SERMAYE YAPISI, KSS VE HİSSE SENEDİ PİYASASI: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ

Öz

Bu çalışma, kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk (KSS) ile finansal kaldıraç arasındaki yönlü ilişkiyi ve bu iki unsurun firma değeri ve risk üzerindeki etkileşimsel etkilerini incelemektedir. 2002–2023 yılları arasında BIST100 endeksinde yer alan Türk firmalarına ait panel veri kullanılarak sabit etkiler modeli uygulanmıştır. Bulgular, kaldıraç seviyesinin KSS faaliyetlerini marjinal olarak olumsuz etkilediğini, ancak KSS'nin kaldıraç üzerinde anlamlı bir etkisinin bulunmadığını göstermektedir. Ayrıca, KSS ile kaldıraç arasındaki etkileşim teriminin firma değeri üzerinde negatif ve anlamlı bir etkisi varken, fiyat oynaklığı üzerinde anlamlı bir etkisi bulunmamaktadır. Bu sonuçlar, KSS'nin finansal yapı bağlamında değer yaratıcı ya da risk azaltıcı etkilerinin firma koşullarına bağlı olduğunu göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• CSR
• panel data analysis
• leverage
• capital structure
• firm value
• value creation
• risk-mitigation

CAPITAL STRUCTURE, CSR, AND STOCK MARKET: EVIDENCE FROM TÜRKİYE

Öz

This study analyses the dynamic relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and financial leverage, and how their interaction influence firm value and risk. Using panel data from Turkish BIST100 firms between 2002 and 2023, fixed-effect regressions showed that leverage has a marginally negative impact on CSR, while CSR does not significantly influence leverage. Additionally, the interaction between CSR and leverage has a negative effect on firm value but does not significantly affect price volatility. These findings contribute to the understanding of CSR's role under financial constraints.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• CSR
• Panel data analysis
• leverage
• capial structure
• firm value
• valu creation
• risk mitigation

Kaynakça

1. Albuquerque, R., Koskinen, Y., & Zhang, C. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: Theory and empirical evidence. Management Science, 65(10), 4451–4469. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3043
2. Bae, K.-H., El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C. Y., & Zheng, Y. (2019). Does corporate social responsibility reduce the costs of high leverage? Evidence from capital structure and product market interactions. Journal of Banking & Finance, 100, 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.11.0057
3. Dewi, P. P. R. A., Sudana, P., Badera, D. N., & Rasmini, N. K. (2021). The effect of CSR disclosure on firm value with profitability and leverage as moderators. Indonesian Journal of Sustainability Accounting and Management, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.28992/ijsam.v5i1.325
4. Do, T. K., Huang, H. H., & Lo, T.-C. (2023). Does corporate social responsibility affect leverage adjustments? Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156.023.01141-8
5. Falck, O., &Heblich, S. (2007). Corporate social responsibility: Doing well by doing good. Business Horizons, 50(3), 247–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2006.12.002
6. Fatemi, A., Fooladi, I., & Tehranian, H. (2015). Valuation effects of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Banking & Finance, 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.04.028
7. Farah, T., Li, J., Li, Z., & Shamsuddin, A. (2021). The non-linear effect of CSR on firms’ systematic risk: International evidence. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, 71, 101388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2021.101288
8. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.

9. Friedman, M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits. The New York Times Magazine, September 13, 1970.
10. Elbardan, H., Uyar, A., Kuzey, C., & Karaman, A. S. (2023). CSR reporting, assurance, and firm value and risk: The moderating effects of CSR committees and executive compensation. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 53, 100579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2023.100579
11. Goss, A., & Roberts, G. S. (2011). The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of bank loans. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(7), 1794–1810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.12.002
12. Guo, Z., Hou, S., & Li, Q. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and firm value: The moderating effects of financial flexibility and R&D investment. Sustainability, 12, 8452. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208452
13. Ho, K.-C., Wang, Q., Sun, K., & Wang, L. F. S. (2021). How does corporate social responsibility affect firm leverage? Managerial Finance, 51 (10). https://doi.org/10.1108/K-10-2020-0708
14. Hsu, S.-C., Wu, K.-T., Wang, Q., & Chang, Y. (2023). Is capital structure associated with corporate social responsibility? International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 8(6). https://doi.org/10.1186/ s40991.023.00081-9
15. Jensen, M. C. & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304- 405X(76)90026-X
16. Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumentalstakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404-437,https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.950.7312924
17. Lee, J., & Koh, K. R. (2024). ESG performance and firm risk in the U.S. financial firms. Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies, 42, https://doi.org/10.1002/rfe.1208
18. Li, H., Zhang, X.& Zhao, Y. (2022). ESG and firm’s default risk. Finance Research Letters, 47, 102713. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102713
19. Lu, H., Oh, W.-Y., Kleffner, A., & Chang, Y. K. (2021). How do investors value corporate social responsibility? Market valuation and the firm specific contexts. Journal of Business Research, 125. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.063
20. Mahmood, A. N., Arslan, H. M., Younas, Z. I., Komal, B., Ali, K. & Muhammad M. (2023). Understanding the dynamics of capital structure, corporate governance, and corporate social responsibility in high – and low-leveraged US and Chinese firms. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 46201–46221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356.022.24843-3
21. Mhiri, C., Ajina, A., Hussain, N., Mnzava, B., & Wieczorek-Kosmala, M. (2024). Corporate social responsibility and capital structure: Moderating effect of culture. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2957
22. Nirino, N., Battisti, E., Ferraris, A., Dell’Atti, S., &Briamonte, M. F. (2022). How and when corporate social performance reduces firm risk? The moderating role of corporate governance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29, 1995–2010. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2296
23. Oduro, S., Umar, R. M., De Massis, A., &Haylemariam, L. G. (2024). Corporate social responsibility and family firm performance: A meta-analytic review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.3004
24. Ogachi, D., & Zoltan, Z. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and firm value protection. International Journal of Financial Studies, 8(72). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs8040072
25. Rosyid, M. F., Saraswati, E., & Ghofar, A. (2022). Firm value: CSR disclosure, risk management and good corporate governance dimensions. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.22219/jrak. v11i3.20367
26. Shahrour, M. H., Girerd-Potin, I., &Taramsaoco, O. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and firm default risk in the Eurozone: A market-based approach. Managerial Finance, 47(7). https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-02- 2020-0059
27. Sheikh, S. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and firm leverage: The impact of market competition. Research in International Business and Finance, 48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2018.11.002
28. Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355-374. https://doi. org/10.2307/1882010
29. Wang, Q., Chen, H., Xue, Y., & Liang, H. (2022). How corporate social responsibility affects firm performance: The inverted-U shape contingent on founder CEO. Sustainability, 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su141811340
30. Wang, W., & Yang, J. (2024). The inverted U-shaped relationship between corporate social responsibility and default risk: The role of financing constraints. Heliyon, 10(7), e34304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. heliyon.2024.e34304
31. Wu, C., Xiong, X., Gao, Y., & Meng, J. G. (2024). Corporate social responsibility dimensions and stock price crash risk: Evidence from the management’s self-interest perspective. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 83, 102535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2023.102235