Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2016, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2, 36 - 44, 01.03.2016

Öz

Kaynakça

  • M.A. Khan, Numerical study on human cornea and modified multiparametric correction equation for Goldmann applanation tonometer, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 30 (2014): 91-102.
  • J. Morisson, (2003) Glaucoma - A clinical guide.
  • P.A. Tonnu, T. Ho, K. Sharma, E. White, C. Bunce, and D. Garway-Heath, A Comparison of four methods of Tonometry: Method Agreement and Introbserver Variability, Br. J. Ophthalmol., 89 (2005), 847-850.
  • N. Ehlers, T. Bramsen, and S. Sperling, Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness, Acta Ophthalmologica, 53 (1975), 34-43.
  • M.M. Whitacre, and R. Stein, Sources of Error with use of Goldmann-type Tonometers, Survey of Ophthalmology, 38(1) (1993), 1-30.
  • J. Liu, and C.J. Roberts, Influence of Corneal Biomechanical Properties on Intraocular Pressure Measurement, J. Cataract Refract. Surg., 31 (2005), 146-155.
  • J.M. Martinez-de-la-Casa, J. Garcia-Feijoo, A. Fernandez-Vidal, C. Mendez-Hernandez, and J. Garcia-Sanchez, Ocular Response Analyzer versus Goldmann Applanation Tonometry for Intraocular Pressure Measurements, Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 47(10) (2006), 4410-4414.
  • A. Kotecha, A. Elshiekh, C.R. Roberts, H. Zhu, and D.F. Garway-Heath, Corneal Thickness and Age Related Biomechanical Properties of the Cornea Measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer, Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 47(12) (2006), 5337-5347.
  • A. Lam, D. Chen, R. Chiu, and W.S. Chui, Comparison of IOP Measurements between ORA and GAT in Normal Chinese, Optometry and Vision Science, 84(9) (2007), 909-914.

Simulation of non-contact tonometer-Ocular response analyzer

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2, 36 - 44, 01.03.2016

Öz

As per World Health Organization, Glaucoma is considered as the second leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide. An accurate assessment of Intraocular Pressure (IOP) is crucial for diagnosis and management of a chronic eye disease called Glaucoma. The elevation of IOP in eye leads to optic nerve damage and hence causing visual impairment. Thus, IOP measurement in tonometry has become an essential part of routine eye examinations for the diagnosis, screening and managing response to treatment in patients.


Simultaneous explosion of ophthalmic knowledge and medical instrument, being made in the 19th century, has led to the invention of tonometers of varied designs and principles, and Non-Contact Tonometers (NCTs) are among them. Glodmann Applanation Tonometer (GAT) is considered the ‘gold standard’ in measuring IOP; however, IOP measurement using GAT is now known to be affected by various factors like corneal thickness, curvature and material properties as demonstrated by Khan [1]. Due to inaccuracies in measuring IOP by GAT, this ‘gold standard’ has been challenged. Therefore, the present research aims to develop a multi-parametric correction equation to determine the True Intraocular Pressure (IOPT) using Non-Contact Tonometer and the current article focuses on evaluating the influence of individual parameters on IOP by NCT.

Kaynakça

  • M.A. Khan, Numerical study on human cornea and modified multiparametric correction equation for Goldmann applanation tonometer, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 30 (2014): 91-102.
  • J. Morisson, (2003) Glaucoma - A clinical guide.
  • P.A. Tonnu, T. Ho, K. Sharma, E. White, C. Bunce, and D. Garway-Heath, A Comparison of four methods of Tonometry: Method Agreement and Introbserver Variability, Br. J. Ophthalmol., 89 (2005), 847-850.
  • N. Ehlers, T. Bramsen, and S. Sperling, Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness, Acta Ophthalmologica, 53 (1975), 34-43.
  • M.M. Whitacre, and R. Stein, Sources of Error with use of Goldmann-type Tonometers, Survey of Ophthalmology, 38(1) (1993), 1-30.
  • J. Liu, and C.J. Roberts, Influence of Corneal Biomechanical Properties on Intraocular Pressure Measurement, J. Cataract Refract. Surg., 31 (2005), 146-155.
  • J.M. Martinez-de-la-Casa, J. Garcia-Feijoo, A. Fernandez-Vidal, C. Mendez-Hernandez, and J. Garcia-Sanchez, Ocular Response Analyzer versus Goldmann Applanation Tonometry for Intraocular Pressure Measurements, Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 47(10) (2006), 4410-4414.
  • A. Kotecha, A. Elshiekh, C.R. Roberts, H. Zhu, and D.F. Garway-Heath, Corneal Thickness and Age Related Biomechanical Properties of the Cornea Measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer, Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 47(12) (2006), 5337-5347.
  • A. Lam, D. Chen, R. Chiu, and W.S. Chui, Comparison of IOP Measurements between ORA and GAT in Normal Chinese, Optometry and Vision Science, 84(9) (2007), 909-914.
Toplam 9 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Articles
Yazarlar

Mohammad Arsalan Khan Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Mart 2016
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2016 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Khan, M. A. (2016). Simulation of non-contact tonometer-Ocular response analyzer. New Trends in Mathematical Sciences, 4(2), 36-44.
AMA Khan MA. Simulation of non-contact tonometer-Ocular response analyzer. New Trends in Mathematical Sciences. Mart 2016;4(2):36-44.
Chicago Khan, Mohammad Arsalan. “Simulation of Non-Contact Tonometer-Ocular Response Analyzer”. New Trends in Mathematical Sciences 4, sy. 2 (Mart 2016): 36-44.
EndNote Khan MA (01 Mart 2016) Simulation of non-contact tonometer-Ocular response analyzer. New Trends in Mathematical Sciences 4 2 36–44.
IEEE M. A. Khan, “Simulation of non-contact tonometer-Ocular response analyzer”, New Trends in Mathematical Sciences, c. 4, sy. 2, ss. 36–44, 2016.
ISNAD Khan, Mohammad Arsalan. “Simulation of Non-Contact Tonometer-Ocular Response Analyzer”. New Trends in Mathematical Sciences 4/2 (Mart 2016), 36-44.
JAMA Khan MA. Simulation of non-contact tonometer-Ocular response analyzer. New Trends in Mathematical Sciences. 2016;4:36–44.
MLA Khan, Mohammad Arsalan. “Simulation of Non-Contact Tonometer-Ocular Response Analyzer”. New Trends in Mathematical Sciences, c. 4, sy. 2, 2016, ss. 36-44.
Vancouver Khan MA. Simulation of non-contact tonometer-Ocular response analyzer. New Trends in Mathematical Sciences. 2016;4(2):36-44.