Öğrencilerin Edebi Türler ile İlgili Metaforik Algıları Üzerine Bir Çalışma

Öz

Dilin algılanması ile ilgili farklı açılardan çalışmalar yapılmış olmasına rağmen edebiyatın algılanışı daha az araştırma yapılmış bir alandır. Bu nedenle edebiyatın algılanışı ile ilgili daha fazla niteliksel araştırmanın yapılması gerekmektedir. Bu çalışma, öğrencilerin edebi türler ile ilgili algılarını kullan-dıkları metaforik kavramlar ile araştırmayı amaçlamıştır. Çünkü metaforlar dünyayı algılama biçimimizi yansıtır ve profesyonel fikirlerimizi ve tutumlarımızı biçimlendirir. Ayrıca bu çalışma birinci sınıf ve dördüncü sınıf öğrencilerinin edebi türlere bakış açılarındaki farkı araştırmaktadır. Bu çalışmaya, İstanbul Üniversitesi İngiliz Dili ve Edebiyatı bölümü birinci sınıf öğrencilerinden 58, dördüncü sınıf öğrencilerinden 43 kişi katılmıştır. Çalışmanın verileri öğrencilerle yapılan görüşme, çoktan seçmeli anket ve metaforlarını yazmaları için hazırlanan form aracılığıyla elde edilmiştir. Edebi türler ile ilgili metaforlar, öğrencilerin olumlu ve olumsuz bakış açılarını yansıtmaktadır. Yüzük, Narnia, yoğunlaş-tırılmış deterjan, iksir ve nar öğrencilerin oluşturdukları özgün ve olumlu metaforlardan bir kısmıdır. Pandora’nın kutusu, kara delik, sarmaşık ve labirent gibi bazı metaforların olumsuz olduğu görülmekte-dir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Edebiyatın Algılanışı
• Edebi Türler
• Metaforik Algılar
• Kavramsal Metaforlar

A Study of the Learners' Metaphorical Perceptions of Literary Genres

Öz

The perception of language has been studied from various aspects to date, whereas how students perceive literature remains today a less researched area. The quantity of qualitative research concerning the perception of literature needs to be increased. The present study aims to fill this gap by exploring students’ perception in respect to the concept of literary genres through the use of metaphor as they reflect the way we perceive the world and shape our professional ideas and attitudes. In addition, the study investigates whether there is a difference in perceptions between junior and senior learners in regard to their perception of literary genres. The study participants were 58 first and 43 fourth grade ELL students enrolled in İstanbul University, Turkey. The data were collected through the use of semi structured interviews, multiple-choice questionnaire and metaphor elicitation papers. The metaphors of literary genres exhibited both the positive and negative perceptions of the learners. The Ring, Narnia, detergent concentrate, veritaserum (‘iksir’ in Turkish) and pomegranate were some of the unique positive metaphors of the learners. Some metaphors seem to be negative such as Pandora’s Box, dark hole, ivy and labyrinth.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Perception of Literature
• Literary Genres
• Metaphorical Perceptions

Kaynakça

1. Ahkemoğlu H. (2011). A Study on Metaphorical Perceptions of EFL Learners Regarding Foreign Language Teacher. Published Master Thesis. Çukurova University, Adana 2011.
2. Akyel A. & Yalçın E. (1990). “Literature in the EFL Class: A Study of Goal Achievement Incongruence”. ELT Journal 44/3 (1990) 174-180.
3. Arıkan A. (2005). “An Evaluation of Literature Component of Hacettepe University English Language Teaching Department”. Hacettepe University Journal of Education 29/1 (2005) 27-33.
4. Balcı A. (1999). Metaphorical Images of School: School Perceptions of Students, Teachers and Parents from Four Selected Schools. Unpublished Master Thesis. Middle East Technical University, Ankara 1999.
5. Bibik J. M. (1997). Metaphors for Teaching: How Health and Physical Education Teachers Describe Their Roles. Georgetown 1997.
6. Bredeson P. V. (1988). “Languages of Leadership: Metaphor Making in Educational Administration”. Administrator’s Handbook 32/6 (1988) 234-243.
7. Bullough R. V. Jr. (1991). “Exploring Personal Teaching Metaphors in Pre-Service Teacher Education”. Journal of Teacher Education 42/1 (1991) 43-51.
8. Dana N. F. & Pitts J. H. (1993). “The Use of Metaphor and Reflective Coaching in the Explanation of Principal Thinking: A Case Study of Principal Change”. Educational Administration Quarterly 29/3 (1993) 23-338.

9. Davis J. N., Gorell L. C., Kline R. R. & Hsieh G. (1992). “Readers and Foreign Languages: A Survey of Undergraduate Attitudes Towards the Study of Literature”. The Modern Language Journal 76/3 (1992) 320-332.
10. Elford C. (1996). Performance Indicators in Postsecondary Education in Alberta Analysis. Albuquerque 1996.
11. Godina H. (1995). Metaphorical Children’s Writing in a Whole-Language Classroom. New Orleans 1995.
12. Herbst P. (1997). “The Number-Line Metaphor in the Discourse of a Textbook Series”. For the Learning of Mathematics 17/3 (1997) 36-45.
13. Hirvela A. & Boyle J. (1988). “Literature courses and student attitudes”. ELT Journal 42/3 (1988) 179-184.
14. Hanson M. (1984). “Exploration of Mixed Metaphors in Educational Administration”. Research Issues in Education 23/1 (1984) 167-185.
15. Johnson-Sheehan R. (1997). “The Emergence of Root Metaphor in Modern Physics: Max Planck’s ‘Quantum’ Metaphor”. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 27/2 (1997) 177-190.
16. Karbach J. (1997). Metaphors in Comments and Classrooms. Orlando 1997.
17. Kesen A. (2010). “Turkish EFL Learners' Metaphors with Respect to English Language Course Books”. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language) 4/1 (2010) 108-118.
18. Kelly G. A. (1955). The Psychology of Personal Constructs: A Theory of Personality. New York 1955.
19. Kliebart H. M. (1980). “Curriculum Theory as Metaphor”. Theory into Practice 21/1 (1980) 11-17.
20. Lakoff G. & Johnson M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago 1980.
21. Marchant G. J. A. (1992). “Teacher is Like a…: Using Simile Lists to Explore Personal Metaphors”. Language and Education 21/1 (1992) 377-398.
22. Nikitina L. & Furuoka F. (2008). “Measuring Metaphors: A Factor Analysis of Students’ Conceptions of Language Teachers”. Metaphorik.de 15/1 (2008) 161-180.
23. Ortony A. & Fainsilber L. (1989). “The Role of Metaphors in Descriptions of Emotions”. Ed. Y. Wilks, Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing (1989) 181-184. Norwood.
24. Parvaresh V. (2008). “Metaphorical Conceptualisations of an Adult EFL Leaner: Where Old Concepts are Impregnable”. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language) 2/2 (2008) 154-161.
25. Steinhoff C. R. & Owens R. G. (1987). “The Organizational Culture Assessment Inventory: Metaphorical Analysis in Educational Settings”. Journal of Educational Administration 27/3 (1987) 17-23.
26. Tseng F. (2010). “Introducing Literature to an EFL Classroom: Teacher’s Presentations and Students’ Perceptions”. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 1/1 (2010) 53-65.
27. Yıldırım A. & Şimşek H. (2005). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara 2005.