BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Yıl 2007, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 30, 31 - 37, 01.05.2007

Nilüfer Öztürk M. Nihal Esin

Öz

Investigation of ergonomic risk : Introductionof Turkish Version Rapid Upper Limb Assesstments The purpose of this study was to assess thevalidity and reliability of Turkish version of theRapid Upper Limb Assessment and introduce tothe occupational health team members. The form was translated using a back –translation technique, which includes the use of a panelof experts. After the review of consultants, thefinal form was applied on a randomized semple of93 female garment workers for content validityand predictive validity . For form’s reliability wasdone independent interrater correlation. Psychometric testing demonstrated satisfactory contentand predictive validity of the form. It can be usedin assessment and prevention of ergonomic risks

Anahtar Kelimeler

Rapid Upper Lemb Assessment validity and reliability.

Kaynakça

  • Erkan N, Ergonomi Verimlilik Sağlık ve Güvenlik İçin İnsan Faktörü Mühendisliği, Milli Prodüktivite Merkezi Yayınları: 373, Ankara,1996.
  • Rogers B, Travers Ph, Occupational Health, In:Nies Ma, Mcewen M (Eds). Community Health Nursing, 3. Ed. W.B. Pages 730-760, Saunders Company, Philadel- phia, 2001.
  • Research Group Secretary, Human Factors Research Group, School M3 University of Nottingham University Park NOTTINGHAM. Erken N, İş Yaşamında Ergonomik Sorunlar, İşyeri Hekimliği Ders Notları, 6. Basım, Yayın No: 011/01, Türk Tabipler Birliği, Ankara, Şubat 2001.
  • Güler Ç, Ergonomi ve Sağlık, Uluslar Arası Katılımlı 10. Ergonomi Kongresi Tebliğ Ve Poster Özetleri Kitabı, Uludağ Üniversitesi Basımevi, Bursa, 2004.
  • Herbert R, Dropkin J, Warren N, Sivin D, ve Arkş, Impact Of Joint- Management Ergonomics Program On Upper Extremity Musckuloskeletal Symptoms Amaong Garment Workers, Applied Ergonomics, Vol Pages 453-460, 2001
  • Dempsey P G, Mcgorry R W, Maynard W S, A Survey Tools And Methods Used By Certified Professional Ergonomists, Applied Ergonomics, Volume 36, Pages 486- , USA, 2005.
  • Eard V D, Beaton D, Cole D, and Frirends, Classification Systems For Upper-Limb Musculoskeletal Disor Workers:A Review Of The Literature,Varince sent,Journal Of Clinical Epidemiology, 56,Pages 925- ,Toronto,2003
  • Choobineh A, Tosian R, Alhamdi Z, Davarzanie M, Ergonomic İntervention İn Carpet Mending Operation, Applied Ergonomics, Volume 35, Pages 493-496, S h i r a z , İran, 2004.
  • Kaergaard A, Andersen H J, Musculoskeletal Disorders Of The Neck And Shoulders İn Female Sewing Machine Operators: Pleverance, İnsidence And Prog Departmant Of Occupational Health, Denmark, A p r i l Kant S, Work –Related Upper Limb Disorders, Abı/Forum Trade & Industry, Occupational Health, Doc- tor Medicine, Pages 20, 2004. ume 32, ders In An Dis- n o s i s
  • Massaccesi M, Pagnotta A, Socetti A, Masali M, ve Arkş, İnvestigation Of Work- Related Disorders İn Truck Drivers Using Rula Method, Applied Ergonom Voume 34, Pages 303-30, Italy, 2003.
  • Atamney L Mc, Corlett E N, RULA: Asurvey Method For İnvesitgation Of Work Related Upper Limb Disorders, Applied Ergonomics, Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages 9 1 - 9 9 , Atamney L Mc, Corlett E N, Reducing The Risks Of Work Related Upper Limb Disorders A Guide and Met- gods, İstitute for Occupational Ergonomics, Uni v e r s i t y of Nottingam, 2nd Reprinted, United Kingdom, 1996.
  • Aksayan S, Bahar Z, Bayık A. ve Ark, Hemşirelikte Araştırma, İlke,Süreç Ve Yöntemleri, Ed:Erefe İ, Hemşire- likte Araştırma ve Geliştirme Derneği-Hemar-G, Yayın No: , İstanbul, 2002.
  • Burns N, Grove S K, The Practice of Nursing Research Conduct, Critique & Ultilization, 3rd.Ed, W B Saunders Company, Piladelphiya, 1997.
  • Gözüm S., Aksayan N., Kültürlerarası Ölçek Uyarla- ması İçin Rehber II: Psikometrik Özellikler ve Kültürler- arası Karşılaştırma, Hemşirelikte Araştırma Geliştirme Dergisi, The Turkish Journal of Research andDevelopment in Nursing, Cilt/Vol:4, Sayı/No:2 Sayfa 9-20, Odak Ofset, Ankara, 2002. www.soley.com.tr/ .../menuresim/ confec- tion. jpg, www.d mrgrup.com.tr/images /teks %20(10).JPG, www.kaankonfeksiyon.com/kaan2.jpg, www. sahinlerhold- ing. com/images/R20_1.jpg. D ü z e l t m e
  • Dergimizin Ocak-Şubat-Mart 2007, 29. sayısında yer alan ve Yrd. Doç. Dr. Recep Kapar tarafından yazılmış “Uygun İş Açığı: İnsana Yaraşmayan İşler” başlıklı makalenin basıma hazırlık aşamasında, teknik nedenlerden kaynaklanan bir hata dolayısıyla, kaynakçada yer alan eserlerin atıf yapılan sayfa numaraları yayınlana- mamıştır. Kaynakçanın tam halini bu sayıda yayınlayarak, okuyucularımızdan ve yazardan özür dileriz. Kaynaklar
  • ILO (2006a), “Facts on Decent Work”. [www.ilo.org/communication], s. 1-2.
  • Vosko, Leah F. (2002), “ ‘Decent Work’ The Shifting Role of the ILO and the Struggle for Global Social Justice”, Global Social Policy, Vol. 2(1), s. 19-46.
