Research Article

A COMPARISON OF EMPLOYEES’ PERCEIVED AND EXPECTED EMPLOYER BRAND ATTRIBUTES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY

Volume: 7 Number: 1 September 1, 2018
EN

A COMPARISON OF EMPLOYEES’ PERCEIVED AND EXPECTED EMPLOYER BRAND ATTRIBUTES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY

Abstract

Purpose- The concept of employer brand has provided great convenience for creating a sense of “great place to work” in the war for talent in today's business world. In particular, employer brand perception meeting the employees’ expectations has a critical prescription for retainment ability of employers. In this context, the aim of the study is to evaluate the congruence of expected and perceived employer brand.

Methodology- Data gathered from 300 employees in the banking sector was analyzed through SPSS and factor and reliability analysis and paired sample t-test were used to test hypotheses.

Findings- Results indicated that employers mostly provide social and application value and the highest difference occurs between perceptions and expectations of interest and economic value in the banking sector.

Conclusion- The study contributes to the comprehension of that using employer branding practices alone is not sufficient and compatibility of attributes with employees’ expectations is essential for employer attractiveness.

Keywords

References

  1. Backhaus, K., Tikoo, S. (2004). Conceptualizing and researching employer branding. Career development international, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 501-51.
  2. Barrow, S., Mosley, R. (2005). The employer brand. England: John Wiley&Sons Ltd, pp. 132-145.
  3. Berthon, P., Ewing, M., Hah, L. L. (2005). Captivating company: dimensions of attractiveness in employer branding. International journal of advertising, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 151-172.
  4. Biswas, M. K., Suar, D. (2014). Antecedents and consequences of employer branding. Journal of Business Ethics, pp. 1-16.
  5. Cable, D. M., Judge, T. A. (1996). Person-organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 294-311.
  6. Charbonnier‐Voirin, A., Poujol, J. F., Vignolles, A. (2016). From value congruence to employer brand: impact on organizational identification and word of mouth. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration.
  7. Elving, W. J., Westhoff, J. J., Meeusen, K., Schoonderbeek, J. W. (2013). The war for talent? The relevance of employer branding in job advertisements for becoming an employer of choice. Journal of Brand Management, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 355-373.
  8. Gaddam, S. (2008). Modeling employer branding communication: the softer aspect of HR marketing management. ICFAI Journal of Soft Skills, vol.2, no.1.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

September 1, 2018

Submission Date

July 18, 2018

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Volume: 7 Number: 1

APA
Ergun, H. S., & Tatar, B. (2018). A COMPARISON OF EMPLOYEES’ PERCEIVED AND EXPECTED EMPLOYER BRAND ATTRIBUTES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY. PressAcademia Procedia, 7(1), 57-61. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.856
AMA
1.Ergun HS, Tatar B. A COMPARISON OF EMPLOYEES’ PERCEIVED AND EXPECTED EMPLOYER BRAND ATTRIBUTES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY. PAP. 2018;7(1):57-61. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.856
Chicago
Ergun, Hande Sinem, and Berivan Tatar. 2018. “A COMPARISON OF EMPLOYEES’ PERCEIVED AND EXPECTED EMPLOYER BRAND ATTRIBUTES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY”. PressAcademia Procedia 7 (1): 57-61. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.856.
EndNote
Ergun HS, Tatar B (September 1, 2018) A COMPARISON OF EMPLOYEES’ PERCEIVED AND EXPECTED EMPLOYER BRAND ATTRIBUTES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY. PressAcademia Procedia 7 1 57–61.
IEEE
[1]H. S. Ergun and B. Tatar, “A COMPARISON OF EMPLOYEES’ PERCEIVED AND EXPECTED EMPLOYER BRAND ATTRIBUTES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY”, PAP, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 57–61, Sept. 2018, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.856.
ISNAD
Ergun, Hande Sinem - Tatar, Berivan. “A COMPARISON OF EMPLOYEES’ PERCEIVED AND EXPECTED EMPLOYER BRAND ATTRIBUTES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY”. PressAcademia Procedia 7/1 (September 1, 2018): 57-61. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.856.
JAMA
1.Ergun HS, Tatar B. A COMPARISON OF EMPLOYEES’ PERCEIVED AND EXPECTED EMPLOYER BRAND ATTRIBUTES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY. PAP. 2018;7:57–61.
MLA
Ergun, Hande Sinem, and Berivan Tatar. “A COMPARISON OF EMPLOYEES’ PERCEIVED AND EXPECTED EMPLOYER BRAND ATTRIBUTES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY”. PressAcademia Procedia, vol. 7, no. 1, Sept. 2018, pp. 57-61, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.856.
Vancouver
1.Hande Sinem Ergun, Berivan Tatar. A COMPARISON OF EMPLOYEES’ PERCEIVED AND EXPECTED EMPLOYER BRAND ATTRIBUTES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY. PAP. 2018 Sep. 1;7(1):57-61. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.856

PressAcademia Procedia (PAP) publishes proceedings of conferences, seminars and symposiums. PressAcademia Procedia aims to provide a source for academic researchers, practitioners and policy makers in the area of social and behavioral sciences, and engineering.

PressAcademia Procedia invites academic conferences for publishing their proceedings with a review of editorial board. Since PressAcademia Procedia is an double blind peer-reviewed open-access book, the manuscripts presented in the conferences can easily be reached by numerous researchers. Hence, PressAcademia Procedia increases the value of your conference for your participants. 

PressAcademia Procedia provides an ISBN for each Conference Proceeding Book and a DOI number for each manuscript published in this book.

PressAcademia Procedia is currently indexed by DRJI, J-Gate, International Scientific Indexing, ISRA, Root Indexing, SOBIAD, Scope, EuroPub, Journal Factor Indexing and InfoBase Indexing. 

Please contact to contact@pressacademia.org for your conference proceedings.