A New Approach in Safety Culture: Safety Coaching

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1, 92 - 112, 30.04.2021

Derya Koçak

https://doi.org/10.38213/ohsacademy.885575

Öz

There are many parameters that affect the safety culture, which is a part of the organizational culture. The most important of these are the values, beliefs and assumptions of the employees. It will be necessary to analyze behavior of employee and study on unsafe behaviors in building and developing a safety culture. At this point, coaching comes into play. With the safety coaching to be applied to contribute to the safety culture in a workplace, it can be ensured that both the employer and the employees adopt this culture and establish a trust-based communication. Instead of the order control approach from top-down, the safety coaching approach enables individuals to discover their potential by taking their values into account. In this study, an extensive literature search was conducted on safety culture, behavior based safety, human factors analysis and classification system, coaching and safety coaching. The contribution of safety coaching to high performance safety culture was discussed. At the same time, a systematic approach has been put forward in which safety coaching, behavior based safety and human factors analysis and classification system can be used together

Güvenlik Kültüründe Yeni Bir Yaklaşım: Güvenlik Koçluğu

Öz

Örgüt kültürünün bir parçası olan güvenlik kültürünü etkileyen birçok parametre vardır. Bunların başında çalışanların değerleri, inançları, varsayımları gibi hususlar gelmektedir. Güvenlik kültürü oluşturmada ve geliştirmede çalışan davranışlarını analiz etmek ve güvensiz davranışlar üzerinde çalışmak gerekecektir. Tam bu noktada koçluk devreye girmektedir. Bir işletmede güvenlik kültürüne katkı sağlamak için uygulanacak güvenlik koçluğu ile hem işverenin hem çalışanların süreci sahiplenmesi ve güvene dayalı bir iletişim kurulması sağlanabilir. Yukardan emir kontrol yaklaşımı yerine güvenlik koçluğu yaklaşımı ile kişilerin değerleri göz önüne alınarak içlerindeki potansiyeli keşfetmeleri sağlanır. Bu çalışma ile güvelik kültür, davranış odaklı güvenlik, insan faktörleri analizi ve sınıflandırma sistemi, koçluk ve güvenlik koçluğuna ilişkin geniş bir literatür taraması gerçekleştirilmiştir. Güvenlik koçluğunun, yüksek performanslı güvenlik kültürüne olan katkısı ele alınmıştır. Aynı zamanda güvenlik koçluğu, davranış odaklı güvenlik ve insan faktörleri analizi ve sınıflandırma sisteminin birlikte kullanılabileceği sistematik bir yaklaşım ortaya konmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Koçluk, Güvenlik koçluğu, Güvenlik kültürü, Davranış odaklı güvenlik, İnsan faktörü analizi ve sınıflandırma sistemi

