Benign ve premalign oral kavite lezyonlarının retrospektif analizi

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2, 48 - 52, 29.06.2019

Akif Gunes Elif Karali Tugberk Sebit

https://doi.org/10.33204/mucosa.576645

Cited By: 3

Öz

Amaç Bu çalışmada oral kaviteden biyopsi yapılan ve histopatolojik olarak benign ve premalign tanı koyulan hastaların retrospektif olarak ayrıntılı analizlerinin yapılması amaçlanmıştır.

Yöntem Çalışmamızda Ocak 2014-Ocak 2019 tarihleri arasında üçüncü basamak bir hastanenin kulak burun boğaz hastalıkları kliniğinde oral mukozadan insizyonel yada eksizyonel biyopsi yapılan ve histopatoloji tanısı benign yada  premalign olarak değerlendirilen 67 hastanın retrospektif olarak histopatolojik tanı, cinsiyet ve yaş grupları dağılımları incelenmiştir.

Bulgular Çalışmamıza 33’ ü (%49.3) erkek, 34’ ü (%50.7) kadın olmak üzere toplam 67 hasta dâhil edildi. Hastaların yaş ortalaması 44.90 ± 19.77 olarak tespit edildi. Hastaların yaş dağılımları değerlendirildiğinde 10-20 yaş aralığında 12 (%17.9), 21-30 yaş aralığında 8 (%11.9), 31-40 yaş aralığında 6 (%9), 41-50 yaş aralığında 9 (%13.4), 51-60 yaş

aralığında 16 (23.9), 61-70 yaş aralığında 10 (%14.9) ve 71-80 yaş aralığında 6 (%9) hasta tespit edildi. En sık saptanan benign lezyonlar piyojenik granülom (%10.4) ve radiküler kist (%11.4) olarak tespit edildi.

Anahtar Kelimeler

oral mukoza, oral kavite, biyopsi, histopatolojik tanı

Retrospective analysis of benign and premalign lesions in the oral cavity

Öz

Background The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze the patients who were biopsied from the oral cavity and histopathologically diagnosed as benign and premalignant.

Methods In this study, we retrospectively examined histopathological diagnosis, sex and age groups of 67 patients who underwent incisional or excisional biopsy of the oral mucosa and diagnosed as benign or premalignant in the otorhinolaryngology clinic of a tertiary hospital between January 2014 and January 2019.

Results A total of 67 patients were included in our study, 33 (49.3%) were male and 34 (50.7%) were female. The mean age of the patients was 44.90 ± 19.77 years. According to age distribution, numbers of patients in 10-20, 21-30, 31-40, 41-50- 51-60, 61-70 and 71-80 age groups were 12 (17.9%), 8 (11.9%), 6 (9%), 9 (13%), 16 (23.9%), 10 (14.9%) and 6 (9%), respectively. The most common benign lesions were pyogenic granuloma (10.4%) and radicular cyst (11.4%).

Conclusions As a result, biopsies should be performed to exclude malignancy in the oral cavity. In addition, the diagnosis of rare lesions is important in terms of treatment management.

Anahtar Kelimeler

oral mucosa, oral cavity, biopsy, histopathological diagnosis

Kaynakça

• 1. Modi D, Laishram RS, Sharma LDC, Debnath K. Pattern of oral cavity lesions in a tertiary care hospital in Manipur, India. J Med Soc 2013;27:199-201.
• 2. Fierro-Garibay C, Almendros-Marqués N, Berini-Aytés L, Gay-Escoda C. Prevalence of biopsied oral lesions in a Department of Oral Surgery. J Clin Exp Dent 2011;3:73-7.
• 3. Reichart PA. Oral mucosal lesions in a representative cross-sectional study of aging Germans. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2000;28:390-8.
• 4. Jainkittivong A, Aneksuk V, Langlais R. Oral mucosal conditions in elderly dental patients. Oral Dis 2002;8:218-23.
• 5. Campisi G, Margiotta V. Oral mucosal lesions and risk habits among men in an Italian study population. J Oral Pathol Med 2001;30:22-8.
• 6. Lin H, Corbet E, Lo E. Oral mucosal lesions in adult Chinese. J Dent Res 2001;80:1486-90.
• 7. Cebeci A, Gulsahi A, Kamburoglu K, Orhan B-K, Oztas B. Prevalence and distribution of oral mucosal lesions in an adult Turkish population. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2009;14:272-7.
• 8. Saraswathi T, Ranganathan K, Shanmugam S, et al. Prevalence of oral lesions in relation to habits: Cross-sectional study in South India. Indian J Dent Res 2006;17:121-4.
• 9. Axéll T. Occurrence of leukoplakia and some other oral white lesions among 20 333 adult Swedish people. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1987;15:46-51.
• 10. Field E, Morrison T, Darling A, Parr T, Zakrzewska J. Oral mucosal screening as an integral part of routine dental care. Br Dent J 1995;179:262-7.
• 11. Riaz N, Warraich RA. Tumors and tumor like lesions of the orofacial region at Mayo Hospital, Lahore five year study. Annals of KEMU 2011;17:123-6.
• 12. Subhe N, Ali E, Hassawi BA. Tumors and tumor like lesions of the oral cavity a study of 303 cases. Tikrit Medical Journal 2010;1:177-83.
• 13. Mehta NV, Dave KK, Gonsai R, et al. Histopathological study of oral cavity lesions: A study on 100 cases. Int J Cur Res Rev 2013;5:110-5.
• 14. Pudasaini S, Baral R. Oral cavity lesions: A study of 21 cases. J Pathol Nep 2011;1:49-51.
• 15. Mujica V, Rivera H, Carrero M. Prevalence of oral soft tissue lesions in an elderly venezuelan population. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2008;13:270-4.
• 16. Al-Khateeb TH. Benign oral masses in a northern Jordanian population-a retrospective study. Open Dent J. 2009;3:147-51.
• 17. Misra V, Singh PA, Lal N, Agarwal P, Singh M. Changing pattern of oral cavity lesions and personal habits over a decade: hospital based record analysis from allahabad. Indian J Community Med 2009;34:321-6.
• 18. Nevalainen M, Närhi T, Ainamo A. Oral mucosal lesions and oral hygiene habits in the home-living elderly. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:332-7.