Aesthetics, Judgement and the Sensus Communis in Kant, Derrida and Since

Öz

This article offers an account of Jacques Derrida’s reading of Kant’s Critique of Judgement, drawing out its implication for an understanding of the signifcance of aesthetic judgement in Kant, and in general. It argues that strictures identifed by Derrida, concerning aesthetics and judgment, the role of analogy, instability in diferentiations of beauty and the sublime, in ideas of the parergon and problematics of the sensus communis, are interrelated. It indicates how such problematics recurred in Clement Greenberg’s Modernist accounts of painting, echoing displaced reiterations of aesthetic criteria in Kant’s articulation of the sensus communis and in analogical argumentation, concerning the theorisation of art, and judgements of beauty and the sublime. The article concludes by showing how readings of the sublime, by Jean-Luc Nancy, Jean-François Lyotard and Jacques Rancière, and the beautiful, by Paul Guyer, fail to allow for the productive plurality of responses that Derrida’s reading suggests.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Aesthetics
• judgement
• sensus communis
• Kant
• Derrida

Kant, Derrida ve Sonrasında Estetik, Yargı ve Sensus Communis

Öz

Bu makale, Jacques Derrida'nın Kant'ın Yargı Yetisinin Eleştirisi okumasının bir açıklamasını sunmakta ve özelde Kant’ın felsefesinden olmak üzere genel olarak estetik yargıların öneminin anlaşılmasına yönelik çıkarımlar ortaya koymaktadır. Derrida'nın okumasında estetik ve yargı, analojinin rolü, güzel ve yüce ayrımlarındaki istikrarsızlık, parergon ve sensus communis ile ilgili olarak işaret ettiği sorunsalların birbiriyle ilişkili olduğunu savunmaktadır. Aynı zamanda, bu tür sorunsalların Clement Greenberg'in Modernist resim anlatılarında nasıl yinelendiğini, Kant'ın sensus communis ve sanatın kuramsallaştırılması yoluyla, güzel ve yüce yargılarıyla ilgili analojik argümantasyonda estetik kriterlerin yerinden edilmiş yinelemelerini yankıladığını göstermektedir. Makale bu iddiayı, Nancy, Lyotard ve Rancière'de yüce ve Paul Guyer’de güzelin Derrida'nın okumasının önerdiği üretken yanıt çoğulluğuna nasıl izin vermediğini göstererek sona ermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Estetik
• yargı
• sensus communis
• Kant
• Derrida

Teşekkür

This is a revised version of a paper given at the Kant symposium The True, The Good, The Beautiful held at Mimar Sİnan Fine Arts University in April 2016. Thanks are due to all those who enabled this event and to those whose suggestions and queries I have sought to respond to.

Kaynakça

1. Bourriaud, N. (2002) Relational Aesthetics. (S. Pleasance, F. Woods with M. Copeland, Trans.). Dijon: Les presses du réel. (Original work published in 1998)
2. Brunette, P. & Wills, D. (1994). The Spatial Arts: An Interview with Jacques Derrida. In Brunette, P. & Wills, D. (Eds.) Deconstruction and the Visual Arts (pp. 9-32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Callanan, J. J. (2008). Kant on Analogy. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 4 (16), pp.747-772. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09608780802407480.
4. De Duve, T. (1996). Kant after Duchamp. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Derrida, J. (1987). The Truth in Painting. (G. Bennington and I. MacLeod, Trans.) Chicago: Chicago University Press. (Original work published 1978)
6. Greenberg, C. (1982). Modernist Painting. In F. Frascina and C. Harrison (Eds.), Modern Art and Modernism: A Critical Anthology (pp. 5-10). London: Harper & Row. (Original work published 1965)
7. Guilbaut, S. (1985). How New York Stole the Idea of Modern Art: Abstract Expressionism, Freedom, and the Cold War. (A. Goldhammer, Trans.) Chicago: Chicago University Press.
8. Guyer, P. (2006). Kant. London: Routledge.

9. Haudenosaunee Confederacy. (2024, Sept. 26). Haudenosaunee Confederacy: Who We Are. https://www.haudenosauneeconfederacy.com/who-we-are/.
10. Johnson, L. (2005, March 31-April 2). Gesture and Simulacrum: Departing from Ideals of Deliberation in the Criticism of Cézanne [Conference presentation]. Association of Art Historians Conference 2005, Bristol. U.K. https://forarthistory.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/ AAHconf2005-1.pdf.
11. Johnson, L. (2009). Gesture after the gestural: Abstract Expressionism, American visual culture and post-war painting in Turkey. Journal of American Studies in Turkey, (25), pp. 67-86.
12. Kant, I. (1986). The Critique of Judgement. (J. C. Meredith, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1790)
13. Laplanche, J. and Pontalis, J.-B. (2006) The Language of Psychoanalysis. (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). London: Karnac Books. (Original work published 1973)
14. Lyotard, J.-F. (1994). Lessons on the Analytic of the Sublime. (E. Rottenberg, Trans.). Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1991)
15. Lyotard, J.-F. (2000). The Sublime and the Avant-Garde. In Cazeux, C. (Ed.) The Continental Aesthetics Reader (pp. 453-464). New York: Routledge. (Original work published 1985)
16. Nancy, J.-L. (1993). The Sublime Ofering. (J. S. Librett. Trans.) In Librett, J. S. (Ed.) Of the Sublime: Presence in Question (pp. 25-53). New York: State University of New York Press.
17. Rancière, J. (2009). The Future of the Image. (G. Elliott, Trans.). London and New York: Verso. (Original work published 2007)
18. Thomas, S. (2008). Romanticism and Visuality: Fragments, History, Spectacle. New York and London: Routledge.