CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY: A FRAMEWORK FOR THE SUSTAINABLE FUTURE OF ENLARGED EUROPE

Öz

Sustainable development has provided a significant conceptual approach for the solutions of problems on the triangle of industrialization, urbanization, and population increase. In order to advance the current and future welfare of its members, European Union (EU) has worked to build its development model on the principles of sustainability. The involvement of business organizations to this process is viewed critical to achieve the overarching sustainability principle. However the adoption of sustainability seems to be more problematic among the organizations in the new member and candidate states. The aim of current study is to discuss why and how corporate social responsibility (CSR) can provide a useful framework for these countries in their integration process to EU’s sustainability policy. In the study, after examining the current understanding of CSR in these countries, a network oriented approach is proposed to contribute to the generation of a sustainable future in an enlarged Europe

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Corporate social responsibility
• corporate social responsibility networks
• European Union
• sustainable development

KURUMSAL SOSYAL SORUMLULUK: GENİŞLEYEN AVRUPA’NIN SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR GELECEĞİ İÇİN BİR ÇERÇEVE

Öz

Sürdürülebilir kalkınma, sanayileşme, kentleşme ve nüfus artışı üçgeninde yer alan sorunların çözümünde önemli bir kavramsal yaklaşım sunmaktadır. Avrupa Birliği (AB), üyelerinin günümüzde ve gelecekteki refahlarının artırmak için sürdürülebilirlik ilkesine dayalı bir kalkınma modeli inşa etmek için çalışmaktadır. İşletme örgütlenmelerinin bu sürece katılımı, kapsayıcı nitelikteki sürdürülebilirlik ilkesine ulaşmada kritik önemde görülmektedir. Fakat sürdürülebilirliğin benimsenmesi yeni ve aday ülkelerde bulunan örgütler için daha sorunlu olacak gibi görünmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, kurumsal sosyal sorumluluğun (KSS) AB’nin sürdürülebilirlik politikası ile bütünleşme süreci içerisinde bulunan bu ülkelere niçin ve nasıl yararlı bir çerçeve sunduğunu tartışmaktır. Çalışmada, bu ülkelerde hali hazırda var olan KSS anlayışı ele alındıktan sonra, genişleyen Avrupa’da sürdürülebilir bir gelecek yaratılmasına katkı sağlayacak, network odaklı bir politik yaklaşım öne sürülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Avrupa Birliği
• kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk
• kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk networkleri
• sürdürülebilir kalkınma

Kaynakça

1. Alexander, G.J. and Buchholz, R.A. (1978). “Corporate Social Responsibility and Stock Market Performance”. Academy of Management Journal, 21(3), 479-486.
2. Burke, L. and Logsdon, J.M. (1996). “How Corporate Social Responsibility Pays Off”. Long Range Planning, 29(4), 495-502.
3. Canadian Business for Social Responsibility. http://www.cbsr.ca/, (Accessed 30.06.2011).
4. Carroll, A.B. (1979). “A Three Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Performance”. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497-505.
5. Carte, C.R. (2005).” Purchasing Social Responsibility and Firm Performance: The Key Mediating Roles of Organizational Learning and Supplier Performance”. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 35(3),177-194.
6. CNN (2011). “European Public Debt at a Glance” http://edition.cnn.com/2011/BUSINESS/06/19/europe.debt.explainer/index.html (Accessed 23.06.2011).
7. Conference on 'CSR in an Enlarged Europe'. (2006). The European Commission's Directorate General for Employment, Social Affairs, and Equal Opportunities (DG Employment), Brussels.
8. Commission of the European Communities (2001a). A Sustainable Europe for a Better World: A European Union Strategy for Sustainable Development', COM (2001) 264 final, Brussels.

