The Impact of the Built Environment on Immigrant Folk Culture: The Case of Harringay/London

Öz

The lives of people who migrate from one place to another for social and economic reasons are reshaped according to their new environment. In this context, this study aims to investigate the effect of the built environment on the sense of belonging of people living in a country other than their homeland for different reasons. The study conducted in this area, a neighborhood named Harringay in London, covers the built environment and its residents, which are produced in a place different from the cultural, social and economic order they are used to. In the field study conducted with the population living here, this environment where residents live is questioned through the concepts of ‘place, belonging, and identity’. As a result of the subjective questions posed to the residents, conclusions are reached by using observation and interview techniques, which are data collection methods from qualitative research methods. In line with the answers received from the residents, sociocultural and physical inferences were made from the interview data. The qualities of the physical environment produced in the diaspora were questioned through the sense of belonging.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Environment
• Physical environment
• Immigrant
• Culture
• Harringay

Etik Beyan

This research was carried out with the permission of the Karadeniz Technical University Rectorate Science and Engineering Ethics Committee dated 4 November 2025 and numbered E-26014373-050.01.04-735177.

Yapılı Çevrenin Göçmen Kültürü Üzerindeki Etkisi: Harringay/Londra Örneği

Öz

Sosyal ve ekonomik nedenlerle bir yerden başka bir yere göç eden insanların yaşamları, bulundukları yeni çevreye göre yeniden şekillenir. Bu bağlamda bu çalışma, çeşitli nedenlerle anavatanları dışında bir ülkede yaşayan bireylerin aidiyet duygusu üzerinde yapılı çevrenin etkisini incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Araştırma, Londra’da bulunan Harringay adlı bölgede gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu bölge, sakinlerinin alışık olduğu kültürel, sosyal ve ekonomik düzenden farklı bir ortamda üretilmiş yapılı çevreyi ve burada yaşayan topluluğu kapsamaktadır. Alan çalışmasında, burada yaşayan göçmen toplulukla birlikte ‘mekân, aidiyet ve kimlik’ kavramları üzerinden yaşadıkları çevre sorgulanmıştır. Katılımcılara yöneltilen öznel sorular doğrultusunda, nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden biri olan gözlem ve görüşme teknikleri kullanılarak veriler elde edilmiştir. Görüşmeler sonucunda elde edilen cevaplar doğrultusunda sosyokültürel ve fiziksel çıkarımlarda bulunulmuştur. Diaspora bağlamında üretilen fiziksel çevrenin özellikleri, aidiyet duygusu üzerinden değerlendirilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yapılı çevre
• Fiziksel çevre
• Göçmen
• Kültür
• Harringay

Etik Beyan

Bu araştırma, 4 Kasım 2025 tarihli ve E-26014373-050.01.04-735177 sayılı Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü Bilim ve Mühendislik Etik Kurulu’nun izniyle gerçekleştirilmiştir.

Kaynakça

1. Abranches, M., & Theuerkauf, U.G. (2021). Visual and oral narratives of place and belonging during Brexit. Visual Anthropology, 34(5), 423-453. https://doi.org/10.1080/08949468.2021.1984807
2. Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G., & Tiffin, G. (2002). The empire writes back. Routledge.
3. Aslan, A. (2020). Dijital diaspora ve kültürel kimlik: Türkiye’de yaşayan Çerkes gençlerle derinlemesine bir görüşme. Akdeniz Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi, 34, 66-82. https://doi.org/10.31123/akil.781866
4. Ataöv, A., Haliloğlu Kahraman, Z. E., & Osmay, S. (2022). Empowering the community through participation and action in historic neighbourhood conservation planning. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 11(3), 492-508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2021.12.001
5. Bachelard, G. (2013). Mekanın poetikası (A. Tümertekin, Trans.). İthaki.
6. Benedictus, L. (2005, January 21). Turks in Green Lanes. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2005/jan/21/britishidentity5
7. Bilecen, T. (2016). Londra’da gelişen Türkiyeli etnik ekonominin sosyal hayata yansımaları. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 9(43), 1714–1728. https://doi.org/10.17719/jisr.20164317740
8. Bilsel, C. (2006). Urban transformation, disintegrating cities and disintegrating public space. Mimarlık, 327.

