Development Phases of E-Government
Abstract
In post-digital ecosystem, the implementation of effective electronic government systems comes to the fore as a strategic priority. Removing paper based processes and increasing integration of the systems used by different departments and agencies are directly related to the power of a government. e-Transformation of the government from traditional to electronic takes place in four stages, namely the phase of initial presence, unification, integration and social transformation. In the initial presence phase, each government institution separately provides services to citizens through its own site. In the unification phase, citizens will be able to access all government agencies' systems through a single website with a single username and password. In the integration phase, the systems of all government agencies will be linked to a common reference and archive system as well as common databases. Finally, in the last phase, the most important phase of electronic government applications, it will be ensured that citizens and the government will meet on the internet through electronic government applications. In this phase, the society will become an information society, and thus increase its productivity at individual level. Therefore, e-government projects have strategic importance for governments. In this context, the study emphasizes the importance of the involvement of the society to electronic government projects and suggests a new classification for the development phases of e-government.
Keywords
Electronic Government,Digital Economy,Digital Divide,Social Transformation
Kaynakça
- Adjei-Bamfa, P., Maloreh-Nyamekye, T., & Ahenkan, A. (2019). The role of e-government in sustainable public procurement in developing countries: A systematic literature review. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 142, 189-203. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.12.001.
- Akman, I., Ali, A., Mishra, A., and Arifoglu, A. (2005). E-government: A global view and an empirical evaluation of some attributes of citizens. Government Information Quarterly, 22(2), 239-257. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2004.12.001
- Alawneh, A., Al-Refai, H., and Batiha, K. (2013). Measuring user satisfaction from e-Government services: Lessons from Jordan. Government Information Quarterly, 30(3), 277-288. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2013.03.001
- Aldrich, J., Bertot, J., and McClure, C. (2002). E-government: Initiatives, developments, and issues. Government Information Quarterly, 19(4), 349-355.
- Andersen, K., and Henriksen, H. (2006). E-government maturity models: Extension of the Layne and Lee model. Government Information Quarterly, 23, 236-248. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2005.11.008
- Bennett , C. (1992). Regulating privacy: Data protection and public policy in Europe and the United States. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
- Castelnovo, W. (2013). A stakeholder based approach to public value. 13th European Conference on eGovernment . 2013, Como: ECEG.
- Castelnovo, W., and Simonetta, M. (2008). A public value evaluation of e-government policies. The Electronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation, 11(2), 61-72.
- Chasin, F., and Scholta, H. (2015). Taking peer-to-peer sharing and collaborative consumption onto the next level: New opportunities and challenges for e-government. 23rd European Conference on Information Systems . Münster: ECIS.
- Ciborra, C., and Navarra, D. (2005). Good governance, development theory, and aid policy: Risks and challenges of e-government in Jordan. Information Technology for Development, 11(2), 141-159. doi: 10.1002/itdj.20008