AN EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE CYPRUS AND CYPRUS TURKISH HISTORY COURSE CURRICULUM OBJECTIVES IN SCHOOL PRACTICES

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1, 69 - 81, 02.07.2019

İpek Danju

Öz

The
aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of the Cyprus and Cyprus
Turkish History course curriculum’s objectiveness and the teachers’
implementation of the curriculum in schools. The research was conducted using a
qualitative research approach and a descriptive research model. In this study,
the qualitative research is structured using the case study pattern The
researcher prepared semi-structured interview form to reveal the teachers’
views. Content analysis method was applied through using Nvivo 10 software in
the analysis of qualitative data. The analysis of the survey data was conducted
by encoding the results, as well as dividing and categorizing the teacher’s
feedback and opinions; furthermore, direct opinions have also been noted. According
to the findings, not only is there a disparity between the application of the
program and its original objectives, but the effectiveness of the curriculum is
also questioned.

Anahtar Kelimeler

education, curriculum, Cyprus and Cyprus Turkish history, ;qualitive

Kaynakça

• Akyuz, Y. (2014). Turk egitim tarihi M.O. 1000 – M.S. 2014. Ankara: Pegem Publishing.
• Batdi, V. (2014). Ortaogretim matematik ogretim programi iceriginin rasch olcme modeli ve nvivo ile analizi. Electronic Turkish Studies, 9(11), 93-109.
• Brown, J. D. (1989), 'Language program evaluation: A synthesis of existing possibilities'. In K. Johnson (Ed.), The second language curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Demir, O., & Duruhan, K. (2015). Ilkokul 2. sınıf Ingilizce dersi programi uygulamalarina iliskin ogretmen gorusleri. International Journal of New Trends in Arts, Sports & Science Education, 4(3), 25 – 36.
• Demirel, O. (1996). Genel ogretim yontemleri. Ankara: USEM Publications.
• Demirel, O. (2006). Egitimde program gelistirme: Kuramdan uygulamaya. Ankara: Pegem Publishing.
• Dogan, H. (1997). Egitimde program ve ogretim tasarimi. Ankara: Onder Press.
• Erden, M. (1995). Icerik sentezleme stratejilerinin erisige etkisi. H. U Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11, 111-117.
• Erden, M. (1998). Egitimde program degerlendirme. Ankara: Ani Publishing.
• Erturk, S. (2013). Egitimde program gelistirme. Ankara: Edge Akademi.
• Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2004). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines. New York: Pearson Education Inc.
• Gibbs, G. R. (2002). Qualitative data analysis: explorations with NVivo. Buckingham: Open University Pres. 

• Hopkins, D. (1989). Evaluation for school development. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
• Kocoglu, E., & Aydin, M. (2017). Alan uzmanlarina gore 2017 sosyal bilgiler programinin 2005 programi cercevesinde analizi. International Journal of Social Science Research, 6(1), 61-74.
• Kose, E. (2011). 2005 Ilkogretim matematik programinin egitsel elestiri modeline gore degerlendirilmesi. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi, 2(2), 1-11. Kucukahmet, L. (1995). Ogretim ilke ve yontemleri. Ankara: Gazi Buro Kitapevi.
• Marsh, C. J., & Willis, G. (2007). Curriculum: Alternative approaches, ongoing issues. (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
• Milli Egitim ve Kultur Bakanligi (2016). Temel Egitim Kibris ve Kibris Turk Tarihi Dersi Ogretim Programi, KKTC Milli Egitim ve Kultur Bakanligi, Talim Terbiye Dairesi.
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. London: Sage Publication.
• Oliva, P. F. (1988) Developing the curriculum. Scott, Foresman and Company: Boston.
• Orakci, S. (2012). Ilkogretim 7. siniflar icin uygulanan 2006 Ingilizce ogretim programinin ogretmen goruslerine gore degerlendirilmesi (Unpublished master thesis). Gazi University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
• Richards, L. (2002). Using NVivo in qualitative research. Melbourne: QSR. 

• Sakaoglu, N. (2008). Ilkokul tarih programlari ve ders kitaplari, tarih ogretimi ders kitaplari. Istanbul: Tarih Vakfi Yurt Publications..
• Saylor, J. G., Alexander, W. M., & Lewis, A. J. (1981). Curriculum planning for better teaching and learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
• Şad, S. N. & Karaova, M. (2015). Ilkokul ikinci sinif Ingilizce dersi baglaminda dinleme becerisi ogretimi: Bir durum calismasi. Egitimde Nitel Arastirmalar Dergisi, 3(2), 66 – 95.
• Tavsancil, E., & Aslan, E. (2001). Sozel, yazili ve diger materyaller icin icerik analizi ve uygulama ornekleri. Istanbul: Epsilon Bookstore.
• Tezcan, M. (1985). Egitim sosyolojisi. Ankara: Ankara Universitesi Press.
• Tyler, R. W. (1975). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. The University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL.
• Varis, F. (1988). Egitimde program gelistirme. Ankara: Ankara Universitesi Press.
• Varis, F. (1997). Egitimde program gelistirme. Ankara: Alkim Publishing.
• Wiles, J., & Bondi, J. (1993). Curriculum development: A guide to practice. NY: McMillan Publishing Company.
• Worthen, B. R. & Sanders, J. R. (1973). Educational evaluation: Theory and practice. Belmont, Calif: Wadsworth.