I
The research was designed according to the qualitative research method and phenomenology design was preferred. The interview (individual interview) technique, which is one of the data collection methods and frequently used in the phenomenology method, was preferred, assuming that it is appropriate for the problem and subject of the research (Creswell, 2017). Personal information forms and semi-structured interview form were used as data collection tools. In the determination of the participants in the study, the criterion sampling method, which is included in the purposeful sampling that allows the participants to be selected in accordance with the purpose, was used (Büyüköztürk et al., 2016). There are 3 open-ended questions to obtain the participants' opinions and suggestions about the effectiveness of the performance evaluation form. The research data were collected through face-to-face interview technique in April-May 2023. Content analysis was applied to analyze the individual interview transcripts obtained through the semi-structured interview form.
Codes were created after analyzing the findings obtained from the participants to measure the effectiveness of the performance evaluation form. Regarding the adequacy of the time in performance evaluation, it was revealed that it depends on the success of the practice student, variation according to the branch, the teacher's skill, the excess of the teacher's class hours, and the teacher's ability to recognize the student in a short time. The inadequacy of the duration was found to be due to the high number of practice students, the student’s adaptation to the school and the environment, and the teacher's lack of class time. According to the codes that emerged about whether the performance evaluation form provides an impartial evaluation, it was determined that the criteria in the form can provide impartiality. Still, there are difficulties in detecting deficiencies and in terms of the number of evaluators. It is seen that the criteria in the form provide adequacy in terms of being suitable and comprehensive for evaluation, providing multidimensional measurement suitable for the branch, and the number of items. On the other hand, the inadequacy of the form in reflecting the practice and its lack of detail, as well as the lack of criteria such as eye contact, effective use of the board, use of technology, discipline, behavior, and dress code are suggested as inadequacies. Regarding the effectiveness of the form in revealing the strengths and weaknesses, the fact that it varies according to the branch, the criteria are explained is evaluated positively, while the reasons such as transferring knowledge to practice, evaluation of the same criterion with different sentences, inability to be objective, insufficiency of the level of scoring the criteria and the lack of elaboration of the expressions and the difficulty of scoring appropriate for the evaluation are accepted as negativity. When the codes obtained for the number of evaluators are examined, codes such as the evaluation of observers, the participation of those who observe the student in the evaluation, the evaluation of more than one person, and the high number of evaluators in terms of feedback are seen as sufficient in terms of the number of evaluators. On the other hand, codes such as excitement in case of an increase in the number of students and the lack of observation of the other evaluator are seen as inadequacies. In terms of feedback, it was determined that the participants provided feedback for the students to eliminate deficiencies, to show their strengths, and to use their attitudes and behaviors appropriately.
Performance Evaluation Performance evaluation form Practice teacher
Performans değerlendirme, günümüzde çalışanların başarısını ölçmede en çok kullanılan yöntemlerden biridir. Bu yöntem kamu kurumlarında da uygulanmaya çalışılmaktadır. Bunlardan biri de öğretmenlik uygulaması yapan öğrencilerin başarılarının ölçülmesidir. Bu çalışmada kamu okullarında Öğretmenlik uygulaması dersine giren (uygulama yapan) öğrencilerin başarılarının ölçümünde kullanılan performans değerlendirme formuna ilişkin uygulama öğretmenlerinin görüşleri analiz edilmiştir. Bu bağlamda performans değerlendirme formunun etkililiğini ortaya koyma amacıyla değerlendirme süresi, değerlendirici sayısı, formda yer alan kriterler, formun güçlü ve zayıf yönleri ortaya çıkarma gücü ve tarafsızlığı, geribildirim ve karşılaşılan zorluklara yönelik uygulama öğretmenlerinin deneyim ve görüşlerine başvurulmuştur. Veriler ölçüt örneklem yaklaşımına uygun olarak kamu okullarında uygulama öğretmenliği yapan 15 katılımcıdan mülakat yöntemiyle elde edilmiştir. Elde edilen verilere Maxqda programı aracılığıyla içerik analizi yapılmıştır. Analiz sonucunda ortaya çıkan bulgulara göre, performans değerlendirme süresinin, değerlendirici sayısının ve formda yer alan kriterlerin yeterli olduğu, performans değerlendirme formunun uygulama öğrencilerinin güçlü ve zayıf yönlerini ortaya çıkarmada etkili olduğu, genel olarak tarafsız bir değerlendirmeye olanak sağladığı görülmüştür. Ayrıca performans değerlendirme formuna ilişkin katılımcıların görüş ve önerilerine de yer verilmiştir.
Performans değerlendirme performans değerlendirme formu uygulama öğretmeni.
Var
Yok
Yok
Birincil Dil | Türkçe |
---|---|
Konular | Kamu Sektörü Organizasyonu ve Yönetimi |
Bölüm | Araştırma Makaleleri |
Yazarlar | |
Yayımlanma Tarihi | |
Gönderilme Tarihi | 9 Ekim 2024 |
Kabul Tarihi | 29 Ekim 2024 |
Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2024 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2 |