İŞLETME RİSKLERİNİN TESPİT VE ÖNLENMESİNİN BAĞIMSIZ DENETİMİN KATMA DEĞERİ ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ
Öz
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Abdullah, K.A. & Al-Araj, S.R. (2011). Traditional audit versus business risk audit: a comparative study - Case of Jordan. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, (40): 74-91.
- Barrett, M.; Cooper, D.J. & Jamal, K. (2005). Globalization and the coordinating of work inmultinational audits, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30(1): 1–24.
- Bell, T. B.; Dooger, R. & Solomon, I. (2007). Audit labour usage and fees under risk-based auditing. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(4): 729-760.
- Bierstaker, J.L. & Wright, A. (2004). Does the adoption of a business risk audit approach changeinternal control documentation and testingpractices?, International Journal of Auditing, 8: 67–78.
- Buisman, J. & Gilmour, G. (2008). International auditing, in C. Nobes & R. Parker (eds), Comparative International Accounting, 10th edition, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 481-509.
- Chang, C. J. & Hwang, N. R. (2003). The impact ofretention ıncentives and client business risks on auditors, decisions involving aggressive reporting practices, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 22(2): 207–218.
- Davidson, R. A. & Chang, S. (2001). The importance ofauditing topics to chinese auditors, International Journal of Auditing, 5: 127–139.
- De Angelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality’, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3): 183–199.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
Türkçe
Konular
-
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar
Kadir Gökoğlan
*
0000-0001-6397-8477
Türkiye
Yayımlanma Tarihi
19 Ekim 2022
Gönderilme Tarihi
30 Nisan 2022
Kabul Tarihi
25 Haziran 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2022 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2