9. Briggs, C. (1986). Learning how to ask: A sociolinguistic appraisal of the role of the interview in social science research. Cambridge University Press.
10. Bruneau, M. (2015). Diasporalar, uluslar ötesi mekanlar ve topluluklar. In M. A. Yolcu (Ed.), E. Tazegül (Trans.), Diaspora ve kimlik (pp.71-94). Kömen Publications.
11. Chiang, C. (2015). Kültürel kimlik üzerine diasporik kuramsallaştırma paradigması (S. Köse, Trans.). In M. A. Yolcu (Ed.), Diaspora ve kimlik (pp.153-186). Kömen Yayınları.
12. Clifford, J. (1994). Diasporas. Cultural Anthropology, 9(3), 302-338. https://doi.org/10.1525/can.1994.9.3.02a00040
13. Clifford, J. (1997). Routes. Harvard University Press.
14. Cohen, R. (1995). Rethinking ‘Babylon’: Iconoclastic conceptions of the diasporic experience. New Community, 21(1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.1995.9976469
15. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.
16. Demir, A. (2011). Home, escapefrom home and returning to home in the stories of Halid Ziya Uşaklıgil. Modern Turkish Literature Research, 3(5), 153-163.
17. Dikici, E. (2021). Göç, entegrasyon ve eğitim ekseni: Birleşik Krallık’taki Türkler. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 50(1), 969-990. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.941937
18. Enneli, P., Modood, T., & Bradley, H. (2005). Young Turks and Kurds: A set of 'invisible' disadvantaged groups. Joseph Rowntree Foundation & University of Bristol.
19. Fenster, T. (2005). Gender and the city: The different formations of belonging. In L. Nelson, & J. Seager (Eds.), A companion to feminist geography (pp.242-257). Blackwell.
20. Gilroy, P. (1997). Diaspora and the detours of identity. In K. Woodward (Ed.), Identity and difference (pp.301-346). Sage.
21. Grosjean, F. (2014). Bicultural bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19(5), 572-586. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006914526297
22. Harris, P. B., Brown, B. B., & Werner, C. M. (1996). Privacy regulation and place attachment: Predicting attachments to a student family housing facility. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16(4), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1996.0025
23. Ivanovic, G. W. (2014). People as place-making coordinate: A methodology for visualizing personal spaces. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 3(1), 36-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2013.11.003
24. Kalem, A. S. (2016). Adding milk to Turkish tea: The everyday life of London’s Turkish immigrants. Journal of Humanity and Society, 5(10), 43-71. https://doi.org/10.12658/human.society.5.10.M0150
25. Kaya, A. (2011). Türkiye’de Çerkesler: Diaspora’da geleneğin yeniden inşası. İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
26. Keating, W. D., & Krumholz, N. (2000). Neighbourhood planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 20(1), 111-114. https://doi.org/10.1177/073945600128992546
27. Keleş, R. (2014). Kent ve Kültür Üzerine. Mülkiye Dergisi, 29(246), 9-18. https://izlik.org/JA45WS64JT
28. Küçükcan, T. (2021). Diaspora Türkleri: Avrupa’da Türk imajı ve İslamofobi. Çizgi Kitabevi.
29. Lambri, M., Chakraborty, A., Leavey, G., & King, M. (2012). Quality of life and unmet need in people with psychosis in the London borough of Haringey, UK. Scientific World Journal, 2012, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/836067
30. Lynch, K. (2010). Kent imgesi. (İ. Akınhay, Trans.). Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları. (Original work published 1960)
