BAŞKANLIK SİSTEMİNDE SİYASAL/YÖNETSEL BİÇİMLENİŞ VE YEREL YÖNETİMLER: ENDONEZYA DENEYİMİ

Öz

Başkanlık sistemi ile yönetilen Güneydoğu Asya ülkelerinden Endonezya’da yerel yönetimlerin örgütlenmesine ilişkin giriş niteliğinde bir analiz sunmayı amaçlayan bu çalışmada, çözümleme düzeyi olarak ülkenin siyasal-yönetsel örgütlenmesi alınacaktır. Bugün Endonezya’da 1967-1998 yıllarını kapsayan ve devlet başkanı Suharto’un merkeziyetçi-otoriter rejiminde gelişen yönetsel pratikler dönüştürülmeye çalışılmakta ve devlet kurumları ile yönetsel pratikler yeniden düzenlenmektedir. Bu kapsamda, yerel yönetimlerin geliştirilmesi ve güçlendirilmesi de Suharto sonrası dönemin en önemli siyasal hedeflerinden biri olmuştur. Çalışmada, Endonezya’nın siyasal/toplumsal gelişimi, devlet örgütlenmesinin anayasal biçimselliği ile yerelin siyasal ve yönetsel biçimlenişi incelenecektir. Bu doğrultuda, Endonezya’da özellikle 1999 sonrasında başlayan ve “Büyük Patlama” olarak adlandırılan yerel yönetimlerin sayısal artışı sürecinde gerçekleşen, yerel siyasetin dönüşümü, yönetsel yapılanmada merkez-yerel ilişkilerinin gelişimi ve mali kaynakların bölüşümü tartışmaları ele alınacaktır. Yapılan çözümleme ile yerelin yönetsel yetkileri ve sorumlulukları artırılsa da iktisadi kaynakların bölüşümü ve kullanımı üzerindeki iktidarı bakımından merkezi yönetim karşısında özerkleşemediği savı ileri sürülecektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Endonezya,Devlet,Yerel Yönetimler,Adem-i Merkezileşme,Mali.

POLITICAL/ADMINISTRATIVE FORMATION AND LOCAL ADMINISTRATIONS IN PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEM: THE EXPERIENCE OF INDONESIA

Öz

In this study, which aims to provide an introductory analysis of the organization of local government in Indonesia being one of the Southeast Asian coun-tries governed by a presidential system, the political-administrative organization of Indonesia is going to be taken as the level of analysis. Today, the state and its institutions are being reorganized after the administrative practices and institutional arrangements developed in the centralist-authoritarian regime of President Suharto, between the period of 1967-1998. In this context, developing and strengthening local administrations has been one of the most significant targets of the post-Suharto period. This study is going to examine the political/social development of Indonesia, the constitutional formality of state organization, and the political and administrative form of the local. In particular, there is going to be discussions on quantitative increase of local administrations after 1999 in Indonesia called “Big Bang”, on transformation of local politics, development of centre-local relations in administrative structure and on distribution of financial resources. With the analysis, it is going to be asserted that the local could not be able to become autonomous against the central government in terms of its power over the distribution and the use economic resources even though the administrative power and responsibilities of the local being strengthened.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Indonesia,State,Local Administrations,Decentralization,Fiscal

Kaynakça

1. Asya Kalkınma Bankası, “Republic of Indonesia: Local Government Finance and Governance Reform”, Technical Assistance Report Project No. 42221, 2012, https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/project-document/73044/42221-022-ino-tar.pdf (20.06.2019).
2. Barter, Shane Joshua, “The Dangers of Decentralization: Clientelism, the State, & Nature in a Democratic Indonesia”, Federal Governance, C.5, S.1, 2008, s. 1-15.
3. Bennet, Richard, “Decentralizing Authority After Suharto: Indonesia’s Big Bang, 1998-2010” Innovations Jor SuccesssJul Societies, Princeton University, 2010, s. 1-11, https://successfulsocieties.princeton.edu/sites/successfulsocieties/files/Indonesia%20ToU%20.pdf (20.06.2019).
4. Bourchier, David ve Vedi R. Hadiz, Indonesian Politics and Society: A Reader, Routledge Curzon, London&New York, 2003.
5. Brodjonegoro, Bambang, “Indonesian Intergovernmental Transfer in Decentralization Era: the case of general allocation fund”, An International Symposium on Intergovernmental Transfers in Asian Countries: Issues and Practices, Hitotsubashi University, February, 2001, s. 9-10.
6. Butt, Simon, “Regional autonomy and legal disorder: The proliferation of local laws in Indonesia”, Sing. J. Legal Stud., 2010, s. 1-21.
7. Butt, Simon ve Nicholas Parsons, “Reining in Regional Government-Local Taxes and Investment in Decentralised Indonesia”, Sydney L. Rev., C. 34, 2012, s. 91-106.
8. Cahyat, Ade, Guidebook to Local Governments in Indonesia, 2011, https://docplayer.net/35004669-Guidebook-to-local-governments-in-indonesia-by-ade-cahyat-m-pa.html (20.08.2017).

