The Language of Typography as an Integration of Functionality, Art and Communication

Öz

This study covers a range of design elements and research topics, from the functionality of typography on the written language to its artistic effectiveness. The research focuses on the contemporary role of typography and its integration into digitalization and multiple communication platforms. With the multiple integration of typography, graphic design has placed experimental typography at the center of its significant changes and transformations in the 21st century. Visual communication norms have undergone significant formal and structural changes. With digitalization, typography's agenda has expanded to become an integral part of communication design. In this context, the functional analysis of typography focuses on various issues such as its role in brand identity, its impact in advertising, accessibility and experimental typography. The study examines the functional aspects of typography in communication design and visual arts, such as legibility, aesthetics and brand identity building, and discusses new approaches to typography. In this context, typography, responsive typography and the many sub-elements that influence responsive typography, including functional analysis of typography, digital reading and typography, typography and consumer response, legibility and readability, typography in brand identity, typography in multimodal environments, typography in accessibility, and experimental typography and artistic expression, are explored.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Typography
• Experimental Typography
• Graphic Design
• Communication

İşlevsellik, Sanat ve İletişim Entegrasyonu Olarak Tipografinin Dili

Öz

Bu çalışma, tipografinin yazı dili üzerindeki işlevselliğinden sanatsal olarak etkililiğine kadar bir dizi tasarım unsurunu ve araştırma konusunu kapsamaktadır. Araştırmada, tipografinin çağdaş roldeki, dijitalleşme ve çoklu iletişim platformlarına entegrasyonu ele alınmıştır. Tipografinin çoklu entegrasyonuyla grafik tasarım, 21. yüzyıldaki önemli değişikliklerinin ve dönüşümlerinin merkezine deneysel tipografiyi yerleştirmiştir. Görsel iletişim normları biçimsel ve yapısal olarak önemli değişimler geçirmiştir. Dijitalleşme ile tipografinin gündemi genişleyerek iletişim tasarımının ayrılmaz bir parçası haline gelmiştir. Bu kapsamda, tipografinin işlevsel analizi, marka kimliğindeki rolü, reklamcılıktaki etkisi, erişilebilirlik ve deneysel tipografi gibi çeşitli konulara odaklanmaktadır. Çalışma, tipografinin iletişim tasarımında ve görsel sanatlarda tipografinin okunabilirlik, estetik ve marka kimliği oluşturma gibi işlevsel yönlerini inceleyerek, tipografi konusundaki yeni yaklaşımları ele almaktadır. Bu bağlamda, tipografi, duyarlı tipografi ve duyarlı tipografiyi etkileyen; tipografinin işlevsel analizi, dijital okuma ve tipografi, tipografi ve tüketici tepkisi, okunaklılık ve okunabilirlik, marka kimliğinde tipografi, çok modlu ortamlarda tipografi, erişilebilirlikte tipografi ve deneysel tipografi ve sanatsal ifade gibi konuları içeren birçok alt unsura ait içgüdümsel bir referans noktaları araştırılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Tipografi
• Deneysel Tipografi
• Grafik Tasarım
• İletişim

Kaynakça

1. Bellantoni, J. (2000). Type in motion. Thames & Hudson Ltd.
2. Bezemer, J. & Kress, G. (2009). Visualizing English: A social semiotic history of a school subject. Visual Communication, 8(3), 247-262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357209106467
3. Childers, T. & Jass, J. (2002). All dressed up with something to say: Effects of typeface semantic associations on brand perceptions and consumer memory. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(2), 93-106. https://doi.org/10.1207/153276602760078631
4. Cui, M., Zheng, C., Shi, W., & Wang, Z. (2023). Research of the typography design for digital reading on mobile devices. AHFE International, 77, 110-121. https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1003368
5. Gani, M., Masrek, M., & Ramli, I. (2014). Typography and its significant to memorizing a logo. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 4(3), 220-224. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijssh.2014.v4.350
6. Günel, K., & Keş, Y. (2021). Kinetik tipografide anlam oluşturma sürecinde sosyal göstergebilim geçişlilik sistemi. Ulakbilge Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 60, 765-786. Doi: 10.7816/ulakbilge-09-60-08
7. Henderson, P.W., Giese, J.L., & Cote, J.A. (2004). Impression management using typeface design. Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 60-72. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.4.60.42736
8. Hillner, M. (2009). Basics typography 01: Virtual typography. AVA Publishers.

