KÜRESEL FUTBOLDA YAPISAL YÖNETİŞİM VE PSİKOLOJİK DİNAMİKLER: TÜRK FUTBOLUNDA KURUMSAL YAPININ BAŞARISIZLIKTAKİ PAYI VE REFORM GEREKLİLİĞİ

Öz

Bu çalışma, küresel futbolun yapısal yönetişim süreçlerini ve bu süreçlerin psikolojik etkilerini inceleyerek, Türkiye futbolundaki kurumsal yapıların başarısızlıktaki rolünü araştırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Araştırma, karma yöntem yaklaşımı ile tasarlanmıştır. Bu yaklaşımda, sayısal veriler (finansal tablolar, altyapı istatistikleri, kulüp raporları) ile nitel veriler (literatür taraması, akademik makaleler, tezler, resmi raporlar) birleştirilerek kapsamlı bir analiz planlanmıştır. Türkiye’ye benzer futbolun kurumsal örgütlenmesi sahip ülkelerden Almanya, Brezilya, ABD ve Japonya örnekleri karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmiş ve başarılı yönetim modelleri, finansal sürdürülebilirlik ile altyapı yatırımlarının kurumsal başarının temel belirleyicileri olabileceği varsayılarak incelenmiştir. Araştırma bulguları, Türkiye’deki futbol kulüplerinin finansal disiplinsizlik, stratejik planlama eksikliği, altyapı ve genç yetenek gelişiminde yetersizlik, hukuki ve özerklik sorunları ile siyasal müdahaleler gibi kurumsal sorunlarla karşı karşıya olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Bu yapısal eksiklikler, oyuncular, yöneticiler ve taraftarlar üzerinde güven kaybı, öfke, aidiyet eksikliği ve toplumsal kutuplaşma gibi psikolojik etkiler yaratmaktadır. Bulgular, Türkiye futbolunun kurumsal sorunlarının literatürde belirtilen başarısızlık nedenleriyle büyük ölçüde paralellik taşıdığını göstermekte ve sistematik reform gerekliliğini desteklemektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Futbol
• Kurumsal Yönetişim
• Türkiye Futbolu
• Psikolojik Etkiler
• Reform
• Spor Yönetimi.

STRUCTURAL GOVERNANCE AND PSYCHOLOGİCAL DYNAMİCS İN GLOBAL FOOTBALL: THE ROLE OF INSTİTUTİONAL STRUCTURES İN THE FAİLURES OF TÜRKİYE FOOTBALL AND THE NEED FOR REFORM

Öz

This study aims to examine the structural governance processes in global football and their psychological impacts, with a particular focus on the role of institutional structures in the failures of Türkiye football. The research was designed using a mixed-methods approach, integrating quantitative data (financial statements, infrastructure statistics, club reports) with qualitative data (literature review, academic articles, theses, and official reports) to conduct a comprehensive analysis. Examples of countries with similar institutional organization of football to Türkiye, namely Germany, Brazil, USA and Japan, were comparatively examined and successful management models were examined assuming that financial sustainability and infrastructure investments could be the main determinants of institutional success. The findings indicate that football clubs in Türkiye face institutional challenges such as financial indiscipline, lack of strategic planning, deficiencies in infrastructure and youth development, legal and autonomy issues, and political interventions. These structural shortcomings produce psychological effects on players, managers, and supporters, including loss of trust, anger, lack of belonging, and social polarization. The results demonstrate that the institutional problems in Türkiye football largely parallel the failure factors identified in the literature and support the necessity for systematic reforms.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Football
• Corporate Governance
• Türkiye Football
• Psychological Impacts
• Reform
• Sports Management.

Kaynakça

1. 6222 Sporda Şiddet ve Düzensizliğin Önlenmesine Dair Kanun (2011), Kanun Numarası 14.04.2011 Resmî Gazete Sayısı: 27905.
