ИҚТИСОДИЁТ ВА БАХТ: АДАБИЁТЛАР ТАҲЛИЛИ

Shoirakhon Nurdinova

ИҚТИСОДИЁТ ВА БАХТ: АДАБИЁТЛАР ТАҲЛИЛИ

Öz

Мазкур тадқиқотнинг мақсади иқтисодиёт ва бахт ўртасидаги боғлиқликни ўрганишдир. Ушбу мақсадда тадқиқотда адабиётларни тизимли таҳлили усулидан фойдаланилган. Таҳлил Дунё Бахтиёрлик Маълумотлар Базасидан ўрин олган маълумотларга асосланади. Таҳлил натижаларига кўра, иқтисодий ўсиш ва бахт ўртасида тўғридан-тўғри боғлиқлик мавжуд.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Angeles, Luis. 2011. “A Closer Look at the Easterlin Paradox.” The Journal of Socio-Economics 40 (1): 67–73.
Ball, Richard, and Kateryna Chernova. 2008. “Absolute Income, Relative Income, and Happiness.” Social Indicators Research 88 (3): 497–529.
Baltatescu, Sergiu. 2006. “Transition Is over, Wait to See the Benefits: A Comparative Evaluation of the Effects of Post-Communist Transition on Life Satisfaction.” The End of Transitions.
Bjørnskov, Christian. 2014. “Do Economic Reforms Alleviate Subjective Well-Being Losses of Economic Crises?” Journal of Happiness Studies 15 (1): 163–82.
Bjørnskov, Christian, Nabanita Datta Gupta, and Peder J. Pedersen. 2008. “Analysing Trends in Subjective Well-Being in 15 European Countries, 1973–2002.” Journal of Happiness Studies 9 (2): 317–30.
Bonasia, Mariangela, Oreste Napolitano, and Nicola Spagnolo. 2018. “Happy PIIGS?” Journal of Happiness Studies 19 (6): 1763–82.
Cheung, Felix. 2018. “Income Redistribution Predicts Greater Life Satisfaction across Individual, National, and Cultural Characteristics.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 115 (5): 867.
Clark, Andrew E., Paul Frijters, and Michael A. Shields. 2008. “Relative Income, Happiness, and Utility: An Explanation for the Easterlin Paradox and Other Puzzles.” Journal of Economic Literature 46 (1): 95–144.

Di Tella, Rafael, and Robert MacCulloch. 2008. “Gross National Happiness as an Answer to the Easterlin Paradox?” Journal of Development Economics 86 (1): 22–42.
Easterlin, Richard A. 1974. “Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence.” In Nations and Households in Economic Growth, 89–125. Elsevier.
———. 2005. “Diminishing Marginal Utility of Income? Caveat Emptor.” Social Indicators Research 70 (3): 243–55.
Fahey, Tony, and Emer Smyth. 2004. “The Link between Subjective Well-Being and Objective Conditions in European Societies.” European Values at the Turn of the Millennium 7: 57–80.
Fischer, Claude S. 2008. “What Wealth-Happiness Paradox? A Short Note on the American Case.” Journal of Happiness Studies 9 (2): 219–26.
Helliwell, John F., Haifang Huang, Shawn Grover, and Shun Wang. 2014. “Empirical Linkages between Good Government and National Well-Being.” National Bureau of Economic Research.
Ouweneel, Р. 1987. “Geluk Volgt Welvaart. (Happiness Follows Welfare).” Economisch Statistische Berichten 3622: 840–42.
Ovaska, Tomi, and Ryo Takashima. 2006. “Economic Policy and the Level of Self-Perceived Well-Being: An International Comparison.” The Journal of Socio-Economics 35 (2): 308–25.
Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés, and Kristina Maslauskaite. 2012. “Can Policy Make Us Happier? Individual Characteristics, Socio-Economic Factors and Life Satisfaction in Central and Eastern Europe.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 5 (1): 77–96.
Senik, Claudia. 2014. “The French Unhappiness Puzzle: The Cultural Dimension of Happiness.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 106: 379–401.
Stevenson, Betsey, and Justin Wolfers. 2008. “Economic Growth and Subjective Well-Being: Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox.” National Bureau of Economic Research.
Van Hemert, Dianne A., Fons JR Van De Vijver, and Ype H. Poortinga. 2002. “The Beck Depression Inventory as a Measure of Subjective Well-Being: A Cross-National Study.” Journal of Happiness Studies 3 (3): 257–86.
Veenhoven, Ruut, and Michael Hagerty. 2006. “Rising Happiness in Nations 1946–2004: A Reply to Easterlin.” Social Indicators Research 79 (3): 421–36.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

-

Bölüm

Derleme

Yazarlar

Shoirakhon Nurdinova ^*
0000-0002-2080-6031
Uzbekistan

Yayımlanma Tarihi

28 Haziran 2021

Gönderilme Tarihi

14 Mayıs 2021

Kabul Tarihi

21 Mayıs 2021

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2021 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA53EL92JM

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Nurdinova, S. (2021). ИҚТИСОДИЁТ ВА БАХТ: АДАБИЁТЛАР ТАҲЛИЛИ. Milli Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(1), 126-134. https://izlik.org/JA53EL92JM

AMA

1.Nurdinova S. ИҚТИСОДИЁТ ВА БАХТ: АДАБИЁТЛАР ТАҲЛИЛИ. MİKAD. 2021;5(1):126-134. https://izlik.org/JA53EL92JM

Chicago

Nurdinova, Shoirakhon. 2021. “ИҚТИСОДИЁТ ВА БАХТ: АДАБИЁТЛАР ТАҲЛИЛИ”. Milli Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi 5 (1): 126-34. https://izlik.org/JA53EL92JM.

EndNote

Nurdinova S (01 Haziran 2021) ИҚТИСОДИЁТ ВА БАХТ: АДАБИЁТЛАР ТАҲЛИЛИ. Milli Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi 5 1 126–134.

IEEE

[1]S. Nurdinova, “ИҚТИСОДИЁТ ВА БАХТ: АДАБИЁТЛАР ТАҲЛИЛИ”, MİKAD, c. 5, sy 1, ss. 126–134, Haz. 2021, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA53EL92JM

ISNAD

Nurdinova, Shoirakhon. “ИҚТИСОДИЁТ ВА БАХТ: АДАБИЁТЛАР ТАҲЛИЛИ”. Milli Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi 5/1 (01 Haziran 2021): 126-134. https://izlik.org/JA53EL92JM.

JAMA

1.Nurdinova S. ИҚТИСОДИЁТ ВА БАХТ: АДАБИЁТЛАР ТАҲЛИЛИ. MİKAD. 2021;5:126–134.

MLA

Nurdinova, Shoirakhon. “ИҚТИСОДИЁТ ВА БАХТ: АДАБИЁТЛАР ТАҲЛИЛИ”. Milli Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi, c. 5, sy 1, Haziran 2021, ss. 126-34, https://izlik.org/JA53EL92JM.

Vancouver

1.Shoirakhon Nurdinova. ИҚТИСОДИЁТ ВА БАХТ: АДАБИЁТЛАР ТАҲЛИЛИ. MİKAD [Internet]. 01 Haziran 2021;5(1):126-34. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA53EL92JM