TÜRKİYE’DE TEK KİŞİLİK HANEHALKLARINDAKİ ARTIŞ: TERCİHLERDEN DOLAYI MI YOKSA KOŞULLARDAN MI?

Öz

Türkiye’de yalnız yaşama eğiliminin temelleri, 20. yüzyılın ikinci yarısından itibaren görülmektedir. Hayatın her aşamasında yaşanan dönüşüm süreçleriyle birlikte geleneksel aile kurumu çözülmüş ve farklı hane tipleri ortaya çıkmaya başlamıştır. Bu çalışma, Türkiye’de tek kişilik hanelerin yaygınlığının altında yatan faktörleri modernizasyon ve gelişimsel idealizm yaklaşımları üzerinden incelemektedir. Türkiye Nüfus ve Sağlık Araştırması’ndan (TNSA) elde edilen veriler, betimsel ve istatistiksel yöntemler kullanılarak tek kişilik hanelerin özelliklerini ortaya çıkarmak amacıyla kullanılmıştır. Bir dizi analiz sonucunda, tek kişilik hanelerin ağırlıklı olarak yaşlılardan oluştuğu, ancak TNSA 1993’ten 2018’e daha genç, eğitimli kişilerin dağılımının zaman içinde arttığı tespit edilmiştir. Koşullara bağlı olarak yalnız yaşayanlar önemli bir temsile sahip olsalar da tercihleriyle yalnız yaşayanlar zaman içinde önemli bir artış göstermişlerdir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• hanehalkı
• tek yaşama
• aile yapısı
• modernizasyon

THE INCREASE IN THE PREVALENCE OF ONE-PERSON HOUSEHOLDS IN TURKEY: BY CHOICES OR BY CIRCUMSTANCES?

Öz

The trend of living alone in Turkey has its roots in the second part of the 20th century. Together with transformation processes in every stage of life, the traditional family institution has dissolved, and different types of households started to appear. This study examines the underlying factors related to the prevalence of one-person households in Turkey by concerning modernization and developmental idealism approaches. The data acquired from Turkey Demographic and Health Survey (TDHS) were mainly used to reveal the characteristics of one-person households by utilizing descriptive and statistical methods. After a set of analyses, it was found that one-person households are primarily composed of older people, however, the younger, educated persons have risen across time from TDHS 1993 to 2018. Even if there is a significant share of people living alone depending on the circumstances, those living alone by their choices have shown a greater increase.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• household
• living alone
• family structure
• modernization

Kaynakça

1. Adams, B. N. & Trost J. (2005). Handbook of World Families, Sweeden: Sage Publications
2. Başlevent, C. (2021). Türkiye’nin değişen hanehalkı yapısı: Tek kişilik haneler ne durumda? [Turkey’s changing household structure: What about single person households?]. Yildiz Social Science Review, 6(1), 17-29.
3. Baştuğ, S. (2003). The Household and Family in Turkey: An Historical Perspective. In Autonomy and Dependence in the Family: Turkey and Sweden in Critical Perspective. (Ed.) Liljeström, R. and Özdalga, R. Istanbul: Swedish Research Institute
4. Çağatay, P. & Koç, İ. (2008). “Is Solo Living a Matter of Choice or Circumstance in Turkey”, Poster presentation at European Population Conference 2008, Barcelona, Spain, 9-12 July:359-360.
5. Eisenstadt, S. N. (1966). Modernization: Protest and Change, Prentice Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, p.1
6. Fricke, T. (1997). Culture Theory and Population Process: Toward a Thicker Demography, in D.I. Kertzer and T. Fricke (eds.), Anthropological Demography: Toward a New Synthesis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 248 – 277.
7. Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures, New York: Basic Books.
8. Gujarati, D. N. (2004) Basic Econometrics. (ed. 4th. Pp.596-599), McGraw-Hill Companies.

9. Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies (2004), Turkey Demographic and Health Survey, 2003. Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies, Ministry of Health General Directorate of Mother and Child Health and Family Planning, State Planning Organization and European Union. Ankara, Turkey
10. Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies. (2009). Turkey Demographic and Health Survey, 2008. Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies, Ministry of Health General Directorate of Mother and Child Health and Family Planning, T.R. Prime Ministry Undersecretary of State Planning Organization and TÜBİTAK, Ankara, Turkey.
11. Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies (2015). 2013 Turkey Demographic and Health Survey. Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies, Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Development, Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK), Ankara.
12. Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies (HUIPS) (2019). 2018 Turkey Demographic and Health Survey. Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies, T.R. Presidency of Turkey Directorate of Strategy and Budget, Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK), Ankara.
13. Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies and Macro International Inc. (1999). Turkey Demographic and Health Survey 1998, HUIPS, Ankara.
14. Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1982). The Changing Value of Children in Turkey, Hawaii: East-West Population Institute Publication, No. 60-E.
15. Kavas, S. & Thornton, A. (2013). Adjustment and Hybridity in Turkish Family Change: Perspectives from Developmental Idealism. Journal of Family History, 38(2): 223-241.
16. Koç, İ. (1997). Female-headed households in Turkey and socio-demographic and economic characteristics of female households’ heads. Nüfusbilim Dergisi, 19: 73-99.
17. Koç, İ. (2019). Formation of single-parent families in the process of changing family structure in Turkey: Its determinants and welfare status (2006 2016). Research on Family Structure in Turkey-Advanced Statistical Analyses 2018 (109–155). Ankara: Republic of Turkey Ministry of Family Labour and Social Services.
18. Koç, İ., Özgören, A., & Şirin, H. (2010). Türkiye’de Yaşlıların Yaşam Kalitesi ve Aile Yapısının Yaşlıların Yaşam Kalitesine Etkisi [The Quality of Life of the Elderly in Turkey and the Effect of Family Structure on the Quality of Life of the Elderly].
19. 2008 Türkiye Nüfus ve Sağlık Araştırması İleri Analiz Çalışması: Türkiye’de Doğurganlık, Üreme Sağlığı ve Yaşlılık (231-283). Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Nüfus Etütleri Enstitüsü, Sağlık Bakanlığı Ana Çocuk Sağlığı ve Aile Planlaması Genel Müdürlüğü, Başbakanlık Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı Müsteşarlığı ve TÜBİTAK.
20. Laslett, P. (1972). Introduction. Household and Family in Past Time (1-86), London: Cambridge University Press. Ministry of Health, Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies, and Macro International Inc. (1994). Turkey Demographic and Health Survey 1993, HUIPS, Ankara.
21. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2011). Projections, Policy Challenges and Policy Options. The Future of Families to 2030 (7–8). doi: 10.1787/9789264168367-en.
22. Ortiz-Ospina, E. (2019). The rise of living alone: how one-person households are becoming increasingly common around the world. Retrieved from https:// ourworldindata.org/living-alone, accessed on 18,04,2020.
23. Steyerberg, E. W., Vickers, A. J., Cook, N. R., Gerds, T., Gonen, M., Obuchowski, N., & Kattan, M. W. (2010). Assessing the Performance of Prediction Models. Epidemiology (21(1), pp.129). doi:10.1097/ede.0b013e3181c30fb2
24. Turkish Statistical Institute (TURKSTAT). (2021). Address Based Population Registration System Results: Regional Statistics, Retrieved from https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/bolgeselistatistik/tabloOlustur.do#. Jan 20, 2023.
25. Thornton, A. (2001). The Developmental Paradigm, Reading History Sideways and family change. Demography, 38, 449-465.
26. Thornton A, Pierotti R. S., Young-DeMarco L., & Watkins, S. (2014). Developmental Idealism and Cultural Models of the Family in Malawi. Popul Res Policy Rev. 2014 Oct 1;33(5):693-716. doi: 10.1007/s11113-014-9322-0. PMID: 25197155; PMCID: PMC4153731.
27. Yavuz, S. (2002). Household Composition and Complexity in Turkey: Findings from the Turkish Demographic and Health Survey 1998. (Unpublished Master Thesis), Ankara: Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies.
28. Yavuz, S. & Yüceşahin, M. M. (2012). Türkiye’de Hanehalkı Kompozisyonlarında Değişimler ve Bölgesel Farklılaşmalar [Changes and Regional Differences in Household Compositions in Turkey.]. Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi, 15(1): 76- 118.