9. Choi, Nankyung, Local Politics in Indonesia: Pathways to Power (Vol. 38), Routledge, London 2011.
10. Devas, Nick, “Indonesia: What Do We Mean by Decentralization?”, Public Administration and Development, C. 17, S. 3, 1997, s. 351-367.
11. Dixon, Geoff ve Danya Hakim, “Chapter 9: Making Indonesia’s budget decentralization work: The challenge of linking planning and budgeting at the local level”, The Many Faces of Public Management Reform in the Asia-Pacific Region, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2009, s. 207-245.
12. Dünya Bankası Endonezya Ülke İstatistikleri, 2017, http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/indonesia (15.08.2017).
13. Eckardt, Sebastian ve Anwar Shah, “Local Government Organization and Finance: Indonesia”, Local Governance in Developing Countries, (Ed. Anwar Shah), The World Bank, Washington 2006, s. 233-274.
14. Firman, Tommy, “Decentralization Reform and Local‐Government Proliferation in Indonesia: Towards a Fragmentation of Regional Development”, Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, C. 21, S. 2‐3, 2009, s. 143-157.
15. Fitrani, Fitria, Bert Hofman ve Kai Kaiser, “Unity in Diversity? The Creation of New Local Governments in A Decentralising Indonesia”, Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, S. 41, C. 1, 2005, s. 57-79.
16. Fossati, Diego, “Beyond “good governance”: The multi-level politics of health insurance for the poor in Indonesia”, World Development, C. 87, 2016, s. 291-306.
17. Gonschorek, Gerrit J., Günther G. Schulze ve Bambang Suharnoko Sjahrir, “To the ones in need or the ones you need? The political economy of central discretionary grants−empirical evidence from Indonesia”, European Journal of Political Economy, C.54, 2018, s. 240-260.
18. Hadiz, Vedi R., “Order and Terror in A Time of Empire”, Empire and Neoliberalism in Asia, (Ed. Vedi R. Hadiz), Routledge, London&New York, 2006a, s. 123-138.
19. Hadiz, Vedi R.,“Post-authoritarian Indonesia”, Critical Asian Studies, S. 37, C.2, 2006b, s. 251-275.
20. Hadiz, Vedi R., “The Localization of Power in Southeast Asia”, Democratization, S.14, C. 5, 2007, s. 873-892.
21. Hadiz, Vedi R., Localising Power in Post-authoritarian Indonesia: A Southeast Asia Perspective, Stanford University Press, Stanford, 2010.
22. Hadiz, Vedi R. ve Richard Robinson, “The Political Economy of Oligarchy and the Reorganization of Power in Indonesia”, Indonesia, S. 96, 2013, s. 35- 57
23. Holzhacker, Ronald L., Rafael Wittek ve Johan Wolter, “Decentralization and Governance for Sustainable Society in Indonesia”, Decentralization and Governance in Indonesia, (Ed. Ronald L. Holzhacker, vd.), Springer International Publishing, 2016, s.3-29.
24. Ito, Takeshi, “Historicizing the Power of Civil Society: A Perspective from Decentralization in Indonesia”, The Journal of Peasant Studies, S. 38, C. 2, 2011, s. 413-433.
25. Jasmina, Thia, “The role of government spending on basic education at the district level in Indonesia”, Policy Science, The Policy Science Association of Ritsumeikan University, C. 25, 2017, s. 135-152.
26. Kis-Katos, Krisztina ve Bambang Suharnoko Sjahrir, “The impact of fiscal and political decentralization on local public investment in Indonesia”, Journal of Comparative Economics, C. 45, S. 2, 2017, s. 344-365.
27. Lewis, Blane D., “Indonesian Local Government Spending, Taxing and Saving: An Explanation of Pre‐and Post‐decentralization Fiscal Outcomes”, Asian Economic Journal, C. 19, S. 3, 2005, s. 291-317.
28. Lewis, Blane D., “Local government capital spending in Indonesia: Impact of intergovernmental fiscal transfers”, Public Budgeting & Finance, C. 33, S. 1, 2013, s. 76-94.
29. McLeod, Ross H. ve Harun Harun, “Public sector accounting reform at local government level in Indonesia”, Financial Accountability & Management, C. 30 S. 2, 2014, s. 238-258.