  • ILO (1999), Decent Work, International Labour Conference, 87th Session 1999, Report of the Director-General, Geneva.
  • Ghai, Dharam (2002), “Decent Work: Concepts, Models and Indicators”, International Institute for Labour Studies, Discussion Paper, DP/139/2002, Gene- va.
  • CINTERFOR (2001), “Decent Work & Vocational Training”, CINTERFOR Papers http://www.cinterfor.org.uy/public/english/region/ampro/cinterfor/publ/sala/dec_work/index.htm]
  • Egger, Philippe-Sengenberger Werner (2001), Decent Work Issues and Policies, ILO-Decent Work Pilot Programme, Geneva.
  • UNESCO, “Decent Work”, [http://portal.unesco.org/shs/en/ev.php-URL_ID=4666&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html]
  • Pursey, Stephen (2007), “The Decent Work Agenda: Modernizing the ILO’s Mission”, Global Social Policy, vol. 2(1), s. 7-9.
  • COM (2006) 249 (2006), Promoting decent work for all, The EU contribution to the implementation of the decent work agenda in the world, Brussels, s. 4.
  • Leur, A. van (2006), Promoting decent work for all in the EU in the world; mobilising internal and external policies”, Promoting Decent Work in the World the contribution of the EU (4-5 December 2006), Brussels.
  • Sengenberger, Werner (2001), “Decent Work: The International Labour Organization” Agenda, Dialogue + Cooperation 2/2001, s. 39-41, 43.
  • ILO (2001), Reducing the Decent Work Deficit: A Global Challenge, International Labour Conference, 89th Session 2001, Report of the Director-General, Geneva, s. 7-10.
  • Trebilcock, Anne (2005), “Decent Work and the Informal Economy”, UNU-WIDER Discussion Paper No. 2005/04, s. 2-3.
  • Schölvinck, Johan (2006), “Promoting decent work for all in the EU and in the world: Mobilizing internal and external policies”, Promoting Decent Work in the World the contribution of the EU (4-5 December 2006), Brussels.
  • ILO (2005), A Global Alliance Against Forced Labour, Global Report under the Follow-up to the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at
  • Work, International Labour Conference, 93rd Session 2005, Report of the Director-General, Geneva, s. 12-13.
  • ILO (2006b), The end of child labour: Within reach, Global Report under the follow-up to the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at
  • Work, International Labour Conference, 95th Session 2006, Report of the Director-General, Geneva, s. 6.
  • ILO (2004a), “More women are entering the global labour force than ever before, but job equality, poverty reduction remain elusive”, 2004 Press releas- es, Friday 5 March 2004 (ILO/04/09).
  • UN (2005), The Inequality Predicament Report on the World Social Situation 2005, Department of Economic and Social Affairs United Nations
  • A/60/117/Rev.1, ST/ESA/299, New York, s. 56. ILO (2004b), “Half the World’s Workers Living below US$ 2 a Day Poverty Line”, Press Release Monday, 6 December 2004.
  • Bardone, Laura – Guio, Anne-Catherine (2005), In-Work Poverty, New commonly agreed indicators at the EU level, EUROSTAT Statistics in Focus, Pop- ulation and Social Conditions, 5/2005, s. 1-3, 6, 9.
  • Anker, Richard vd., (2003), “Measuring decent work with statistical indicators”, International Labour Review; Vol. 142, No.2, s. 147-151, 159-162, 166
  • Özen, Serap (2007), “Çalışanın İş ve Aile Sorumluluklarının Dengelemesinde Sendikalar”, Sendikal Notlar, S.32 (Şubat) (Baskıda).
  • ILO (2007a), Equality at work: Tackling the challenges, Global Report under the follow-up to the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at
  • Work, International Labour Conference, 96th Session 2007, Report of the Director-General, Geneva, s. 7, 9.
  • ILO (2007b), Safe and healthy workplaces Making decent work a reality, The ILO Report for World Day for Safety and Health at Work, International
  • Labour Organization, Geneva, s. 1. Kapar, Recep (2004), “Çevresel Konularda Sendikal Gerekçeler ve Açılımlar: Sosyal Dayanışmanın Gücü”, Sendikal Notlar, S.2 (Kasım–2004).
  • Reynaud, Emmanuel (2006), “Social Security for all: Global Trends and Challenges”, Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, Vol. 27, No. 2, s. 132.
  • Standing, Guy (2001), “Global Insecurity: Restructuring Social Income”, Global Tensions Conference in Honor of Ester Boserup (9-10 March, 2001), Cor- nell University. [http://www.bisnath.com/events/Global_Tensions/papers/standing.html]
  • ILO (2004c), Organizing for Social Justice, Global Report under the follow-up to the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, Inter- national Labour Conference, 92th Session 2004, Report of the Director-General, Geneva.
  • ICFTU (2006), Annual survey of violations of trade union rights 2006, Brussels.
  • Kapar, Recep (2005), “Uygun İş Bağlamında Çalışan Yoksullar”, Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları, 48. Kitap, s.185-204.
  • Ahmed, Iftikhar (2003), “Decent work and human development”, International Labour Review, Vol. 142, No. 2, s. 265.