2. Açıkgöz, S. ve Edin, İ. (2018). Kaosun örgütsel değişim üzerindeki etkisi: profesyonel futbol kulüpleri üzerine bir çalışma. Spor ve Performans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.17155/omuspd.300912
3. Adam, S., Müller-Thümen, F., Kaiser, S. ve Hovemann, G. (2025). Kicking towards sustainability: the role of institutional pressures in German professional football. Managing Sport and Leisure, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/23750472.2025.2459728
4. Andrews, D. L. ve Ritzer, G. (2007). The grobal in the sporting glocal. Global Networks, 7(2), 113–153, ISSN 1470–2266. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2007.00161.x
5. Aykın, A. G. (2013). Meşrutiyetten günümüze Türkiye’de spor politikaları ve 1980 sonrası parti ve hükümet programları ile kalkınma planlarında sporun yeri. Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Sayı: 38, (Eylül – Ekim 2013), 1-16, ISSN:1694-528X.
6. Bundesverband Alternative Investments e.V. (BAI) (2025). Infrastructure Report Germany 2025 Investments between optimism and deteriorating municipal assets, 1-39, https://www.bvai.de/fileadmin/Veroeffentlichungen/BAI_Publikationen/Studien/Infra25_Infrastructure-Report_Germany_2025_1108_EN.pdf
7. Batmaz, H. Ç., Devecioğlu, S. ve Murathan, T. (2017). Türkiye’de futbolun kurumsal değişimi. SPORMETRE Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 15(2), 47-56. ISSN: 1302-2040. https://doi.org/10.1501/Sporm_0000000307.
8. Bauers, S. B. ve Hovemann, G. (2019). The regulation of investors’ influence in German professional football: An analysis of the ‘50+ 1 Rule’and its future from the perspective of potential investors. German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research, 49(4), 463-471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12662-019-00595-0.

9. Bavaresco, G., Dickson, G., Camargo, P., Santos, T. ve Marinho Mezzadri, F. (2024). Transparency and accountability in Brazilian National Sport Organisations. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 1-19, 10.1080/23311886.2024.2355560.
10. Bayle, E. ve Robinson, L. (2007). A Framework for understanding the performance of national governing bodies of sport. European Sport Management Quarterly, 7(3), 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184740701511037.
11. Benin, M. M., Diehl, C. A. ve Figueira-Marquezan, L. H. (2019). Determinantes da evidenciação de indicadores não financeiros de desempenho por clubes brasileiros de futebol. Estudios Gerenciales, 35(150), 16-26. https://doi.org/10.18046/j.estger.2019.150.2884.
12. Biçer, A. B., Çolakoğlu, T. ve Eraslan, A. (2022). Türkiye’deki spor kulüplerinin yönetsel sorunları: Futbol kulüpleri örneği. Mediterranean Journal of Sport Science, 5(3), 365–382. https://doi.org/10.38021/asbid.1140380.
13. Bozkurt, E. İ. ve Çeviker, A. (2024). Examınatıon of the relatıonshıp between fans’ opınıons on the source of vıolence ın football and levels of ıdentıfıcatıon ın sports. Spor ve Performans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 15(1), 143-160. https://doi.org/10.17155/omuspd.1383628.
14. Bundesministerium des Innern und für Heimat (BMI). (2021). Corona-Hilfe Profisport: Informationen zur Förderung. https://www.bmi.bund.de/DE/themen/sport/sportfoerderung/corona-hilfe-profisport, 07.09.2025.
15. Ceylan, B. (2016). Türkiye’de futbol, siyaset ve medya ilişkisi: 3 Temmuz 2011 şike operasyonu haberlerine eleştirel bir yaklaşım. Yüksek lisans tezi, Atatürk Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Erzurum.
16. Chappelet, J. L. ve Mrkonjic, M. (2013). Basıc ındıcators for better governance ın ınternatıonal sport (bıbgıs): an assessment tool for ınternatıonal sport governıng bodıes. (No. 1/2013). IDHEAP(1-55)
17. Confederação Brasileira de Desportos (CBD), (2025). CBF completa 110 anos de fundação. https://www.fbf.org.br/noticias/detalhe/11797. 04.09.2025.
18. Cushion, C. J. ve Jones, R. L. (2012). A Bourdieusian analysis of cultural reproduction: socialisation and the ‘hidden curriculum’ in professional football. Sport, Education and Society, 19(3), 276–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2012.666966.
19. Çakmak, G. ve Kara, C. (2025). Ekonomik ve yönetsel açıdan Türk futbol yönetiminde sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri. Journal of EFES Sports Sciences, 1(1), 50-63. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14945981.
