TARİHİ PEYZAJ DEĞERLENDİRMESİ PEYZAJIN KENDİSİNE Mİ YOKSA PEYZAJIN TARİHİNE Mİ ODAKLANIR?

Öz

Avrupa Peyzaj Sözleşmesi (APS) kapsamında her ülke, peyzajlarını tanımlamalı, sınıflamalı, planlamalı, korumalı, yönetmeli ve değişime yol açan baskıları analiz ederek değerlendirmelidir. Peyzaj değerlendirme çalışmalarında genellikle mevcut doğal ve kültürel peyzajlar ele alınırken, peyzajların tarihi kimliği ve değerini ortaya koyan, tarihsel gelişimlerini izleyen değerlendirmeler eksiktir. Özellikle peyzaj planlama süreçlerinde, peyzajların miras yönetimi ve tarihi boyutları yeterince dikkate alınmamaktadır. Bu bağlamda, insan faaliyetleri ile doğal süreçlerin etkileşimlerini inceleyen ve peyzaj üzerindeki insan etkilerini analiz eden Tarihi Peyzaj Değerlendirmesi (TPD) önem kazanmaktadır. APS’e göre; peyzaj, doğal ve/veya insan faaliyetlerinin etkileşimleri sonucu şekillenen ve insanlar tarafından algılanan bir alan olarak tanımlanır ve TPD ile doğrudan ilişkilidir. Bu çalışma, TPD hakkındaki yanlış algıların düzeltilmesini amaçlamaktadır. Dün, bugün ve geleceğe yönelik peyzaj değerlendirme yöntemleri ele alınarak, zamansal derinliği olan ve değişimlere direnç göstermiş tarihi peyzajların biyografisini tanımlayan TPD’nin önemi vurgulanmaktadır. TPD, peyzajların tarihini değil, günümüze ulaşabilen peyzajların derinliğini değerlendirir. Bu çalışma, mevcut yanlış algıların düzeltilmesine katkı sağlayarak, TPD’ye farklı bir bakış açısı getirmeyi amaçlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Tarihi peyzaj değerlendirmesi
• peyzaj biyografisi
• zamansal derinlik

IS HISTORICAL LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT FOCUSED ON THE LANDSCAPE ITSELF OR THE HISTORY OF LANDSCAPE?

Öz

Under the European Landscape Convention (ELC), each country is required to identify, classify, plan, protect, and manage its landscapes while analyzing the pressures causing changes. Landscape assessment studies have primarily focused on existing natural and cultural landscapes. However, evaluations that reveal historical identity, historical value, and trace their development and transformation processes are insufficient. Specifically, the historical and heritage dimensions of landscapes are often inadequately addressed in landscape planning. In this context, the Historical Landscape Assessment (HLA), which analyzes long-term interactions between human activities and natural processes, and examines the traces left by human influence, has gained significant importance. According to ELC, landscape is an area perceived by people, shaped by the interaction of natural and/or human factors, and is closely related to HLA. The aim of this study is to highlight common misunderstandings about HLA. By discussing landscape assessment methods focused on the past, present, and future, this study emphasizes the importance of HLA, which defines the biography of historical landscapes that have endured over time, possess temporal depth, and demonstrated resilience to change. HLA evaluates the temporal depth of landscapes that have survived to the present day, focusing on more than just their history. Addressing the similarities and differences between HLA and landscape character assessment, this study proposes an integrated and holistic approach to landscape evaluation. By contributing to the correction of misunderstandings, this study can set an example approach for promoting a different perspective on HLA.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Landscape historical assessment
• landscape biography
• temporal depth

Teşekkür

I sincerely thank Prof. Dr. Öner DEMİREL, Prof. Dr. Şükran ŞAHİN, Prof. Dr. Osman UZUN, and Prof. Dr. Engin NURLU for their valuable scientific contributions to the HLA topic.

Kaynakça

1. Atik, M. (2009). APS’ye taraf olan Ülkelerdeki Peyzaj Sınıflandırma Çalışmaları. Peyzaj Yönetimi, Türkiye ve Orta Doğu Amme İdaresi Enstitüsü, Editör: Akay, S. ve Demirbaş Özen, M., No: 27 ve 354, 153-168.
2. Atik, M., Tülek, B., Parlak,E.(2021). Landscape Observatories on The Pathway to European Landscape Convention with the cases of Seven European Countries. Journal of Landscape Research and Practices (JOLARP), 3(2): 1-11.
3. Balta, S., and Atik, M. (2022). Rural planning guidelines for urban-rural transition zones as a tool for the protection of rural landscape characters and retaining urban sprawl: Antalya case from Mediterranean. Land Use Policy, 119, 106144.
4. Belen, N., and Şahin, Ş. (2021). Historıcal Landscape Character Areas as Memory Carriers: Priene Ancient City Case. GSI Journals Serie C: Advancements in Information Sciences and Technologies, 4(2), 38-57.
5. Crow J, Turner S (2009) Silivri and the Thracian hinterland of Istanbul: An historic landscape. Anatolian Studies, 59: 167 181.
6. Crow J, Turner S, Vionis AK (2011) Characterizing the historic landscapes of Naxos. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology, 24 (1): 111-137.
7. Demir, S. ve Demirel Ö. (2018). According to European Landscape Convention Historical and Archaeological New Approach. IBAD Journal, 3 (2), 546-562.
8. Eetvelde, V.V. and Antrop, M., (2009). A Stepwise Multi-Scaled Landscape Typology and Characterisation For Trans-Regional Integration, Applied On The Federal State Of Belgium, Landscape and Urban Planning, 91,160–170.