30. Mietzner, Marcus, “Local Democracy”, Inside Indonesia. S. 85, 2005, s. 17-18.
31. Nasution, Anwar, “Government Decentralization Program in Indonesia”, Asian Development Bank Institute Working Paper Series No. 601, 2016, https://www.adb.org/publications/government-decentralization-programindonesia (20.08.2017).
32. OECD Endonezya İstatistikleri, 2016, http://www.oecd.org/indonesia/ (15.08.2017).
33. Ostwald, Kai, Yuhki Tajima, ve Krislert Samphantharak, “Indonesia’s Decentralization Experiment: Motivations, Successes, and Unintended Consequences”, Journal of Southeast Asian Economies, C. 33, S. 2, 2016, s. 139-156.
34. Palupi, Ade, ve Refinaldo Febiandra, “The institutional logics of local government budget in Indonesia”, SHS Web of Conferences, C. 34, EDP Sciences, 2017.
35. Ritonga, Irwan Taufiq, Colin Clark ve Guneratne Wickremasinghe, “AssessingFinancial Condition of Local Government in Indonesia: An Exploration”, Public and Municipal Finance, C.1, S.2, 2012, s.37-50.
36. Robinson, Richard, Indonesia: The Rise of Capital, Equinox, 2009.
37. Rusyiana, Aris ve Sujarwoto Sujarwoto, “Does decentralization good for reducing communal conflict? A multilevel analysis of communal conflict at Indonesia’s villages 2008-2014”, Journal of Public Administration Studies, C. 2. S. 1, 2017, s. 25-44.
38. Setiawan, Doddy ve Farah Rizkiah, “Political Budget Cycles In Municipalities: Evidence From Indonesia”, International Journal of Business and Society, C. 18, S. 3, 2017, s. 533-546.
39. Sjahrir, Bambang Suharnoko, Krisztina Kis-Katos, ve Günther G. Schulze, “Political budget cycles in Indonesia at the district level”, Economics Letters, C. 120, S. 2, 2013, s. 342-345.
40. Skoufias, Emmanuel, Ambar Narayan, Basab Dasgupta ve Kai Kaiser, “Electoral Accountability and Local Government Spending in Indonesia”, The World Bank: Policy Research Working Paper, S. 6782, 2014.
41. Sobacı, Mehmed Zahid ve Özer Köseoğlu, Başkanlık Sistemlerinde Yerel Yönetimler: ABD, Brezilya, Şili, Endonezya ve Güney Kore, SETA, İstanbul, 2016.
42. Statistik 60 Tahun Indonesia Merdeka, 2005, https://www.bps.go.id/publication/2005/12/08/4ff3c22a5f23c73c720cf7ec/statistik-60-tahun-indonesiamerdeka.html (15.08.2017).
43. Statistical Yearbook of Indonesia, 2014,https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/49018-ID-statistik-indonesia-2014.pdf (15.08.2017).
44. Statistical Yearbook of Indonesia, 2016,https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/48410-ID-statistik-indonesia-2016.pdf (15.08.2017).
45. Sujarwoto, Sujarwoto, “Political Decentralization and Local Public Services Performance in Indonesia”, Journal of Public Administration and Governance, S. 2, C. 3, 2012, s. 55-84.
46. Turner, Mark, “Implementing Laws 22 and 25: The Challenge of Decentralization in Indonesia”, Asian Review of Public Administration, S. 13, C. 1, 2001, s. 69-82.
47. Utomo, Tri Widodo Wahyu, “Building Good Governance through Decentralization in Indonesia (Recognizing Some Inhibiting Factors in the Implementation Stage)”, Limits of Good Governance in Developing Countries, Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University, 2011, s. 245-273.
48. 1945 tarihli Endonezya Anayasası, http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/--- ed_protect/---protrav/---ilo_aids/documents/legaldocument/wcms_174556.pdf (15.08.2017).
49. 1999 tarihli 22 sayılı Kanun, http://www.flevin.com/id/lgso/translations/JICA%20Mirror/english/12.22.1999.eng.qc.html (20.08.2017).
50. 2004 tarihli 32 sayılı Kanun, http://www.ilo.org/dyn/natlex/natlex4.detail?p_lang=en&p_isn=77116 (20.08.2017).
51. 2014 tarihli 22 sayılı Kanun, http://www.indlaw.org/UU/Law%20No.%2022%20of%202014%20on%20Election%20of%20Governors,%20Regents,%20and%20Mayors.pdf (20.08.2017).
52. 2014 tarihli 23 sayılı Yerel Yönetim Kanunu, http://www.indolaw.org/UU/Law%20No.%2023%20of%202014%20on%20Local%20Government.pdf (20.08.2017).