THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING CAPABILITY, INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL AND JOB SATISFACTION IN SPORT ORGANIZATIONS

Year 2017, , 790 - 795, 30.06.2017

Umit Can Buyukakgul Metin Argan

https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.659

Abstract

The
organizational learning capability of sport organizations is an important
resource of being a learning organization. The effective and efficient
management of this resource plays key role in the success of whole
organization. Accurate assessment of the values which are created by the
organizational learning process and evaluation of these values are necessary to
make these values more efficient. The intellectual assets which are the results
of organizational learning process are the most important resources of learning
organizations. Positive and highly motivational climate created by these
resources can inevitably affect performance of employees. In the light of these
expectations first purpose of this research ise to identify organizational
learning capability of sport organizations, and to explain the relationship
between organizational learning capability and intellectual capital, and to
assess effect of intellectual capital on job satisfaction. After conducting the
analysis, it is found out that there are significant relationships between
organizational learning capability factors -are commitment to learn, system
perspective, openness and experimentation, knowledge transfer- and intellectual
capital components. Also, as there are significant relationships between
intellectual capital components which are human capital, structural capital and
relational capital and job satisfaction but there is no significant
relationship between organizational learning capability and job satisfaction.
The other purpose of this research is to identify the employees’ perceptions of
organizational learning capability, intellectual capital and job satisfaction,
and differentations of these perceptions by the demographic features, work
experiment and instutions of participants. After conducting analysis, it has
been reported that perceptions of organizational learning capability, intellectual
capital and job satisfaction diffirentiate by monthly income and instutions of
participants. 

Keywords

Organizational Learning, Intellectual Capital, Job Satisfaction, Sport Organization

