UZAKTAN EĞİTİM YOLUYLA MUHASEBE EĞİTİMİNDE BİREYSEL YENİLİKÇİLİK, ÖZ YETERLİLİK VE ÖZ MOTİVASYONUN MEMNUNİYETE ETKİSİ

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2, 123 - 132, 01.10.2022

İsmail Atabay

https://doi.org/10.32951/mufider.1105373

Cited By: 1

Öz

Covid-19 pandemi sürecinden önce yükseköğretimdeki muhasebe eğitimi genellikle geleneksel yöntemlerle yürütülmekteydi. Ancak, pandemi süreci yükseköğretimin hemen hemen tüm alanlarında olduğu gibi, muhasebe eğitiminin de uzaktan eğitim yoluyla yapılmasını zorunlu kıldı. Pandemi sona erse bile pandemiden önceki duruma dönüşün mümkün olamayacağı yönünde görüşler dikkate alındığında, bu süreç muhasebe eğitimi açısından belki de uzun vadeli değişimin bir başlangıcı olabilir. Bu nedenle, uzaktan eğitimde memnuniyete etki eden faktörleri belirlemek son derece önemlidir.
Bu çalışma, uzaktan eğitim yoluyla muhasebe eğitimi alan öğrencilerin bireysel yenilikçilik, öz yeterlilik ve öz motivasyonlarının memnuniyetleri üzerindeki etkisini belirlemeye yöneliktir. Bu amaçla en az bir dönem uzaktan eğitim yoluyla muhasebe eğitimi almış 393 üniversite öğrencisi ile yapılan anket sonuçları SPSS 25.0 ve AMOS 23 paket programları ile analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda bireysel yenilikçilik boyutlarından değişime direnç ve değişime açıklığın, öz yeterliliğin ve öz motivasyonun uzaktan eğitim memnuniyetinin önemli yordayıcısı oldukları tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Muhasebe Eğitimi, Uzaktan Eğitim, Öz Yeterlilik, Öz Motivasyon, Bireysel Yenilikçilik

