Kuşak Değişiminin Demokratikleşmedeki Sınırları: Azerbaycan Örneği

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1, 1 - 11, 30.06.2025

Gökhan Alper Ataşer

https://doi.org/10.58632/olgusos.1601608

Öz

Bu makale, otoriter yönetimin 2010’ların ortalarındaki konsolidasyonundan önce kuşak değişiminin demokratikleşmeye olası etkisini ele almaktadır. Kimi araştırmacılar, SOvyet sonrası dönemde otoriter eğilimlerin devam etmisinde Sovyet-dönemi siyasi-toplumsallaşmanın etkilerini belirtmektedir. Buna göre değer ve normlardaki kuşağa bağlı değişim, özellikle yurtdışında eğitim alan genç profesyonellerin ülkenin demokratikleşmesinde etkisi tartışılmaktadır. Derinlemesine mülakat ve katılımcı gözlem yöntemlerinin yanı sıra ilgili alanyazının incelenmesine dayanarak, bu türden bir dönüşümün ihtimallerini ve sınırlılıklarını tartışmaktayım. Rejimin istikrarı ve dahil etme kapasitesi bu türden “demokratik-zihniyete sahip” gençlerin etkisini sınırlayan önemli bir etkendir. Serbest ekonomini, sivi toplum ve medyanın genel güçsüzlüğü de gençliğin motivasyonunu olumsuz etkilemektedir. Ayrıca Batı kültür ve değerlerine maruz kalan gençlerin, toplumla sağlıklı bağlar kuramaması belirtilmektedir. Son olarak, yabancı ülkelerdeki daha iyi ekonomik fırsatlar ve değerler ortamı, beyin göçüne yol açarak Batı eğitimine ve demokratik toplum anlayışına sahip gençlerin yurtlarını terk etmesine yol açmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Azerbaycan , demokratikleşme , yeni kuşak , post-Sovyet , beyin göçü

Limits of Generational Change on Democratization: The Case of Azerbaijan

Öz

This article is dealing with the possible impact of generational change on democratization before the full consolidation of authoritarian regime in mid-2010s in Azerbaijan. According to some commentators, the authoritarian tendencies in post-Soviet societies, including Azerbaijan was the result of the Soviet-era political socialization. Thus, a generational change in norms and values, especially relevant for young professionals with higher education in foreign countries, was debated as a possible dynamic for democratic society. Based on in-depth interviews and participant observation, as well as a review of literature, I am discussing the possibilities and limits of such generational change. Stability of the authoritarian regime and its capacity for cooptation can be seen as a major source of strength in preventing the so-called “democratic-minded” youth form a social dynamic towards democratic demands. The overall weakness of free economy, civil society and media have a detrimental impact, therefore increasing the disillusionment of the youth. Exposure to Western culture and values are believed to create limits of the educated youth to form ties with the general population. Finally, better material opportunities abroad play an important role in brain-drain, resulting in not with the loss of well-trained professionals but individuals with a democratic understanding of society.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Azerbaijan , democratization , new generation , post-Soviet , brain-drain

Kaynakça

• Arendt, H. (1951-1958). The Origins of Totalitarianism. 2nd enlarged ed. New York: Meridian Books.
• Bahry, Donna (1987) “Politics, Generations and Change in the USSR,” in James. R. Millar (ed.) Politics, Work and Daily Life in the USSR: A Survey of Former Soviet Citizens, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Derluguian, Georgi (2005) Bourdieu’s secret admirer in the Caucasus, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
• Djilas, Milovan (1957) The New Class, London: Thames & Hudson.
• Fainsod, Merle (1964) “Soviet Youth and the Problem of the Generations,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 108:5, pp. 429-436.
• FAR Center (2007) “Azerbaijani Students Abroad and at Home,” III ERA: Qafqazda ve Orta Asiyada Sülh ve Demokratiya Problemleri, No:7.
• Friedrich, C.J., & Brzezinski, Z.K. (1956). Totalitarian Dictatorship and Autocracy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard U. Press.
• Galbraith, John Kenneth (1967) The New Industrial State, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Goldthorpe, J. H. (1960). Social stratification in industrial society. The sociological review, 8(1_suppl), 97-122.
• Harasymiw, B. (1984). Political elite recruitment in the Soviet Union. Springer.
• Hunner-Kreisel, Christine (2015). Back to Baku: Educational Mobility Experiences of Two Young Azerbaijanis and Identity Positionings Back ‘Home’, Childhood, Youth and Migration, Vol. 12 of the Series Children’s Well Being: Indicators and Research, pp. 273-287.Inkeles, A. (1966). Models and issues in the analysis of Soviet society. Quadrant, 10(5), 51-62.
• Ismayılov, Murad (2008) “Nation-Building and State-Building in Azerbaijan: The Challenges of Education Abroad,” Turkish Policy Quarterly, 8:4, pp. 89-104.
• Ismayilov, M., & Tkacik, M. (2009). Nation-building and state-building in Azerbaijan: The challenges of education abroad. Turkish Policy Quarterly, 8(4), 89-104.
• Lepisto, Eric (2010) “Forging Ahead: Azerbaijan’s New Generation and Social Change,” Central Asian Survey, 29:4, pp.435-451.
• Mannheim, Karl (1972) “The Problem of Generations” in Paul Kecskemeti (ed.), Karl Mannheim: Essays, London: Routledge.
• Mawdsley, E., & White, S. (2000). The Soviet Elite from Lenin to Gorbachev: the central committee and its members 1917-1991. OUP Oxford.
• Nagle, John D. (1977) System and Succession: The Social Bases of Elite Recruitment, Austin: University of Texas Press.
• Sakwa, Richard (1999) Post-Communism, Buckingham: Open University Press.
• Sorokin, P. A. (1960). Mutual convergence of the United States and the USSR to the mixed sociocultural type. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 1, 143.
• Stewart, Philip D. (1977) “Attitudes of Regional Soviet Leaders Toward Understanding the Potential for Change,” in Margaret G. Hermann (ed.) A Psychological Examination of Political Leaders, New York: Free Press.