John Banville’in Tutanak Defteri Başlıklı Romanında Bakışın Travması

Öz

John Banville’ın sanat üçlemesinin ilki olan Tutanak Defteri, okuru bakan özneler ve bakılan nesnelerle dolu bir hikâye evrenine sokan, ekfrastik bir suç anlatısıdır. Kendisini “yüzergezer bir göz” olarak tarif eden bir katilin ağzından anlatılan roman, öznelik, bakış ve güç/iktidar arasındaki karmaşık ilişkiye dair sorular ortaya koyar. Bu makalenin amacı, Tutanak Defteri başlıklı romanın sembolik evrenini, anlatıcı karakterin travmatik cinayet deneyiminde bakışın ve bakma eyleminin oynadığı belirleyici rol açısından okumaktır. Bu çerçevede, tartışmanın genelinde, benliğin Öteki ile ilişkisinin oluşumunda ve teyidinde bakışın ve bakma eyleminin önemini irdelemeyi amaçlayan bir eleştirel izlek takip edilecektir. Bir tür semiyotik mekanizma olan bakışın, bakılanı nesneleştirmede bir iktidar aracı olarak kullanılması, özellikle eril bakışın erkek egemen dinamikleri bağlamında ele alınacaktır. Bu tartışma çerçevesinde, makalenin, Banville ve Tutanak Defteri üzerine şimdiye kadar üretilen literatüre katkıda bulunması ve sunduğu farklı kavramsal mercek ile Banville’in ekfrastik içeriğine dair üretilen eleştiri arşivini zengin- leştirmesi umulmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• John Banville
• The Book of Evidence
• Trauma

Trauma of the Gaze in John Banville’s The Book of Evidence

Öz

John Banville’s The Book of Evidence, the first book of his art trilogy, is an ekphrastic crime novel that introduces the reader to a storyworld populated with gazing subjects and gazed objects. Narrated by a murderer who describes himself as a “floating eye”, the novel raises questions about the complex link between subjectivity, gaze, and power. This article aims to introduce a critical reading of the symbolic universe of The Book of Evidence in terms of the shaping role the gaze plays in the protagonist’s traumatic experience of murder. The overall discussion will follow a critical trajectory that seeks to explore the pivotal significance of the gaze and the act of looking in the formation and affirmation of the self in relation and response to the Other. The gaze as a particular semiotic mechanism will be addressed as a tool of exercising power on the object of the gaze especially in the context of the phallocentric dynamics of the male gaze. With this argumentative frame, the article seeks to contribute to the critical literature on Banville and The Book of Evidence by introducing a different conceptual lens that may enrich the archive of readings on Banville’s ekphrastic content.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• John Banville
• The Book of Evidence
• Trauma

Kaynakça

1. Banville J. 2001, The Book of Evidence. New York.
2. Benjamin W. 2002, The Arcades Project. Trans. by Holand Eiland & Kevin McLaughlin. Cambridge, Massachusetts.
3. Berger J. 1985a, Ways of Seeing. London.
4. Berger J. 1985b “The Storyteller”. Ed. Lloyd Spencer, The Sense of Sight: Writings by John Berger. New York, 13-18.
5. Blanchot M. 1989, The Space of Literature. Lincoln, London.
6. Debord G, 2014. The Society of the Spectacle. Trans. by Ken Knabb. Bureau of Public Secrets.
7. Foucault M. 2008, “Las Meninas”. The Order of Things. London and New York, 3-18.
8. Freud S. 1997, “Medusa’s Head”. Writings on Art and Literature. Stanford, 264-65.

9. Ghassemi M. 2019, “Reading Banville with Lacan: Hysteric Aesthetics in The Book of Evidence”. Eds. P. Palazzolo, M. Springer & S. Butler. John Banville and His Precursors. London, 177-194.
10. Kaplan E. A. 1983, Women and Film: Both Sides of the Camera. London and New York.
11. Lacan J. 1998, The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis: The Seminar of Jacques
12. Lacan, Book XI. Ed. Jacques-Alain Miller. Trans. By Alan Sheridan. New York and London.
13. Luckhurst R. 2008, The Trauma Question. New York.
14. Mulvey L. 1999, “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema”. Eds. Leo Braudy & Marshall Cohen, Film Theory and Criticism: Introductory Readings. New York, 833-44.
15. Murphy N. 2019, “John Banville’s Ekphrastic Experiments”. Eds. P. Palazzolo, M. Springer & S.
16. Butler. John Banville and His Precursors. London, 234-249.
17. Müller A. 2004, “‘You Have Been Framed’: The Function of Ekphrasis for the Representation of
18. Women in John Banville’s Trilogy (The Book of Evidence, Ghosts, Athena)”. Studies in the Novel 36/2, 185-205.
19. O’Connell M. 2013, John Banville’s Narcissistic Fictions. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
20. Sartre J. P. 1956, Being and Nothingness. Trans. by Hazel E. Barnes. New York.
21. Seltzer M. 1997, “Wound Culture: Trauma in the Pathological Public Sphere”. October 80, 3-26.
22. Žižek S. 1992, Looking Awry: An Introduction to Jacques Lacan Through Popular Culture. Cambridge, MA.