31. Madsen, K. D., & Naerssen, T. (2003). Migration, identity, and belonging. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 18(1), 61-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2003.9695602
32. Morley, D. (2001). Belongings: Place, space and identity in a mediated world. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 4(4), 425-448. https://doi.org/10.1177/136754940100400404
33. Öztürk, A. (2022). Memory spaces in the space–sense–emotion plane: The case of Sinop Prison Museum and Ankara Ulucanlar Prison Museum (Thesis No. 727041) [Doctoral dissertation, Karadeniz Technical University]. Türkiye Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
34. Patton, M. Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. Sage.
35. Raffaetà, R., & Duff, C. (2013). Putting belonging into place: Place experience and sense of belonging among Ecuadorian migrants in an Italian Alpine region. City & Society, 25(3), 328-347. https://doi.org/10.1111/ciso.12025
36. Rapport, N. J. (1998). Home and movement: A polemic. In N. J. Rapport & A. Dawson (Eds.), Migrants of identity. Perceptions of home in a world of movement. (pp. 3-38). Berg.
37. Rishbeth, C., & Powell, M. (2013). Place attachment and memory: Landscapes of belonging as experienced post-migration. Landscape Research, 38(2), 160-178. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2011.642344
38. Sakhaeifar, A., & Ghoddusifar, S. H. (2016). Impact of location-behavior on sense of belonging to place. Modern Applied Science, 10(5), 1-57, https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v10n5p57
39. Safran, W. (1999). Diasporas in modern societies: Myths of homeland and return. In S. Vertovec, & R. Cohen (Eds.), Migration, diasporas and transnationalism. Edward Elgar Pub.
40. Sheffer, G. (2020). Diaspora politikaları. (A. Demirhan, Trans.). GAV Perspektif. (Original work published 2003)
41. Sonyel, R. (1988). The silent minority: Turkish Muslim children in British school. The Islamic Academy.
42. Şentürk, A., & Gülersoy, N. Z. (2019). Investigation of user continuity in the context of the sense of belonging, urban identity and urban conservation interaction: The case of Kadıköy-Moda. Megaron, 14(1), 145-159. https://doi.org/10.5505/megaron.2018.71676
43. Türk Dil Kurumu. (n.d.). Diaspora. In Güncel Türkçe sözlük. Retrieved Sep. 5, 2025, from https://sozluk.gov.tr/
44. Türker, D., & Yıldız, A. (2015). Socio-psychological integration analysis of immigrants. In B. D. Şeker, İ. Sirkeci, & M. M. Yüceşahin (Eds.), Migration and integrations (pp.27-38). Transnational Press.
45. Ulusoy, E. (2017). Diaspora concept and a socio-political analysis of Turkey’s diaspora politics in the context of modern theory. Journal of Humanity and Society, 7(1), 139-160. https://doi.org/10.12658/human.society.7.13.M0167
46. Uysal, A. (2014). Londra'da Türk varlığı: Mekân ve aidiyet (Thesis No. 391489) [Doctoral dissertation, İstanbul University]. Türkiye Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
47. Uysal, A. (2015). Londra’daki Türklerde aidiyet ve mekân ilişkisi. Journal of Geography, 30, 61-78. https://izlik.org/JA67TE89KZ
48. Yalçınoğlu, P. (2020). Kelimelerin uçmasını sağlama: Görüşme yoluyla anlamak. In A. Ersoy & P. Yalçınoğlu (Eds.), Nitel araştırmaya giriş (6th ed.). Anı Yayınevi.
49. Yaldız, F. (2013). Diaspora kavramı: Tarihçe, gelişme ve tartışmalar. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Türkiyat Araştırmaları (HÜTAD), 18, 289-318. https://izlik.org/JA22HS56XC
50. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2008). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri (11th ed.). Seçkin.
51. Yuval-Davis, N. (2011). The politics of belonging: Intersectional contestations. Sage.