Araştırma Makalesi

Comparison of the cuticular profiles of several dung beetles used as host carriers by the phoretic mite Macrocheles saceri (Acari: Mesostigmata)

Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1 5 Mart 2017
  • Jerome Niogret *
  • Jean-pierre Lumaret
  • Michel Bertrand
PDF İndir
EN

Comparison of the cuticular profiles of several dung beetles used as host carriers by the phoretic mite Macrocheles saceri (Acari: Mesostigmata)

Abstract

Macrochelid mites have developed phoretic interactions with coprophilous arthropods in order to disperse and colonize new substrate. Macrocheles saceri (Acari: Mesostigmata) is a mite phoretically specialized on the dung beetles of the Scarabaeus genus. A previous study has demonstrated that M. saceri can discriminate among available hosts and showed host preferences using the host cuticular material. In this present study, we have compared the cuticular chemicals including the volatiles present among several species of Scarabaeus and Bubas genera. By comparing the host chemical profiles to the host preferences, several hypotheses regarding the role of some of these volatile chemicals in host discrimination based on attractiveness and repellency, are proposed.


Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. Antony, C., & Jallon, J. M. (1982). The chemical basis for sex recognition in Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Insect Physiology (28), 873-880.
  2. Athias Binche, F. (1994). La phorésie chez les acariens. Aspects Adaptatifs et Evolutifs. Editions du Castillet, Perpignan, France.
  3. Bartelt, R. J., & Jackson, L.L. (1984). Hydrocarbon component of the Drosophila virilise (Diptera: Drosophilidae): aggregation pheromone: (Z)-10-Heneicosan. Annual Entomological Society of America (77), 364-371.
  4. Byers, J. A. (1989). Chemical Ecology of Bark beetles. Experientia (45), 271-276.
Dettner, K., & Liepert, C. (1994). Chemical mimicry and camouflage. Annual Review of Entomology (39), 129-154.
  5. Diehl, P. A. (1975). Synthesis and release of hydrocarbons by the oenocytes of the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria. Journal of Insect Physiology (21), 1337-1246.
  6. Dillwith, J. W., Blomquist, G. J., & Nelson, D.R. (1981). Biosynthesis of the hydrocarbon components of the sex pheromone of the housefly, Musca domestica L. Insect Biochemistry (11), 247-253. Gu, X., Quilici, S., Juarez, P., Blomquist, G., & Schal, C. (1995). Biosynthesis of hydrocarbons and contact pheromone and their transport by lipophorin in the females of the German cockroach. Journal of Insect Physiology (41), 257-267.
  7. Howard, R. W., Stanley-Samuelson, D. W., & Akre, R. D. (1990). Biosynthesis and chemical mimicry of cuticular hydrocarbons from the obligate predator Microdon incompleta Provancher (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Journal of Kansas Entomological Society (63), 437-443.
  8. Katase, H., & Chino, H. (1984). Transport of hydrocarbons by haemolymph lipophorin in Locusta migratoria. Insect Biochemistry (14), 1-6.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Jerome Niogret * Bu kişi benim
Türkiye

Jean-pierre Lumaret Bu kişi benim

Michel Bertrand Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi

5 Mart 2017

Gönderilme Tarihi

23 Ağustos 2018

Kabul Tarihi

23 Ağustos 2018

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2017 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Niogret, J., Lumaret, J.- pierre, & Bertrand, M. (2017). Comparison of the cuticular profiles of several dung beetles used as host carriers by the phoretic mite Macrocheles saceri (Acari: Mesostigmata). Natural Volatiles and Essential Oils, 4(1), 8-13. https://izlik.org/JA79GM34LS