Kaynakça

• Akın A. & Ulukök E., (2017), Koçluk Yaklaşımı İle İşgören Geliştirme, Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(2), 279 – 300)
• Al-Hemoud, A. M., & & Al-Asfoor, M. M. (2006), “A behavior based safety approach at a Kuwait research institution”, Journal of Safety Research, 37(2), 201–206.
• Anderson, M., (2004), “Behavioural Safety and Major Accident Hazards: Magic Bullet or Shot in The Dark?”, HSE.
• Antonsen, S., (2009), Safety Culture: Theory, Method and Improvement, England: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
• Brown, K. A., Willis, P. G., & Prussia, G. E., (2000), “Predicting safe employee behavior in the steel industry: Development and test of a sociotechnical model”, Journal of Operations Management, 18, 445–465.
• Brown, S. W. & Grant, A. M., (2010) “From GROW to GROUP: theoretical issues and a practical model for group coaching in organisations”, Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 3(1), 30–45.
• Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development [CIPD], (2015), Learning and development, Annual survey report, London.
• Cheyne, A., Oliver, A., Tomás, J. M., & Cox, S. (2002), “The architecture of employee attitudes to safety in the manufacturing sector”, Personnel Review, 31(6), 649–670.
• Cooper, D., (2001), Improving Safety Culture: Practical Guide, Londan: Applied Behavioural Sciences.
• Cooper, M., (2000), “Towards a model of safety culture”, Safety Science, 36, 111-136.
• Cox, T., & Cox, S. (1991), “The structure of employee attitudes to safety an European example”, Work and Stress, 5(2), 93-106.
• Fedorycheva, I., & Hammer, M., (2015), “A Description of Safety Triad Models of Safety Culture As A Tool In Human Performance Research”, MM Science Journal, 4, 768-771.
• Fernández-Muñiz B., M.-P. J.-O., (2007), “Safety culture: Analysis of the causal relationships between its key dimensions”, Journal of Safety Research, 38, 627–641.
• Fleming, M., & Lardner, R., (2002)”, Strategies to Promote Safe Behaviour as Part of a Health and Safety Management System, HSE.
• Fleming, M., (2001), “Safety Culture Maturity Model”, Offshore Technology Report, HSE.
• Flin, R., Burns, C., Mearns, K., Yule, S., & Robertson, E. M., (2006), “Measuring safety climate in health care”, Quality and Safety in Health Care, 15(2), 109–115.
• Gadd, S., (2002), Safety Culture: A review of the literatüre, HSE.
• Geller, E. S., (2001), The Psychology of Safety Handbook, Lewis Publishers.
• Geller, E. S., (2011), “Guidelines for Managing Participation in Behavior-Based Coaching”, Industrial Safety & Hygiene News (ISHN), Eylül 2020 tarihinde https://www.safetyperformance.com/GuidelinesforManagingParticipationinBehavior-BasedCoaching.pdf adresinden alındı
• George, J. M., & Jones, G. R., (2012), Understanding and Managing Organizational Behaviour, (Sixth Edition), Pearson.
• Guldenmund, F., (2000), The Nature of Safety Culture: A review of Theory and Research. Safety Science, 34(1-3), 215-257.
• Guldenmund, F., (2007), “The Use of Questionnaires in Safety Culture Research - an Evaluation”, Safety Science, 45, 723-743.
• Guo, B. H., Goh, Y. M., & Wong, K. L., (2018), “A system dynamics view of a behavior-based safety program in the construction industry”, Safety Science, 104, 2002-2015.
• Health & Safety Authority [HSA]., (2013), Behaviour Based Safetu Guide.
• https://coachfederation.org/core-competencies. [2020, International Coaching Federation [ICF], Core Competencies].
• https://internationalcoachingcommunity.com/what-is-coaching/. [2020, International Coaching Community [ICC], What is Coaching].
• https://www.health.org.uk/sites/default/files/MeasuringSafetyCulture.pdf. [2011, The Health Foundation, Measuring Safety Culture].
• https://www.hfacs.com/hfacs-framework.html. [2014, Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS)].
• https://www.icsi-eu.org/sites/default/files/2020-07/Icsi_essential_EN_safety-culture_2017.pdf. [2017, Institute for a Industrial Safety Culture [ISCI], The Essentials of Safety Culture]
• https://www.iloencyclopaedia.org/part-viii-12633/accident-prevention/item/894-theory-of-accident-causes. [2015, International Lobour Oragnization [ILO], Theory of Accident Causes, Accidents and Safety Management].
• Institution of Occupational Safety and Health [IOSH], (2017), Coaching to Engage – An Introductory Guide.
• International Atomic Energy Agency [IAEA], (2002), Safety Culture in Nuclear Installations: Guıdance For Use in the Enhancement of Safety Culture.
• Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek, M., Szwedzka, K., & Szczuka, M., (2015), “Behaviour based intervention for occupational safety – case study”, Procedia Manufacturin, 3, 4876 – 4883.