References

• Akıncı, Z. (2002). Turizm sektöründe işgören iş tatminini etkileyen faktörler: beş yıldızlı konaklama işletmelerinde bir uygulama. Akdeniz University Faculty of Economics & Administrative Sciences Faculty Journal/Akdeniz Universitesi Iktisadi ve Idari Bilimler Fakultesi Dergisi, 2(4), p. 1-25.
• Andres, L., Grayson, J. P. (2002, April). Educational Attainment, Occupational Status and Job Satisfaction: A Ten Year Portrait of Canadian Young Women and Men. In annual meeting of American Educational Research Association.
• Arslantaş, C.C. (2003). Öğrenen Organizasyonlar ve Öğrenen Organizasyonlarda Örgüt İçi Bütünleşmeyi Etkileyen Unsurlara Yönelik Bir Araştırma, Doktora Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
• Basım, N., Şeşen, H., Meydan, C. H. (2009). Öğrenen örgüt algısının örgüt içi girişimciliğe etkisi: kamuda bir araştırma. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 64(03), 27-44.
• Beehr, T. A., Nair, V. N., Gudanowski, D. M., Such, M. (2004). Perceptions of reasons for promotion of self and others. Human Relations, 57(4), 413-438.
• Boudreau, J. W., Ramstad, P. M. (2007). Beyond HR: The new science of human capital. Harvard Business Press.
• Bozdemir, N. Ö. (2009). Entelektüel sermayenin örgüt üzerindeki etkileri ve uygulamadan örnekler. Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Çalışma Ekonomisi ve Endüstri İlişkileri Anabilim Dalı, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul.
• Bozkurt, Ö., & Bozkurt, İ. (2008). İş tatminini etkileyen işletme içi faktörlerin eğitim sektörü açısından değerlendirilmesine yönelik bir alan araştırması.
• Cano, J., & Miller, G. (1992). A gender analysis of job satisfaction, job satisfier factors, and job dissatisfier factors of agricultural education teachers. Journal of agricultural education, 33(3), 40-46.
• Chahal, H., Bakshi, P., (2016). Measurement of intellectual capital in the Indian banking sector. Vikalpa, vol. 41, no. 1, p. 61-73.
• Chalykoff, J., & Kochan, T. A. (1989). Computer‐aided monitoring: its influence on employee job satisfaction and turnover. Personnel Psychology, 42(4), 807-834.
• Chen, J. Q., Lee, T. E., Zhang, R., & Zhang, Y. J. (2003). Systems requirements for organizational learning. Communications of the ACM, 46(12), 73-78.
• Chen, M. C., Cheng, S. J., & Hwang, Y. (2005). An empirical investigation of the relationship between intellectual capital and firms’ market value and financial performance. Journal of intellectual capital, 6(2), 159-176.
• Çalık, T. (2003). Öğrenen örgütler olarak eğitim kurumları. Manas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(2), 115-130.
• Çalışkan, Z. (2005). İş tatmini: Malatya’da sağlık kuruluşları üzerine bir uygulama. Doğu Anadolu Bölgesi Araştırmaları, 3(1), 9-18.
• Edvinsson, L. (1997). Developing intellectual capital at Skandia. Long range planning, 30(3), 320-373.
• Eren, E. (2014). Örgütsel davranış ve yönetim psikolojisi. Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım.
• Ghosh, D., & Wu, A. (2007). Intellectual capital and capital markets: additional evidence. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8(2), 216-235.
• Gürüz, D., & Gürel, E. (2006). Yönetim ve organizasyon: Bireyden örgüte, fikirden eyleme. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
• Hall, R. (1992). The strategic analysis of intangible resources. Strategic management journal, 13(2), 135-144.
• Huber, G. P. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization science, 2(1), 88-115.
• Koç, Ö. (2006). Öğrenen organizasyonlarda motivasyonun etkisi ve bir işletme uygulaması. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. İnönü Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Malatya.
• Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual review of sociology, 14(1), 319-338.
• Marr, B. (2007). Measuring and managing intangible value drivers. Business Strategy Series, 8(3), 172-178.
• McGuirk, H., Lenihan, H., & Hart, M. (2015). Measuring the impact of innovative human capital on small firms’ propensity to innovate. Research Policy, 44(4), 965-976.
• Mura, M., & Longo, M. (2013). Developing a tool for intellectual capital assessment: an individual‐level perspective. Expert Systems, 30(5), 436-450.
• Okumuş, K. (2013).Liderlik Tarzları, Örgütsel Öğrenme Yeteneği, Yenilik ve Firma Performansı İlişkisi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gebze Yüksek Teknoloji Enstitüsü, Strateji Bilimi Anabilim Dalı, Gebze.
• Oshagbemi, T. (2000). Gender differences in the job satisfaction of university teachers. Women in Management review, 15(7), 331-343.
• Özkalp, E., & Korel, Ç. (2004). Örgütsel Davranış, Anadolu Üniversitesi Açıköğretim Fakültesi Yayınları, 2. Baskı, Eskişehir.
• Rebelo, T. M., Gomes, A. D., (2008). Organizational learning and the learning organization: reviewing evolution for prospecting the future, Learning Organization, 15(4), 294-308.
• Probst, G., & Büchel, B. S. (1997). Organizational learning: The competitive advantage of the future. Prentice Hall.
• Riahi-Belkaoui, A. (2003). Intellectual capital and firm performance of US multinational firms: a study of the resource-based and stakeholder views. Journal of Intellectual capital, 4(2), 215-226.
• Sabuncuoğlu, Z. (2009). Turizm işletmelerinde örgütsel davranış. MKM Yayınları.
• Seetharaman, A., Helmi Bin Zaini Sooria, H., & Saravanan, A. S. (2002). Intellectual capital accounting and reporting in the knowledge economy. Journal of Intellectual capital, 3(2), 128-148.
• Sevimli, F., & Iscan, Ö. F. (2005). Bireysel ve is ortamina ait etkenler acisindan is doyumu. Ege Academic Review, 5(1), 55-64.
• Shipton, H. J., West, M. A., Parkes, C. L., Dawson, J. F., & Patterson, M. G. (2006). When promoting positive feelings pays: Aggregate job satisfaction, work design features, and innovation in manufacturing organizations. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15(4), 404-430.
• Steward, T. A. (1997). Entelektüel sermaye: Örgütlerin yeni zenginliği. İstanbul: MESS yayınları.
• Sveiby, K. E. (1997). The new organizational wealth: Managing & measuring knowledge-based assets. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
• Şahinkesen, Ö. G. (2010). Öğrenen organizasyonlar Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi’nde bir uygulama. Basılmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Tokat.
• Terekli, G. (2010). Örgütsel Güven Boyutları Ve İş Tatmini İlişkisi: Tekstil İşletmesinde Bir Araştırma. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Eskişehir.
• Yazıcı, S. (2001). Öğrenen organizasyonlar. İstanbul: Alfa.