9. Ho, A. G. (2013). Typography today: Emotion recognition in typography. IASDR 2013 Conference, 1(2). 5573- 5582. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315658241_Typography_today_Emotion_recognition_in_typography
10. Huh, J. (2012). Considerations on wolfgang weingart's typography based on syntactic characteristics. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 12(7), 86-93. https://doi.org/10.5392/jkca.2012.12.07.086
11. Hussain, R., & Ferdous, A. (2014). Developing a framework of integrated visual brand identity touch point (ivbit) programmes in universities. The Marketing Review, 14(4), 429-443. https://doi.org/10.1362/146934714x14185702841406
12. Kim, N. (2015). Creating expressive and experimental typography and typeface by utilizing scriptographer: Focused on rush type and celestial type. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 15(6), 203-214. https://doi.org/10.5392/jkca.2015.15.06.203
13. Legge, G., & Bigelow, C. (2011). Does print size matter for reading? A review of findings from vision science and typography. Journal of Vision, 11(5), 8-8. https://doi.org/10.1167/11.5.8
14. Lelis, C., Leitão, S., Mealha, Ó., & Dunning, B. (2020). Typography: The constant vector of dynamic logos. Visual Communication, 21(1), 146–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357220966775
15. Lumenta, N. (2015). Typeface "garuda batik" sebagai duta budaya indonesia. Artika, 1(1), 49-58. https://doi.org/10.34148/artika.v1i1.28
16. Luthfiasari, A., & Fadillah, C. (2023). Comparative analysis of kinetic typography elements in movie title sequence. Serat Rupa Journal of Design, 7(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.28932/srjd.v7i1.5636
17. Mahmood, A. K. (2013). Expressions of Arabic calligraphy in Arabic typography for a cultural identity of the visual Arabic script. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:145817773
18. Morgan, N., Pritchard, A., & Pride, R. (2004). Destination branding (2. Baskı). Elsevier Butterworth Heinemann.
19. Mullin, B.J., Hardy, S., & Sutton, W. (2000). Sports marketing. Human Kinetics Press.
20. Nedeljković, U., Novaković, D., Puškarević, I., & Tomić, I. (2014). Helvetica as a type convention for the youthful and trendy image: A consumer response to designer safe option. Marketing, 45(1), 50-62. https://doi.org/10.5937/markt1401050n
21. Nørgaard, N. (2009). The semiotics of typography in literary texts. A multimodal approach. Orbis Litterarum, 64(2), 141-160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0730.2008.00949.x
22. Poon, S. (2021). Typography design’s new trajectory towards visual literacy for digital mediums. Studies in Media and Communication, 9(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v9i1.5071
23. Rowe, C. L. (1982). The connotative dimensions of selected display typefaces. Information Design Journal, 3(1), 30–37. doi: 10.1075/idj.3.1.03row
24. Sawyer, B. D., Dobres, J., & Chahine, N. (2020). The great typography bake off: Comparing legibility at a glance. Ergonomics, 63(4), 391-398. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2020.1714748
25. Smith, J., & Firth, J. (2011). Qualitative data analysis: The framework approach. Nurse Researcher, 18(2), 52-62. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2011.01.18.2.52.c8284
26. Stanić Loknar, N., Bratić, D., & Agić, A. (2020). Kinetic typography - figuration and technology. Proceedings - The Tenth International Symposium GRID 2020.
27. Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Towards a semiotics of typography. Information Design Journal, 14(2), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.14.2.06lee
28. Warschauer, M. (2007). The paradoxical future of digital learning. Learning Inquiry, 1(1), 41-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11519-007-0001-5
29. Watzlawick, P., Beavin Bavelas, J., & Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. W. W. Norton & Company.
30. Wheeler, A. (2006). Designing brand identity. John Wiley & Sons.
31. Woolman, M., & Bellantoni, J. (2000). Moving type: Designing for time and space. Rotovision.
32. Yang, C., & Hsu, T. (2015). Applying semiotic theories to graphic design education: An empirical study on poster design teaching. International Education Studies, 8(12), 117. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n12p117