Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Azotlu Gübrelemenin Elmada Klorofil İçeriği Üzerine Etkileri

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 12 - 17, 22.10.2018

Öz

Bu çalışma 2009-2011 yılları arasında Yalova
koşullarında yürütülmüştür. Çalışmanın amacı M9 anacı üzerine aşılı Golden Sel
B elma çeşidinde, fertigasyon ve hasat sonrası yaprak gübrelemesi yöntemleri
kullanılarak farklı dozlarda (0, 30, 60, 90 g/ağaç) ve farklı uygulama
zamanlarında (Uygulama:1Erken ilkbaharda gözler uyanmadan önce başlayıp
hasattan 40-45 gün önce biten, Uygulama:2 Erken ilkbaharda gözler uyanmadan
önce başlayıp hasattan 40-45 gün önce biten ve hasat sonrası yaprak uygulaması
olan, Uygulama:3 Çiçeklenme sonrası başlayıp hasattan 40-45 gün önce biten,
Uygulama:4 Çiçeklenme sonrası başlayıp hasattan 40-45 gün önce biten ve hasat
sonrası yaprak uygulaması olan) verilen azotun bitkilerin klorofil içeriği
üzerine olan etkilerinin belirlenmesidir. Deneme, tesadüf bloklarında
faktöriyel deneme desenine göre üç tekrarlamalı olarak kurulmuştur. Yapılan
klorofil analiz sonuçlarına göre, yaprak klorofil içerikleri artan azot dozları
ile artış göstermiş fakat farklı uygulama zamanları klorofil içerikleri
üzerinde etkili olmamıştır.

Kaynakça

  • Curran PJ, Dungan JL, Gholz HL, 1990. Exploring the Relationship Between Reflectance Red Edge and Chl Content in Slash Pine. Tree Physiol. 7: 33 - 48.
  • Ercişli S, 2004. A Short Review of the Fruit Germplasm Resources of Turkey. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 51: 419 - 435.
  • FAO, (2017). FAOSTAT production data [online]. Available at http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC (Acces data: 15.06.2017)
  • Filella I, Serrano L, Serra J, Penuelas J, 1995. Evaluating Wheat Nitrogen Status with Canopy Reflectance Indices and Discriminant Analysis. Crop Sci. 35: 1400 - 1405.
  • Gaskell M, 2004. Acid injection in irrigation water improwing pH adjustment for blueberries. Available from URL: http://www.sbceo.k12.ca.us/~uccesb1/sf1002.htm (Acces data: 02.07.2008)
  • Kacar B, Katkat AV, Öztürk Ş, 2002. Bitki Fizyolojisi. Uludağ Üniversitesi Güçlendirme Vakfı Yayın No: 198, Vipaş .Ş. Yayın No: 74, s. 224-292, İstanbul.
  • Kowalczyk-Jusko A, Koscik B, 2002. Possible Use of the Chlorophyll Meter (SPAD-502) for Evaluation Nitrogen Nutrition of the Virginia Tobacco. Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities 5 (1): 05.
  • Lei C Tao, ShaoLing W, GaiFang Z, ShuTian Y, Bing T, YongChun J, HuiLian MC, 2010. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Fruit Quality and Leaf Physiological Metabolism of Hosui Pear. Journal of Fruit Science 27 (6): 871 - 876.
  • Neto CB, Carranca C, Clemente J, Varennes A, 2011. Assessing the Nitrogen Nutritional Status of Young Non-Bearing ‘Rocha’ Pear Trees Grown in a Mediterranean Region by Using c Chlorophyll Meter. Journal of Plant Nutrition 34: 627 - 639.
  • Odabaş F, 1981. Effects to Chlorophyll Content of Nitrogen Fertilization on Bacchus Variety (Vitis Vinifera L.).Atatürk University Journal of the FacultyofAgriculture 12(2): 39-50.
  • O’Rourke D, 2003. World Production, Trade, Consumption and Economic Outlook for Apples In: Ferree DC, Warrington IJ, editors. Apples: Botany, Production and Uses. CABI Publishing, Cab International UK, pp. 15 - 28
  • Özçağıran R, Ünal A, Özeker E, İsfendiyaroğlu M, 2004. Ilıman İklim Meyve türleri (Yumuşak Çekirdekli Meyveler Cilt-II) Ege Üniv. Zir. Fak. Yayın 556, İzmir, 200 s.
  • Prsa I, Stampar F, Vodnik D, Veberic R, 2007. Influence of Nitrogen on Leaf Chlorophyll Content and Photosynthesis of ‘Golden Delicious’ Apple. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B-Soil and Plant Science 57: 283 - 289.
  • Shaahan MM, El-Sayed AA, Abou El-Nour EAA, 1999. Predicting Nitrogen, Magnesium and Iron Nutritional Status in Some Perennial Crops Using a Portable Chlorophyll Meter. Scientia Horticulture 82: 339 - 348.
  • Turan M, Horuz A, 2012. Bitki Besleme. Bitki Beslemenin Temel İlkeri (Ed: M. R. Karaman), Gübretaş Rehber Kitaplar Dizisi: 2, s. 123-345
  • Uysal E, Sağlam MT, Büyükyılmaz M, 2013. Effects to Chlorophyll Content of Fertigation and Foliar Nitrogen Application on Deveci Pear Variety. Soil-Water Journal Special Issue for AGRICASIA’2013 1st Central Asia Congress on Modern Agricultural Techniques and Plant Nutrition 1-3 October 2013, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan, p. 67-74
  • Van den Berg AK, Perkins TD, 2004. Evaluation of Portable Chlorophyll Meter to Estimate Chlorophyll and Nitrogen Contents in Sugar Maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.) leaves. Forest Ecology and Management 200:113 - 117.
  • Witham FH, Blaydes DF, Devlin RM, 1971. Experiments in Plant Physiology. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, USA.