20. Dayı, F. (2019). Futbol kulüplerinde finansal risk analizi. Maliye ve Finans Yazıları (111), 357-386. https://doi.org/10.33203/mfy.493778.
21. De Castro, S. B. E., de Souza, J. V. M., de Camargo, P. R. ve Mezzadri, F. M. (2023). Government budget and priorities for sports in Brazil (2004-2020). Managing Sport and Leisure, 30(3), 487–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/23750472.2023.2196529.
22. De Menêses Silva, V., Minatto, F. ve Alonso Borba, J. (2023). Gerenciamento de ımpressão nos relatórios dos clubes Brasileiros de futebol. Contabilidade Gestão E Governança, 25(3), 506–523. https://doi.org/10.51341/cgg.v25i3.2976.
23. Delgado, F. (1997). Major league soccer: The return of the foreign sport. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 21(3), 285-297. https://doi.org/10.1177/019372397021003005.
24. Demirci, S. (2024). Spor anonim şirketleri özelinde sporda şirketleşme. Dicle Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 29(50), 299-360.
25. Deutscher Fußball-Bund (DFB). (2024). Governance and Structure/ History of the DFB/Nachwuchsförderung/History of the Bundesliga. Struktur der Sportförderung. https://www.dfb.de/
26. Devecioğlu, S. ve Çoban, B. (2003). Türkiye Futbol Federasyonu’nun özerkliği. Gazi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, VIII (3), 49-58.
27. Devecioğlu, S., Çoban, B. ve Karakaya, Y. E. (2011). Spor kulüplerinin yönetim modellerinin değerlendirilmesi. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (31), 51-68.
28. Devecioğlu, S., Çoban, B., Karakaya, Y. E. ve Karataş, Ö. (2012). Türkiye’de spor kulüplerinin şirketleşmeye yönelimlerinin değerlendirilmesi. Spormetre Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 10(2), 35-42.
29. Dolles, H. ve Söderman, S. (2013). Twenty years of development of the J-League: analysing the business parameters of professional football in Japan. Soccer & Society, 14(5), 702–721. https://doi.org/10.1080/14660970.2013.792503.
30. Ekmekçi, Y. A. D. ve İrmiş, A. (2015). Türk Spor Sektöründe Kurumsallaşma: Futbol Kulüpleri Örneği. In Internatıonal Conference on Eurasian Economies 2015, 740-749.
31. Fan, M., Chen, X., Liu, B., Zhou, F., Gong, B. ve Tao, R. (2023). An analysis of financial risk assessment of globally listed football clubs. Heliyon, 9(12), 1-16. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22886
32. Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA). (2024). Member Associations. https://www.fifa.com/about-fifa/associations/ 06.09.2025.
33. FIFA, Revise the FIFA Statutes and improve our regulations, (2025). https://inside.fifa.com/strategic-objectives-2023-2027/goal-1#overview 04.09.2025.
34. Football Benchmark Group, (2024). Brazilian Football overview: growth, transformation and untapped potential. https://footballbenchmark.com/w/brazilian-football-overview-growth-transformation-and-untapped-potential 04.09.2025.
35. Franck, E. (2010). Private firm, public corporation or member's association – Governance structures in European football. International Journal of Sport Finance, 5(2):108-127. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-35150
36. Freeman, M. (2022). A brief study of football in London from 1800 to the founding of the Football Association in 1863. Soccer & Society, 24(1), 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/14660970.2022.2113128
37. GAO. (2023). Federal Support for sports ınfrastructure. U.S. Government Accountability Office. https://www.gao.gov 04.09.2025.
38. Geeraert, A. (2018). Sports governance observer 2018. An assessment of good governance in five international sports federations. Play the Game / Danish Institute for Sports Studies. ISBN: 978-87-93784-00-0, (1-143).
39. Geeraert, A. (2018). Sports governance observer 2018: Measuring governance in national sports federations. Play the Game / Danish Institute for Sports Studies. ISBN 978-87-970325-7-2, 1-264.
40. Gerke, A., Shilbury, D., Philipps, P., Karg, A. ve Rowe, K. (2017). Sport Management in Australia. An Organisational Overview. Sport Management Review, 20(5), 537–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2017.06.001.
