BİLİM DİPLOMASİSİ BAĞLAMINDA ORTAK ARAŞTIRMA İSTASYONLARININ TÜRKİYE’NİN ANTARKTİKA VİZYONUNA KATKISI

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1, 232 - 250, 30.06.2023

Ferhat Kökyay , Ahmet Can Uysal Nazlıcan Ece Kökyay

https://doi.org/10.52122/nisantasisbd.1259713

Öz

21. yüzyılın olgusu olarak bilim diplomasisi önemini gittikçe artırmaktadır. Uluslararası sistemdeki aktörler bilim diplomasisine daha fazla önem vermekte ve kurumsal olarak yeni oluşumlar meydana getirmektedir. Türkiye ekonomik, bilimsel ve teknolojik gelişmesine ve artan küresel etkisine bağlı olarak diplomasi içinde bilim diplomasisine de artan düzeyde yer vermektedir. Son yıllarda Antarktika’ya olan ilgisini artıran Türkiye açısından bilim diplomasisinin daha büyük önemi bulunmaktadır. Çalışmada bilim diplomasisi, Antarktika özelinde irdelenerek, tarihi süreçte Antarktika’da bilim diplomasisi kapsamındaki çalışmalar ve bu kapsamda ortak araştırma istasyonlarının durumu analiz edilmiştir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye’nin Antarktika açılımı ile paralel bir süreçte gelişen ve çeşitli alanlarda olduğu gibi bilimsel alanda da iş birliğini artıran Türk Devletleri Teşkilatı çatısı altında ortak araştırma istasyonu kurulmasının bilim diplomasisi kapsamında Türkiye ve Teşkilat üyelerine muhtemel katkılarını ortaya koymaktır. Nitel araştırma ve analiz yöntemiyle yürütülen çalışmada Türkiye’nin çok uluslu ortak bir araştırma istasyonunu hayata geçirmekle bilim diplomasisi kapsamında ilişkilerini güçlendireceği ve Antarktika vizyonuna olumlu katkı sağlayacağı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Antarktika, Bilim Diplomasisi, Antarktika Antlaşmalar Sistemi, Türk Devletleri Teşkilatı, Türkiye’nin Antarktika Politikası

CONTRIBUTION OF JOINT RESEARCH STATIONS TO TÜRKİYE’S ANTARCTIC VISION IN THE CONTEXT OF SCIENCE DIPLOMACY

Öz

As a phenomenon of the 21st century, the importance of science diplomacy is increasing. Actors in the international system give more importance to science diplomacy and create new institutions. Due to its economic, scientific, and technological developments and increasing global influence, Türkiye gives more place to science diplomacy within diplomacy. Science diplomacy continues to have greater importance for Türkiye, which has increased its interest in Antarctica in recent years. In this study, the studies within the scope of science diplomacy in Antarctica and the situation of joint research stations in this context in the historical process were analyzed by examining science diplomacy in Antarctica. The aim of this study is to reveal the possible contributions of the establishment of a joint research station under the umbrella of the Organization of Turkic States, which developed in parallel with Türkiye's Antarctic expansion and increased cooperation in the scientific field as well as in various fields, to Türkiye and the members of the Organization within the scope of science diplomacy. In the study conducted with the qualitative research and analysis method, it was concluded that with the creation of a multinational joint research station, Türkiye will strengthen its relations within the scope of science diplomacy and contribute positively to the Antarctic vision.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Antarctic, Science Diplomacy, Antarctic Treaty System, Organization of Turkic States, Türkiye’s Antarctic Policy

Kaynakça

• AAAS (2008), “Center for Science Diplomacy”, https://www.aaas.org/programs/center-science-diplomacy., 14.02.2022.
• AWI (Alfred Wegener Institute) (t.y.), “Mosaic in Number”, https://mosaic-expedition.org/expedition/mosaic-in-numbers/., 10.02.2022.
• BBC (2012), “Argentina angry after Antarctic territory named after Queen”, https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-20822582., 16.02.2022.
• Beyondepica (2022), “European Project for Ice Coring in Antarctica (EPICA)”, https://www.beyondepica.eu/en/., 01.02.2022.
• CERN (2022), “Who Are We?”, https://home.cern/about/who-we-are/our-governance/member-states., 05.03.2022.
• CALM (2010), “Census of Antarctic Marine Life”, http://www.coml.org/census-antarctic-marine-life-caml/., 20.02.2022.
• Colglazier, E.W., (2018), “Science Diplomacy and Future Worlds”, Science & Diplomacy, 7 (3), https://www.sciencediplomacy.org/editorial/2018/science-diplomacy-and-future-worlds., 01.03.2022.
• COMNAP (2017), “Antarctic Station Catalogue”, https://static1.squarespace.com /static/61073506e9b0073c7eaaf464/t/611497cc1ece1b43f0eeca8a/1628739608968/COMNAP_Antarctic_Station_Catalogue.pdf., 06.03.2022.
• Constantinou, C.M. ve Der Derian, J., (2010), “Sustaining Global Hope: Sovereignty, Power and the Transformation of Diplomacy”, Constantinou, Costas M. ve James Der Derian (Der.), içinde, Sustainable diplomacies, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 1-22.
• Dastidar, P.G. ve Ramachandran S., (2008), “Intellectual Structure of Antarctic Science: A 25-Years Analysis”, Scientometrics, 77 (3): 389–414.
• EC, DG for Research and Innovation (2016), Open innovation, open science, open to the world : a vision for Europe (Brüksel: Publications Office), https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/552370., 22.03.2022.
• Erb, K.A., (2011), “International Collaboration in the Antarctic for Global Science”, Berkman, Paul Arthur, Michael A.Lang, David W. H. Walton, ve Oran R. Young, (der.) içinde, Science Diplomacy Antarctica, Science, and the Governance of International Spaces, Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian İnstitution, 265-270.
• EU-PolarNet (2022) “About EU-PolarNet 2”, https://eu-polarnet.eu/about/#objectives_eu-polarnet., 05.04.2022.
• European Polar Board (2022), “European Polar Infrastructure Database”, https://www.europeanpolarboard.org/infrastructure/., 22.05.2022.
• Fedoroff, N.V., (2009), “Science Diplomacy in the 21st Century”, Cell, 136 (1), 9-11.
• Friedman, T.L., (2007), The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century. New York: Picador.
• Gluckman, P.D., Turekian, V.C., Grimes, R.W., ve Kishi, T., (2017), “Science Diplomacy: A Pragmatic Perspective from the Inside”, Science & Diplomacy 6(4), http://www.sciencediplomacy.org/article/2018/pragmatic-perspective., 25.04.2022.
• Gov. UK (2022), “UK Science and Innovation Network”, https://www.gov.uk/world/organisations/uk-science-and-innovation-network., 18.03.2022.
• Güzel, M. ve Erol, M.S., (2019), “Türkiye ile Türk Cumhuriyetleri Arasındaki İlişkilerin Bilim Diplomasisi Boyutu”, Bölgesel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3(1), 12-49.
• Hemmings, A.D., (2011), “Why did we get an International Space Station before an International Antarctic Station?”, The Polar Journal, 1(1), 5-16, DOI: 10.1080/2154896X.2011.569377.
• Hong, N., (2021), “China and the Antarctic: Presence, policy, perception, and public diplomacy”, Marine Policy, (134), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104779.
• IAP. (t.y.), “About IAP”, https://www.interacademies.org/iap/about., 23.04.2022.
• Kaltofen, C. ve Acuto, M., (2018), “Science Diplomacy: Introduction to a Boundary Problem”, Global Policy, 9(3), 8-14.
