The Turkish Adaptation of Compulsive Texting Scale for Adolescents: The Validity and Reliability Study

Öz

The main purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the Turkish translation of the Compulsive Texting Scale. This scale was developed by Lister-Landman, Domoff, and Dubow (2015). The Compulsive Texting Scale for adolescents was first translated into Turkish and then back translated. Subsequently, the sample composed of 335 high school students. The internal consistency was observed for reliability and second order confirmative factor analysis was carried out through the software Lisrel 8.80 regarding the validity. Factor analysis confirmed the fit of the three-factor model (Interference, Cognitive Preoccupation and Concealment) similar to the original scale (χ2=155.40, df=73, χ2/df=2,13; NFI=0,96; AGFI= 0,91; RFI= 0,96; NNFI= 0,98; GFI= 0,94; CFI=0,98; IFI= 0,98; RMSEA=0,058). The rreliability coefficient of the complete scale and sub-demission were ranged from .71 to .89. Our findings indicate that Turkish version of the Compulsive Texting Scale for Adolescents is acceptable in terms of reliability and validity for the selected samples.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Compulsive texting,adolescents,reliability,validity

Ergenler için Takıntılı Mesajlaşma Ölçeğinin Türkçe Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı Lister-Landman, Domoff ve Dubow (2015) tarafından geliştirilen Takıntılı Mesajlaşma Ölçeği’nin Türkçe versiyonun geçerlik ve güvenirlik analizini yapmaktır. Ölçeğin uyarlama çalışması için Muğla iline bağlı çeşitli liselerde öğrenim gören 335 lise öğrencisinden veri toplanmıştır. Ölçeğin yapı geçerliği için İkinci Düzey Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi, güvenirliğini belirlemek için ise Cronbach iç tutarlılık katsayısına bakılmıştır. İkinci Düzey Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi sonucuna göre ölçeğin üç faktörlü yapısı (Engelleme, Bilişsel Meşguliyet, Gizleme) doğrulanmış ve analize ilişkin uyum indesklerinin mükemmel sonuç verdiği görülmüştür (χ2=155.40, df=73, χ2/df=2,13; RMSEA=0,058; NFI=0,96; CFI=0,98; NNFI= 0,98; IFI= 0,98; RFI= 0,96; GFI= 0,94; AGFI= 0,91). Bunun yanında güvenirlik analizinde Cronbach Alpha içtutarlılık katsayısı bütün ölçek için .89,engelleme için .77, bilişsel meşguliyet için .76 ve gizleme için .71 bulunmuştur. Yapılan analiz sonuçlarına göre ergenler için geliştirlen Takıntılı Mesajlaşma ölçeğinin Türkçe uyarlama çalışmasının seçilen örneklemde iyi sonuçlar verdiği görülmüştür

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Takıntılı Mesajlaşma,Ergenler,Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik

Kaynakça

1. Amichai-Hamburger, Y. ve Vinitzky, G. (2010). Social network use and personality. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1289-1295. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.018
2. Bayer, J. B. ve Campbell, S. W. (2012). Texting while driving on automatic: Considering the frequency-independent side of habit. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 2083-2090. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.012
3. Carpenter, C. J. (2012). Narcissism on Facebook: Self-promotional and anti-social behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(4), 482-486.
4. Cheung, C. M. K., Chiu, P.-Y. ve Lee, M. K. O. (2011). Online social networks: Why do students use facebook? Computers in Human Behavior, 27(4), 1337-1343. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.028
5. Correa, T., Hinsley, A. W. ve de Zúñiga, H. G. (2010). Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users’ personality and social media use. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 247-253. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.09.003
6. Dake, J. A., Price, J. H., Maziarz, L. ve Ward, B. (2012). Prevalence and correlates of sexting behavior in adolescents. American Journal of Sexuality Education, 7(1), 1-15. doi: 10.1080/15546128.2012.650959
7. Duran, R. L., Kelly, L. ve Rotaru, T. (2011). Mobile phones in romantic relationships and the dialectic of autonomy versus connection. Communication Quarterly, 59(1), 19-36. doi: 10.1080/01463373.2011.541336
8. Ehrenberg, A., Juckes, S., White, K. M. ve Walsh, S. P. (2008). Personality and self-esteem as predictors of young people's technology use. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(6), 739-741. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2008.0030

9. Hong, F.-Y., Chiu, S.-I. ve Huang, D.-H. (2012). A model of the relationship between psychological characteristics, mobile phone addiction and use of mobile phones by Taiwanese university female students. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 2152-2159. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.020
10. Hughes, D. J., Rowe, M., Batey, M. ve Lee, A. (2012). A tale of two sites: Twitter vs. Facebook and the personality predictors of social media usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 561-569. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.001
11. Junco, R. (2012). The relationship between frequency of Facebook use, participation in Facebook activities, and student engagement. Computers & Education, 58(1), 162-171.
12. Kemp, N. ve Bushnell, C. (2011). Children's text messaging: Abbreviations, input methods and links with literacy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(1), 18-27. doi: doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00400.x
13. Ketizmen, A. (2013). Genel eğitimde güzel sanatlar ve grafik eğitimi ve İlişkili uzmanlık alanları. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 33(2).
14. Kirschner, P. A. ve Karpinski, A. C. (2010). Facebook® and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1237-1245. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.024
15. Lee, J.-E. R., Moore, D. C., Park, E.-A. ve Park, S. G. (2012). Who wants to be “friend-rich”? Social compensatory friending on Facebook and the moderating role of public self-consciousness. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 1036-1043.
16. Lenhart, A., Purcell, K., Smith, A. ve Zickuhr, K. (2010). Social media & mobile internet use among teens and young adults. Millennials. Pew internet & American life project.
17. Lister-Landman, K. M., Domoff, S. E. ve Dubow, E. F. (2015). The role of compulsive texting in adolescents’ academic functioning. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 1-15. doi: 10.1037/ppm0000100
18. McCord, B., Rodebaugh, T. L. ve Levinson, C. A. (2014). Facebook: Social uses and anxiety. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 23-27.
19. Moore, K. ve McElroy, J. C. (2012). The influence of personality on Facebook usage, wall postings, and regret. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 267-274.
20. Oliveto, A. (2015). Changing the Attitudes, Behaviors, and Perceptions of Driving and Texting by Teen Drivers through Awareness and Education. (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis), A.T. Still University of Health Sciences, Missouri, USA.
21. Ostrager, B. (2010). SMS. OMG! LOL! TTYL: Translating the law to accommodate today's teens and the evolution from texting to sexting. Family Court Review, 48(4), 712-726. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2010.01345.x
22. Özaşçilar, M. (2012). Genç bireylerin cep telefonu kullanımı ve bireysel güvenlik: Üniversite öğrencilerinin cep telefonunu bireysel güvenlik amaçlı kullanımları. Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi, 15(1), 43-74.
23. Özdamar, K. (2004). Paket Programlar ile İstatistiksel Veri Analizi-II, (Çok değişkenli Yöntemler), 5. Baskı. Eskişehir: Kaan Kitabevi.
24. Pempek, T. A., Yermolayeva, Y. A. ve Calvert, S. L. (2009). College students' social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(3), 227-238. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2008.12.010
25. Plester, B., Wood, C. ve Bell, V. (2008). Txt msg n school literacy: Does texting and knowledge of text abbreviations adversely affect children's literacy attainment? Literacy, 42(3), 137-144. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-4369.2008.00489.x
26. Rau, P.-L. P., Gao, Q. ve Ding, Y. (2008). Relationship between the level of intimacy and lurking in online social network services. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(6), 2757-2770.
27. Redmayne, M. (2013). New Zealand adolescents’ cellphone and cordless phone user-habits: are they at increased risk of brain tumours already? A cross-sectional study. Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source, 12(5), 1-10. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-12-5
28. Rosen, L. D., Whaling, K., Rab, S., Carrier, L. M. ve Cheever, N. A. (2013). Is Facebook creating “iDisorders”? The link between clinical symptoms of psychiatric disorders and technology use, attitudes and anxiety. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 1243-1254.
29. Ross, C., Orr, E. S., Sisic, M., Arseneault, J. M., Simmering, M. G. ve Orr, R. R. (2009). Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 578-586. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.024
30. Ryan, T. ve Xenos, S. (2011). Who uses Facebook? An investigation into the relationship between the Big Five, shyness, narcissism, loneliness, and Facebook usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1658-1664. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.02.004
31. Sagioglou, C. ve Greitemeyer, T. (2014). Facebook’s emotional consequences: Why Facebook causes a decrease in mood and why people still use it. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 359-363.
32. Seidman, G. (2014). Expressing the “True Self” on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 367-372.
33. Sheldon, P. (2008). The relationship between unwillingness-to-communicate and students’ Facebook use. Journal of Media Psychology, 20(2), 67-75.
34. Subrahmanyam, K., Reich, S. M., Waechter, N. ve Espinoza, G. (2008). Online and offline social networks: Use of social networking sites by emerging adults. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(6), 420-433.
35. Şar, A. H., Tuncay, A. ve Horzum, M. B. (2015). Developing the smart phone addiction scale and its validity and reliability study. Online Journal of Technology Addiction & Cyberbullying, 2(3).
36. Tse, A. Y.-h. (2012). Impacts of short message service texting on university students in Malaysia. Asian Social Science, 8(1), 107-110. doi: 10.5539/ass.v8n1p107
37. West, M., Dawson, J., Admasachew, L. ve Topakas, A. (2011). NHS staff management and health service quality. London: Retrieved from http://www.dh.gov.uk/health/2011/08/nhs-staff-management/
38. Worthington, L., Braunscheidel, E. M., Lachenmayr, L., Grutzmacher, S., Speirs, K., DiBari, J., . . . Munger, A. (2012). Text2bhealthy: A pilot nutrition texting program targeting parents of school-aged children. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 112(9), A78. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2012.06.278
39. Wu, Y.-C. J., Chang, W.-H. ve Yuan, C.-H. (2014). Do Facebook profile pictures reflect user’s personality? Computers in Human Behavior.
40. Yen, C.-F., Tang, T.-C., Yen, J.-Y., Lin, H.-C., Huang, C.-F., Liu, S.-C. ve Ko, C.-H. (2009). Symptoms of problematic cellular phone use, functional impairment and its association with depression among adolescents in
41. Southern Taiwan. Journal of Adolescence, 32(4), 863-873.
42. Young, K. S. (1998). Caught in the net. New York: NY: Wiley.