142 kişi katılmıştır. Çalışmanın sonucunda sonuçlarına göre, çalışmada yer alan üç grup için arasında toplam mobbing puanları açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunmuştur. Psikologların toplam mobbing puanları öğretmenlere göre daha yüksek olarak bulunurken alt boyutlar arasında meslekler arasında farklılıklara rastlanmış ve her grubun grubunun belirli alt boyutlardan diğer gruplara göre daha yüksek puan aldığı görülmüştür..

Anahtar Kelimeler

Mobbing , İş Yeri Stresi , Şiddet , Örgüt Psikolojisi

Examining The Exposure To Mobbing Among Certain Professional Groups: Psychologists, Teachers, And Others Professional Groups

Öz

Mobbing is defined as a concept that refers to systematically applied psychological violence and harassment behaviors in the workplace. This study was conducted to investigate the mobbing experiences of teachers, who are at the forefront of the education of the society, and psychologists, who are at the forefront of the treatment and rehabilitation of mobbing victims, and to compare them with different professional groups. The research is a quantitative research and the relational screening model was adopted as the research design. The Mobbing Scale for Academicians, consisting of a total of 23 items under 5 dimensions, was used in the study. 142 people, including 53 teachers, 38 psychologists and 51 members of other professional groups, participated in the study. According to the results of the study, a statistically significant difference was found in terms of total mobbing scores between the three groups in the study. While the total mobbing scores of psychologists were found to be higher than teachers, differences were found between the sub-dimensions and between the professions, and it was seen that each group scored higher than the other groups in certain sub-dimensions.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Mobbing , Workplace Stress , Violence , Organizational Psychology