• Keskin, M.H. ve Kökyay, F., (2020), “Paris Anlaşmasına Giden Süreçte AB İklim Değişikliği ve Çevre Politikaları”, Kafkas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 25(Bahar), 315-340.
• Legrand, T. ve Stone, D., (2018), “Science diplomacy and transnational governance İmpact”, Br Polit, (13), 392–408, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-018-0082-z.
• Mayewski, P.A., Frezzotti, M., Bertler, N., Ommen, T.V., Hamilton, G., Jacka, T.H., Welch, B., Frey, M., Qin, D., Ren, J., Sımo ̃ Es, J., Fıly, M., Oerter, H., Nishio, F., Isaksson, E., Mulvaney, R., Holmund, P., Lipenkov, V. ve Goodwin, I., (2005), “The International Trans-Antarctic Scientific Expedition (ITASE): An overview”, Annals of Glaciology, (41), 180-185.
• Melissen, J., (2005), “The New Public Diplomacy: Between Theory and Practice”, Melissen, Jan (Der.), The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations, London: Palgrave MacMillan, 3-27, https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230554931_1.
• Newton Fund (t.y.). “Partner countries”, https://www.newton-gcrf.org/newton-fund/., 25.04.2022. Nye, J.S., (2008), “Public Diplomacy and Soft Power”, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 94-109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311699.
• Office of Science and Technology Cooperation (t.y.), “U.S. Science Envoy Program”, https://www.state.gov/programs-office-of-science-and-technology-cooperation/u-s-science-envoy-program/., 19.03.2022.
• Pound, K., Huffman, L., Hubbard, I., Cattadori, M., Dahlman, L., Dooley, J., Frisch-Gleason, R., Lehmann, R. ve Trummel B., (2019), “ANDRILL ARISE: A model for team-based field research immersion for educators”, Polar Record, (55), 251–273, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247419000056.
• Resmî Gazete. Tarih: 24/7/1963. Sayı: 11462. Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu Kurulması Hakkında Kanun, Kanun Numarası: 278, Tarih: 17.7.1963.
• Resmî Gazete. Tarih: 07/02/2013. Sayı: 28552, Bakanlar Kurulu Kararı 2013/4239.
• SCAR (t.y.), “The History of SCAR”, https://www.scar.org/about-us/history/., 23.05.2022.
• Smith III, F.L., (2014), “Advancing Science Diplomacy: Indonesia and the US Naval Medical Research Unit”, Social Studies of Science, 44(6), 825–847.
• Sütçü, G., (2012), “New Mode of Diplomacy in the 21st Century: Science Diplomacy”, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13(2), 1-14.
• S4D4C (2021), “The Impact Story of S4D4C”, https://www.s4d4c.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/The-Impact-Story-of-S4D4C.pdf., 24.04.2022.
• The Royal Society (2010), New frontiers in science diplomacy Navigating the changing balance of power, London: Science Policy Centre.
• Turekian, V., (2018), “The Evolution of Science Diplomacy”, Global Policy, 9(3), 5-7.
• TÜBİTAK MAM KARE (2021), “Biz Kimiz?”, https://kare.mam.tubitak.gov.tr/tr/kurumsal/biz-kimiz-0., 25.06.2022.
• TDT (t.y.), “Türk Akademisi”, https://www.turkkon.org/tr/iliskili-kurumlar/turk-akademisi_1., 28.05.2022.
• Van Ham, P., (2005), “Power, Public Diplomacy, and the Pax Americana”, Jan Melissen (Der.), The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations, London: Palgrave MacMillan, 47-66), https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230554931_3.
• Vanstappen, N. ve Wouters, J., (2016), “The EU and the Antarctıc: Strange Bedfellows?”, Working Paper No. 169 – February 2016. Leuven Center for Global Governance Studies.
• Weiss, C., (2005), “Science, technology and international relations”, Technology in Society, (27), 295–313.
• Yakushiji, T., (2009), “The potential of science and technology diplomacy”, Asia-Pacific Review, 16(1), 1–7.
• YEE (t.y.), “TABİP Nedir?” https://www.tabip.global/ecosystem/views/portalHeader/Tabip-Nedir-1., 29.05.2022.