Araştırma Makalesi

Feedback Complexity and Writing Skill: The Relative Effectiveness of No Feedback, Error-flagging and Response-contingent Feedback Types

Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2 30 Aralık 2014
PDF İndir

Feedback Complexity and Writing Skill: The Relative Effectiveness of No Feedback, Error-flagging and Response-contingent Feedback Types

Öz

Despite controversies about the value of presenting written corrective feedback, research suggests that feedback has an undeniably significant role in improving performance in skill learning. However, little extant research has attended the different types of feedback ranged along a dimension of complexity. Thirty participants participated in this study in order to compare their writing accuracy under the no feedback, error-flagging, response-contingent and control conditions. The results of repeated measures, ANOVA revealed a significant main effect and interaction effect for feedback types on the accuracy improvement of learners from pre-test to post-test. Overall, these results suggest that unelaborated feedback is of limited pedagogical value, whereas elaborated feedback can contribute to linguistic accuracy in L2 writing.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Ashwell, T. (2000). “Patterns of Teacher Response to Student Writing in a Multiple-Draft Composition Classroom: Is Content Feedback Followed by Form Feedback the Best Method?”. Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 227-257.
  2. Bitchener, J. (2008). “Evidence in Support of Written Corrective Feedback”. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17/2, 69-124.
  3. Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). “The Effect of Different Types of Corrective Feedback on ESL Students”. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12/3, 191-205.
  4. Carroll, S., Swain, M., & Roberge, Y. (1992). “The Role of Feedback in Adult Second Language Acquisition: Error Correction and Morphological Generalizations”. Applied Psycholinguistics, 13/2, 173-198.
  5. Chandler, J. (2003). “The Efficacy of Various Kinds of Error Feedback for Improvement in the Accuracy and Fluency of L2 Student Writing”. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 267-296.
  6. Corbett, A. T., & Anderson, J. R. (2001). “Locus of Feedback Control in Computer-Based Tutoring: Impact on Learning Rate, Achievement and Attitudes”. In Proceedings of ACM CHI 2001conference on human factors in computing systems, 245–252. New York: ACM Press.
  7. Dempsey, J., Driscoll, M., & Swindell, L. (1993). “Text-Based Feedback”. Eds.: Dempsey & G. Sales. Interactive Instruction and Feedback, 21-54. Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology Publications.
  8. Fazio, L. (2001). “The Effect pf Corrections and Commentaries on the Journal Writing Accuracy of Minority- and Majority-Language Students”. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 55-69.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

Eğitim Sosyolojisi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Javad Gholami Bu kişi benim
Iran

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Aralık 2014

Gönderilme Tarihi

1 Temmuz 2014

Kabul Tarihi

1 Ağustos 2014

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2014 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
Zeinolabedini, M., & Gholami, J. (2014). Feedback Complexity and Writing Skill: The Relative Effectiveness of No Feedback, Error-flagging and Response-contingent Feedback Types. Akdeniz İnsani Bilimler Dergisi, 4(2), 373-382. https://izlik.org/JA86LY25LK
AMA
1.Zeinolabedini M, Gholami J. Feedback Complexity and Writing Skill: The Relative Effectiveness of No Feedback, Error-flagging and Response-contingent Feedback Types. MJH. 2014;4(2):373-382. https://izlik.org/JA86LY25LK
Chicago
Zeinolabedini, Maryam, ve Javad Gholami. 2014. “Feedback Complexity and Writing Skill: The Relative Effectiveness of No Feedback, Error-flagging and Response-contingent Feedback Types”. Akdeniz İnsani Bilimler Dergisi 4 (2): 373-82. https://izlik.org/JA86LY25LK.
EndNote
Zeinolabedini M, Gholami J (01 Aralık 2014) Feedback Complexity and Writing Skill: The Relative Effectiveness of No Feedback, Error-flagging and Response-contingent Feedback Types. Akdeniz İnsani Bilimler Dergisi 4 2 373–382.
IEEE
[1]M. Zeinolabedini ve J. Gholami, “Feedback Complexity and Writing Skill: The Relative Effectiveness of No Feedback, Error-flagging and Response-contingent Feedback Types”, MJH, c. 4, sy 2, ss. 373–382, Ara. 2014, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA86LY25LK
ISNAD
Zeinolabedini, Maryam - Gholami, Javad. “Feedback Complexity and Writing Skill: The Relative Effectiveness of No Feedback, Error-flagging and Response-contingent Feedback Types”. Akdeniz İnsani Bilimler Dergisi 4/2 (01 Aralık 2014): 373-382. https://izlik.org/JA86LY25LK.
JAMA
1.Zeinolabedini M, Gholami J. Feedback Complexity and Writing Skill: The Relative Effectiveness of No Feedback, Error-flagging and Response-contingent Feedback Types. MJH. 2014;4:373–382.
MLA
Zeinolabedini, Maryam, ve Javad Gholami. “Feedback Complexity and Writing Skill: The Relative Effectiveness of No Feedback, Error-flagging and Response-contingent Feedback Types”. Akdeniz İnsani Bilimler Dergisi, c. 4, sy 2, Aralık 2014, ss. 373-82, https://izlik.org/JA86LY25LK.
Vancouver
1.Maryam Zeinolabedini, Javad Gholami. Feedback Complexity and Writing Skill: The Relative Effectiveness of No Feedback, Error-flagging and Response-contingent Feedback Types. MJH [Internet]. 01 Aralık 2014;4(2):373-82. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA86LY25LK

Açık Erişim ve Telif Politikası

by-nc-sa.png

Akdeniz İnsani Bilimler Dergisi (MJH) CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 lisansı altında yayınlanmaktadır.

35200

MJH Açık Erişim bir dergidir ve yayımladığı içeriği doğrudan açık erişime sunar.
Yayın Sahibi

Akdeniz Üniversitesi, Edebiyat Fakültesi

Yazışma Adresi
Akdeniz İnsani Bilimler Dergisi (MJH), Akdeniz Üniversitesi, Edebiyat Fakültesi 07058 Kampüs, Konyaaltı, Antalya Türkiye

Yayın Periyodu: Yılda iki sayı (Haziran – Aralık)

E-ISSN: 2148-144X

E-posta: mjh@akdeniz.edu.tr