Implementability of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Approaches to Vehicle Homologation Tests

Öz

Regulations governing the homologation process for regular and/or public transport vehicles require numerous tests to be carried out during the production phase, and it is extremely important that these tests are evaluated accurately, quickly, and at low cost. This article explores the application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) techniques to the regulatory testing processes of MAN Türkiye A.Ş., a manufacturer of public transportation vehicles, within the context of current literature, with the aim of improving the speed and cost-effectiveness of these tests. The research examines the most prominent current applications related to the homologation process and includes approaches utilizing AI/ML approaches as well as numerical/statistical analysis for relevant regulations. A key challenge in current homologation processes is integrating information-based system components into traditionally rigid automotive verification systems. In other words, bridging the gaps between Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) and AI/ML in homologation processes. The merging of AI and ML techniques into the current homologation and self-assessment processes applied to passenger vehicles will undoubtedly increase the accuracy and speed of these processes. The information obtained showed that integrating AI/ML approaches with database-supported engineering field applications, especially those with testing and ICT infrastructure in which MAN Türkiye A.Ş. is strong, will provide benefits in validation processes.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Artificial intelligence
• Machine learning
• Numerical/statistical analysis
• Vehicle homologation

Kaynakça

1. E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.3/Add.154. Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Vehicles with Regards to Cyber Security and Cyber Security Management System, Addendum 154 – UN Regulation No. 155; 1995; Geneva, Italy.
2. Zöldy M. Investigation of Autonomous Vehicles Fit into Traditional Type Approval Process. ICTTE 2018: International Conference on Traffic and Transport Engineering; 2018; Belgrade.
3. Tan G, Chen Q, Li C, Yang R (Chunhui). A Machine Learning Model for Predicting Noise Limits of Motor Vehicles in UNECE R51 Regulations. Applied Sciences. 2020;10(22):8092. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10228092
4. Nguyen TT, Nguyen CT, Nguyen VS, Nguyen DN. Optimal Design for Body Structure of Coach Bus to Satisfy Rollover Collision Safety Based on ECE R66 Standard. Lecture notes in mechanical engineering. 2022;76–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99666-6_12
5. Achariyaviriya W, Wongsapai W, Rinchumphu D, Tippayawong N, Tippayawong KY, Suttakul P. A Comparative Study of Vehicle Powertrain Efficiency: Data-Driven Analysing Energy Consumption and Environmental Impact. Transportation Engineering. 2024;18:100286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.treng.2024.100286
6. Jui JJ, Ahmad MA, Molla MMI, Rashid MIM. Optimal Energy Management Strategies for Hybrid Electric Vehicles: A Recent Survey of Machine Learning Approaches. Journal of Engineering Research. 2024;12, 454-467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jer.2024.01.016
7. Saito H, Kanzaki D, Yonekura K. Applications of Machine Learning in Surge Prediction for Vehicle Turbochargers. Machine Learning with Applications. 2024;16:100560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mlwa.2024.100560
8. Burton S, Iwo Kurzidem, Schwaiger A, Philipp Schleiss, Unterreiner M, Graeber T, et al. Safety Assurance of Machine Learning for Chassis Control Functions. Lecture notes in computer science. 2021;149–62, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83903-1_10

