Level of Mask Use, Attitudes and Behaviors of Patients Applying to a Family Healthcare Center

Öz

Aim: This study investigated mask use, preferred mask types, and usage patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic, and examined their relationship with sociodemographic factors, chronic disease history, and vaccination status. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted with 463 individuals using direct observation and a questionnaire. Results: Appropriate mask use was observed in 82.07% of participants, with surgical masks being the most common type (69.76%). Cloth/fabric mask use was significantly higher among unvaccinated individuals. Logistic regression revealed that age significantly affected proper mask use, while chronic disease and vaccination status influenced mask type preference. Conclusion: Mask use behaviors are shaped not only by individual characteristics but also by health literacy, pandemic experience, and public policies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• COVID-19
• family practice
• mask

Bir Aile Sağlığı Merkezine Başvuran Hastaların Maske Kullanım Düzeyi, Tutum ve Davranışları

Öz

Amaç: COVID-19 pandemisi sürecinde bireylerin maske kullanım düzeyi, tercih ettikleri maske türü ve kullanım biçimleri incelenmiş; bu davranışların sosyodemografik değişkenler, kronik hastalık öyküsü ve aşılanma durumu ile ilişkisinin değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Yöntem: Kesitsel tanımlayıcı tasarıma sahip çalışmada, toplam 463 bireyden doğrudan gözlem ve anket yoluyla veri toplanmıştır. Bulgular: Katılımcıların %82,07’sinin maskeyi uygun biçimde kullandığı, en sık tercih edilen maske türünün cerrahi maske (%69,76) olduğu belirlenmiştir. Aşı olmayan bireylerin bez/kumaş maske kullanma oranı anlamlı derecede yüksek saptanmıştır. Lojistik regresyon analizinde yaşın uygun maske kullanımı üzerinde, kronik hastalık ve aşılanma durumunun ise maske tipi tercihinde anlamlı etkisi olduğu gösterilmiştir. Sonuç: Bulgular, bireylerin maske kullanım davranışlarının sadece kişisel özelliklerle değil, aynı zamanda sağlık okuryazarlığı, pandemi deneyimi ve kamu politikalarıyla da şekillendiğini göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• COVID-19
• aile hekimliği
• maske

Kaynakça

1. World Health Organization [Internet]. 2023. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19). [cited 2023 Mar 15]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/coronavirus-disease-(COVID-19)
2. World Health Organization. Independent assessment of the origins of SARS-CoV-2, developed by the Scientific Advisory Group for the Origins of Novel Pathogens (SAGO) [Internet]. 2023. [cited 2023 Oct 20]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/independent-assessment-of-the-origins-of-sars-cov-2-from-the-scientific-advisory-group-for-the-origins-of-novel-pathogens
3. COVID-19 Pandemisinde Sağlık Kurumlarında Çalışma Rehberi ve Enfeksiyon Kontrol Önlemleri [Internet]. Sağlık Bakanlığı; 2021. [cited 2021 Jul 15]. Available from: https://covid19.saglik.gov.tr/Eklenti/40282/0/covid19-saglikkurumlarindacalismarehberiveenfeksiyonkontrolonlemleripdf.pdf
4. Sağlık Bakanlığı. Pandemi ile Mücadelemiz [Internet]. Ankara: Sağlık Bakanlığı; 2022. [cited 2022 Dec 10]. Available from: https://dosyamerkez.saglik.gov.tr/Eklenti/45858/0/pandemiileulusalmucadelemizpdf.pdf
5. Ankara Valiliği. İl Umumi Hıfzıssıhha Kurulu’nun 17.06.2020 Tarih ve 2020/48 Sayılı Kararı [Internet]. Ankara: ankara.gov.tr; 2020. [cited 2021 Jun 12]. Available from: http://www.ankara.gov.tr/ankara-valiligi-il-umumi-hifzissihha-kurulunun-17062020-tarih-ve-202048-sayili-karari
6. Lio CF, Cheong HH, Lei CI, Lo IL, Yao L, Lam C, et al. Effectiveness of personal protective health behaviour against COVID-19. BMC Public Health. 2021;21:827.
7. Sarmasoğlu Ş, Çelik GHT, Korkmaz F. İnceleme: COVID-19 Hastalığından Korunmaya Yönelik Kişisel Koruyucu Ekipman Kullanımı. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi. 2020;7(Özel Sayı):47-65.
8. Andrejko KL, Pry JM, Myers JF, Fukui N, DeGuzman JL, Openshaw J, et al. Effectiveness of Face Mask or Respirator Use in Indoor Public Settings for Prevention of SARS-CoV-2 Infection - California, February-December 2021. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2022;71(6):212-6.