ERGONOMİK RİSKLERİ BELİRLEME: ÇALIŞANIN ÜST EKSTREMİTELERİNİ DEĞERLENDİRME FORMU’NUN TANITIMI

Yıl 2007, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 30, 31 - 37, 01.05.2007

Nilüfer Öztürk M. Nihal Esin

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı Çalışanın Üst Ekstremitelerini Değerlendirme Formu’nungeçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmalarını yapmak ve formu iş sağlığı ekibiüyelerine tanıtmaktır. Form uzmanlardan oluşan bir grup tarafından geri çeviri tekniği ile Türkçe ve daha sonra tekrar İngilizce ye çevrilmiştir. Son değerlendirmeden sonra form 93 kadın konfeksiyon çalışanına içerik ve yordama- kestirim geçerliliği için uygulanmıştırFormun güvenirliği için bağımsız gözlemciler arası uyum katsayısı değerlendirilmiştir. Sonuç olarak formun ergonomik riskleri belirleme ve önlemede kullanılabilir olduğu belirtilebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Çalışanın Üst Ekstremitelerini Değerlendirme Formu geçerlik vegüvenirlik

Kaynakça

  • Erkan N, Ergonomi Verimlilik Sağlık ve Güvenlik İçin İnsan Faktörü Mühendisliği, Milli Prodüktivite Merkezi Yayınları: 373, Ankara,1996.
  • Rogers B, Travers Ph, Occupational Health, In:Nies Ma, Mcewen M (Eds). Community Health Nursing, 3. Ed. W.B. Pages 730-760, Saunders Company, Philadel- phia, 2001.
  • Research Group Secretary, Human Factors Research Group, School M3 University of Nottingham University Park NOTTINGHAM. Erken N, İş Yaşamında Ergonomik Sorunlar, İşyeri Hekimliği Ders Notları, 6. Basım, Yayın No: 011/01, Türk Tabipler Birliği, Ankara, Şubat 2001.
  • Güler Ç, Ergonomi ve Sağlık, Uluslar Arası Katılımlı 10. Ergonomi Kongresi Tebliğ Ve Poster Özetleri Kitabı, Uludağ Üniversitesi Basımevi, Bursa, 2004.
  • Herbert R, Dropkin J, Warren N, Sivin D, ve Arkş, Impact Of Joint- Management Ergonomics Program On Upper Extremity Musckuloskeletal Symptoms Amaong Garment Workers, Applied Ergonomics, Vol Pages 453-460, 2001
  • Dempsey P G, Mcgorry R W, Maynard W S, A Survey Tools And Methods Used By Certified Professional Ergonomists, Applied Ergonomics, Volume 36, Pages 486- , USA, 2005.
  • Eard V D, Beaton D, Cole D, and Frirends, Classification Systems For Upper-Limb Musculoskeletal Disor Workers:A Review Of The Literature,Varince sent,Journal Of Clinical Epidemiology, 56,Pages 925- ,Toronto,2003
  • Choobineh A, Tosian R, Alhamdi Z, Davarzanie M, Ergonomic İntervention İn Carpet Mending Operation, Applied Ergonomics, Volume 35, Pages 493-496, S h i r a z , İran, 2004.
  • Kaergaard A, Andersen H J, Musculoskeletal Disorders Of The Neck And Shoulders İn Female Sewing Machine Operators: Pleverance, İnsidence And Prog Departmant Of Occupational Health, Denmark, A p r i l Kant S, Work –Related Upper Limb Disorders, Abı/Forum Trade & Industry, Occupational Health, Doc- tor Medicine, Pages 20, 2004. ume 32, ders In An Dis- n o s i s
  • Massaccesi M, Pagnotta A, Socetti A, Masali M, ve Arkş, İnvestigation Of Work- Related Disorders İn Truck Drivers Using Rula Method, Applied Ergonom Voume 34, Pages 303-30, Italy, 2003.
  • Atamney L Mc, Corlett E N, RULA: Asurvey Method For İnvesitgation Of Work Related Upper Limb Disorders, Applied Ergonomics, Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages 9 1 - 9 9 , Atamney L Mc, Corlett E N, Reducing The Risks Of Work Related Upper Limb Disorders A Guide and Met- gods, İstitute for Occupational Ergonomics, Uni v e r s i t y of Nottingam, 2nd Reprinted, United Kingdom, 1996.