9. Manuguerra L, Cappelletti F, Germani M. A Machine Learning Based Method for Parametric Environmental Impact Model for Electric Vehicles. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2024;142308–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142308
10. Rivera-Campoverde ND, Muñoz-Sanz JL, Arenas-Ramirez B del V. Estimation of Pollutant Emissions in Real Driving Conditions Based on Data from OBD and Machine Learning. Sensors. 2021;21(19):6344. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21196344
11. Udoh J, Lu J, Xu Q. Application of Machine Learning to Predict CO2 Emissions in Light-Duty Vehicles. Sensors. 2024;24(24):8219. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24248219
12. Tutuianu M, Bonnel P, Ciuffo B, Haniu T, Ichikawa N, Marotta A, et al. Development of the World-wide Harmonized Light Duty Test Cycle (WLTC) and A Possible Pathway for its Introduction in the European Legislation. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 2015;40:61–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.07.011
13. Li M, Zhou W, Liu J, Zhang X, Pan F, Yang H, et al. Vehicle Interior Noise Prediction Based on Elman Neural Network. Applied sciences. 2021;11(17):8029–9. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11178029
14. Huang H, Huang X, Li R, Lim TC, Ding W. Sound Quality Prediction of Vehicle Interior Noise Using Deep Belief Networks. Applied Acoustics. 2016;113:149–61. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2016.06.021
15. Wang B, Li W, Khattak ZH. Anomaly Detection in Connected and Autonomous Vehicle Trajectories Using LSTM Autoencoder and Gaussian Mixture Model. Electronics. 2024;13;1251. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13071251
16. Gupta A, Anpalagan A, Guan L, Khwaja AS. Deep Learning for Object Detection And Scene Perception in Self-Driving Cars: Survey, Challenges, and Open Issues. Array. 2021;10:100057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.array.2021.100057
17. Zöldy M, Szalay Z, Tihanyi V. Challenges in Homologation Process of Vehicles with Artificial Intelligence, Transport. 2020;35(4):447–453. https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2020.12904
18. WP.29-175-21. Artificial Intelligence and Vehicle Regulations. Note by the secretariat - 175th WP.29. Agenda item 2.3. 2018.
19. Anastasi S, Madonna M, Monica L. Implications of Embedded Artificial Intelligence - Machine Learning on Safety of Machinery. Procedia Computer Science. 2021;180:338–43. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.171
20. Bharilya V, Kumar N. Machine Learning For Autonomous Vehicle’s Trajectory Prediction: A Comprehensive Survey, Challenges, and Future Research Directions. Vehicular Communications. 2024;46:100733–3. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.vehcom.2024.100733
21. Vasudevan V, Abdullatif A, Kabir S, Campean F. Certifiability Analysis of Machine Learning Systems for Low-Risk Automotive Applications. Computer. 2024;57(9):45–56. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2024.3401402
22. Wang C, Guo F, Zhao S, Zhu Z, Zhang Y. Safety Assessment for Autonomous Vehicles: A Reference Driver Model for Highway Merging Scenarios. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2024;206:107710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2024.107710
23. Benyahya M, Collen A, Nijdam NA. Analyses on Standards and Regulations for Connected and Automated Vehicles: Identifying the Certifications Roadmap. Transportation Engineering. 2023;14:100205. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.treng.2023.100205
24. Holenko K, Dykha O, Koda E, Kernytskyy I, Royko Y, Horbay O, et al. Validation of Frontal Crashworthiness Simulation for Low-Entry Type Bus Body According to UNECE R29 Requirements. Applied Sciences. 2024;14(13):5595. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14135595
25. Lopes R, Ramos NV, Cunha R, Maia R, Rodrigues R, Parente MPL, et al. Passive Safety Solutions on Coach according ECE R29: Experimental and Numerical analyses. Procedia structural integrity. 2022;42:1159–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2022.12.148
26. Lopes RB, Barros F, Cristóvão F, Nuno, Moreira P, Cunha RR, et al. Simulation of A Frontal Impact on A Coach Door Sub-System Using A Pseudo-Dynamic (PSD) Test. 2022;37:115–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2022.01.066
27. Güler MA, Cerit ME, Mert SK, Acar E. Experimental and Numerical Study on the Crashworthiness Evaluation of An Intercity Coach Under Frontal Impact Conditions. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering.2020;234(13):3026–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954407020927644
28. Afripin MAA, Zainudin AZ, Sahar MM. Sukeri MY. Frontal Impact on Bus Superstructure As Per UNECE R29 and NCAP. 2019;670(1):012014–4. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/670/1/012014
29. Kongwat S, Jongpradist P, Hasegawa H. Lightweight Bus Body Design and Optimization for Rollover Crashworthiness. International Journal of Automotive Technology. 2020;21(4):981–91. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-020-0093-9
30. Kriston A, Broggi D, Re F, Minarini F, Bonato C. Estimation of Injury Risk of Different Child Restraint Systems in Realistic Frontal Impact Tests for Future Moblility Applications. 27th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV), 2023; Yokohama, Japan.
31. Clar-Garcia D, Velasco-Sanchez E, Campillo-Davo N, Campello-Vicente H, Sanchez-Lozano M. A New Methodology to Assess Sound Power Level of Tyre/Road Noise Under Laboratory Controlled Conditions in Drum Test Facilities. Applied Acoustics. 2016;110:23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2016.03.018
32. Clar-Garcia D, Velasco-Sanchez E , Sanchez-Lozano M, Campello-Vicente H. An Alternative Drum Test Method to UNECE Regulation 117 for Measuring Tyre/Road Noise Under Laboratory Controlled Conditions. Applied Acoustics. 2019;151:113–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2019.03.005
33. Mondal S, Goswami SS. Machine Learning Applications in Automotive Engineering: Enhancing Vehicle Safety and Performance. Journal of Process Management New Technologies. 2024;12(1-2):61-71. https://di.org/10.5937/jpmnt12-50607
34. Masello L, Sheehan B, Murphy F, Castignani G, McDonnell K, Ryan C. From Traditional to Autonomous Vehicles: A Systematic Review of Data Availability. Transportation Research Record. 2022;2676(4):161–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981211057532