9. Gunasekaran GH, Gunasekaran SS, Gunasekaran SS, Zaimi NSIB, Halim NABA. Prevalence of facemask use among general public when visiting wet market during COVID-19 pandemic: An observational study [Internet]. medRxiv; 2020 [cited 2025 July 07]. 2020.05.17.20105023. Available from: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.17.20105023v1
10. Tan M, Wang Y, Luo L, Hu J. How the public used face masks in China during the coronavirus disease pandemic: A survey study.International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2021;115:103853.
11. Collins AP, Service BC, Gupta S, Mubarak N, Zeini IM, Osbahr DC, et al. N95 respirator and surgical mask effectiveness against respiratory viral illnesses in the healthcare setting: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open. 2021;2(5):e12582.
12. Pan J, Harb C, Leng W, Marr LC. Inward and outward effectiveness of cloth masks, a surgical mask, and a face shield. Aerosol Science and Technology. 2021;55(6):718-33.
13. Eikenberry SE, Mancuso M, Iboi E, Phan T, Eikenberry K, Kuang Y, et al. To mask or not to mask: Modeling the potential for face mask use by the general public to curtail the COVID-19 pandemic. Infectious Disease Modelling. 2020;5:293-308.
14. Tanisali G, Sozak A, Bulut AS, Sander TZ, Dogan O, Dağ Ç, et al. Effectiveness of different types of mask in aerosol dispersion in SARS-CoV-2 infection. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2021;109:310-4.
15. Bundgaard H, Bundgaard JS, Raaschou-Pedersen DET, von Buchwald C, Todsen T, Norsk JB, et al. Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2021;174(3):335-43.
16. Stosic MD, Helwig S, Ruben MA. Greater belief in science predicts mask-wearing behavior during COVID-19. Personality and Individual Differences. 2021;176:110769.
17. Bagepally BS, Haridoss M, Natarajan M, Jeyashree K, Ponnaiah M. Cost-effectiveness of surgical mask, N-95 respirator, hand-hygiene and surgical mask with hand hygiene in the prevention of COVID-19: Cost effectiveness analysis from Indian context. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health. 2021;10:100702.
18. Bartsch SM, O’Shea KJ, Chin KL, Strych U, Ferguson MC, Bottazzi ME, et al. Maintaining face mask use before and after achieving different COVID-19 vaccination coverage levels: a modelling study. The Lancet Public Health. 2022;7(4):e356-65.
19. Li T, Liu Y, Li M, Qian X, Dai SY. Mask or no mask for COVID-19: A public health and market study. PLOS ONE. 2020;15(8):e0237691.
20. Leech G, Rogers-Smith C, Monrad JT, Sandbrink JB, Snodin B, Zinkov R, et al. Mask wearing in community settings reduces SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2022;119(23):e2119266119.
21. Brooks JT, Butler JC. Effectiveness of Mask Wearing to Control Community Spread of SARS-CoV-2. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2021;325(10):998-9.
22. Joo T, Takeuchi M, Liu F, Rivera MP, Barr J, Blum ES, et al. Evaluation of particle filtration efficiency of commercially available materials for homemade face mask usage. Aerosol Science and Technology. 2021;55(8):930-42.
23. Riley J, Huntley JM, Miller JA, Slaichert ALB, Brown GD. Mask Effectiveness for Preventing Secondary Cases of COVID-19, Johnson County, Iowa, USA. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2022;28(1):69-75.
24. Sharma M, Sra H, Painter C, Pan-ngum W, Luangasanatip N, Chauhan A, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of surgical masks, N95 masks compared to wearing no mask for the prevention of COVID-19 among health care workers: Evidence from the public health care setting in India. PLOS ONE. 2024;19(5):e0299309.
25. Coclite D, Napoletano A, Gianola S, del Monaco A, D’Angelo D, Fauci A, et al. Face Mask Use in the Community for Reducing the Spread of COVID-19: A Systematic Review. Frontiers in Medicine. 2021;7:594269.