İLKOKUL ÖĞRETMENLERİNİN MATEMATİK DERSİNDEKİ ÖĞRETİM STİLLERİNİN BELİRLENMESİ

Öz

               Bu çalışmanın amacı, ilkokul öğretmenlerinin matematik dersinde kullandıkları öğretim stillerinin yaş, cinsiyet, mesleki kıdem ve mezun olunan okul değişkenlerine göre belirlenmesidir. Araştırma Balıkesir il merkezindeki devlet okullarında yürütülmüştür. Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak Grasha Öğretim Stilleri Envanteri kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sürecinde Türkçe formu kullanılan Grasha Öğretim Stilleri Envanteri Matematik dersine uyarlanmış ve ölçeğin yapı geçerliliği Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi ile belirlenmiştir. Elde edilen uyum indeksleri ve faktör yükleri ölçeğin yapı geçerliliğini teyid edici düzeyde bulunmuştur. Öğretmenlerin envantere verdikleri cevaplar ise SPSS 16 ile analiz edilmiştir. Elde edilen veriler doğrultusunda sınıf öğretmenlerinin kolaylaştırıcı/kişisel model/uzman kategorisinde yer aldıkları bulunmuştur. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Öğretim Stili,İlkokul,Matematik Dersi,Grasha Öğretim Stili,Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi

Kaynakça

1. • Aktan, S. and Tezci, E., (2013). The study of Validity and Reliability of Self Regulated Learning Strategies Scale in Mathematics. Education Sciences, 8(1), 46-62.
2. • Akyüz, Y., (2008). Türk Eğitim Tarihi. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
3. • Bain, K., (2004). What the Best College Teachers Do. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
4. • Bangkok: UNESCO Principal Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific (2012, Kasım 8). Increasing the Number of Women Teachers in Rural Schools: A Synthesis of Country Case Studies: South Asia.http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001227/122720e.pdf adresinden edinilmiştir.
5. • Barron, K. and Harackiewicz, J.M., (2000). Achievement Goals and Optimal Motivation: A Multiple Goals Approach. In C. Sansone & J.M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: The Search for Optimal Motivation and Performance, 231-255. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
6. • Basow, S.A. and Silberg, N.T., (1987). Student Evaluations of College Professors: Are Female and Male Professors Rated Differently?. [Abstract] Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(3), 308-314.
7. • Chall, S.J., (2000). The Academic Achievement Challenge: What Really Works in the Classroom? New York: The Guilford Press.
8. • Charters, W.W. and Waples, D., (1929). The Commonwealth Teacher – Training Study. Chicago, Illınois: The University of Chicago Press.

