Disability in Turkey: The Risks in Being Disabled for Accessing Educational Opportunities

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1, 53 - 62, 30.06.2014

Özgür Arun

Öz

Types of impairments are determined by societal perceptions as to what is outside of the ‘normal’ (such as having poor health) and not ‘ideal’ (such as being female). Can it be said that these preconceptions internalized by Turkish society are systemically formed? The objective of this study is to explore the types of obstacles that impede the individual’s participation in societal life within the framework mentioned above through analysing the latest data obtained from TurkStat. Analyses indicate that one of the two types of obstacles individuals face in Turkey is physical impairment, the other is gender. Once obstacles stemming from health conditions are considered together with those related to gender within the field of education, opportunities related to visibility in and integration within the public sphere can be turn understand to be both severely and systemically limited for individuals.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Disability, Education, Gender, Turkey, Correspondence Analysis

Kaynakça

• Arun, Ö. (2012). “Cultivated Citizens? Cultural Capital, Class, Gender and Generations in Contemporary Turkey”. METU Studies in Development, Vol. 39 (3), 283-302.
• Bezmez, D., & Yardımcı, S. (2010). “In search of disability rights: citizenship and Turkish disability organizations”. Disability & Society, Vol. 25 (5), 603-615.
• Bourdieu, P. (1986). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
• Byrne, D., (2002). Interpreting Quantitative Data. London: Sage Publications.
• Clausen, S., E. (1998). Applied Correspondence Analysis: An Introduction. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication.
• Daston, L., (2000). “Review of Desrosieres (1998)”. London Review of Books, 22 (8).
• Foucault, M. (2003). Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975-76 New York: Picador.
• Foucault, M. (1990). The History of Sexuality. New York: Penguin Books.
• Greenacre, M., & Blasius, J. (1994). Correspondence Analysis in the Social Sciences. London: Academic Press.
• Marks, J. (2006). “Biopolitics”. Theory, Culture, and Society. 23 (2-3), 333-335.
• Tufan, İ. (2006) Engellilik. Webpage of the Disables and Their Friends. http://www.engelliler.biz/ SosyalBakis/engellilik_ismailtufan.htm. 27.10.2006.
• Tufan, İ., & Arun, Ö. (2006). 2002 Turkey Disability Survey, Secondary Analysis. TUBITAK: Project Number: SOBAG-104K077.
• Tufan, İ., Yaman, H., & Arun, Ö. (2007). “Disability in Turkey: Suggestions for Overcoming Current Problems”. International Social Work, Vol. 50 (6), 839-45.