41. Global Tourism Forum, (2025). The Global Appeal Gap: Why Turkish Football Clubs Lag in National Tourism Board Partnerships. https://live.worldtourismforum.net/news/the-global-appeal-gap-why-turkish-football-clubs-lag-in-national-tourism-board-partnerships?utm_source=chatgpt.com 04.09.2025.
42. Gordon, C. ve Helal, R. (2001). The Crisis of Brazilian Football: Perspectives for the Twenty-First Century. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 18(3), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/714001590
43. Gov.br, (2022). Government of Brazil: Brazil has completed more than 4,000 sports infrastructure projects, https://www.gov.br/en/government-of-brazil/latest-news/brazil-has-completed-more-than-4-000-sports-infrastructure-projects 04.09.2025.
44. Greyser, S. A. ve Cortsen, K. (2021). MLS as a sports product – the prominence of the world’s game in the U.S. (Working Paper No. 21-111). Harvard Business School. https://www.hbs.edu/ris/Publication%20Files/21-111_283cd273-d740-4d7f-84b6-4e252fd8a0ab.pdf
45. Güllich, A. (2014). Selection, de-selection and progression in German football talent promotion. European Journal of Sport Science, 14(6): 530-537. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2013.858371
46. Güneş, G. (2024). “Cumhuriyetin ilk yıllarında Türk ocaklarında beden eğitimi spor faaliyetleri (1923-1931)”. Belgi Dergisi, no. 27 (January 2024): 19-43. https://doi.org/10.33431/belgi.1402329.
47. Güngör, H. Y. (2024). Analysis of Financial Performance of public sports clubs in Türkiye via CRITIC-Based SAW Method. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 13(2), 499-509. https://doi.org/10.33206/mjss.1366043
48. Hill, J. S., Vincent, J. ve Curtner-Smith, M. (2014). The worldwide diffusion of football: Temporal and spatial perspectives. Global Sport Business Journal, 2(2), 1, 1- 28. https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/gsbj/vol2/iss2/1
49. Horch, H. D. (1994). Does government financing have a detrimental effect on the autonomy of voluntary associations? Evidence from German sports clubs. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 29(3), 269-285. https://doi.org/10.1177/101269029402900303
50. Horne, J. ve Manzenreiter, W. (2006). An Introduction to the Sociology of Sports Mega-Events1. The Sociological Review, 54(2), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2006.00650.x
51. Japan Football Association (JFA). (2024). About JFA- Elite Program Overview- Governance Overview - Vision and Structure. https://www.jfa.jp/eng/ 04.09.2025.
52. Katırcı, H. (2009). Corporate communication management in Turkish football. Gazi Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 14(4), 65-75.
53. Kellison, T. ve Mills, B. M. (2021). Voter intentions and political implications of legislated stadium subsidies. Sport Management Review, 24(2), 181–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2020.07.003
54. Kikulis, L. M., Slack, T., Hinings, B. ve Zimmermann, A. (1989). A structural taxonomy of amateur sport organizations. Journal of Sport Management, 3(2), 129-150. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.3.2.129
55. Kocamaz, S., Çolakoğlu, T. ve Erturan-öğüt, E. E. (2017). Türk Spor Federasyonlarının Özerklik Sonrası Değişimi. Gazi Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 18(1-4), 7-26.
56. Kubat A. ve Yıldız Ö. (2022). Futbol Altyapı Antrenörlerinin Altyapı Eğitiminde Karşılaştıkları Sorunlar ve Çözüm Önerileri. Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi. 16(2), 128-148.
57. Lee, S. ve Harris, J. (2012). Managing excellence in USA Major League Soccer: an analysis of the relationship between player performance and salary. Managing Leisure, 17(2–3), 106–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/13606719.2012.674389.
58. Mannix, P., Roberts, S. J., Enright, K. ve Littlewood, M. (2024). The evolution of the talent pathway in Major League Soccer. Soccer & Society, 26(1), 189–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/14660970.2024.2400390.
59. Manzenreiter, W. (2004). Japanese football and world sports: raising the global game in a local setting. Japan Forum, 16(2), 289–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/0955580042000222664.