Kaynakça

• 1. Martins JS, Simões M, Relva IC, Monteiro AP. Workplace mobbing. In: The Palgrave Handbook of Global Social Problems. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2023. p. 1–18.
• 2. Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper CL. The concept of bullying and harassment at work: The European tradition. In: Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper CL, editors. Bullying and harassment in the workplace: Developments in theory, research, and practice. Boca Raton, FL; 2011. p. 3-39.
• 3. Quinn, S., Waheduzzaman, W., & Djurkovic, N. (2024). Impact of Organizational Culture on Bullying Behavior in Public Sector Organizations. Public Personnel Management, 54(2), 184-208.
• 4. Nielsen MB, Rosander M, Einarsen SV. Witnessing workplace bullying—protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual health and well-being outcomes. Syst Rev. 2023;12(1):119.
• 5. Nielsen MB, Einarsen S. Outcomes of exposure to workplace bullying: A meta-analytic review. Work & Stress. 2012; 26(4): 309-332.
• 6. Plimmer G, Nguyen D, Teo S, Tuckey MR. Workplace bullying as an organisational issue: Aligning climate and leadership. Work Stress. 2022;36(2):202–27.
• 7. Bartlett JE, Bartlett ME. The phenomenology of principal mistreatment: Teachers' perspectives. Advances in Developing Human Resources. 2011; 13(1): 69-84.
• 8. Lutgen‐Sandvik P, Tracy SJ, Alberts JK. Burned by bullying in the American workplace: Prevalence, perception, degree and impact. Journal of Management Studies. 2007; 44(6): 837-862.
• 9. Kowalski RM, Toth A, Morgan M. Bullying and cyberbullying in adulthood and the workplace. The Journal of social psychology. 2018; 158(1): 64-81.
• 10. Power JL, Brotheridge CM, Blenkinsopp J, Bowes-Sperry L, BN, Buzády Z, et al. Acceptability of workplace bullying: A comparative study on six continents. Journal of Business Research. 2013; 66(3): 374-380.
• 11. Salin D. Risk factors of workplace bullying for men and women: The role of the psychosocial and physical work environment. Scandinavian journal of psychology. 2015; 56(1): 69-77.
• 12. Handayani, P., Rosari, R., & Mujib, M. (2023). Organizational Change Communication, Workplace Bullying and Job Insecurity: The Moderating Role of Trust in Management. JPBM (Jurnal Pendidikan Bisnis Dan Manajemen), 9(1), 36-49.
• 13. Develi A, Turak TT. Consequences of workplace bullying: Findings from public sector via PLS-SEM. Alanya Akademik Bakış. 2023;7(3):1387–400.
• 14. Salin D, Hoel H. Organisational causes of workplace bullying. In: Bullying and harassment in the workplace: Developments in theory, research, and practice. 2011;(2): 227-243.
• 15. Bulutlar F, Öz EÜ. The effects of ethical climates on bullying behaviour in the workplace. Journal of Business ethics. 2009;(86): 273-295.
• 16. Giorgi G, Leon-Perez JM, Arenas A. Are bullying behaviors tolerated in some cultures? Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between workplace bullying and job satisfaction among Italian workers. Journal of Business Ethics. 2015;(131): 227-237.
• 17. Neall AM, Li Y, Tuckey MR. Organizational justice and workplace bullying: Lessons learned from externally referred complaints and investigations. Societies. 2021;11(4):143.
• 18. Zapf D, Escartín J, Einarsen S, Hoel H, Vartia M. Empirical findings on prevalence and risk groups of bullying in the workplace. In: Bullying and harassment in the workplace: Developments in theory, research, and practice. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2011. p. 75-105.
• 19. Fahie D, Devine D. The impact of workplace bullying on primary school teachers and principals. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. 2014; 58(2): 235-252.
• 20. De Wet C. The reasons for and the impact of principal-on-teacher bullying on the victims’ private and professional lives. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2010; 26(7): 1450-1459.
• 21. Hoel H, Sheehan MJ, Cooper CL, Einarsen S. Organisational effects of workplace bullying. In: Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper CL, editors. Bullying and harassment in the workplace: Developments in theory, research, and practice. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2011. p. 129-148.
• 22. Çögenli MZ, Asunakutlu T. Akademisyenlere yönelik mobbing ölçeği geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2014; 7(2): 92-105.
• 23. Cemaloğlu N. The exposure of primary school teachers to bullying: An analysis of various variables. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal. 2007; 35(6): 789-802.
• 24. Toker Gökçe A. Mobbing at elementary schools in Turkey. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. 2012; 3(3): 61-73.
• 25. Çelebi N, Kaya GT. Öğretmenlerin maruz kaldığı mobbing (yıldırma): Nitel bir araştırma. Eğitim ve İnsani Bilimler Dergisi: Teori ve Uygulama. 2014; 5(9): 43-66.
• 26. Erturk A. Mobbing behaviour: Victims and the affected. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice. 2013; 13(1): 169-173.
• 27. Yaman E, Vidinlioğlu Ö, Çitemel N. İşyerinde psikoşiddet, motivasyon ve huzur: Öğretmenler çok şey mi bekliyor? Psikoşiddet mağduru öğretmenler üzerine. Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi. 2010; 7(1): 1136-1151.
• 28. Koç M, Urasoğlu Bulut H. Ortaöğretim öğretmenlerinde mobbing: Cinsiyet yaş ve lise türü değişkenleri açısından incelenmesi. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences. 2009; 1(1): 64-80.
• 29. Jang SJ, Son YJ, Lee H. Intervention types and their effects on workplace bullying among nurses: a systematic review. Journal of Nursing Management. 2022; 30(6): 1788-1800.
• 30. Yildirim A, Yildirim D. Mobbing in the workplace by peers and managers: mobbing experienced by nurses working in healthcare facilities in Turkey and its effect on nurses. Journal of clinical nursing. 2007; 16(8): 1444-1453.
• 31. Riley D, Duncan DJ, Edwards J. Staff bullying in Australian schools. Journal of Educational Administration. 2011; 49(1): 7-30.
• 32. Rodríguez-Muñoz A, Antino M, León-Pérez JM, Ruiz-Zorrilla P. Workplace bullying, emotional exhaustion, and partner social undermining: A weekly diary study. J Interpers Violence. 2020;37(5–6):NP3650–66.
• 33. Salin D. Ways of explaining workplace bullying: A review of enabling, motivating and precipitating structures and processes in the work environment. Human relations. 2003; 56(10): 1213-1232.
• 34. Einarsen SV, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper CL. The concept of bullying and harassment at work: The European tradition. In: Bullying and harassment in the workplace. CRC Press; 2020.