Correlation of dyspeptic symptoms and endoscopic findings in diabetic patient
Abstract
|
Objective: We aimed to demonstrate the relationship between the endoscopically increased mucosal damage and the frequency of dyspeptic symptoms in patients with diabetes. Material and Methods: The 42 diabetic patients with dyspeptic complain and 40 healthy dyspeptic people were involved in this study and evaluated with video endoscopes. Diabetic patients when compared with the control group according to the endoscopic evaluation and Glasgow Dyspepsia Symptom Scoring System no significant difference had been detected. Results: The symptoms of the diabetic group and the control group were familiar and there was no significant difference between the frequencies of the symptoms in both groups. In dyspeptic diabetic patients a weak correlation between BMI and endoscopically detected hiatal hernia was reported. However there was no relation between BMI and the other gastrointestinal symptoms. Also there was no difference between the patients with neuropathy and without neuropathy in terms of endoscopic findings and gastrointestinal symptoms. Conclusion: Endoscopic findings of diabetic patient and non-diabetic control group were compared statistically. Although gastric ulcus was significantly higher in diabetic group, there was no significant difference between two groups in terms of other endoscopic findings. Hovewer, gastric ulcus frequency in diabetic group is higher, there were no significant difference in terms of gastrointestinal symptoms, diabetic complications and glisemic control in patients with other endoscopic lesions when compared with the patients with gastric ulcus. Hiatal hernia frequency in diabetic patients was higher due to control group. In shed light on our findings, diabetic patients must be evaluated for the esophageal reflux symptoms. |
Keywords
Kaynakça
- 1. Harrison İç Hastalıkları Prensipleri , cilt 2, 2004, Nobel Kitabevleri, 2109-2137 (Çeviri Editörü: Prof.Dr.Yahya Sağlıker,2004).
- 2. Talley NJ, Stanghellini V, Heading RC, Koch KL, Malagelada JR, Tytgat GN. Functional gastroduodenal disorders. Gut 1999;45 Suppl 2:1137-1142.
- 3. Kassander P. Asymptomatic gastric retention in diabetics (gastroparesis diabeticorum). Ann Intern Med 1958;48(4):797-812.
- 4. Takeuchi K, Ueshima K, Ohuchi T, Okabe S. Induction of gastric lesions and hypoglycemic response by food deprivation in streptozotocin-diabetic rats. Dig Dis Sci 1994;39(3):626-634.
- 5. Parkman HP, Hasler WL, Fisher RS. American Gastroenterological Association. American Gastroenterological Association technical review on the diagnosis and treatment of gastroparesis. Gastroenterology 2004;127(5):1592-1622.
- 6. Calvet X, Bustamante E, Montserrat A, Roqué M, Campo R, Gené E, et al. Validation of phone interview for follow-up in clinical trials on dyspepsia: Evalution of the Glasgow Dyspepsia Severity Score and a Likert-scale symptoms test. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2000; 12: 949-953.
- 7. Bytzer P, Talley NJ, Leemon M, Young LJ, Jones MP, Horowitz M. Prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms associated with diabetes mellitus: a population-based survey of 15,000 adults. Arch Intern Med 2001;161(16):1989-1996.
- 8. Koch CA, Uwaifo GI. Are gastrointestinal symptoms related to diabetes mellitus and glycemic control? Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008;20(9):822-825.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar
Ramazan Oner
*
Adiyaman University, Faculty of Medicine, Internal Medicine Department, Adiyaman
0000-0001-6975-4060
Türkiye
Melih Karincaoglu
Bu kişi benim
Inonu University, Faculty of Medicine, Gastroenterology Department, Malatya
0000-0002-9727-5128
Türkiye
Yayımlanma Tarihi
31 Mart 2018
Gönderilme Tarihi
27 Şubat 2018
Kabul Tarihi
20 Mart 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2018 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 3