Kaynakça

• Abayadeera, N., Mihret, D. G., & Dulige, J. H. (2019). Acculturation of non-native English-speaking teachers in accounting: an ethnographic study. Accounting Research Journal, 33(1), 1-15.
• Al-Sheeb, B., Hamouda, A. M., & Abdella, G. M. (2018). Investigating determinants of student satisfaction in the first year of college in a public university in the state of Qatar. Education Research International, 2018.
• Baker, R., & Wick, S. (2020). Undergraduate accounting students’ perception of a course in accounting research and theory. Accounting Research Journal, 33(1), 217-233.
• Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Human Behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71-81). New York: Academic Press. (Reprinted in H. Friedman[Ed.],Encyclopedia of mental health. San Diego: Academic Press, 1998).Online: https://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Bandura/Bandura1994EHB.pdf
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman and Company.
• Basuony, M. A., EmadEldeen, R., Farghaly, M., El-Bassiouny, N., & Mohamed, E. K. (2020). The factors affecting student satisfaction with online education during the COVID-19 pandemic: an empirical study of an emerging Muslim country. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 12(3), 631-648.
• Bryant, J., & Bodfish, S. (2014). The Relationship of Student Satisfaction to Key Indicators for Colleges and Universities. 2014 National Research Report. Noel-Levitz, Inc.
• Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in higher education, 47(1), 1-32.
• Caza, A., Brower, H. H., & Wayne, J. H. (2015). Effects of a holistic, experiential curriculum on business students' satisfaction and career confidence. The International Journal of Management Education, 13(1), 75-83.
• Chemers, M. M., Hu, L. T., & Garcia, B. F. (2001). Academic self-efficacy and first year college student performance and adjustment. Journal of Educational psychology, 93(1), 55-64.
• Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a New General Self-Efficacy Scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4(1), 62-83.
• Coates, H. (2007). A model of online and general campus‐based student engagement. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(2), 121-141.
• DeWitz, S. J., & Walsh, W. B. (2002). Self-efficacy and college student satisfaction. Journal of career Assessment, 10(3), 315-326.
• Elliott, K. M., & Healy, M. A. (2001). Key factors influencing student satisfaction related to recruitment and retention. Journal of marketing for higher education, 10(4), 1-11.
• Eom, S. B., Wen, H. J., & Ashill, N. (2006). The determinants of students' perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education: An empirical investigation. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(2), 215-235.
• Gürbüz, S. ve Şahin, F. (2018). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri (5. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Harbour, K. E., Evanovich, L. L., Sweigart, C. A., & Hughes, L. E. (2015). A brief review of effective teaching practices that maximize student engagement. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 59(1), 5-13.
• Hurt, H. T., Joseph, K., & Cook, C. D. (1977). Scales for the measurement of innovativeness. Human Communication Research, 4(1), 58-65.
• Irshad, A., Narayan, A.K., & Umesh, S.(2021). Adapting to COVID-19 disruptions: student engagement in online learning of accounting. Accounting Research Journal, 34(3), 261-269.
• Kılıçer, K., & Odabaşı, H. F. (2010). Bireysel Yenilikçilik Ölçeği (BYÖ): Türkçeye Uyarlama, Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 38, 150-164.
• LaRose, R., & Whitten, P. (2000). Re‐thinking instructional immediacy for web courses: A social cognitive exploration. Communication Education, 49(4), 320-338.
• Midgley, D. F., & Dowling, G. R. (1978). Innovativeness: The concept and its measurement. Journal of consumer research, 4(4), 229-242.
• Mohamed, E. K. (2009). Optimizing business education: A strategic response to global challenges. Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues, 2(4), 299-311.
• Muslichah (2018). The Effect of Self Efficacy and Information Quality on Behavioral Intention with Perceived Usefulness as Intervening Variable. Journal of Accounting–Business & Management, 25(1), 21-34.
• Pellas, N. (2014). The influence of computer self-efficacy, metacognitive self-regulation and self- esteem on student engagement in online learning programs: Evidence from the virtual world of Second Life. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 157-170.
• Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
• Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovations. (3th ed.). New York: Free Press.
• Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations 5th ed. New York: The Free Press.
• Rogers, E. M., & Shoemaker, F. F. (1971). Communication of Innovations; A Cross-Cultural Approach.
• Sahin, I., & Shelley, M. (2008). Considering students' perceptions: The distance education student satisfaction model. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(3), 216-223.
• Scull, J., Phillips, M., Sharma, U., & Garnier, K. (2020). Innovations in teacher education at the time of COVID19: an Australian perspective. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 497-506.
• Sezgin, E. E. ve Düşükcan, M. (2020). Hemşirelerin öz yeterlilik inanç düzeylerinin performansları üzerindeki etkisi: Elazığ ili örneği. Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 9(3), 1689-1702.
• Sharma, U., & Kelly, M. (2014). Students’ perceptions of education for sustainable development in the accounting and business curriculum at a business school in New Zealand. Meditari Accountancy Research, 22(2), 130-148.
• Smith, P. A. (2001). Understanding self-regulated learning and its implications for accounting educators and researchers. Issues in Accounting Education, 16(4), 663-700.
• Stone, G., Fiedler, B. A., & Kandunias, C. (2014). Harnessing Facebook for student engagement in accounting education: Guiding principles for accounting students and educators. Accounting Education, 23(4), 295-321.
• Taylor, M., Marrone, M., Tayar, M., & Mueller, B. (2018). Digital storytelling and visual metaphor in lectures: a study of student engagement. Accounting Education, 27(6), 552-569.
• Wang, Q. (2006). Quality assurance–best practices for assessing online programs. International Journal on E-learning, 5(2), 265-274.
• Wickersham, L. E., & McGee, P. (2008). Perceptions of satisfaction and deeper learning in an online course. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 9(1), 73-83.
• Zimmerman, B. J. (1985). The development of “intrinsic” motivation: A social learning analysis. Annals of Child Development, 2, 117–160.
• Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Dimensions of academic self-regulation: A conceptual framework for education. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Selfregulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 3–21.
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64-70.