Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2020, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 28 - 35, 31.12.2020
https://doi.org/10.22531/muglajsci.688018

Öz

Kaynakça

  • [1] Harvey, G. (1986). Study of Airport Access Mode Choice. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 112 (5), 525-545.
  • [2] Gupta, S., Vovsha, P., & Donnelly, R. M. (2008). Air Passenger Preferences for Choice of Airport and Ground Access Mode in the New York City Metropolitan Region. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2042, 3-11.
  • [3] Tam, M. L., Lam, W. H., & Lo, H. P. (2008). Modeling air passenger travel behavior on airport ground access mode choices. Transportmetrica, 4 (2), 135-153.
  • [4] Alhussein, S. N. (2011). Analysis of ground access modes choice King Khaled International Airport, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Journal of Transport Geography, 19, 1361-1367.
  • [5] Koster, P., Kroes, E., & Verhoef, E. (2011). Travel time variability and airport accessibility. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 45 (10), 1545-1559.
  • [6] Akar, G. (2013). Ground access to airports, case study: Port Columbus International Airport. Journal of Air Transport Management, 30, 25-31.
  • [7] Choo, S., You, S., & Lee, H. (2013). Exploring characteristics of airport access mode choice: a case study of Korea. Transportation Planning and Technology, 36 (4), 335-351.
  • [8] Budd, T., Ryley, T., & Ison, S. (2014). Airport ground access and private car use: a segmentation analysis. Journal of Transport Geography, 36 (April 2014), 106-115.

MODE CHOICE BEHAVIOR FOR GROUND ACCESS TO AIRPORTS: A CASE OF ISTANBUL ATATÜRK INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (IST) AND SABIHA GOKCEN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (SAW)

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 28 - 35, 31.12.2020
https://doi.org/10.22531/muglajsci.688018

Öz

Accessing airports has been a problem for passengers due to traffic congestion in cities. Thus, in order to catch the flights on time, passengers consider many factors to choose the transportation mode for airport access. Some of the factors are covariates, and they can be listed as age of the passenger, number of luggage carried, travel cost and travel time to the airport, group size of the passengers, and reliability of access modes. These covariates, may differ for each airport; and hence, in this paper, we investigated the differences of these covariates between Istanbul Ataturk International Airport (IST) and Istanbul Sabiha Gokcen International Airport (SAW). Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc tests were conducted to investigate the covariates that affect the mode choice to access IST and SAW. The results indicated that these two airports have differences in terms of the effect of these selected six covariates on airport access mode choice. Reliability of the modes, travel time, travel cost, age of the passenger and traveling group size affected the mode choice to access IST. On the other hand, only reliability of the modes, travel time and travel cost had effects on airport access mode choice for SAW. Based on the analysis, some recommendations for the decision makers were also provided.

Kaynakça

  • [1] Harvey, G. (1986). Study of Airport Access Mode Choice. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 112 (5), 525-545.
  • [2] Gupta, S., Vovsha, P., & Donnelly, R. M. (2008). Air Passenger Preferences for Choice of Airport and Ground Access Mode in the New York City Metropolitan Region. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2042, 3-11.
  • [3] Tam, M. L., Lam, W. H., & Lo, H. P. (2008). Modeling air passenger travel behavior on airport ground access mode choices. Transportmetrica, 4 (2), 135-153.
  • [4] Alhussein, S. N. (2011). Analysis of ground access modes choice King Khaled International Airport, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Journal of Transport Geography, 19, 1361-1367.
  • [5] Koster, P., Kroes, E., & Verhoef, E. (2011). Travel time variability and airport accessibility. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 45 (10), 1545-1559.
  • [6] Akar, G. (2013). Ground access to airports, case study: Port Columbus International Airport. Journal of Air Transport Management, 30, 25-31.
  • [7] Choo, S., You, S., & Lee, H. (2013). Exploring characteristics of airport access mode choice: a case study of Korea. Transportation Planning and Technology, 36 (4), 335-351.
  • [8] Budd, T., Ryley, T., & Ison, S. (2014). Airport ground access and private car use: a segmentation analysis. Journal of Transport Geography, 36 (April 2014), 106-115.
Toplam 8 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Mühendislik
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Gürkan Günay 0000-0003-0597-1511

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Aralık 2020
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2020 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Günay, G. (2020). MODE CHOICE BEHAVIOR FOR GROUND ACCESS TO AIRPORTS: A CASE OF ISTANBUL ATATÜRK INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (IST) AND SABIHA GOKCEN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (SAW). Mugla Journal of Science and Technology, 6(2), 28-35. https://doi.org/10.22531/muglajsci.688018
AMA Günay G. MODE CHOICE BEHAVIOR FOR GROUND ACCESS TO AIRPORTS: A CASE OF ISTANBUL ATATÜRK INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (IST) AND SABIHA GOKCEN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (SAW). MJST. Aralık 2020;6(2):28-35. doi:10.22531/muglajsci.688018
Chicago Günay, Gürkan. “MODE CHOICE BEHAVIOR FOR GROUND ACCESS TO AIRPORTS: A CASE OF ISTANBUL ATATÜRK INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (IST) AND SABIHA GOKCEN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (SAW)”. Mugla Journal of Science and Technology 6, sy. 2 (Aralık 2020): 28-35. https://doi.org/10.22531/muglajsci.688018.
EndNote Günay G (01 Aralık 2020) MODE CHOICE BEHAVIOR FOR GROUND ACCESS TO AIRPORTS: A CASE OF ISTANBUL ATATÜRK INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (IST) AND SABIHA GOKCEN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (SAW). Mugla Journal of Science and Technology 6 2 28–35.
IEEE G. Günay, “MODE CHOICE BEHAVIOR FOR GROUND ACCESS TO AIRPORTS: A CASE OF ISTANBUL ATATÜRK INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (IST) AND SABIHA GOKCEN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (SAW)”, MJST, c. 6, sy. 2, ss. 28–35, 2020, doi: 10.22531/muglajsci.688018.
ISNAD Günay, Gürkan. “MODE CHOICE BEHAVIOR FOR GROUND ACCESS TO AIRPORTS: A CASE OF ISTANBUL ATATÜRK INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (IST) AND SABIHA GOKCEN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (SAW)”. Mugla Journal of Science and Technology 6/2 (Aralık 2020), 28-35. https://doi.org/10.22531/muglajsci.688018.
JAMA Günay G. MODE CHOICE BEHAVIOR FOR GROUND ACCESS TO AIRPORTS: A CASE OF ISTANBUL ATATÜRK INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (IST) AND SABIHA GOKCEN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (SAW). MJST. 2020;6:28–35.
MLA Günay, Gürkan. “MODE CHOICE BEHAVIOR FOR GROUND ACCESS TO AIRPORTS: A CASE OF ISTANBUL ATATÜRK INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (IST) AND SABIHA GOKCEN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (SAW)”. Mugla Journal of Science and Technology, c. 6, sy. 2, 2020, ss. 28-35, doi:10.22531/muglajsci.688018.
Vancouver Günay G. MODE CHOICE BEHAVIOR FOR GROUND ACCESS TO AIRPORTS: A CASE OF ISTANBUL ATATÜRK INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (IST) AND SABIHA GOKCEN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (SAW). MJST. 2020;6(2):28-35.

5975f2e33b6ce.png
Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri ve Teknoloji Dergisi Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari-AynıLisanslaPaylaş 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.