THE ROLE OF GREEN SPACES IN POST-DISASTER RECOVERY: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY AMONG MIGRANT SURVIVORS OF THE 6 FEBRUARY EARTHQUAKES IN EDİRNE, TÜRKİYE

Öz

Post-disaster migration detaches individuals not only from their homes but also from their surrounding environments and the social bonds established within these spaces. In this context, green spaces can provide psychosocially restorative contributions during the post-earthquake migration process through their functions that support social and spatial attachment for displaced survivors in their new living environments. This study aims to explore the potential effects of green space experiences on the psychosocial recovery processes of a group of earthquake survivors who migrated to Edirne following the February 6, 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes. Within the scope of the study, an exploratory exploratory survey was conducted with 22 earthquake survivors residing in Edirne to assess their levels of green space experience, place attachment, and social resilience. 77% percent of the participants reported using parks and green areas as reference points for establishing a connection with place and navigating within the city, while 68% stated that they had access to areas in Edirne where they could experience contact with nature. Furthermore, positive and moderate correlations were identified between green space experience and both place attachment (~0.50) and social resilience (~0.54). These findings suggest that green spaces should be considered not only as spatial or ecological assets but also as potential psychosocial resources.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• place attachment;
• social resilience;
• aftermath of disasters
• earthquake
• green spaces

AFET SONRASI GÖÇ EDEN BİREYLERİN İYİLEŞME SÜRECİNDE YEŞİL ALANLARIN İŞLEVİ: EDİRNE’DEKİ 6 ŞUBAT DEPREMZEDELERİNE YÖNELİK ÖNCÜ BİR ÇALIŞMA

Öz

Afet sonrası göç, bireyleri yalnızca konutlarından değil, aynı zamanda yaşadıkları çevreden ve bu çevrede kurdukları sosyal bağlardan da koparmaktadır. Bu bağlamda, yeşil alanlar göç eden afetzedelerin yeni yaşam alanlarında sosyal ve mekânsal bağ kurmalarını destekleyen işlevleriyle, deprem sonrasındaki göç sürecinde psikososyal açıdan onarıcı katkılar sağlayabilir. Bu çalışma, 6 Şubat 2023 Kahramanmaraş depremleri sonrasında Edirne’ye göç eden bir grup depremzedenin yeşil alan deneyimlerinin afet sonrası psikososyal toparlanma süreçlerine olası etkilerini incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışma kapsamında, Edirne’de ikamet eden 22 depremzede ile gerçekleştirilen keşif amaçlı öncü bir anket uygulaması aracılığıyla, yeşil alan deneyimi, yere bağlılık ve sosyal dirençlilik düzeyleri değerlendirilmiştir. Katılımcıların %77’si, yeşil alanları yerle ilişki kurma ve şehirde yön bulma açısından bir referans noktası olarak kullandığını belirtmiş; %68’i ise Edirne’de doğayla temas kurabildikleri bir alanın bulunduğunu ifade etmiştir. Ayrıca, yeşil alan deneyimi ile yere bağlılık (~0.50) ve sosyal dirençlilik (~0.54) arasında pozitif yönlü, orta düzeyde ilişkiler tespit edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, yeşil alanların yalnızca mekânsal ya da ekolojik değil, aynı zamanda psikososyal destek unsuru olarak değerlendirilmesi gerektiğine dair önemli ipuçları sunmaktadır