  • Aksayan S, Bahar Z, Bayık A. ve Ark, Hemşirelikte Araştırma, İlke,Süreç Ve Yöntemleri, Ed:Erefe İ, Hemşire- likte Araştırma ve Geliştirme Derneği-Hemar-G, Yayın No: , İstanbul, 2002.
  • Burns N, Grove S K, The Practice of Nursing Research Conduct, Critique & Ultilization, 3rd.Ed, W B Saunders Company, Piladelphiya, 1997.
  • Gözüm S., Aksayan N., Kültürlerarası Ölçek Uyarla- ması İçin Rehber II: Psikometrik Özellikler ve Kültürler- arası Karşılaştırma, Hemşirelikte Araştırma Geliştirme Dergisi, The Turkish Journal of Research andDevelopment in Nursing, Cilt/Vol:4, Sayı/No:2 Sayfa 9-20, Odak Ofset, Ankara, 2002. www.soley.com.tr/ .../menuresim/ confec- tion. jpg, www.d mrgrup.com.tr/images /teks %20(10).JPG, www.kaankonfeksiyon.com/kaan2.jpg, www. sahinlerhold- ing. com/images/R20_1.jpg. D ü z e l t m e
  • Dergimizin Ocak-Şubat-Mart 2007, 29. sayısında yer alan ve Yrd. Doç. Dr. Recep Kapar tarafından yazılmış “Uygun İş Açığı: İnsana Yaraşmayan İşler” başlıklı makalenin basıma hazırlık aşamasında, teknik nedenlerden kaynaklanan bir hata dolayısıyla, kaynakçada yer alan eserlerin atıf yapılan sayfa numaraları yayınlana- mamıştır. Kaynakçanın tam halini bu sayıda yayınlayarak, okuyucularımızdan ve yazardan özür dileriz. Kaynaklar
  • ILO (2006a), “Facts on Decent Work”. [www.ilo.org/communication], s. 1-2.
  • Vosko, Leah F. (2002), “ ‘Decent Work’ The Shifting Role of the ILO and the Struggle for Global Social Justice”, Global Social Policy, Vol. 2(1), s. 19-46.
  • ILO (1999), Decent Work, International Labour Conference, 87th Session 1999, Report of the Director-General, Geneva.
  • Ghai, Dharam (2002), “Decent Work: Concepts, Models and Indicators”, International Institute for Labour Studies, Discussion Paper, DP/139/2002, Gene- va.
  • CINTERFOR (2001), “Decent Work & Vocational Training”, CINTERFOR Papers http://www.cinterfor.org.uy/public/english/region/ampro/cinterfor/publ/sala/dec_work/index.htm]
  • Egger, Philippe-Sengenberger Werner (2001), Decent Work Issues and Policies, ILO-Decent Work Pilot Programme, Geneva.
  • UNESCO, “Decent Work”, [http://portal.unesco.org/shs/en/ev.php-URL_ID=4666&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html]
  • Pursey, Stephen (2007), “The Decent Work Agenda: Modernizing the ILO’s Mission”, Global Social Policy, vol. 2(1), s. 7-9.
  • COM (2006) 249 (2006), Promoting decent work for all, The EU contribution to the implementation of the decent work agenda in the world, Brussels, s. 4.
  • Leur, A. van (2006), Promoting decent work for all in the EU in the world; mobilising internal and external policies”, Promoting Decent Work in the World the contribution of the EU (4-5 December 2006), Brussels.
  • Sengenberger, Werner (2001), “Decent Work: The International Labour Organization” Agenda, Dialogue + Cooperation 2/2001, s. 39-41, 43.
  • ILO (2001), Reducing the Decent Work Deficit: A Global Challenge, International Labour Conference, 89th Session 2001, Report of the Director-General, Geneva, s. 7-10.
  • Trebilcock, Anne (2005), “Decent Work and the Informal Economy”, UNU-WIDER Discussion Paper No. 2005/04, s. 2-3.
