Historiography as a Tool for Nationbuilding: The Case of Turkey

Yıl 2013, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2 , 209 - 230 , 30.12.2013

Armand Sağ

https://izlik.org/JA76GY48FP

Öz

Almost every country in the world is based upon nationalism. Some are based on a spiritual unity, while others focus on an ethnic or racial background. In all of these theories, there is the element of creating an unity through the process of nation-building. In this process, one can use multiple sources. Among these are songs, poems, writings, historiography and much more. In particular the case of historiography is emphasized in this article as historiography can be best implemented by using history text books for education. In this way, generations of school children can enjoy historiography that will make them grow into a unity with their fellow countrymen. In the case of Turkey, this tool of histo- riography is used to depict a new nation. I argue that this image of the nation is not based upon ethnicity, racial background, nor even linguistics or religion but mainly on geography. And in order to create a geographical basis, historiography was used as a tool to promote the military glorification of Anatolia. The strong focus on Anatolia also meant neglecting other geographical regions, of which the Balkans seem to be the most neglected, due to the military humilitation the Turks encounted in those regions.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Nation-building , historiography , Turkey , Balkans , Anatolia , geography , military glorification

Kaynakça

• Adhikari, S., & Mukul Kamle, M. (2010). “The Kashmir: An Unresolved Dispute Between India and Pakistan”. Geopolitics Quarterly, VI/4, 58-107.
• Ahmad, F. (1993). The Making of Modern Turkey. London: Routledge.
• Akçam, T. (2006). A Shameful Act: The Armenian Genocide and the question of Turkish responsibility. New York: Metropolitan.
• Akçam, T. (2007). De Armeense Genocide: een reconstructie. Amsterdam: Nieuw Amsterdam.
• Almond, G., & Pye, L. (eds. 1965). Comparative Political Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Altınay, A. G. (2004). The Myth of the Military-Nation: Militarism, Gender, And Education in Turkey. New York: Palgra, & Macmillan.
• Anderson, B. (1991 [1983]). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism. 2nd edition. London: Verso.
• Arıca, S. T., & Yaşasınoğlu, A. (2010). Çeyrek Asrın Soruları: Tarih Çıkmış 1985-2010 Soruları, (The Questions of a quarter century: History questions between 1985-2010). Ankara: Örnek Yayınevi.
• Baykara, T. (2000). The Meaning of Turk: Turk's Brief History and Present. Ankara: Atatürk Culture Centre.
• Belge, M. (2010). “Genç Kalemler and Turkish Nationalism”. Eds. Kerslake, C., Öktem, K., & Robins, P. Turkey’s Engagement with Modernity: Conflict and Change in the Twentieth Century, 27-37. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Berkes, N. (1959). Turkish Nationalism and Western Civilization. Connecticut: Greenwood Press.
• Bozdoğan, S. (2001). Modernism and Nation Building: Turkish Architectural Culture in the Early Republic. Washington: University of Washington Press.
• Bozkurt, İ. (2002). “Kıbrıs'ın Tarihine Kısa Bir Bakış”, (A Short View of the History of Cyprus). Eds. İ. K. Ülger, & E. Efegil. Avrupa Birliği Kıskacında Kıbrıs Meselesi: Bugünü ve Yarını, 9-15. ('The Cyprus Issue in the grip of the European Union: the present and the future). Ankara: Ahşen Yayıncılık.
• Cassirer, E. (2009). The Myth of the State. Connecticut: Yale University Press.