60. Matsuyama, H., Matsutake, T., Horino, H. ve Tsuchiya, H. (2015). Competitiveness of young football players in the Japan football association social action program. Advances in Physical Education, 5(2), 94-102. 10.4236/ape.2015.52012
61. Ministério do Esporte. (2024). Políticas públicas do esporte. https://www.gov.br/esporte/ 04.09.2025.
62. Nazi, R. M. ve Amboni, N. (2021). Práticas de governança e futebol: um estudo em clubes do Rio Grande do Sul. Revista De Ciências Da Administração, 22(56), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8077.2020.e61620.
63. Noll, R. G. (2002). The economics of promotion and relegation in sports leagues: the case of english football. Journal of Sports Economics, 3(2), 169-203. https://doi.org/10.1177/152700250200300205
64. Paulo, S. (2025). Esporte: CBF registra receita recorde de R$ 1,5 bilhão e superávit de R$ 107 milhões em 2024. https://www.uol.com.br/esporte/ultimas-noticias/agencia/2025/04/29/cbf-registra-receita-recorde-de-r-15-bilhao-e-superavit-de-r-107-milhoes-em-2024.htm?uol_app=placaruol&utm_source=chatgpt.com. 04.09.2025.
65. Playground-Landscape. (2024). Money for sports grounds – how clubs secure financing. https://playground-landscape.com/en/article/2268-money-for-sports-grounds-how-clubs-secure-financing.html 07.09.2025.
66. Ravichandra, A. (2024). The effect of the UEFA Champions League on commercialization and nationalization in building football club identity in 1990s Europe, and its effects on the future of competition. Journal of High School Science, 8(2), 47-74. https://doi.org/10.64336/001c.116557.
67. Reyhan, S., Müniroğlu, S. ve Yetim, A. A. (2020). Taraftarların futbolda şiddetin kaynağına ilişkin görüşleri: Ölçek geliştirme çalışması. SPORMETRE Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 18(1), 213-224. https://doi.org/10.33689/spormetre.626887.
68. Sauer, T., Anagnostopoulos, C., Zülch, H. ve Werthmann, L. (2024). Creating value in football: unveiling business activities and strategies of financial investors. Managing Sport and Leisure, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/23750472.2024.2314568.
69. Say, H. (2025). Geç Osmanlı-erken Cumhuriyet Dönemi’nde Türkiye’de futbol ve siyaset ilişkisi. Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 26(48), 125-148. https://dx.doi.org/10.21550/sosbilder.1505350.
70. Schregel, J. P., Cruz, J. M. ve Zülch, H. (2021). Identifying football management variables that lead to sustainable success in professional European Football Clubs. HHL Working Paper, No: 191. https://opus.bsz-bw.de/hhlpd/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/2832/file/HHL191.pdf.
71. Seifoddini, S. (2023). Spor kulüplerinin sosyal ve maddi desteklerinin takım performansına etkilerinin incelenmesi. Yüksek lisans tezi, Ufuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
72. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of management review, 20(3), 571-610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331
73. Sugiyama, M., Khoo, S. ve Hess, R. (2017). Grassroots football development in Japan. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 34(17–18), 1854–1871. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523367.2017.1340881
74. Szymanski, S. (2016). Professional Asian football leagues and the global market. Asian Economic Policy Review, 11(1), 16-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/aepr.12112.
75. Thibault, L., Slack, T. ve Hinings, B. (1991). Professionalism, structures and systems: The ımpact of professional staff on voluntary sport organizations. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 26(2), 83-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/101269029102600202.
76. Tuna, U. (2019). Erken cumhuriyet döneminde resmi tarih çalışmaları ve spor yaklaşımı arasındaki ilişki (1923-1938). Yüksek lisans tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi, Lisansüstü Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
77. Türkiye Futbol Federasyonu (TFF), (2025). Tarihçe. https://www.tff.org/default.aspx?pageID=18. 04.09.2025. UEFA (2021). UEFA Grassroots Report. Nyon: UEFA. https://www.uefa.com/development/grassroots/overview/ 06.09.2025.
78. Wagner, U., Storm, R. K. ve Cortsen, K. (2021). Commercialization, governance problems, and the future of european football—or why the european super league is not a solution to the challenges facing football. International Journal of Sport Communication, 14(3), 321-333. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2021-0049
79. Yamamoto, M. Y. Y. (2012). Development of the sporting nation: sport as a strategic area of national policy in Japan. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 4(2), 277–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2012.685489.