  • Schölvinck, Johan (2006), “Promoting decent work for all in the EU and in the world: Mobilizing internal and external policies”, Promoting Decent Work in the World the contribution of the EU (4-5 December 2006), Brussels.
  • ILO (2005), A Global Alliance Against Forced Labour, Global Report under the Follow-up to the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at
  • Work, International Labour Conference, 93rd Session 2005, Report of the Director-General, Geneva, s. 12-13.
  • ILO (2006b), The end of child labour: Within reach, Global Report under the follow-up to the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at
  • Work, International Labour Conference, 95th Session 2006, Report of the Director-General, Geneva, s. 6.
  • ILO (2004a), “More women are entering the global labour force than ever before, but job equality, poverty reduction remain elusive”, 2004 Press releas- es, Friday 5 March 2004 (ILO/04/09).
  • UN (2005), The Inequality Predicament Report on the World Social Situation 2005, Department of Economic and Social Affairs United Nations
  • A/60/117/Rev.1, ST/ESA/299, New York, s. 56. ILO (2004b), “Half the World’s Workers Living below US$ 2 a Day Poverty Line”, Press Release Monday, 6 December 2004.
  • Bardone, Laura – Guio, Anne-Catherine (2005), In-Work Poverty, New commonly agreed indicators at the EU level, EUROSTAT Statistics in Focus, Pop- ulation and Social Conditions, 5/2005, s. 1-3, 6, 9.
  • Anker, Richard vd., (2003), “Measuring decent work with statistical indicators”, International Labour Review; Vol. 142, No.2, s. 147-151, 159-162, 166
  • Özen, Serap (2007), “Çalışanın İş ve Aile Sorumluluklarının Dengelemesinde Sendikalar”, Sendikal Notlar, S.32 (Şubat) (Baskıda).
  • ILO (2007a), Equality at work: Tackling the challenges, Global Report under the follow-up to the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at
  • Work, International Labour Conference, 96th Session 2007, Report of the Director-General, Geneva, s. 7, 9.
  • ILO (2007b), Safe and healthy workplaces Making decent work a reality, The ILO Report for World Day for Safety and Health at Work, International
  • Labour Organization, Geneva, s. 1. Kapar, Recep (2004), “Çevresel Konularda Sendikal Gerekçeler ve Açılımlar: Sosyal Dayanışmanın Gücü”, Sendikal Notlar, S.2 (Kasım–2004).
  • Reynaud, Emmanuel (2006), “Social Security for all: Global Trends and Challenges”, Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, Vol. 27, No. 2, s. 132.
  • Standing, Guy (2001), “Global Insecurity: Restructuring Social Income”, Global Tensions Conference in Honor of Ester Boserup (9-10 March, 2001), Cor- nell University. [http://www.bisnath.com/events/Global_Tensions/papers/standing.html]
  • ILO (2004c), Organizing for Social Justice, Global Report under the follow-up to the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, Inter- national Labour Conference, 92th Session 2004, Report of the Director-General, Geneva.
  • ICFTU (2006), Annual survey of violations of trade union rights 2006, Brussels.
  • Kapar, Recep (2005), “Uygun İş Bağlamında Çalışan Yoksullar”, Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları, 48. Kitap, s.185-204.
  • Ahmed, Iftikhar (2003), “Decent work and human development”, International Labour Review, Vol. 142, No. 2, s. 265.
Toplam 49 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Research Article
Yazarlar

