Küresel Çocukluk Rejimlerinin Popülist Siyasetle Kesişimi: UNICEF Dünya Çocuklarının Durumu (2000–2025) Raporlarının Eleştirel Bir Analizi

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 7, 58 - 75, 31.12.2025

Yeşim Eraslan

Öz

Bu makale, UNICEF’in 2000–2025 dönemine yayılan Dünya Çocuklarının Durumu raporlarını analiz ederek çocukluğun küresel ölçekte nasıl tanımlandığını, temsil edildiğini ve yönetildiğini incelemektedir. Çocukluğun biyopolitik, teknik ve aile-merkezli bir çerçevede yeniden üretildiği bu raporlar, görünürde hak temelli bir yaklaşım sunsa da çoğu zaman çocukluğu risk, kırılganlık ve hedeflenebilir nüfus kategorileri üzerinden düzenlemektedir. Çalışma, çocukluğun bu biçimde kurgulanmasının sağ-popülist rejimlerin aileci, güvenlikçi ve performatif siyaset anlayışlarıyla nasıl kesiştiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Bulgular, raporların özellikle kriz söylemleri, ebeveynlik odaklı moralizasyon, dijital gözetim, demografik gelecekçilik ve çok boyutlu yoksulluk temaları etrafında çocukluğu apolitikleştiren bir yönetimsellik ürettiğini göstermektedir. Bu çerçeve, çocuk yoksulluğunu ve eşitsizliği depolitize ederek aile davranışlarına bağlayan, çocuğu “korunması gereken kırılgan özne” biçiminde sunarak gözetimci politikaları meşrulaştıran ve ulusal performans siyasetini güçlendiren popülist stratejilere zemin hazırlamaktadır. UNICEF raporlarının eleştirel analizi, küresel çocuk politikalarının yalnızca sosyal refah alanını değil, çağdaş popülist siyasetlerin, ulusu, aileyi ve geleceği nasıl yeniden kurguladığını anlamak açısından da önemli bir gösterge sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Çocukluk rejimleri; , popülist siyaset; , biyopolitika; , UNICEF raporları; dijital gözetim

Governing Childhood in the Age of Populism: A Critical Reading of UNICEF’s Global Childhood Reports (2000-2025)

Öz

This article examines UNICEF’s State of the World’s Children reports published between 2000 and 2025 in order to analyze how childhood is framed, represented, and governed within global policy discourse. While the reports appear to adopt a rights-based approach, they increasingly construct childhood through categories of risk, vulnerability, and manageability, positioning children as measurable populations rather than political subjects. The study demonstrates how these representations intersect with the family-centered, moralizing, security-oriented, and performance-driven logic of contemporary right-wing populist regimes. Findings show that across the twenty-five–year period, UNICEF frames childhood around five dominant axes: biological risk and survival, parental responsibility and moralization, digital surveillance, demographic futurism, and multidimensional poverty. These framings depoliticize structural inequalities, shift responsibility from state to family, legitimize surveillance and control practices under the guise of “child protection,” and provide a discursive foundation for populist performances of care and authority. The critical analysis of these global reports reveals that childhood is increasingly governed as a biopolitical, technical, and future-oriented domain—one that not only structures child welfare policies but also reinforces broader populist imaginaries of nation, family, and societal order.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Childhood regimes , populism; , biopolitics; , UNICEF; digital surveillance