• Jones, R. J., Woods, S. A., & Guillaume, Y. R., (2015), “The effectiveness of workplace coaching: a meta¬analysis of learning and performance outcomes from coaching”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 89(2), 249-277.
• Kalçık, F., (2017), “Öğrenci Başarısını Desteklemede Bir Yol: Öğrenci Koçluğu”, Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(1), 53-67.
• Kabaş, G., & Tecir, Y. B., (2019), Güçlü Soru Sorma Sanatı (3 . Baskı), İstanbul: Olimpos Yayınları.
• Kołodziejczak, M. (2015), “Coaching Across Organizational Culture”, Procedia Economics and Finance, 23, 329 – 334.
• Li, H., Lu, M., Hsu, S.-C., Gray, M., & Huang, T., (2015), “Proactive Behavior-Based Safety Management for Construction Safety Improvement”, Safety Science, 75, 107–117.
• Olsen, E., Bjerkan, A. M., & Nævestad, T., (2009), “Modelling the effects of a large‐scale safety culture programme: a combined qualitative and quantitative approach”, Journal of Risk Research, 12(3-4), 389–409.
• Osman, A., Khalid, K., & AlFqeeh, F. M., (2019), “Exploring the Role of Safety Culture Factors Towards Safety Behaviour in Small-Medium Enterprise”, International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 23(3), 1-11.
• Pınar A. H., (2013), Mintzberg’in Yönetim Yaklaşımı Açısından ilköğretim Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin Koçluk ve Mentorluk Yetkinlikleri ile Öğrencilerin Sınav Başarı Puanları Arasındaki İlişki Üzerine Bir Araştırma, Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 22(1), 121 – 138.
• Reason, J., (2000), “Human Error: Models and Management”, British Medical Journal, 320(7237), 768-770.
• Reason, J., (2016), Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents, Ashgate Publishing.
• Sabin, E. J., Bigda-Peyton, T. G., Brown, J. P., & Patankar, M. S., (2012), Safety Culture: Building and Sustaining a Cultural Change in Aviation and Healthcare. Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
• Safety Circle. (bt), Coaching for Safety, New Zealand
• Safety Institute of Australia Ltd (S.I.A), (2012), Models of Causation: Safety. Kasım 2020 tarihinde http://www.ohsbok.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/32-Models-of-causation-Safety.pdf adresinden alındı
• Shappell, S. A., & Wiegmann, D. A., (2000), The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System–HFACS, U.S.A Department of Transportation.
• Shappell, S., Detwiler, C., H. K., Hackworth, C., Boquet, A., & Wiegmann, D. A., (2007), “Human Error and Commercial Aviation Accidents: An Analysis Using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System”, Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 49(2), 227-242.
• Smither, J. W., London, M., Flautt, R., Vargas, Y., & Kucine, I. (2003), “Can working with an executive coach improve multisource feedback ratings over time? A quasi-experimental field study”, Personnel Psychology, 56, 23–44.
• Son, G. R., Albertyn, R., & Gerber, C. (2017), “Determining the Importance of Coaching Methods in Workplace Health and Safety”, Journal of Ergonomics, 6(2), 1-7.
• Step Change in Safe, (2003), Chainging Mind: Apractical Guide behavioural change, Aberdeen: Step Change.
• Suskind, D., (2020), Otuz Milyon Kelime (11. Baskı.), (E. Eret, & B. Satılmış, Çev.), Ankara: Buzdağı Yayınevi.
• Theeboom, T., Beersma, B., & van Vianen, A. E., (2013), “Does coaching work? A meta-analysis on the effects of coaching on individual level outcomes in an organizational context”, The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9(1), 1–18.
• Vierendeels, G., Reniers, G., Nunen, K., & Ponnet, K., (2018), “An integrative conceptual framework for safety culture: The Egg AggregatedModel (TEAM) of safety culture”, Safety Science, 103, 323-339.
• Whitmore, J., (2019), Performans için Koçluk-Koçluğun ve liderliğin İlkeleri ve Uygulaması, (3. Baskı ), (B. Erol, Çev.), Paloma.
• Wiegand, D. M., (2007), “Exploring the role of emotional intelligence in behavior-based safety coaching”, Journal of Safety Research, 38, 391–398.
• Wiegmann, D. A., Zhang, H., von Thaden, T., Sharma, G., & Mitchell, A., (2002), A Synthesis of Safety Culture and Safety Climate Research,
• Wu, T., Lin, C. H., & Shiau, S. Y., (2009), “Developing Measures for Assessing the Causality of Safety Culture in a Petrochemical Industry”, Water Air Soil Pollut: Focus, 9, 507–515.
• Yorio, P., Willmer, D., & Moore, S. M., (2015), “Health and safety management systems through a multilevel and strategic management perspective: Theoretical and empirical considerations”, Safety Science, 72, 221-228.
• Zohar, D., (1980), “Safety Climate in Industrial Organizations: Theoretical and Applied Implications”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(1), 96-102.