9. Erdoğan N, Carrer F, Ersoy Tonyaloğlu E, Çavdar B, Varinlioğlu G, Şerifoğlu TE, Jackson M, Kurtşan K, Nurlu E, Turner S (2020) Simulating change in cultural landscapes: The integration of historic landscape characterisation and computer modelling. Landscapes 21(2): 168-182.
10. Fairclough G, Sarlöv Herlin I, Swanwick C (Eds.) (2018) Routledge Handbook of Landscape Character Assessment: Current approaches to caharacterisation and assessment, Routledge.
11. Fairclough GJ, Macinnes L (2003) Understanding Historic Landscape Character. Topic Paper 5, Landscape Character Assessment Guidance for England and Scotland, Countryside Agency, Scottish Natural Heritage, Historic Scotland, and English Heritage.
12. Fairclough, G., and Herring, P. (2016). Lens, mirror, window: interactions between Historic Landscape Characterisation and Landscape Character Assessment. Landscape Research, 41(2), 186–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2015.1135318
13. Harrison, R. (2010). What is heritage. Understanding the politics of heritage,9.
14. HeriScape (2017) Key Messages from CHeriScape: Cultural Solutions to Cultural Problems. https://cheriscape.eu/key-messages/.
15. Herlin, I., (2007). European Landscape Convention, an Overview and Implementation of the Convention. Avrupa Peyzaj Sözleşmesinin Uygulanması Yolunda Uluslararası Katılımlı Toplantı, Mayıs, Ankara, Bildiriler Kitabı, 24-27.
16. Kolen J, Renes J, Hermans R (eds.) (2015) Landscape Biographies: Geographical, Historical and Archaeological Perspectives on the Production and Transmission of Landscapes, Amsterdam University Press.
17. Lambrick,G., Hind, J., Wain,I. (2013). Historic Landscape Characterisation in Ireland: Best Paractice Guidance, Published by The Heritage Council, The Heritage Council of Ireland Series, pp.93. ISBN 978-1-906304-21-8
18. Long, M. (2013). Environmental Data Management and its Role in Landscape Assessment. Environmental Studies Journal, 28(4).
19. Ņitavska, N. (2011). The method of landscape identity assessment. Research for rural development, 2, 175-181. Nurlu E, Turner S (2019) Cultural heritage in landscape: Planning for development in Turkey. Conference on cultural heritage in landscape: Planning for development in Turkey, Izmir, 12-13 September 2019.
20. Olwig, K. R., Dalglish, C., Fairclough, G., and Herring, P. (2016). Introduction to a special issue: the future of landscape characterisation, and the future character of landscape – between space, time, history, place and nature. Landscape Research, 41(2), 169–174.
21. Ortaçeşme, V. (2007). Avrupa Peyzaj Sözleşmesi Bağlamında Peyzaj Planlama, Avrupa Peyzaj Sözleşmesinin Uygulanması Yolunda Uluslararası Katılımlı Toplantı Bildiri Kitabı, 81-87, Mayıs, Ankara.
22. Scazzosi, L. (2010). Assessment of policies considering cultural heritage in European agricultural landscapes. In European Culture expressed in Agricultural Landscapes (pp. 149-178). Palombi Editori.
23. Şengür Şn and Nurlu E (2021) Historic landscape characterization in protected areas; a case study Kazdagi National Park. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 27(1): 106-113.
24. Tudor, C. (2014) An Approach to Landscape Character Assessment, Natural England.
25. Turner, S. (2006) Historic landscape characterisation: A landscape archaeology for research, management and planning. Landscape Research 31 (4): 385-398.
26. Turner S. and Crow J (2010) Unlocking historic landscapes in the Eastern Mediterranean: Using characterisation on Naxos (Greece) and in Thrace (Turkey). Antiquity, 84 (323): 216-229.
27. Uzun,O,Müderrisoğlu, H., Demir, Z., Gündüz,S., Gürkan Kaya l., , Gültekin, P. (2018). The Concept of Landscape Quality in the Planning of Rural Spaces: Yeşilırmak Basin Example. Planlama. 28(1): 118-138.
28. Winterburn E (2008) Historic landscape characterization in context. FORUM E-Journal 8: 33-46, Newcastle University