Effects of Nitrogen Fertilization on the Chlorophyll Content of Apple

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 12 - 17, 22.10.2018

Öz

The experiment was carried out during 2009 - 2011 period in Yalova
conditions.
The
aim of the experiment is to determine
fertigation and postharvest foliar fertilization
methods with different nitrogen doses (0, 30, 60, 90 g/tree) and application
times
(Application:1 starts at early spring before the buds
burst and ends 40-45 days ago from harvest, Application:2 In addition to A1
postharvest foliar
nitrogen application
, Application:3 starts after blooming
and ends 40-45 days ago from harvest, Application:4 In addition to A3
postharvest foliar
nitrogen application
) effects on leaf chlorophyll content of Golden Sel B apple
variety grafted on M9 rootstock. The experiment was designed according to
randomized block
factorial experiment design with three
replication.
According to the results increasing doses of
nitrogen had increased the
chlorophyll content of the leaves, however no significant
differences was observed due to the different nitrogen application times on the
chlorophyll content.

Kaynakça

  • Curran PJ, Dungan JL, Gholz HL, 1990. Exploring the Relationship Between Reflectance Red Edge and Chl Content in Slash Pine. Tree Physiol. 7: 33 - 48.
  • Ercişli S, 2004. A Short Review of the Fruit Germplasm Resources of Turkey. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 51: 419 - 435.
  • FAO, (2017). FAOSTAT production data [online]. Available at http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC (Acces data: 15.06.2017)
  • Filella I, Serrano L, Serra J, Penuelas J, 1995. Evaluating Wheat Nitrogen Status with Canopy Reflectance Indices and Discriminant Analysis. Crop Sci. 35: 1400 - 1405.
  • Gaskell M, 2004. Acid injection in irrigation water improwing pH adjustment for blueberries. Available from URL: http://www.sbceo.k12.ca.us/~uccesb1/sf1002.htm (Acces data: 02.07.2008)
  • Kacar B, Katkat AV, Öztürk Ş, 2002. Bitki Fizyolojisi. Uludağ Üniversitesi Güçlendirme Vakfı Yayın No: 198, Vipaş .Ş. Yayın No: 74, s. 224-292, İstanbul.
  • Kowalczyk-Jusko A, Koscik B, 2002. Possible Use of the Chlorophyll Meter (SPAD-502) for Evaluation Nitrogen Nutrition of the Virginia Tobacco. Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities 5 (1): 05.
  • Lei C Tao, ShaoLing W, GaiFang Z, ShuTian Y, Bing T, YongChun J, HuiLian MC, 2010. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Fruit Quality and Leaf Physiological Metabolism of Hosui Pear. Journal of Fruit Science 27 (6): 871 - 876.
  • Neto CB, Carranca C, Clemente J, Varennes A, 2011. Assessing the Nitrogen Nutritional Status of Young Non-Bearing ‘Rocha’ Pear Trees Grown in a Mediterranean Region by Using c Chlorophyll Meter. Journal of Plant Nutrition 34: 627 - 639.
  • Odabaş F, 1981. Effects to Chlorophyll Content of Nitrogen Fertilization on Bacchus Variety (Vitis Vinifera L.).Atatürk University Journal of the FacultyofAgriculture 12(2): 39-50.
  • O’Rourke D, 2003. World Production, Trade, Consumption and Economic Outlook for Apples In: Ferree DC, Warrington IJ, editors. Apples: Botany, Production and Uses. CABI Publishing, Cab International UK, pp. 15 - 28
  • Özçağıran R, Ünal A, Özeker E, İsfendiyaroğlu M, 2004. Ilıman İklim Meyve türleri (Yumuşak Çekirdekli Meyveler Cilt-II) Ege Üniv. Zir. Fak. Yayın 556, İzmir, 200 s.
  • Prsa I, Stampar F, Vodnik D, Veberic R, 2007. Influence of Nitrogen on Leaf Chlorophyll Content and Photosynthesis of ‘Golden Delicious’ Apple. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B-Soil and Plant Science 57: 283 - 289.
  • Shaahan MM, El-Sayed AA, Abou El-Nour EAA, 1999. Predicting Nitrogen, Magnesium and Iron Nutritional Status in Some Perennial Crops Using a Portable Chlorophyll Meter. Scientia Horticulture 82: 339 - 348.
  • Turan M, Horuz A, 2012. Bitki Besleme. Bitki Beslemenin Temel İlkeri (Ed: M. R. Karaman), Gübretaş Rehber Kitaplar Dizisi: 2, s. 123-345
  • Uysal E, Sağlam MT, Büyükyılmaz M, 2013. Effects to Chlorophyll Content of Fertigation and Foliar Nitrogen Application on Deveci Pear Variety. Soil-Water Journal Special Issue for AGRICASIA’2013 1st Central Asia Congress on Modern Agricultural Techniques and Plant Nutrition 1-3 October 2013, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan, p. 67-74
  • Van den Berg AK, Perkins TD, 2004. Evaluation of Portable Chlorophyll Meter to Estimate Chlorophyll and Nitrogen Contents in Sugar Maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.) leaves. Forest Ecology and Management 200:113 - 117.
  • Witham FH, Blaydes DF, Devlin RM, 1971. Experiments in Plant Physiology. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, USA.
Toplam 18 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Erdinç Uysal 0000-0003-3809-4156

Yayımlanma Tarihi 22 Ekim 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2018 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster