Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

University Students’ Opinion on Urban Agriculture Course: A Case Study

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 44, 7505 - 7519, 26.12.2021
https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.928253

Öz

Urban agriculture is one of the most popular sustainable concepts in the world and Turkey recently. There are various programs and courses for urban agriculture education in universities around the world. However, urban agriculture education in Turkey is still developing. Therefore, Uşak University has recently started offering an urban agriculture course to undergraduate students. This course aims at increasing their awareness and knowledge of urban agriculture. It is the first urban agriculture course at the undergraduate level in Turkey. This study aims to determine the opinions of Usak University 3rd-grade students about urban agriculture courses and their attitudes towards urban agriculture after the course. An online questionnaire was conducted for 40 undergraduate students from different depart-ments who enrolled in an urban agriculture course. The questionnaire consisted of 19 questions includ-ing multiple-choice, yes/no, and fill-in-the-blank question types. In this study, descriptive statistical methods were used and answers were sought for sub-problems using the chi-square test. As a result of the research, it was concluded that the student's opinions of the course were positive, course content and materials were sufficient and the course was considered suitable for e-learning. In addition, it was observed that the awareness of urban agriculture increased at the end of the course.

Kaynakça

  • Bartin University, (2021). Retrieved 17 January, 2021 from http://ubys.bartin.edu.tr/
  • Baptista, F., Lourenço, P., da Cruz, V. F., Silva, L. L., Silva, J. R., Correia, M., Picuno, P., Dimitriou, E. and Papadakis, G. (2021). Which are the best practices for MSc programmes in sustainable agriculture?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 303, 126914.
  • Bryld, E. (2003). Potentials, problems, and policy implications for urban agriculture in developing countries. Agriculture and human values, 20(1), 79-86.
  • Cankırı Karatekin University, (2021). Retrieved 17 January, 2021 from http://of.karatekin.edu.tr/yukle/dpfbe2017b-pm.pdf.
  • Duchemin, E., Wegmuller, F. and Legault, A. M. (2008). Urban agriculture: Multi-dimensional tools for social development in poor neighbourhoods. Field Actions Science Reports. The Journal of Field Actions, 1(1), 43–52.
  • Doherty K., (2015). Urban agriculture and ecosystem services: a typology and toolkit for planners. University of Massachusetts Amherst, USA.
  • Ferreira, A. J. D., Guilherme, R. I. M. M. and Ferreira, C. S. S. (2018). Urban agriculture, a tool towards more resilient urban communities?. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health, 5, 93-97.
  • Grossman, J., Sherard, M., Prohn, S. M., Bradley, L., Goodell, S. and Andrew, K. (2012). An exploratory analysis of student-community interactions in urban agriculture. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 16(2), 179-196.
  • Haşiloğlu, M. A., Kocaman, S. and Aydın, S. (2011). Tarım okuryazarlığı ve tarım eğitimine bir bakış. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 31(2), 619-629.
  • Mougeot, L. J., (2000). Urban agriculture: Definition, presence, potentials and risks, and policy challenges. Cities Feeding People Series, Report 31, p.58.
  • Oregon State University, (2021). Retrieved 17. January, 2021 from https://workspace.oregonstate.edu/course/urban-ag-program.
  • Orsini, F., Kahane, R., Nono-Womdim, R. and Gianquinto, G. (2013). Urban agriculture in the developing world: A review. Agronomy for sustainable development, 33(4), 695-720.
  • Pearson, D., Hodgkin, K., (2010). The role of community gardens in urban agriculture. In Community Garden Conference, (p.99).
  • Pourjavid, S., Poursaeed, A. and Mirdamadi, S. M. (2020). Modeling the effectiveness of urban agriculture education courses. Urban Ecosystems, 23, 927–932.
  • Purdue University, (2021). Retrieved 17. January, 2021 from https://www.purdue.edu/dffs/urbanag/programs-old/urban-ag-certificate/.
  • Reynolds, K. (2017). Designing urban agriculture education for social justice: Radical innovation through Farm School NYC. International Journal of Food Design, 2(1), 45-63.
  • Travaline, K. and Hunold, C. (2010). Urban agriculture and ecological citizenship in Philadelphia. Local Environment, 15(6), 581-590.
  • United Nations, (2015). Retrieved 17. January, 2021 from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/partnership/?p=30648.
  • University of Guelph, (2021). Retrieved 17. January, 2021 from https://courses.opened.uoguelph.ca/public/category/courseCategoryCertificateProfile.do?method=load&certificateId=615989.
  • Usak University, (2021). Retrieved 17. January, 2021 from https://www.usak.edu.tr Virginia State University, (2021). Retrieved 17. January, 2021 from https://www.ext.vsu.edu/urban-agriculture-certificate-program.
  • Weissman, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial endeavors:(re) producing neoliberalization through urban agriculture youth programming in Brooklyn, New York. Environmental Education Research, 21(3), 351-364.

Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Kentsel Tarım Dersine Yönelik Bakış Açıları

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 44, 7505 - 7519, 26.12.2021
https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.928253

Öz

Kentsel tarım son zamanlarda dünyada ve ülkemizde öne çıkan sürdürülebilir popüler konseptlerden biridir. Dünya’da üniversitelerde kentsel tarım eğitimine yönelik çeşitli programlar ve dersler bulunmaktadır. Fakat ülkemizde kentsel tarım eğitimi olduça yetersiz düzeydedir. Uşak Üniversitesi lisans düzeyi öğrencilerine yönelik üniversitenin ortak seçmeli dersler havuzu için alan dışı seçmeli ders olarak kentsel tarım dersi açılmıştır. Bu ders Türkiye’de lisans düzeyindeki ilk kentsel tarım dersidir ve öğrencilerin kentsel tarıma ilişkin farkındalıklarının ve bilgi düzeylerinin artırılmasını hedeflenmiştir. Bu araştırmada. Uşak Üniversitesinin farklı bölümlerinden 3. sınıf öğrencilerinin seçmeli ders olarak seçtikleri kentsel tarım dersine yönelik görüşlerinin araştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmada 2019-2020 Bahar dönemi kentsel tarım soru dersini alan 40 lisans öğrencisine çoktan seçmeli, evet / hayır ve boşluk doldurma tiplerini içeren 19 sorudan oluşan bir online anket uygulanmıştır. Verilerin analizi için SPSS Statistics 24 paket programında yer alan tanımlayıcı istatistiksel analiz yöntemleri ve ki-kare testinden faydalanılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda öğrencilerin kentsel tarım dersine ilişkin görüşlerinin olumlu olduğu, ders içeriği ve materyallerinin yeterli olduğu ve dersin online eğitim için uygun olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Ayrıca dersin sonunda kentsel tarıma olan farkındalığın arttığı gözlemlenmiştir.

Kaynakça

  • Bartin University, (2021). Retrieved 17 January, 2021 from http://ubys.bartin.edu.tr/
  • Baptista, F., Lourenço, P., da Cruz, V. F., Silva, L. L., Silva, J. R., Correia, M., Picuno, P., Dimitriou, E. and Papadakis, G. (2021). Which are the best practices for MSc programmes in sustainable agriculture?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 303, 126914.
  • Bryld, E. (2003). Potentials, problems, and policy implications for urban agriculture in developing countries. Agriculture and human values, 20(1), 79-86.
  • Cankırı Karatekin University, (2021). Retrieved 17 January, 2021 from http://of.karatekin.edu.tr/yukle/dpfbe2017b-pm.pdf.
  • Duchemin, E., Wegmuller, F. and Legault, A. M. (2008). Urban agriculture: Multi-dimensional tools for social development in poor neighbourhoods. Field Actions Science Reports. The Journal of Field Actions, 1(1), 43–52.
  • Doherty K., (2015). Urban agriculture and ecosystem services: a typology and toolkit for planners. University of Massachusetts Amherst, USA.
  • Ferreira, A. J. D., Guilherme, R. I. M. M. and Ferreira, C. S. S. (2018). Urban agriculture, a tool towards more resilient urban communities?. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health, 5, 93-97.
  • Grossman, J., Sherard, M., Prohn, S. M., Bradley, L., Goodell, S. and Andrew, K. (2012). An exploratory analysis of student-community interactions in urban agriculture. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 16(2), 179-196.
  • Haşiloğlu, M. A., Kocaman, S. and Aydın, S. (2011). Tarım okuryazarlığı ve tarım eğitimine bir bakış. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 31(2), 619-629.
  • Mougeot, L. J., (2000). Urban agriculture: Definition, presence, potentials and risks, and policy challenges. Cities Feeding People Series, Report 31, p.58.
  • Oregon State University, (2021). Retrieved 17. January, 2021 from https://workspace.oregonstate.edu/course/urban-ag-program.
  • Orsini, F., Kahane, R., Nono-Womdim, R. and Gianquinto, G. (2013). Urban agriculture in the developing world: A review. Agronomy for sustainable development, 33(4), 695-720.
  • Pearson, D., Hodgkin, K., (2010). The role of community gardens in urban agriculture. In Community Garden Conference, (p.99).
  • Pourjavid, S., Poursaeed, A. and Mirdamadi, S. M. (2020). Modeling the effectiveness of urban agriculture education courses. Urban Ecosystems, 23, 927–932.
  • Purdue University, (2021). Retrieved 17. January, 2021 from https://www.purdue.edu/dffs/urbanag/programs-old/urban-ag-certificate/.
  • Reynolds, K. (2017). Designing urban agriculture education for social justice: Radical innovation through Farm School NYC. International Journal of Food Design, 2(1), 45-63.
  • Travaline, K. and Hunold, C. (2010). Urban agriculture and ecological citizenship in Philadelphia. Local Environment, 15(6), 581-590.
  • United Nations, (2015). Retrieved 17. January, 2021 from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/partnership/?p=30648.
  • University of Guelph, (2021). Retrieved 17. January, 2021 from https://courses.opened.uoguelph.ca/public/category/courseCategoryCertificateProfile.do?method=load&certificateId=615989.
  • Usak University, (2021). Retrieved 17. January, 2021 from https://www.usak.edu.tr Virginia State University, (2021). Retrieved 17. January, 2021 from https://www.ext.vsu.edu/urban-agriculture-certificate-program.
  • Weissman, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial endeavors:(re) producing neoliberalization through urban agriculture youth programming in Brooklyn, New York. Environmental Education Research, 21(3), 351-364.
Toplam 21 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Alan Eğitimleri
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Hüseyin Berk Türker 0000-0002-8995-3259

Yayımlanma Tarihi 26 Aralık 2021
Kabul Tarihi 22 Kasım 2021
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2021 Cilt: 18 Sayı: 44

Kaynak Göster

APA Türker, H. B. (2021). University Students’ Opinion on Urban Agriculture Course: A Case Study. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 18(44), 7505-7519. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.928253