Anahtar Kelimeler

• yere bağlılık
• sosyal dirençlilik
• afet sonrası
• deprem
• Yeşil alanlar

Kaynakça

1. Albers, T., Ariccio, S., Weiss, L. A., Dessi, F., and Bonaiuto, M. (2021). The role of place attachment in promoting refugees’ well-being and resettlement: A literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(21), 11021.
2. Alizadeh, H., and Sharifi, A. (2022). Social resilience in urban communities: A systematic review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 76, 103468.
3. Anton, C. E., and Lawrence, C. (2014). Home is where the heart is: The effect of place of residence on place attachment and community participation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 451–461.
4. Arslan, H., and Unlu, A. (2011). Afet sonrası yeniden yapılanma sürecinde yer değiştirme ve yere bağlılığın değerlendirilmesi: Düzce örneği. İTÜ Dergisi/a, 9(1).
5. Baylan, E., Aşur, F., and Şehribanoğlu, S. (2018). Sense of place and satisfaction with landscaping in post-earthquake housing areas: The case of Edremit TOKI-Van (Turkey). ACE: Arquitectura, Ciudad y Entorno.
6. Bell, S. L., Phoenix, C., Lovell, R., and Wheeler, B. W. (2014). Green space, health and wellbeing: Making space for individual agency. Health & Place, 30, 287–292.
7. Brown, B., and Perkins, D. D. (1992). Disruptions in place attachment. In Human Behavior and Environment (Vol. 12, pp. 279–304).
8. Charles-Rodriguez, U., de la Torre, M. D. V., Hecker, V., Laing, R. A., and Larouche, R. (2023). The relationship between nature and immigrants' integration, wellbeing and physical activity: A scoping review. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 25(1), 190–218.

9. Douglas, O., Lennon, M., and Scott, M. (2017). Green space benefits for health and well-being: A life-course approach for urban planning, design and management. Cities, 66, 53–62.
10. Fei, W. J., and Gao, X. F. (2020). A review on disaster prevention and reduction function of urban green space in China.
11. Fried, M. (1963). Grieving for a lost home. In L. J. Duhl (Ed.), The Urban Condition (pp. 151–171). Basic Books.
12. Hertzog, M. A. (2008). Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies. Research in Nursing & Health, 31(2), 180–191. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20247
13. International Displacement Monitoring Centre. (2023). Global report on internal displacement. Retrieved from https://www.internal-displacement.org/global-report/grid2023/
14. İnal-Çekiç, T., Kozaman-Aygün, S., and Bilen, Ö. (2024). Reflections on “place attachment”: Perceptions of urban redevelopment in an informal neighborhood in Istanbul. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 39(1), 1–20.
15. Johanson, G. A., and Brooks, G. P. (2010). Initial scale development: Sample size for pilot studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(3), 394–400.
16. Kaplan, R., and Kaplan, S. (1989). The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. Cambridge University Press.
17. Khalili, S., Harre, M., and Morley, P. (2018). A temporal social resilience framework of communities to disasters in Australia. Geoenvironmental Disasters, 5, 1–9.
18. Kwok, A. H., Doyle, E. E., Becker, J., Johnston, D., and Paton, D. (2016). What is ‘social resilience’? Perspectives of disaster researchers, emergency management practitioners, and policymakers in New Zealand. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 19, 197–211.
19. Magis, K. (2010). Community resilience: An indicator of social sustainability. Society & Natural Resources, 23(5), 401–416.
20. Maguire, B., and Hagan, P. (2007). Disasters and communities: Understanding social resilience. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 22(2), 16–20.
21. Mahmoudi, B., Sorouri, Z., Zenner, E. K., and Mafi-Gholami, D. (2022). Development of a new social resilience assessment model for urban forest parks. Environmental Development, 43, 100724.
22. Mihaylov, N., and Perkins, D. D. (2014). Community place attachment and its role in social capital development. In L. C. Manzo & P. Devine-Wright (Eds.), Place Attachment: Advances in Theory, Methods and Applications (pp. 61–74).
23. Norris, F. H., Stevens, S. P., Pfefferbaum, B., Wyche, K. F., and Pfefferbaum, R. L. (2008). Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(1–2), 127–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6
24. Scannell, L., and Gifford, R. (2010). Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 1–10.
25. Stedman, R. C. (2003). Is it really just a social construction? The contribution of the physical environment to sense of place. Society & Natural Resources, 16(8), 671–685.
26. Tidball, K. G., Krasny, M. E., Svendsen, E., Campbell, L., and Helphand, K. (2010). Stewardship, learning, and memory in disaster resilience. Environmental Education Research, 16(5–6), 591–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2010.505437
27. Twigger-Ross, L. C., and Uzzell, D. L. (1996). Place and identity processes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16(3), 205–220.
28. Yalcin, E., and Oguz, D. (2015). Evaluation of the relationship between sense of place and landscape values on campuses. Journal of Spatial Planning and Design, 1(1), 1–12.