9. • Centra, J.A. and Gaubatz, N.B. (2000). Is There Gender Bias in Student Evaluation of Teaching? Journal of Higher Education, 71(1), 17-33.
10. • Chen, P. and Zimmerman, B., (2007). A Cross-National Comparison Study on the Accuracy of Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Middle School Mathematics Students. The Journal of Experimental Education, 75(3), 221-244.
11. • Chudgar, A and Sankar, V., (2008). The Relationship Between Teacher Gender and Student Achievement: Evidence from Five Indian States. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 38(5), 627-642.
12. • Cornelius-White, J., (2007). Learner-Centered Teacher-Student Relationships Are Effective: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 113-143.
13. • Dilekli, Y. and Tezci, E., (2016). The Relationship among Teachers’ Classroom Practices for Teaching Thinking Skills, Teachers’ Self-Efficacy towards Teaching Thinking Skills And Teachers’ Teaching Styles. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, 144-151.
14. • Fisher, R., (1998). Thinking About Thinking: Developing Metacognition in Children. Early Child Development and Care, 141(1), 1-15.
15. • Grasha, A.F., (1994). Discovering Your Best Teaching Styles. College Teaching, 42(4), 122-123.
16. • Grasha, A.F. ve Yanberger-Hicks, N., (2000). Integrating Teaching Styles and Learning Styles with Instructional Technology. College Teaching, 48(1), 2-10.
17. • Grasha, A.F., (2002). Teaching Style: A Practical Guide to Enhancing Learning by Understanding Teaching and Learning Styles. San Bernadino, CA: Allience Publishing.
18. • Grasha, A.F., (2003). The Dynamics of One-On-One Teaching. The Social Studies, 94(4), 179-187.
19. • Gregorc, A.F., (1979). Learning/Teaching Styles: Potent Forces Behind Them. Educational Leadership,36(4), 234-236.
20. • Hattie, J., (2009). Visible learning: A Synthesis of Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
21. • Hemlich, J.E., (1990). Measuring Teaching Style: A Correlational Study Between The Van Tilburg/Heimlich Sensivity Measure and Myers- Brıggs Personality Indicator on Adult Educators in Central Ohio. Doctoral Dissertation. Ohio State University.
22. • Kratz, H.E., (1896). Characteristics of the Best Teacher as Recognized by Children, The Pedagogical Seminary, 3(3), 413-460.
23. • Kolay, B., (2008). Öğretim Stillerinin Farklı Öğrenme Stillerine Sahip 6.Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Fen ve Teknoloji Dersi Başarısı Arasındaki İlişki. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
24. • Kulinna, P.H. and Cothran, D.J., (2003). Physical Education Teacher’s Self-Reported Use And Perceptions Of Various Teaching Styles. Learning and Instruction, 13(6), 597-609.
25. • Lacey, C.H., Saleh, A., Gorman, R., (1998). Teaching Nine to Five: A Study of the Teaching Styles of Male and Female Professors. Paper Presented at the Annual Women in Educational Leadership Conference, 11–12 October, in Lincoln, Nebraska. ED 442334.
26. • Lee, J.G., (2004). An Investigation And Analysis of The Teaching Styles of Faculty Members in Midwestern Christian Colleges And Universities. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Kansas State University. UMI.3155524.
27. • Maden, S., (2012). Türkçe Öğretmenlerinin Öğretme Stilleri. Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim Dergisi, 1(1), 178-200.
28. • McCaskey, S.J., (2009). Teaching Styles and Learning Strategies of Illinois Secondary Career and Technical Education Teachers. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Southern Illinois University Carbondale. UMI. 3372543.
29. • Medlen, D.M., (1972). Early History of Research on Teacher Behavior. International Review of Education, 18(4), 430-439.
30. • Mendoza, S., (2004). Teaching Styles of Technological Institutes Faculty in El Salvador. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Capella University. UMI. 3127201.
31. • National Center for Education (2012, Kasım 17). International Outcomes of Learning in Mathematics Literacy and Problem Solving: PISA 2003 Results from the U.S. www.nces.ed.gov/pubs2005/2005003_1.pdf adresinden edinilmiştir.
32. • OECD Education Working Papers (2010, Aralık 19). 21st Century Skills and Competences for New Millennium Learners in OECD Countries.www.oecd-ilibrary.org/21st-century-skills-and-competences-for-new-millennium-learners-in-oecd-countries_5ks5f2x078kl.pdf adresinden edinilmiştir.
33. • Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association (2012, Eylül 13). Gender Gaps: Understanding Teaching Style Differences Between Men and Women. www.cpr.iub.edu/uploads/2007AIRGenderGaps.pdf adresinden edinilmiştir.
34. • Partnership for 21st Century Skills (2011, Ağustos 11). A Report and Mile Guide for 21st Century Skills.http://www.21stcenturyskills.org/downloads/P21_Report.pdf adresinden edinilmiştir.
35. • Perry, N.E., Vande-Kamp, K.O., Mercer, L.K., and Nordby, C.J., (2002). Investigating Teacher-Student Interactions that Foster Self-Regulated Learning. Educational Psychologist, 37(1), 5–15.
36. • Saracaloğlu, A.S., Karademir, Ç.A., Dinçer, B., and Dedebali, N.C., (2017). Öğretmenlerin Öğretme Stilleri, Özyeterlik Ve İş Doyumlarının Belirlenmesi. Education Sciences, 12(1), 58-85.
37. • Schimmel, A., (2010). Ben Rüzgârım Sen Ateş: Mevlana Celaleddin Rumi’nin Hayatı ve Eseri. (Çev. S. Özkan). İstanbul: Ötüken Neşriyat.
38. • Texas A & M University-Commerce. (2012, Ekim 2). Berliner and Biddle: Defending Public Education. www.tcpea.org/pdf/gre/2008/gre08_mcmoran.pdf adresinden edinilmiştir.
39. • Üredi, L., (2006). İlköğretim I. ve II. Kademe Öğretmenlerinin Öğretim Stili Tercihlerine Göre Öğretmenlik Mesleğine İlişkin Algılarına İncelenmesi. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Marmara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
40. • Watkins, J.B., (2006). The Educational Beliefs and Attitudes of Title I Teachers in Tulsa Public Schools. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater.
41. • Willson, A., (2006). Predictors of Teaching Styles and The Adult Education Philosophies of Instructors of Radiologic Technology Programs. Doctoral Dissertation. College of Health Sciences Touro University International. UMI. 3241987.
42. • Zhang, L.F., (2007). Do Personality Traits Make a Difference In Teaching Styles Among Chinese High School Teachers? Personality and Individual Differences, 43(4), 669–679.