Determination of conditions that may prevent the effective use of blood in blood transfusion

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2, 119 - 123, 28.02.2018

Seyma Kilinc Cigdem Kockar

https://doi.org/10.17546/msd.391584

Öz

Objective: This study was conducted to determine conditions that may prevent the effective use of blood in blood transfusion. Methods: The study's universe consisted of transplanted and wasted blood and blood products (n=309) in a university research hospital orthopedics and traumatology, neurosurgery, pediatric hematology and pediatric intensive care clinics.  Between 10.12.2014 and 20.04.2015, in the mentioned clinics, the data about blood waste and reasons was collected. The rates of use and waste of blood according to clinics, the rates of use and waste of blood according to the age of patients and the rates of use and waste of blood according to blood groups were analyzed by using independent t test. Results: When the blood ratios used and wasted according to the clinics were examined, the mean blood amount used in the neonatal intensive care clinic was 27,79 ml, while the amount of blood wasted was 472,43 ml (Due to 500 ml Blood bags). The mean amount of blood used in the pediatric hematology clinic was 189.62 ml, and the amount of blood wasted at the same clinic was 310.38 ml. When the reasons of blood waste were examined, it was concluded that the rate of not using pediatric blood bags was 40.1% and the rate of unnecessary request was 59.9%. Conclusion: As a result, despite the fact that there is still not enough blood donations nowadays, it seems that blood is wasted because of preventable causes and not being used effectively.

Anahtar Kelimeler

blood transfusion, blood waste

Kaynakça

• 1. Hablemitoglu S, Ozkan Y, Yıldırım F. Blood donation as a sacrifice example. Journal of Family and Society 2010;11(5): 67-77.
• 2. Yavuz M. Burns. In: Karadakovan A, Aslan F.E (eds). Medical Surgical Nursing. Ankara: Akademisyen Bookstore, 2014. 1019-1048 p.
• 3. Okuroglu K.G, Bahcecik N, Alpar S.E. Philosophy and nursing ethic. Cilicia Journal of Philosophy 2014;1:53-61.
• 4. Katrancı N. Factor affecting blood donation status and blood donation continuity in Turkey. Journal of Fırat Health Services 2014; 7(21): 39-45.
• 5. Hillman R. S, Helbig S, Howes S, Hayes J, Meyer D.M, Mcarthur J.R. The effect of an educational program on transfusion practices in a regional blood program. Transfussion 1979;19(2):153-157.
• 6. Sıhbaraklıoglu H, Kıyak M, İncedere L. Attitudes and behaviors of the community towards blood donation in Kayseri Province 8. Health and Hospital Administration Congress Book, Girne/KKTC 2014; 523-528.
• 7. Sarkar S. Artifical Blood. Indian J Crit Care Med 2008;12(3):140-144.
• 8. Moradi S, Jahanian-Najafabadi A, Roudkenar M.H. Artifical blood susbstitutes: First steps on the long route to clinical utility. Clinical Medicine Insights: Blood Disoders 2016;9:33-41.
• 9. Yıldız C, Emekdas G, Kanık A, Tiftik N, Solaz N, Aslan G, Tezcan S. et al. Why do not we donate blood? Overview of blood donation in Mersin Province: survey study. Turkish Journal of Infection 2006;20(1): 41-55.
• 10. http://www.kizilay.org.tr/Haber/KurumsalHaberDetay/1083 Accessed 25 March 2017.
• 11. Right O.J. Patient, rightblood, right care: safe transfusion practice. British Journal of Nursing 2013;18(5):312- 20
• 12. Taylan S, Alan S, Kadıoglu S. Nursing roles and autonomy. Journal Research and Development in Nursing 2011;2:66-74.
• 13. Ozpulat F. Opinions of university students regarding blood and organ donation. HSP 2016;4(2):71-79.
• 14. Lindeboom G.A. The story of blood transfusion to a pope. Oxford Jornual, J Hist Med. Sci 1994;11(4): 455-459.
• 15. World Health Organization, Global Database On Blood Safety 2011, http://who.int/bloodsafety Accessed 25 March 2017.
• 16. Tore O, Uluhan R, Karakoç E, Altunay H, Kılıç B. Transfusion-transmitted infection problem in Turkey. Journal of Clinic 2005;65:109-120.
• 17. Özbeser E, Bayrak S, Bozdogan B, Genc A, Ugur K. Information, attitude and behavior measurement survey study on blood donation. XV. Student Symposium Working Group Reports, Ankara 2013;1-5.
• 18. Far R.M, Rad F.S, Abdolazimi Z, Kohan M.M.D. Determination of rate and causes of wastage of blood and blood products in Iranian hospitals. Turk Journal of Hematology 2014;31:161-167.
• 19. Singhal M, Patel M, Kapoor D, Mittal D. A research analysis on blood component usage and wastage in blood. Bank and Blood Component Center. 2013;4(2):23-28.
• 20. Portugal A.A.C. at all. Transfusion practices in a neonatal ıntensive care unit in a city in Brazil. Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter 2014;36(4):245-249.
• 21. Akın G, Dostbil N. Blood group researches in Turkey. Journal Of Ankara University Language and History-Geography Faculty 2005;45(2): 1-15.
• 22. Pelit N.B. Transfusion Team and Hospital Transfussion Committes. National Blood Centers and Transfusion Medicine Course XII Course Book 2009;187-191.
• 23. Cevizci S, Erginoz E, Yuceokur A. Factor affecting voluntary donation and blood donation behavior. J Cardiovasc Sci 2010;22(1):85-92.