Nilüfer Öztürk Bu kişi benim

M. Nihal Esin Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Mayıs 2007
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2007 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 30

Kaynak Göster

APA Öztürk, N., & Esin, M. N. (2007). ERGONOMİK RİSKLERİ BELİRLEME: ÇALIŞANIN ÜST EKSTREMİTELERİNİ DEĞERLENDİRME FORMU’NUN TANITIMI. TTB Mesleki Sağlık Ve Güvenlik Dergisi, 8(30), 31-37.
AMA Öztürk N, Esin MN. ERGONOMİK RİSKLERİ BELİRLEME: ÇALIŞANIN ÜST EKSTREMİTELERİNİ DEĞERLENDİRME FORMU’NUN TANITIMI. MSG. Mayıs 2007;8(30):31-37.
Chicago Öztürk, Nilüfer, ve M. Nihal Esin. “ERGONOMİK RİSKLERİ BELİRLEME: ÇALIŞANIN ÜST EKSTREMİTELERİNİ DEĞERLENDİRME FORMU’NUN TANITIMI”. TTB Mesleki Sağlık Ve Güvenlik Dergisi 8, sy. 30 (Mayıs 2007): 31-37.
EndNote Öztürk N, Esin MN (01 Mayıs 2007) ERGONOMİK RİSKLERİ BELİRLEME: ÇALIŞANIN ÜST EKSTREMİTELERİNİ DEĞERLENDİRME FORMU’NUN TANITIMI. TTB Mesleki Sağlık ve Güvenlik Dergisi 8 30 31–37.
IEEE N. Öztürk ve M. N. Esin, “ERGONOMİK RİSKLERİ BELİRLEME: ÇALIŞANIN ÜST EKSTREMİTELERİNİ DEĞERLENDİRME FORMU’NUN TANITIMI”, MSG, c. 8, sy. 30, ss. 31–37, 2007.
ISNAD Öztürk, Nilüfer - Esin, M. Nihal. “ERGONOMİK RİSKLERİ BELİRLEME: ÇALIŞANIN ÜST EKSTREMİTELERİNİ DEĞERLENDİRME FORMU’NUN TANITIMI”. TTB Mesleki Sağlık ve Güvenlik Dergisi 8/30 (Mayıs 2007), 31-37.
JAMA Öztürk N, Esin MN. ERGONOMİK RİSKLERİ BELİRLEME: ÇALIŞANIN ÜST EKSTREMİTELERİNİ DEĞERLENDİRME FORMU’NUN TANITIMI. MSG. 2007;8:31–37.
MLA Öztürk, Nilüfer ve M. Nihal Esin. “ERGONOMİK RİSKLERİ BELİRLEME: ÇALIŞANIN ÜST EKSTREMİTELERİNİ DEĞERLENDİRME FORMU’NUN TANITIMI”. TTB Mesleki Sağlık Ve Güvenlik Dergisi, c. 8, sy. 30, 2007, ss. 31-37.
Vancouver Öztürk N, Esin MN. ERGONOMİK RİSKLERİ BELİRLEME: ÇALIŞANIN ÜST EKSTREMİTELERİNİ DEĞERLENDİRME FORMU’NUN TANITIMI. MSG. 2007;8(30):31-7.