Differences in the Perception of Health among the Urban Poor Living in Two Squatter House Neighbourhoods in Ankara

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1, 309 - 333, 30.06.2018

Yelda Özen Helga Rıttersberger-tılıç

Öz

This study aims to understand the differences in conceptualizations of health and illness among the urban poor. Although the interconnections between poverty and health have been revealed many times, sometimes lumping the poor together into one homogeneous mass. But how poor individuals perceive health and illness has not received much attention sociologically, especially in the Turkish context. This study examined the urban poor’s perceptions relating to health through in-depth interviews with 40 participants in two squatter housing neighbourhoods in Altındağ, a district in Ankara. In the study, a qualitative research method was used on the basis of primary and qualitative data. To understand the respondents’ health-related perspective, their subjective health and wellbeing; their views about the causation of their illness; how they define/explain health, being healthy, the prerequisites of health and being healthy, and the causes of disease were analysed according to gender, age, poverty experiences and the state of being healthy/ill. The findings show that poverty experiences, age, gender and being permanently sick are influential on perceptions of health and illness. Four constructs were found in the sample: health as the absence of illness, health as tool or capital, health as product or consequence and health as peace and wellbeing.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Health Perception, Health Construct, Lay perspective, Urban Poverty, Squatter House

Differences in the Perception of Health among the Urban Poor Living in Two Squatter House Neighbourhoods in Ankara

Öz

Kaynakça

• Adak N. (ed.) (2016). Sağlık Sosyolojisinde Güncel Tartışmalar. Ankara 2016.
• Adak N. (2002). Sağlık Sosyolojisi: Kadın ve Kentleşme. İstanbul 2002.
• Akşit B. & Akşit B. (1997). “Mother's Education, Differential Child Valuation and Infant/Child Mortality”. Eds. L. Visaria, J. Simons, P. Berman. Mother's Education and Child Survival: Pathways and Evidence (2009) 128-135. New Delhi.
• Akşit B. & Akşit B. (1989). “Socio-Cultural Determinants of Infant and Child Mortality”. Social Sciences and Medicine 28/6 (1989) 571-579.
• Akşit B. T. (1993). “Rural Health Seeking: Under Fives in Sivas, Van and Ankara”. Ed. P. Stirling. Culture and the Economy: Changes in Turkish Villages (1993) 156-170. Cambridgeshire.
• Alptekin D. (ed.) (2015). Hasta Toplum. Ankara 2015.
• Ayata A. & Ayata S. (2003). “The Benefit Dependent and the Regular Income Earning Poor: The Analysis of the Interview Data”. Turkey: Poverty and Coping After Crisis Vol: II, Background Papers. World Bank, Human Development Unit Europe and Central Asia Region. Report no: 24185-TR.
• Benzeval M., Judge K. & Whitehead M. (1995). Tackling Inequalities in Health: An Agenda for Action. London 1995.
• Blaxter M. (1990). Health and Lifestyle. London 1990.
• Blaxter M. (1983). “The Causes of Disease: Women Talking”. Social Science and Medicine 17 (1990) 59- 69.
• Blaxter M. & Paterson E. (1982). Mothers and Daughters. A Three-Generational Study of Health Attitudes and Behaviour. London 1982.
• Boratav K. (1995). İstanbul ve Anadolu’dan Sınıf Profilleri. İstanbul 1995.
• Bury M. (1982). “Chronic Illness as Biographical Disruption”. Sociology of Health and Illness 4 (1982) 167-182.
• Bury M. (1991). “The Sociology of Chronic Illness”. Sociology of Health and Illness 13/4 (1991)451-468.
• Bury M. (2001). “Illness Narratives. Fact or Fiction?” Sociology of Health and Illness 23/3(2001) 263-285.
• Bury M. (2005). Health and Illness. Cambridge 2005.
• Cirhinlioğlu Z. (2000). Sağlık Sosyolojisi. Ankara 2000.