Kaynakça

• Acar, F., & Altunok, G. (2013). ‘‘The ‘politics of the intimate’ at the intersection of neo-liberalism and neo‑conservatism in contemporary Turkey. Women's Studies International Forum, 41, 14– 23.
• Alanen, L. (2001). Childhood as a generational condition: Children’s daily lives in a welfare state In L. Alanen & B. Mayall (Eds.), Conceptualizing child–adult relations, pp.129–143, Routledge.
• Apple, M. W. (2013). Educating the “right” way: Markets, standards, God, and inequality (2nd ed.). Routledge.
• Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.
• Brown, W. (2019). In the ruins of neoliberalism: The rise of antidemocratic politics in the West. Columbia University Press.
• Çınar, K. (2024). The historical roots of right-wing populism in Turkey: A spatial examination of DP, ANAP and AKP.Southeast Europen and Black Sea Studies, 24(1), 121-143.
• Doğan, G. (2025). Family-oriented discourse and policymaking in right-wing populist governance. Politics, Religion & Ideology, 26(1), 63-88.
• Donzelot, J., Hurley, R., & Deleuze, G. (1979). The policing of families, 88-89, Pantheon Books.
• Foucault, M. (1978). The History of Sexuality Volume I: An Introduction (R. Hurley, Trans.) NY: Vintage.
• Fraser, N. (2016). Contradictions of capital and care. New Left Review, vol.100 pp. 99-117.
• Giroux, H. (2022). .Pedagogy of resistance: Against manufactured ignorance. Bloomsbury.
• Graff, A., & Korolczuk, E. (2022). Anti-gender politics in the populist moment . Routledge.
• Hanson, K., & Lundy, L. (2017). Does exactly what it says on the tin?: A critical analysis and alternative conceptualisation of the so-called “general principles” of the convention on the rights of the child. The International Journal of Children's Rights. 25(2), 285-306.
• James, A., & Prout, A. 2003). Constructing and reconstructing childhood: Contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood (2nd ed.). Routledge.
• Kourou, N. S. (2020). Sağ popülizm ve toplumsal cinsiyet karşıtı hareketlerin birlikteliğinde AKP hükümetlerinin aile siyaseti ve popülist siyasal mobilizasyonu. Feminist Tahayyül Akademik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2(2), 207–241.
• Kuhar, R., & Paternotte, D. (Eds.). (2017). Anti-gender campaigns in Europe: Mobilizing against equality. Bloomsbury Publishing PLC.
• Livingstone, S., Stoilova, M., & Nandagiri, R. (2019). Children’s data and privacy online: Growing up in a digital age: Research findings. London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Media and Communications.
• Qvortrup, J. Bardy, M., Sgritta, G., & Wintersberger, H. (1994). Childhood matters: Social theory, practice and politics. Avebury.
• Reynaert, D., Bouverne-de-Bie, M., & Vandevelde, S. (2009). A review of children’s rights literature since the adoption of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Childhood, 16(4), 518-534.
• Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge University Press.
• Tronto, J. C. (2013). Caring democracy: Markets, equality and justice. In Caring Democracy. NYU Press.
• UNICEF. (2005). The State of the World's Children: Childhood Under Threat. Erişim: 30 Kasım 2025, https://books.google.com.tr/booksid=LP0_zAjsyCsC&lpg=PR5&ots=HO9It- cU5c&dq=the%20state%20of%20the%20world's%20children&lr&hl=tr&pg=PR5#v=onepage&q=the%20state%20of%20the%20world's%20children&f=false
• UNICEF. (2006). The State of the World's Children: Excluded and Invisible. Erişim: 30 Kasım2025,https://books.google.com.tr/booksid=q8aQAYGwoHgC&lpg=PR6&ots=5kCRc1wOLm&dq=the%20state%20of%20the%20world's%20children&lr&hl=tr&pg=PR6#v=onepge&q=the%20state%20of%20the%20world's%20children&f=false
• UNICEF. (2008). The State of the World's Children: Child Survival. Erişim: 30 Kasım 2025, https://books.google.com.tr/booksid=mt93KbP1JCYC&lpg=PR3&ots=Mpy7eiGGo6&dq=the%20state%20of%20the%20world's%20children&lr&hl=tr&pg=PR3#v=onepage&q&f=fal se
• UNICEF. (2009). The State of the World's Children: Maternal and Newborn Health. Erişim: 30 Kasım 2025, https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/645771
• UNICEF. (2010). The State of the World's Children: Celebrating 20 Years of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (special edition). Erişim: 30 Kasım 2025, https://books.google.com.tr/booksid=rUIU9HwMF8C&lpg=PA12&ots=3IIi5rYz9I&dq=the%20state%20of%20the%20world's20children&lr&hl=tr&pg=PA12#v=onepage&q=the%20state%20of%20the%20world's%20children&f=false
• UNICEF. (2011). The State of the World's Children: Adolescence: An Age of Opportunity. Erişim: 30 Kasım 2025, https://books.google.com.tr/books? id=S94hOBDJFcIC&lpg=PA8&ots=xazBA0hXNM&dq=the%20state%20of%20the%20world's%20children&lr&hl=tr&pg=PA8#v=onepage&q=the%20state%20of%20the%20world's%20children&f=false