9. Commission of the European Communities (2001b). Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility. COM(2001) 366 final, Brussels.
10. Commission of the European Communities (2006). Communication from the Commission - Implementing the Partnership for Growth and Jobs: Making Europe a Pole of Excellence on Corporate Social Responsibility. COM(2006) 136final, Brussels.
11. Commission of the European Communities (2011a). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions - A renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for Corporate Social Responsibility. http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/ sustainable-business/files/csr/new-csr/act_en.pdf (Accessed 11.01.2012).
12. Commission of the European Communities (2011b). Enterprise and Industry / Sustainable and Responsible business /Corporate Social Responsibility, http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sustainable-business/corporate-social-responsibility/index_en.htm (Accessed 03.07.2011).
13. CSR360 Global Partner Network (2011). http://www.csr360gpn.org/ (Accessed 30.06.2011).
14. CSR Asia (2011). http://www.csr-asia.com/aboutus.php (Accessed 30.06.2011).
15. CSR Europe (2011). http://www.csreurope.org/ (Accessed 30.06.2011).
16. Dahlsrud, A. (2006). “How Corporate Social Responsibility is Defined: An Analysis of 37 Definitions”. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15, 1-13.
17. Elms, H. (2006). “Corporate (and Stakeholder) Responsibility in Central and Eastern Europe”. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 1(3), 203-211.
18. Emirates Environmental Group (2011). http://www.eeg-uae.org/ (Accessed 30.06.2011).
19. Eurostat (2011a). Economic statistics GDP and main components/Current prices http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=nama_gdp_c&lang= en (Accessed 03.07.2011).
20. Eurostat (2011b). Sustainable Production and Consumption/ Ecolabel Licences.http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&plugin=1&language=en&pcode=tsdpc420 (Accessed 03.07.2011).
21. European Commission Environment Website (2011). http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/ (Accessed 03.07.2011).
22. European Commission Enterprise and Industry Website (2011). Promotion of CSR and Development of CSR Network in Croatia, http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/ policies/sustainable-business/files/csr_platforms/csr_croatia.pdf (Accessed 30.06.2011).
23. European Commission Enterprise and Industry Website (2011). Mainstreaming National CSR Agenda, http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/ sustainable-business/files/csr_platforms/csr_macedonia.pdf (Accessed 30.06.2011).
24. Giraud, B. (2004). Executive Director, CSR Europe, http://www.euractiv.com/en/enlargement/full-interview-bernard-giraud-executive-director-csr-europe/article-128528 [12.05.2011].
25. Grigore, L.N. and Candidatu, C. (2009). “The Perception and Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in Central and Eastern Europe”. Romanian Economic and Business Review, 4(4), 79-88.
26. Hajnalka, F.C. (2006). Hungarian Distinctiveness of CSR in Comparison with the EU Practice. Working Paper (CSR PAPER 13.2006) core-conferences.net/attach/CSR2006-013.pdf (Accessed 07.06.2011).
27. Herremans I.M., Akathaporn, P., and McInnes, M. (1993). “An Investigation of Corporate Social Responsibility Reputation and Economic Performance”. Accounting, Organizations and Society ,18, 587-604.
28. Johnson, H.H. (2003). “Does It Pay To Be Good? Social Responsibility and Financial Performance”. Business Horizons, 46, 34-40.
29. Korka, M. (2005). “Corporate Social Responsibility in Romania: From Theory to Practice”. Transition Studies Review, 12(1), 47-57.
30. Letica, B. (2008). “Three CSR Models in New European Union Member States and Candidate Countries”. Working Paper (CSR PAPER 43.2008) core-conferences.net/attach/CSR2008-043.pdf (Accessed 07.06.2011).
31. Line, M. and Braun, R. (2007). Baseline Study on CSR Practices in the New EU Members States and Candidate Countries. UNDP and the European Commission.
32. Mazurkiewicz, P. and Crown, R. (2005). Opportunities and Options for Governments to Promote Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe and Central Asia: Evidence from Bulgaria, Croatia, and Romania. World Bank.
33. Mazurkiewicz, P., Crown, R., and Bartelli, V. (2005a). What Does Business Think about Corporate Social Responsibility? Part I: A Comparison of Attitudes and Practices in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuenia. World Bank.
34. Mazurkiewicz, P., Crown, R., and Bartelli, V. (2005b). What Does Business Think about Corporate Social Responsibility? Part II: A Comparison of Attitudes and Practices in Hungary, Poland and Slovakia. World Bank.
35. McGuire, J.B., Sundgren, A., and Schneeweis, T. (1988). “Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance”. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 854-872.
36. Nielsen, A.E. and Thomsen, C. (2011). “Sustainable Development: The Role of Network Communication”. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 18(1), 1-10.
37. Perkins, R. and Neumayer, E. (2004). “Europeanisation and the Uneven Convergence of Environmental Policy: Explaining the Geography of EMAS”. Environment and Planning C, 22(6), 881-897.
38. Porter, M.E. and Kramer, M.R. (2002). “The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy”. Harvard Business Review, 80, 56-65.
39. Secchi, D. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe: Analyzing Business in Transnational Contexts. Working Paper. Economics and Quantitative Methods. University of Insubria. http://eco.uninsubria.it/dipeco/Quaderni/files/QF2004_34.pdf(Accessed 06.05.2011).
40. Snider, J., Hill, R.P., and Martin, D. (2003). “Corporate Social Responsibility in the 21st Century: A View from the World's Most Successful Firms”. Journal of Business Ethics, 48, 175-187.
41. Tencati, A., Perini, F., and Pogutz, S. (2004). “New Tools to Foster Corporate Socially Responsible Behaviour". Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 173–190.
42. United Nations Development Programme (2008). Turkey Corporate Social Responsibility Baseline Report http://www.undp.org.tr/publicationsDocuments/ CSR_Report_en.pdf (Accessed 30.06.2011).
43. United Nations Global Compact (2011). http://www.unglobalcompact.org/AboutTheGC/, (Accessed 30.06.2011).
44. Votaw, D. (1972). “Genius Became Rare: A Comment on the Doctrine of Social Responsibility”. California Management Review, 15(2), 25-31.
45. Wokutch, R.E. and Spencer, B.A. (1987). “Corporate Saints and Sinners: The Effects of Philanthropic and Illegal Activity on Organizational Performance”. California Management Review, 29(2), 62-78.
46. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Meeting changing expectations http://www.wbcsd.org. (Accessed 06.05.2011).
47. World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.